iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Robert Mackey

Robert Mackey

Posted January 27, 2009 | 09:17 AM (EST)

150th Civil War Sequiscentennial


In a bit over two years, it will be 150 years since Confederate troops opened fire on the Federal forces inside Fort Sumter, South Carolina. Four years and 650,000 dead later, the guns fell silent.

We have just elected our first African-American President. This singular act brings to focus the long road for Americans of every region and race over the past century and a half. From the battlefields of Shiloh, Gettysburg, Chickamauga, and the Wilderness, to lynchings and the KKK, to a woman who refused to sit in the back of a bus and a preacher who decided his time to stand against tyranny had come, to today, the legacy of slavery and the bloodbath of the Civil War still haunts us. It is not just a moment in our collective history, but the central defining moment of our nation.

In the midst of the current economic crisis, it is easy to forget such historical anniversaries. In fact, many would say that any Federal or State dollars going toward remembering the sesquicentennial would be better used toward mitigating the damage caused by the financial collapse. Ironically, this argument was used in the Great Depression as well, when the 75th anniversary of the war was remembered. In those days, there were still a few old veterans surviving. Despite the Depression, FDR ordered the remembrance events to be conducted anyway, even going as far as using the US Army as support for the famous "final encampment" at Gettysburg in 1938.

We should not use the current crisis as an excuse to not remember the war. That most painful time of our history, and the concordant suffering of both the victims of the war and the tragedy of the post-war African-American experience, should be studied and brought to the fore. We should take our children to the battlefields, to the reenactments, and to the museums. Our new dollar coins, instead of celebrating Presidents, should be used as teaching tools, showing people like Ulysses S. Grant, William Lloyd Garrison, Clara Barton, William T. Sherman, Frederick Douglass, Robert E. Lee, Sojourner Truth, and Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson. The painful memories of the war and its aftermath should be brought into the open light and discussed.

It is time for Congress to pass S. 2802 and H.R. 1131 and establish a national Civil War Sesquicentennial Commission; both bills have languished since 2007-2008. In addition, the critical need to save endangered battlefields should be continued and sponsored by Congress as well, with the passage of S. 1921, the Civil War Battlefield Prevention Act of 2008. [Correction: The CWBP Act of 2009 passed on January 15, 2009, thanks to the hard work of Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) and his staff. My heartfelt thanks to the Senator and his overworked but always appreciated staff )

We have the chance, as a People, to finish the healing process of the Civil War so that future generations will not only appreciate the sacrifices of that time but the wisdom of our generation in saving a legacy for them.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:35 PM on 01/27/2009
Wouldn't the 150th Civil War Sesquicentennial happen in the year 24,361?

Sorry, just nitpicking.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Mackey
09:13 AM on 01/29/2009
ROFL. I realized that after I posted it, but it was too late to change the title. Plus, it is just sort of funny now...
01:52 PM on 01/27/2009
Thanks for the post. I wouldn't hold your breadth for the federal government to pass legislation creating a national commission. There is too much politics involved and, for some, a bad taste left over from the centennial celebrations of the 1960s. This is an opportunity to address the significance of the war from a number of different angles. I am on an advisory panel for Virginia's Civil War Sesquicentennial. The commission has been working hard for the past few years getting ready for 2011. But as a sign of how things have changed we are not waiting for 2011. Rather, events start in April with a conference at the University of Richmond to analyze the coming of the war and John Brown's Raid. That Virginia is acknowledging Brown's Raid as the beginning of the sesquicentennial says a great deal about the evolution of Civil War memory. Other states, including North Carolina are well on their way to forming and organizing events. Whether the recession prevents other states from appropriating public funds for the purposes of commemoration has yet to be seen, but I am optimistic. For more information on what Va is up to check out the commission's webste: http://www.virginiacivilwar.org/ as well as my own blog, Civil War Memory: www.cwmemory.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Mackey
09:14 AM on 01/29/2009
thanks for the thoughtful entry. And I agree completely about John Brown's Raid--it was the spark that started the path to war.
jhNY
Mercy.
01:14 PM on 01/27/2009
The healing process the author envisions at the end of our ruminations over the American Civil War on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of its beginning would be off to a better start if the beginning of said war was described with historical accuracy here in this very column. Confederate troops did not fire on Ft. Sumter. South Carolinian state troops did, because after the state declared itself seceded from the Union, Lincoln refused to remove US troops from its territory, against the advice of every member of his cabinet, who feared ,rightly, that a bloody war would ensue.

And before we start minting coins with WT Sherman's visage in bas-relief on the obverse, it would be only prudent to observe that in his zeal to establish the US government's implacable authority but a few short years later, many American Indians were starved at his command, and chased from their own lands. And Sherman's March to the Sea in Georgia and South Carolina, during the Civil War, is considered to be among the earliest examples of modern "total war". That sort of presience is not laudable.

I believe that he war, its causes and its actors are very largely misunderstood and mischaracterized by its survivors and most historians in all the years since its end. And, like the author, I believe it would very much be in the national interest to commemorate its beginnings and to study its effects with dispassion and care. We'd all learn something.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Mackey
09:16 AM on 01/29/2009
you make excellent points; my intent would be to put people like Sherman or John Brown, or Quantrill and Forrest, for that matter, on coins, stamps, etc., to start controversy and discourse. That is the only way to reach some sort of national discussion on the war.