Bonus Time: You Give, Wall St. Takes

For most workers, the year-end bonus no longer exists, having gone the way of company-paid holiday parties and gift turkeys. Indeed, such Yuletide Cheer is rare, except on Wall Street, which is licking its collective chops in anticipation of yet another round of big annual payouts.

And why not? Extra effort means extra pay. And no group has worked harder at bringing down the economy and forcing a massive taxpayer-backed rescue plan than Wall Street's rat pack of wheeler-dealers, incompetents, and nogoodniks.

Merry Christmas, folks.

It's not clear yet how deep the "bonus pool" will be. But looking at the year-to-date compensation estimates, count on it being pretty cavernous. One estimate of Wall Street pay, bonus and related costs goes up to $70 billion this year.

Whatever the ultimate number, we all get the honor of pitching in. Remember your government is initially investing $250 billion into shoring up the nation's largest banks, including that longtime bonus-leader Goldman Sachs & Co. It's all part of the fed's $700 billion master rescue plan.

For many of us the real question isn't how much Wall Streeters will be getting but why are they getting anything extra at all?

In the past when an investment bank made money, the bonus checks were passed out like candy. But now, as the traditional investment banking industry is being wiped off the face of the earth, wouldn't it be prudent to back off?

Apparently not.

Goldman is poised to hand out about $11 billion in compensation and bonuses, while Morgan Stanley is set to distribute nearly $10 billion. Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch will be doing their bonus thing, too.

This redistribution of wealth comes while each of these financial services companies are getting ample cash infusions from the taxpayer-backed rescue plan, courtesy of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson (who is a former Goldman chief).

Obviously, solvency isn't a requirement for getting a bonus. And forget about profitability--that's out the window, too. Instead, investment banks argue that big bonuses are needed to keep the crucial "talent" on board.

Really? You mean with Wall Street expected to cut 50,000-plus jobs in this downturn,companies are still concerned about losing key staff to rivals?

And what type of "talent" is being bought off?

Are these the same big brains who developed the sub prime mortgage market, credit swaps, and other obscure financial plays that are crippling the global economy and taking down Main Street?

In spite of everything that's happened, Wall Street hubris is alive and well.Everyone is making due with less. Much less. So why should an industry that's taken a huge role in bringing about a worldwide economic crisis still be allowed to adhere to its outdated standards as if nothing wrong has happened?

Yes, I know there's many innocent victims on Wall Street, people who went to work everyday and kept their noses clean. And I hate the idea of the government stepping in to control wages and bonuses.

But Wall Street is playing with our money now, so different rules and regulations must apply.

Hey, we'll gladly give up our holiday turkeys, provided Wall Street stops flipping us the bird.

Comments

[ForObamaInDallas]

Nice.

Just lost my job 2 days ago and I get to read this, and also the story about how banks have no intention of lending any money out but hoarding the cash infusion. Sweet.

slash sarcasm

[hey0there]

so freakin sick of wall street. not only do they get all these perks and bonuses for just showing up to work now they get to continue it using my tax dollars.

meanwhile things are so bad its almost like every company has become Uncle Scrooge viewing their employees as deserving a substandard wage .. oh and to work even harder for it since half the workforce is gone.

so sick of wall street.

[PT6]

It was clear from Senate Testimony of Paulson's flunky Kashkari "Cash and Carry" that he wants to simply hand the banks the money and let them do as they please!

His excuse is that he does not want to interfere in their business!

So we give them our money and they can payout Bonuses, pay off debts, or take a spa vacation!

The Bush Administration must STEP DOWN Immediately After the Election!

[OB-GYN]

I think his words were something like "not wanting to be overly controlling"

This is high way robbery, folks!

Time to blanket Congress and what's left of the WH with emails/letters/phonecalls.

This can't be tolerated.

[Lynn Voedisch - Huffpost Blogger]

Wow, why did I think anything would change?

Bob, come over to my stories and leave a comment. I don't know your e-mail anymore, but mine hasn't changed.

Lynn

[proreality]

Its time for the oligarchs to hang in the street! History should look back on the name Wall Street with a collective horror, not just for what it did to America but for the blood that flowed because of it.

[Dynamohum]

Wait a minute. I thought there were laws written into the Rescue Bill that prohibited golden parachutes and bonuses. I also thought that if they were accepting federal help, that their books would need to be open for independent review.

[lottakatz]

For Golden Parachutes yes, mostly, but bonus'? No. I recall reading that during the negotiation over how the bailout would be structured the greatest amount of time and most spirited debate was regarding executive compensation. That is reflected pretty clearly in how many other aspects of the bailout are lacking in detail or forethought.