More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich
 

The GOP's Big Investors

Posted: 02/22/2012 8:36 am

Have you heard of William Dore, Foster Friess, Sheldon Adelson, Harold Simmons, Peter Thiel, or Bruce Kovner? If not, let me introduce them to you. They're running for the Republican nomination for president.

I know, I know. You think Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, and Mitt Romney are running. They are -- but only because the people listed in the first paragraph have given them huge sums of money to do so. In a sense, Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, and Romney are the fronts. Dore et al. are the real investors.

According to January's Federal Election Commission report, William Dore and Foster Friess supplied more than three-fourths of the $2.1 million raked in by Rick Santorum's super PAC in January. Dore, president of the Dore Energy Corporation in Lake Charles, Louisiana, gave $1 million; Freis, a fund manager based in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, gave $669,000 (he had given the Santorum super PAC $331,000 last year, bringing Freis's total to $1 million).

Sheldon Adelson and his wife Miriam provided $10 million of the $11 million that went into Gingrich's super PAC in January. Adelson is chairman of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation. Texas billionaire Harold Simmons donated $500,000.

Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal, provided $1.7 million of the $2.4 million raised by Ron Paul's super PAC in January.

Mitt Romney's super PAC raised $6.6 million last month -- almost all from just forty donors. Bruce Kovner, co-founder of the New York-based hedge fund Caxton Associates, gave $500,000, as did two others. David Tepper of Appaloosa Management gave $375,000. J.W. Marriott and Richard Marriott gave a total of $500,000. Julian Robertson, co-founder of hedge fund Tiger Management, gave $250,0000. Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman gave $100,000.

Bottom line: Whoever emerges as the GOP standard-bearer will be deeply indebted to a handful of people, each of whom will expect a good return on their investment.

And this is just the beginning. We haven't even come to the general election.

Non-profit political fronts like "Crossroads GPS," founded by Republican political guru Karl Rove, are already gathering hundreds of millions of dollars from big corporations and a few wealthy individuals like billionaire oil and petrochemical moguls David and Charles Koch. The public will never know who or what corporation gave what because, under IRS regulations, such non-profit "social welfare organizations" aren't required to disclose the names of those who contributed to them.

Before 2010, federal campaign law and Federal Election Commission regulations limited to $5,000 per year the amount an individual could give to a PAC making independent expenditures in federal elections. This individual contribution limit that was declared unconstitutional by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in a case based on the Supreme Court's grotesque decision at the start of 2010, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission.

Now, the limits are gone. And this comes precisely at a time when an almost unprecedented share of the nation's income and wealth is accumulating at the top.

Never before in the history of our Republic have so few spent so much to influence the votes of so many.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

 
 
  • Comments
  • 630
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gabemill
10:01 PM on 02/23/2012
25% of republican PAC funding comes from 5 billionaires...thanks Citizens United for attempting to provide the "best" government that money can buy....
09:18 PM on 02/23/2012
Everyone is running around shouting about the rich and their money and the polictical influence they are gaining, but what about the corrupt and bought supreme court justices that wrought this sorry story.They seem to be getting of easy, i think they could stand a little more scrutiny in their judgements and their polictical leanings, i don't know they seem to get things wrong and their judgements don,t seem have much justice or fairness.
01:13 AM on 03/01/2012
Currently Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is under investigation by the State Dept. ordered by Pres. Obama for his Ethic's Policy's, and Hopefully Soon his ties with Monsanto, he's an ex-employee, and a Lobbyist for Round-Up Ready Crop's you eat every day...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
02:50 PM on 02/23/2012
Is the money that Sheldon Adelson giving to support Gingrich because he's the only Republican candidate who is an unabashed hawk on Iran? I've no idea. Perhaps it goes the other way. Gingrich has taken the position he has on Iran because of all the money he's getting from this source. A journalist might ask Adelson why he's giving money and might ask Gingrich whether that money has influenced his position on Iran. The money didn't go to Ron Paul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rajoro
12:32 PM on 02/23/2012
The real threat is an oligarchy backed by an ignorant angry mob of religious extremists. The Republican coalition is filled with the worst of American society. People motivated by greed, bigotry and fear. These so called Republican "leaders", if any became President, would lead the nation, if not the world, into more war, economic depression and ecological disaster. Spreading suffering while protecting and engorging a small group of corrupt and morally bankrupt billionaires.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duerksen
...but on the other side, it didn't say nothing.
06:59 AM on 02/23/2012
I noticed a whole new angle for the right-wing shills regarding this topic. All day yesterday they were stating that "only the vote counts" and "Money can't influence the vote". It all started at once, and is fairly incessant. Either a memo went out, or these mercenaries for the oligarchs are sitting elbow to elbow in a cube farm somewhere.
09:36 AM on 02/23/2012
I am a liberal Democrat. The fact that only votes count in elections is not a "new angle" - it's been true since before 1789. I believe in freedom of speech, even for my opponents. Sure wish more people did.

By the way, the ACLU agrees with me and supported the Citizen's United decision. That should make you stop and think.

It's sad that you don't have enough respect for other people's opinions that you think I have to be paid to express them, instead of being genuine. But that's not surprising.
photo
Alux
Pull the Wool Over Your Own Eyes!
02:53 AM on 02/23/2012
But of course, the Dear Great Leader Obama is NOT deeply indebted to anyone. No one. Nada, Zip.

Well, except . . . the Too Big To Fail Banks. Yeah, the ones he just let off of the biggest fraud in history with a slap on the wrist and a kiss on the cheek.

Whew! What a relief! At least one candidate for President is completely and totally free of any influence whatsoever from any campaign contributor.

I think it is nice that Reich is so loyal to the Axelrod/Media Matters/Journolist agitprop machine. Unlike some traitor I could mention, like HuffPo, for example (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/22/obama-super-pac_n_1294614.html)
02:08 AM on 02/23/2012
I want to earn enough money to be able to give away $500,000!
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
10:22 PM on 02/22/2012
And don't forget, folks...these big campaign spenders are the same 1% who don't want their taxes increased!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElleKaye
Beware the Zealots.
01:52 AM on 02/23/2012
Ah, if that were only the case. Those few who DO pay taxes, don't want to. The huge corporations that support the SuperPacs don't pay any taxes now and haven't for many years.

The engineering goes far beyond merely taxes. They want to eliminate the public school system and have control over all legislation. For example, privately run prisons don't have to follow state laws, not even to report escapes or deaths in custody. They can be quite profitable if they are under staffed and inmates are under fed, not getting health issues addressed. It goes on and on. And not in a good way.
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
12:22 AM on 02/24/2012
Yeah, I should have said that they don't want their taxes, that they don't pay anyhow, increased. Wonder if Obama is having any luck getting the names of the "upstanding" citizens who have Swiss bank accounts.

Since Reagan got elected, the neocons have been insinuating themselves into local and state governments...and school boards...from the grassroots up so that they can get their agendas passed...small government...privatization of federal and state run facilities...unregulated capitalism...onerous religious and idealistic laws...schools that teach creationism and climate warming denialism...and on and on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
03:46 PM on 02/23/2012
I hope that these conservatives throwing money at candidates will show that a bunch of richies can set up their candidates to be nominated as the GOP candidate for president but ultimately it won't get their guy elected. I hope that the President's broad-based support will win the day for his re-election, four more years!!
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
12:32 AM on 02/24/2012
The republican neocons have gotten a pretty strong toehold in state and local governments...in some states, they have a lot to say and are strong enough to pass laws in keeping with their idealistic and economic beliefs...but...if they don't get control of Congress and the White House, and the policies that Obama has put in place start to improve things for people...and he gets reelected again, it will be a hell of a long time before there will be another neocon in the White House...and they know it.

After Obama, Clinton could run...and there's Warren...both smart and popular. I don't think that anyone from the neocon party would have a chance to beat either...and if that happens, and I never see another republican neocon in office again, it will be OK with me!
10:01 PM on 02/22/2012
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2076568-4,00.html

The lesson of Germany is a good one. Back in 2000, the Germans were facing an economic rebalancing not unlike what the U.S. is experiencing. East and West Germany had unified, creating a huge wealth gap and high unemployment at a time when German jobs were moving to central Europe.

CEOs sat down with labor leaders as partners; union reps sit on management boards in Germany. The government offered firms temporary subsidies to forestall outsourcing. Corporate leaders worked with educators to churn out a labor force with the right skills.

It worked. Germany has not only higher levels of growth but also lower levels of unemployment.

The Republican “Jobs” program during this time?

46,000 factories went overseas during the bush years. The states lost this tax base. It was done intentionally by the right. (google Bains Capital + Romney)

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001854367_bushecon10.html

2004 President's Economic Report.

BUSH: SENDING JOBS OVERSEAS HELPS U.S
February 10, 2004

WASHINGTON — Movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if short-term pain and dislocation, Bush administration

Republican Golden Rule

"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?

"The Republican philosophy

To hell with principle; what matters is power, and that we have it, and that they do not." - Pat Buchanan
01:38 AM on 02/23/2012
This election is shaping up just like Meg Whitman v. Jerry Brown. Diebold FTW!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keedyk87
09:14 PM on 02/22/2012
REALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:40 PM on 02/22/2012
And the President won't? Come on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AsISaid
08:35 PM on 02/22/2012
Sickening. A slap in the face of every American.
08:24 PM on 02/22/2012
Many governments have had an "Eminence Grise" ("Gray Eminence") -- a power behind the throne. But now, thanks to Chief Justice Roberts and his 4 cronies on the Supreme Court, the United States is permanently saddled with one, under our very own Constitution which was supposed to ensure a democratic government acting on behalf of all citizens, not just a select few. Isn't that special?
09:39 AM on 02/23/2012
Everyone has the right to vote. Money can't vote.
12:42 PM on 02/23/2012
Right. All money can do is drown out real debate with lies and distractions, and assassinate the character of good candidates. If your ivory-tower theory were correct, Buddy Roemer would be leading in the polls. But because he refuses PAC money, nobody even knows who he is.

You're probably one of those people who claims not to be influenced by campaign ads and to make your decisions based strictly on your own personal research on candidates and issues -- yet your views and votes miraculously coincide with the latest talking points from "Americans for Prosperity" or some other corporate-funded front group.
08:19 PM on 02/22/2012
May the Lord keep blessing Peter Thiel for seeing the good in Ron Paul.
09:01 PM on 02/23/2012
It must be very well hidden?
08:06 PM on 02/22/2012
Nobody is interested in having either of these old men call the shots for America. We don't want them given an ambassadorship. We don't want to see them ever again.

Obama 2012
02:10 AM on 02/23/2012
Ambassadorships are the least of your worries. They don't cost the average voter anywhere near as much money as does the clout these people hope to gain.