iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich
 

Why We Shouldn't Be Selling the Right to Live in America

Posted: 10/25/2011 5:04 pm

America is having a fire sale. Why not sell wealthy foreigners the right to live here, too?

That's the notion behind a bill introduced last week by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah and Democrat Senator Charles Schumer of New York: Stoke demand for American homes by allowing foreign nationals to buy them. In return, give foreigners the right to live here (although not work here).

The price? At least $500,000 cash. It could be one piece of real estate costing $500,000 or more, or several, of one would have to be worth at least $250,000.

Presumably, this would help homeowners by boosting demand. "This is a way to create more demand without costing the federal government a nickel," Schumer told the Wall Street Journal.

And it would help the street. Rather than have the big banks carry all those non-performing mortgage loans on their books or be forced to write them down, we'll just goose the housing market by selling off the right to live in America.

And the measure wouldn't allow in the world's riff-raff, because buyers would have to be rich enough to pay cash, and live here six months a year without working.

Realtors love it. Says Glenn Kelman, CEO of Redfin, an online brokerage firm, "when property values sag and this is a desirable place to live, one of the simplest solutions is just to let more people in so they can buy the homes."

In Seattle, where Kelman lives, housing prices have slumped -- as they have all over America. But Vancouver, Canada -- just 140 miles to the north -- is enjoying a housing boom because Canada allows foreigners to buy their way into Canada, just as the Lee-Schumer bill would do here.

But wait a minute.

Rich foreigner buyers may be a boon to American homeowners looking to sell, because those homeowners can't find Americans willing and able to fork over as much money as the sellers would like.

But what about American home buyers -- many of them young, just entering the market -- who would prefer low home prices that aren't bid upward by rich foreigners? It's not altogether obvious why we should favor American homeowners over American home buyers.

The visa-for-home swap proposal also comes at exactly the same time the nation is actively closing its doors to foreigners who aren't wealthy. Is this what America is all about?

Policy makers have tightened eligibility for entering the country legally. Student visas are harder to obtain. Family members are waiting years to become resident aliens. Green cards are in short supply.

Meanwhile, many states are doing whatever they can to make immigrants -- mostly poor, but legal as well as illegal -- feel unwelcome. For example, Alabama and Arizona allow police to demand "papers, please" from anyone they suspect may be undocumented (read: anyone who looks Hispanic). Alabama requires public schools to demand documentation from parents of all children in K-12 programs.

The nation is expelling record numbers of undocumented workers. Over the last year (from October 1, 2010 to October 31, 2011), almost 400,000 people were deported - the largest number in the history of the Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency. Annual deportations have increased 400 percent since 1996.

Some of these people committed criminal acts in the United States but a significant number simply overstayed their visas. Others had been in America for decades, working and raising their families here. Some had even been here legally but had no opportunity to defend themselves. A recent report by my colleagues at the Berkeley Law School notes that many immigrants "are pushed rapidly through the system without appropriate checks or opportunities to challenge their detention and/or deportation."

If the Schumer-Lee bill becomes law, the easiest way for a foreigner to live in America will be to plunk down $500,000 for a piece of property.

Maybe we should rewrite Emma Lazarus's words on the Statue of Liberty:

Give us your richest, fattest cats,

Your highest net-worth, seeking pleasure domes,

Your wealthy heirs and pampered brats.

Send these, with a half-million to buy our homes,

And gild our fading door mats.
---

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

FOLLOW BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 210
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
12:23 AM on 10/27/2011
Your Canadian connection is a little off. Canada demands that immigrants have a practicing profession. These people usually have cash on hand and of course would buy property. We have a special arrangement with China to do so. Also, over 4000 Americans come here every year to re-locate and start a new life. They also have the cash to purchase, or mortgage at one of our secure and prosperous banks.

We actually have a many tiered policy where a professional would have preference over say a person without. No country can be perfect, but we do our best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dch58
To think is to differ.
12:45 PM on 10/26/2011
... and well-financed terrorists would be excluded how?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:44 PM on 10/26/2011
Good question. I'm already trying to imagine the litany of "answers" like "It's easier to keep an eye on them if we have them right under our noses..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notdarkyet
End the Drug War.
11:40 AM on 10/26/2011
It looks like the 1% are trying to recruit and become the 2%. Millionaires only need apply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
11:36 AM on 10/26/2011
There is a flip side to the proposal as well. We might get a large influx of wealthy foreigners from poorer countries. This could result in a huge transfer of monies from those poorer countries that can least afford to lose that wealth. Presumably only wealthier persons would be able to make such home purchases. This could also have the undesirable effect here of widening the gap between the rich and the lower and middle classes.

We really need to think through such a scheme carefully, especially given the law of unintended consequences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:34 PM on 10/26/2011
The Law of Unintended Consequences is probably the LEAST heeded law in the nation...especially among the nations political/financial elites.
11:30 AM on 10/26/2011
This is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. Why do we keep trying to artificially raise home prices or keep them from falling further? Home prices were WAY too high at their peak in '07, and when they came crashing down, as painful as that may have been for some, it was for the best. People got greedy, not just Wall Street, but home buyers, too. There is a market determined price for every home out there today and the government keeps trying to make it higher than it is, whether it's this or a tax credit or a foreclosure freeze or something ignorant. I thought we were supposed to be looking out for the poor in this country. How does keeping home prices artificially high do that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:41 PM on 10/26/2011
Because beneath all the bull that passes for common wisdom, if not universal TRUTH - they neither truly believe in the genuinely Free Market - Nor do they like the way it works without goverrment intervention on THEIR behalf. That's why (with a little help from the Supremely Treasonous Court) they had to buy the government to manipulate the market to benefit the 1%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:18 AM on 10/26/2011
Give us your richest, fattest cats,

Your highest net-worth, seeking pleasure domes,

Your wealthy heirs and pampered brats.

Send these, with a half-million to buy our homes,

And gild our fading door mats.
If we could figure out someway to legally export Our poor, They would be out of here in a flash.
There are plenty of middle class unemployed to do the crap work for the Rich.
Ain't America Great???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
10:54 AM on 10/26/2011
Good article, but would you please write a column about McConnell. I'm boiling mad at the GOP and Perry's "I don't care" BS.

This bill will never make it into law and I'm disappointed in Shumer. Obama would veto it.

On the other hand, it is the minority leader who symbolizes the whole GOP and has done more to harm this country, than anything I have ever seen.

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/president_obama_picks_a_worthy_enemy/?source=newsletter

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_10/if_the_villains_shoe_fits033041.php

In August 2011, McConnell admitted that he and his Republican colleagues were willing to hold the nation and its economy “hostage,” threatening to destroy the United States’ full faith and credit on purpose.

These dummies do not realize how close this country is to violence. They do not know how deep the anger is. If they succeed in 2012, they are going to see anger and violence. I'm really worried that the GOP will touch off a spark that will spread, and all for "NOT CARING" when they could have helped with the mess they made. Blaming Obama is not going to work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
11:37 AM on 10/26/2011
Hear! Hear!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:51 PM on 10/26/2011
Schumer is a disappointing tool and a highly placed cog in the well-oiled machine. But Mitch McConnell is truly one of the most despicable "beings" (I see no evidence of any humanity) around and with enormous power. He has not only defied, but DEFILED his Oath of Office. My skull literally prickles at the sight/or sight of him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertHenryEller
a micro-bio hp can handle
10:31 AM on 10/26/2011
And we can gold plate the Statue of Liberty, and make some extra money by selling her to Donald Trump, thata gold-plated, gold-pated purveyor of all things flashy but trashy, but marketed as "luxury," like all his other properties. Just make sure the Donald pays cash; he's famous for 'renegotiating' the debts on his properties and businesses (You know, as he rails against homeowners for trying to do?).

Alas, Emma Lazarus poem is just that, a poem, not the law of our land, or our immigration policies.

But while your sentiments, as always, are in the right place, Mr. Reich, your economics may, uncharacteristically, be a bit myopic. Rich foreigners may also spend and consume stimulating the economy. They will not buy up all the homes, may build new ones, and would probably not distort the prices of affordable starter homes for the young.

Most ironically, however, for a good economist, you miss the opportunity the Lee-Schumer bill inadvertently affords to argue for raising taxes on wealthy people who are Americans now: There is a demonstrable value to the wealthy to be domiciled in the United States. As that value is ongoing, it should not be sold on a one-time basis, but as an ongoing fee. The wealthy should pay a tax equal to the value of being in the US. Then, wealthy foreigners will only increase our tax revenues.

And of course, they will need more less-wealthy immigrants to work for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
02:01 PM on 10/26/2011
They won't want to come here if they can't take advantage of the undocumented ("illegal") workers who have no rights and no recourse...

But I agree it is an admission of the true VALUE this country offers (PROVIDES for) the uber wealthy (1%ers) is a inadvertant admission that the wealthy should pay more in taxes because they do indeed get so much more. Why else pay mega bucks for the PRIVILEGE?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertHenryEller
a micro-bio hp can handle
02:44 PM on 10/26/2011
I think being able to live in the United States affords many of us (not enough of us) a lot of value. But there is particular value to people who accumulate inordinate assets and income. The US is still, more or less, a country ruled by law, particularly property rights, which the rich are proportionately more interested in. There is relative transparency in business. The country is politically stable, even economically. Imagine any other country with our current economic situation being as benign an environment. The US is indeed a country more valuable to citizens in proportion to their industry and wealth.
10:00 AM on 10/26/2011
THATS HOW THE HOUSING BUBBLE STARTED, FANNIE MAY AND FREDDY MAC GAVE LOANS TO LOW INCOME PEOPLE THAT COULDNT AFFORD THEM, IT THEN CREATED A FALSE DEMAND TO HOUSES AND THE PRICES JUST STARTED TO SOAR 200,000 HOUSES, NOW IS PRICED AT 600,000 BECAUSE OF THE FALSE DEMAND FOR PROPERTY AND THEN THE BUBBLE BURST AND HERE WE ARE IN A SMALL DEPRESSION.

THANK ALOT BARNEY FRANKS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
11:38 AM on 10/26/2011
False premise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrae2007
09:59 AM on 10/26/2011
self-sustainability and certain minimum assets are the rule in Australia, 6months income proof is the rule in Costa Rica, etc, etc, this is nothing new.
photo
DoubleYellowLines
Left of the Right, and Right of the Left
09:37 AM on 10/26/2011
So, unknown al Qaeda guy with access to funds can set up shop? Fun times.
09:37 AM on 10/26/2011
In the last decade, most of the real estate, especially condos, in Vancouver Canada as been bought up by absentee Chinese from China, not Hong Kong. This has driven the prices sky high and is now a source of complaints from local Canadians, especially yonger ones, who now cannot afford to own a starting home there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EQ8Rhomes
03:51 PM on 10/26/2011
U can blame the greedy "local Canadians" for jumping at the possibly crooked immigrant Renminbi. If "local" Canadians did not fall over each other to sell, the immigrants could not buy. Look at the ear-to-ear grin on the sellers and the real estate agents!
They R the ones who inflated and drove housing costs sky high and bought long motor homes and "spent their children's inheritance!"
Now their nice Canadian descendants are going to pay, pay, P A Y!
01:10 PM on 10/27/2011
It's not the "local" Canadians. The bulk of these sales are new condos. it is the Real Estate Brokers and Developers, many of which go to China to pitch the sale of new condos to Chinese who are NOT immigrants!
09:37 AM on 10/26/2011
I am a real estate agent....Uhhm.... how is letting foreign rich people buy $500k homes going to help the market and the economy? The only thing its going to do is continue the divide between the have and the have nots (occupy wallstreet). They want to keep pushing the middle class into poverty so the rich, now foreign too, can have their working slave class...for peanuts of course....and it was all designed very carefully. By having members of both parties sponsor the bill, now you have no-one party to blame. Its time to wake up AMERICA. The rich are selling this country to the foreign right from under your ignorant little feet, as you struggle to make a dollar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndyFem
09:56 AM on 10/26/2011
Just reason...I am a Realtor, too....and I would rather make fewer sales...than sell American soil to wealthy foreigners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Is Right
11:13 AM on 10/26/2011
How xenophobic...and ugly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EQ8Rhomes
03:56 PM on 10/26/2011
@IndiFem: U R a rare bird in this GREED DRIVEN AGE!
09:36 AM on 10/26/2011
Wow, just giving it away. Of course the mortgage brokers think it's just dandy. They want to sell homes, they were told it was a quick and easy way to make lots of money, then push came to shove,the housing boom ended, and they were like, wait a minute.
This is crap, we should do more to encourage first time American buyers, keep deporting illegals, and tell the rich foreigners to shove off. Go to effin Canada, who cares. The brokers are just upset because their Canadian counter part is getting the rich Brazilians money. Or the Chinese. That's who will be buying these homes.
With any luck they will buy homes to rent for cheap, but they can't become slumlords, because the home has to be 500,000 or more. That's a friggin palace nowadays.
And to the end part:
I think we should take Lazarus' words on the side of the statue of "liberty" and etch them right off. The we should wrap chains around liberty and drag her to the scrap yard and recycle her ass. Because she is a lie.
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
09:32 AM on 10/26/2011
The Bill proposed by these two US Senators is an insult to all Americans. Instead of fighting harder to pass jobs bills that encourage growth so Americans can take advantage of the low interest and low housing prices. They propose to sell chunks of America to the highest foreign bidders. Taking house off the market and removing them from Access by Americans.

These two Senators are overstaying their welcome and should be voted out.

Schumer shame on you.
10:19 AM on 10/26/2011
Shame on Schumer, he knows better than pairing up with rookie Lee from Utah. ( Lee is the one pushing for the balanced budget amendment. He is a TP darling.) This guy is ambitious and is dying for attention. He will sell his mother for 2 bits. Shame on Schumer; shame on Lee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Is Right
11:14 AM on 10/26/2011
Let me get this straight: undocumented tomato pickers are more welcome in this country than documented wealthy people?
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
12:43 AM on 10/27/2011
only if they are rich tomato pickers or a group pooling their money.