EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Robert Reich

Robert Reich

Posted: August 14, 2010 05:37 PM

It's nonsense to think of the economy heading downward again into a double-dip recession when most Americans never emerged from the first dip. We're still in one long Big Dipper.

More people are out of work today than were last year, counting everyone too discouraged even to look for work. The number of workers filing new claims for jobless benefits rose last week to the highest level since February. Not counting temporary census workers, a total of only 12,000 net new private and public jobs were created in July -- when 125,000 are needed each month just to keep up with growth in the population of people who want and need to work.

Not since the government began to measure the ups and downs of the business cycle has such a deep recession been followed by such anemic job growth. Jobs came back at a faster pace even in March 1933 after the economy started to "recover" from the depths of the Great Depression. Of course, that job growth didn't last long. That recovery wasn't really a recovery at all. The Great Depression continued. And that's exactly my point. The Great Recession continues.

Even investors are beginning to see reality. Starting in February the stock market rallied because corporate profits were rising briskly. Investors didn't mind that profits were coming from payroll cuts, foreign sales, and gimmicks like share buy-backs -- none of which could be sustained over the long term. But the rally died in April when investors began to see how paper-thin these profits actually were. And now the stock market is back to where it was at the start of the year.

What to do? First, don't listen to Wall Street and the Right.

Forget the Neo-Hoover deficit hawks who say we have to cut government spending and trim upcoming deficits. We didn't get into this mess and aren't remaining in it because of budget deficits. In fact, the only way to reduce long-term deficits is to restore jobs and growth so government revenues rise and expenses like unemployment insurance drop.

Ignore the government haters who say we have to void or delay upcoming regulations of Wall Street and big business. We got here because Wall Street went bonkers, the housing bubble burst, and the middle class couldn't continue to spend because their health-care bills were soaring and their pay was stagnating. New regulations of Wall Street and big business are necessary to avoid a repeat.

And don't believe the supply-siders who say we have to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Because the wealthy save rather than spend most of their incomes, extending their tax cut won't do squat. And restoring their marginal tax rate to what it was under Bill Clinton won't harm the economy. The Clinton years had the best sustained economy in American history.

The central problem is lack of demand -- and that's what has to be tackled.

Three of the four sources of demand have stopped working. (1) Consumers can't and won't buy because they're still under a huge debt load, can't get more credit, are afraid of losing their jobs (or already have), depend on two wage earners, at least one of whom is working part-time and pulling in less, or have to save. (2) Businesses won't invest and spend on creating more jobs if they don't see consumers willing to buy more. (3) Exports are stalled because the dollar is so high they cost too much, much of the rest of the world is still struggling with recession, and American firms can make things for sale abroad more cheaply abroad.

That leaves only one remaining source of demand -- government. We need a giant jobs program to hire people and put money in their pockets that they'll spend and thereby create more jobs. Put ideology aside and recognize this fact. If it makes you more comfortable call it the National Defense Jobs Act. Call it the WPA. Call it Chopped Liver. Whatever, we have to get the great army of the unemployed and underemployed working again.

Also: Put more money in consumer's wallets by eliminating payroll taxes on the first $20K of income (and make it up by applying payroll taxes to incomes over $250K.)

Also: Get more hiring by giving the states and locales interest-free loans -- so they can rehire all the teachers, fire fighters, police officers, and sanitation workers they've fired -- to be repaid when their state employment rates hit 5 percent or below.

Also: Get more credit by having the Fed return to "quantitative easing" -- expanding the money supply by purchasing mortgage-backed and other types of securities.

If we let the deficit hawks and government haters dominate this debate, as they have, the Big Dipper will continue for years. The Great Depression lasted twelve.

This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,691
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
09:47 AM on 08/23/2010
K.I.S.S.
Keep It Simple Stupid.
or
MARKETING 101
"Find A Hole And Fill It"

There are a lot of holes out there.
From pot holes in our own roads to lack of water, food, shelter, clothing and medicines for
disaster ravaged countries. These are GIANT HOLES that can be filled now. WITH JOBS!!!!

I refer to it as The WPA meets The Peace Corp meets Job Corp meets UNICEF meets The Red Cross...et­c.
Imagine if all countries of the world were invited to a neighborho­od pot luck dinner to help a local family after their house burned to the ground.
Each neighbor was asked to bring a something they are famous for, prepare it, package it and hold it until one of the neighbor's houses actually does burn to the ground, or is hit by a hurricane, a tornado, sunami, earthquake­, flash flood....e­tc.
The neighbor with rescue experience and equipment will go there first.
The neighbor with food service experience will set up the tables and will phone the other neighbors explaining when and how much the other neighbors will need to bring.
Our neighborho­od clothing rep will have special clothing ready to go. CLOTHING ESPECIALLY MADE TO HELP OUR NEIGHBOR COPE WITH THEIR DISASTER.
etc., etc, etc.
Our government pays for the labor and materials to prepare the items we are famous for and major advertiser­s can help pay for the packaging and shipping.
K.I.S.S.
Thanks for listening.
Ed Catano
01:05 AM on 08/22/2010
The central problem is NOT a lack of demand. The central problem is that we had a housing bubble burst. Now banks have billions of bad mortgages on their balance sheets, and millions of homeowners have bad loans and are fearful about losing their house.

This will take years to sort out, it has nothing to do with "demand". As if demand suddenly was zapped from the economy.

What is government going to do? Buy the bad loans from banks? Moral hazard? Help the underwater homeowners­? Moral hazard.

Housing has to bottom out, banks and homeowners take their haircuts, and we move on.
09:33 AM on 08/20/2010
As usual, Robert Reich hits the nail right on the head! And you don't have to accept the word of an economist on this point. Just look back to the original Henry Ford and his 'demand-pu­sh' mentality. It worked, plain and simple, it worked. And it was mocked at the time. But it worked.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tollilf
05:54 PM on 08/19/2010
Reich - you fed this mess when you were in your finance positions. You empowered the banks, you pulled for full home ownership and cheap $$ which was a major cause of this bubble. We've had too much personal borrowing, our homes are still way overvalued­. In order to consume people need to get out of debt - unfortuant­ely it often will be through bankruptcy­. This will hurt them short term - but it will really hurt a large cause of this problem - the banks. Unfortuant­ely the FED has been buying all these MBS from the bank and they now sit at Freddie and Fanny, so all those LOSSES will ultimately land on the back of the federal government­, and us the tax payer. Do you really think a WPA type program would be supported by the unions? No Way! This has been a problem in the Green Energy job programs. They's want Davis Bacon wages on all WPA jobs and mandatory unionizati­on. I've read many stories of shopps refusing pay / benefit cuts and instead voting for LAYOFFS - how does that help the economy? They are only hoping for a BAILOUT.
02:52 AM on 08/21/2010
Dude, you really don't get it.  

Home ownership was not the problem, and still isn't.  The problem was, and is, Wall Street gambling.  The scam was bundling crap with grade B paper and selling it like it was AAA paper.  The real crooks are the rating agencies, all of whom are still in business as if the crash of 2008 never happened.  

It's criminal.  Blaming the collapse of the housing bubble on a few people who never should have had loans in the first place ignores the role of rating agencies who told everybody that their unsecured loans were investment grade securities­.  

You need to understand that banks won't loan money to most people unless the loan is structured such that it can be guaranteed by Freddie.  When I bought a house 8 years ago, I could not get a loan for more than could be unloaded onto Freddie if things went bad.  I had nothing to do with Freddie, but it still had a very real effect on what I could buy.  That's the way it is.  Freddie put the brakes on a market that was otherwise accelerati­ng without limit.  

You should be thankful for Fannie and Freddie.  
05:35 PM on 08/19/2010
What hit us was the bubble in real estate. To get out of this problem we need to beef up the bankruptcy systems in this country. The federal govt. should send block grants to courts to speed up the bankruptcy process. Once small companies have gone through bankruptcy they will be able to reduce the jobs crisis by filling some of their jobs. The accounting in a small business has three items: the price of the goods or services, the cost of putting people into jobs, and the cost of capital. The 1st two are easy to deal with, it is the third item that can shut you down unless you go through bankruptcy­. Once the small businesses get the cost of their capital down they will be able to handle lowering their prices and getting more sales. And then, they will be able to pick up some of the low cost labor that is sitting around and there by lower the unemployme­nt rate. When the banks see the unemployme­nt rate go down they will start lending again. I think about $20,000,00­0,000 to $30,000,00­0,000 from the federal gov. should be able to beef up the bankruptcy system here in the US. The federal gov. should work at getting as many small businesses through bankruptcy as fast a possible.
01:52 PM on 08/19/2010
I have become a little cynical about the jobless numbers since so many people that I know, or have heard about, are starting to work again - under the table - and are still collecting unemployme­nt. Have no idea how prevalent this is, but especially in constructi­on seems quite common here in northern Calif.
12:00 PM on 08/19/2010
I like this one: "Put more money in consumer's wallets by eliminatin­g payroll taxes on the first $20K of income (and make it up by applying payroll taxes to incomes over $250K.)" It would make life so much easier for those of us at the median income, as well as those with less.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tibetanterrier
reirretnatebit
11:50 AM on 08/19/2010
There is a good read on the Government haters in todays NYTimes.

'Alaska's Scorn Of Washington Exempts Cash' Michael Powell
photo
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
10:54 AM on 08/19/2010
The feckless Senate is incapable of coming together and doing what is necessary to resolve this. The Republican­s see it as an opportunit­y to make people forget that it was their policies that got us here in the first place and Democrats are so easily cowered they are in paralysis.

The problem with representa­tive democracy is that you end up with people in office who don't know what they are doing and only try to score political points so they can get reelected.
08:14 PM on 08/18/2010
I agree that something needs to be done about this situation. I think that a jobs bill might actually help our economy more than it would hinder it and the tax proposal that Reich mentions is one of the best ideas that I have ever heard in helping those who have jobs, but are still dealing with this financial hardships. Anything that can be done by us and/or the GOVERNMENT should, so that we can get our economy back where it needs to be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beauboy
09:21 PM on 08/17/2010
I agree with those who believe we need to pass a jobs bill, and i don't particular­ly care what it's called. We need to get Americans back to work, and it needs to be done now. That's what I'm talking about!! We do have another problem that needs to be addressed, and that is this long over due question of race. Most Americans seem uncomforta­ble about discussing race, and some will flat out lie that race is still a problem in this country, especially since we have a Black president. That is the very thing that exposed the level of racism in America. Never before in the history of this country have so much racial hatred been directed at an American President. The fact that he was borne by a White woman from one of the Plains State of America does nothing to quiet the venomous hatred from so many on the right, as well as some on the left who feels he's not liberal enough..if Americans want a decent jobs bill, one that will allow decent pay, then we must be ready to forget about the race of this president and afford him the same respect as White presidents of the past. We have senators and congressme­n collecting pay checks and enjoying free medical care for themselves and their families, and they have committed themselves to saying "no" .to anything that a Black President tries to accomplish­. You know who they are, and you know HOW TO CALL.
07:42 PM on 08/17/2010
Absolutely­. Totally agree with Reich. Something has to give. Some intelligen­ce and considerat­ion must prevail. Otherwise this country is pretty much gone.
02:37 PM on 08/17/2010
What Mr. Reich suggests above is Reagan trickle down in reverse. If the Government just gives enough money to us we'll spend enough to create a job need. Talk about wishful thinking over any true economic strategy. Thank God he's not of any true influence. Moronic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:11 PM on 08/17/2010
So your point is that Reagan trickle down is the opposite of moronic?
Actually, this is Keynesian macroecono­mic theory 101. It's another chapter in the fight for the Commanding Heights, Schumpeter­/von Hayek have been PROVEN wrong by the 2008 financial collapse and their acolytes will have to retrench and find a situation where Keynes's approach fails.

The truth? It's not the middle. There is no middle here, it;s a fork in the road and this is just an Exit Sign that we will stamp our face into if we try to go halfway.

American entreprene­urs are great at making money out of any new idea, but public resources are better at actually solving problems that had no solution before, like going to the moon, or building a transport system to move our troops from coast to coast, or devising a communicat­ion system that would be robust to attacks at any one point.
Do you think Pfizer's bottom line is better because they found a cure for a disease or because they make a rhomboid little blue pill?
If Lipitor cured your cholestero­l, would Pfizer have made so much money?
So what do you think gets higher priority at Pfizer on the research to-do list?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:29 PM on 08/19/2010
Jusat an FYI - cholestero­l is genetic first, and diet second. I can eat deep fried bacon every morning with eggs, sausage, hot dogs, etc. and my doctors always remark how good my reading are. As for the little blue pills I've found that younger women work better.
06:15 PM on 08/19/2010
"...have to retrench and find a situation where Keynes's approach fails."

it's failing now, before our very eyes.
02:44 PM on 08/19/2010
The opposite of trickle down would be no taxes on the bottom 85% of Americans and a policy based on truth. Reagan worked with myths and fables and was expert at peeing on people's boots and convincing them that it was raining. If you believe in Reaganomic­s you probably are waiting for the tooth fairy or a communist takeover of the military. There is no more fallacious 'policy' or intellectu­ally corrupt piece of political subterfuge than Reaganomic­s.
yougg
just a citizen
01:37 PM on 08/17/2010
Mostly agree with Mr. Reich. Talk to somebody who remembers the Great Depression­. The squawking will cease about the recession. We have a jobs program-th­e military for the wars we are fighting. We need power plants, (nuclear, coal, natural gas, renewable energies) refineries­, power grid, railroads, ect. Maybe if we had an energy policy-tha­t would help. Forty years after the first oil embargo and we still have no energy policy. Is that gutless or what? Why are people calling Obama a leftist? He is far from that. We need a sustainabl­e economy. Which would mean a total overhaul of how we think about economics. It is a guarantee that banks and Wall Street would not be helpful/en­thuastic. Wall Street is nothing more than a casino. Put the teachers back to work-that'­s a no brainer. My problem with some of the so called plans is that they are too big. We need to be more local/regi­onal. Big corporatio­ns are not the answer-the­y are the problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:01 PM on 08/17/2010
Great comment!
12:29 PM on 08/17/2010
That leaves only one remaining source of demand -- government­. We need a giant jobs program to hire people and put money in their pockets that they'll spend and thereby create more jobs. Put ideology aside and recognize this fact. If it makes you more comfortabl­e call it the National Defense Jobs Act. Call it the WPA. Call it Chopped Liver. Whatever, we have to get the great army of the unemployed and underemplo­yed working again.
__________­__________­____

Moronic idea. This isn't the 1930s, you can't have a bunch of people off the street working in civil constructi­on. The unions would howl at that anyway.

The whole notion of stimulus is just a big crock. What, we don't spend $ in 2007 for the DOT? All stimulus is is just regular government spending, there is nothing special about it whatsoever­.

And as we can clearly see, running a deficit will not get you out of a recession.

We have a $1400 billion deficit planned for this year, what should we make it Robert? $5 trillion? 10 trillion?

Ridiculous­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar Cudmore
02:23 PM on 08/17/2010
Revenues are highly procyclica­l. If the government didn't run a deficit during recessions they would have to make huge cuts. This would greatly exacerbate the downturn.
11:21 PM on 08/17/2010
Except they run massive deficits in the UPturn too!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MartyinLA
02:42 PM on 08/17/2010
Did you buy your home with cash? Didn't think so. Why not have the govt invest in infrastruc­ture to create jobs that can be taxed? Its an investment in our future productivi­ty and can reduce our oil dependency on oil (which translates into sending $ offshore and dirty skies).
11:22 PM on 08/17/2010
"Invest in infrastruc­ture"? What is the annual yield of "infrastru­cture"? Can I buy some shares of it for my IRA?

It's a ridiculous concept, stimulus is just plain old government spending that doesn't do jack to help out an economy.