More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich
 

Greece's Choice -- And Ours: Democracy Or Finance?

Posted: 11/01/11 04:07 PM ET

Which do you trust more: democracy or financial markets?

Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou decided in favor of democracy yesterday when he announced a national referendum on the draconian budget cuts Europe and the IMF are demanding from Greece in return for bailing it out.

(Or, more accurately, the cuts Europe and the IMF are demanding for bailing out big European banks that have lent Greece lots of money and stand to lose big if Greece defaults on those loans -- not to mention Wall Street banks that will also suffer because of their intertwined financial connections with European banks.)

If Greeks accept the bailout terms, unemployment will rise even further in Greece, public services will be cut more than they have already, the Greek economy will contract, and the standard of living of most Greeks will deteriorate further.

If Greeks reject the terms and the nation defaults, it will face far higher borrowing costs in the future. This may reduce the standard of living of most Greeks, too. But it doesn't have to. Without the austerity measures the rest of Europe and the IMF are demanding, the Greek economy has a better chance of growing and more Greeks are likely to find jobs.

Shouldn't Greeks be able to make this decision for themselves?

Of course, if Greek defaults on its loans, global investors (fearing that a default in Greece sets a dangerous precedent) may yank their money out of Italy. This would almost certainly bust several big European banks -- and generate panic on Wall Street. That's why Tim Geithner has been pressing Europe to bail out Greece.

We've been here before, remember? Here in the United States, at the end of 2008 and start of 2009. Wall Street had made lots of bad loans, and the question we faced then was whether to bail out the Street.

The difference is, we didn't hold a referendum. Instead, the Bush administration told Congress the nation risked "economic Armageddon" if it didn't immediately authorize a giant bailout of the Street -- with no strings attached. Of course Congress hastily agreed. Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner (as head of the New York Fed) then doled out the money. And the Obama administration (with Geithner installed as Treasury Secretary) gave out more.

So instead of allowing the Street to live with the consequences of its negligence, we bailed it out -- and allowed the Main Streets of America to suffer the consequences.

If Americans had been consulted about the bank bailout, I doubt it would have happened the way it did. At the very least, strict conditions would have been placed on the banks in return for the money. The banks would have had to eat the losses of the predatory mortgages they sold, and help homeowners reduce those mortgages. They'd be required to improve the capitalization of small banks in communities across the country. They'd be forced to accept stringent new regulations, including resurrection of Glass-Steagall.

But Americans weren't really consulted. It was an inside job.

As a result, Wall Street has prospered but the rest of the nation hasn't. One out of four homeowners is underwater, owing more on their homes than the homes are worth.

And with the worst economy since the Great Depression, we're now embarking on fiscal austerity. Either Congress's super-committee comes up with $1.2 trillion of federal budget cuts that Congress agrees to -- going into effect a little over thirteen months from now -- or $1.5 trillion of cuts are made across the board. Meanwhile, states and cities have been slashing public services for the past three years.

So which is it? Rule by democracy or by financial markets? Based on what's happened in America, I'd choose the former.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

Which do you trust more: democracy or financial markets? Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou decided in favor of democracy yesterday when he announced a national referendum on the draconian budg...
Which do you trust more: democracy or financial markets? Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou decided in favor of democracy yesterday when he announced a national referendum on the draconian budg...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 949
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
03:14 AM on 11/09/2011
I like Reich, if only O would listen?
01:09 PM on 11/03/2011
Though I sympathize with feeling expressed, one has to recognize that direct democracy as expressed through a referendum simply is not a practical method to deal with current day complexities.

Representatives are voted into office to deal with such complexities full time. If their actions are not in line with the preferences of their constituents, they will be voted out of office for the next term.

It save to allege that more than 80% of Greece or those of any other European country's voters don't have a clear understanding of the issues involved. Most are for example simply not aware of the already very extensive regulatory framework instigated by the EU.

Countries which are forced to submit major issues to a referendum (like the Swiss) end up with no effective foreign policy to speak of. As demonstrated by Greece now you can't negotiate a compromise under direct democracy.

Politics and associated compromises are difficult enough without a referendum. Image that after the Greece referendum all other European partners would have to submit that compromise to their respective populations too.

A referendum might be nice on some constitutional principles, but not on day to day policies.

Instead of a referendum, the US would be much more served with limiting election funding to contributions from citizens only and proportional representation. Might even transform the US in a civilized state again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jscratz
Musician, social democrat, atheist, expatriate
09:03 PM on 11/03/2011
Agree.
I can only add that I think the Swedish system is just.
All political parties receive equal amounts of money for each election from a government fund set aside for this propose. Fair and just. Then they can use the money as needed. Promotions., commercials.... ect
No special interests, lobbyists or private donations.
Fair and balanced.... in reality.
10:10 PM on 11/05/2011
How is the money distributed? How does it reflect new and dissenting opinions? How are specific candidates selected to receive pro-rata shares of that money within the party? In short, public funding either has to be completely open to anyone requesting it, or by its very nature, it changes the outcome of the election. This is simply a truism. I would prefer our system ANY DAY than a bureaucratic selection of who actually gets to participate.
07:39 AM on 11/06/2011
Political parties are eligible to receive public funding depending on past election results. There are no restrictions on the source, form or amount of private donations. Similarly, no restrictions apply to parties’ campaign expenditures. Political parties are not legally required to publish their accounts, although a joint agreement among the parliamentary parties has resulted in all of these parties doing so. Not all individual contributions, however, are itemized. Some political parties expressed their criticism of the Swedish system of party/campaign finance and reporting. They argued that greater transparency is required, especially regarding the disclosure of individual
donations.
www.osce.org/odihr/elections/70947

Seems your education has failed you. You don't know how your own system works.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Red Herring
Retired Miner, living in third world
08:57 AM on 11/03/2011
I see that now the international banks have forced the PM of Greece to step down and form a coalition government headed up by you may have guessed it...........the former head of the Central Bank of Greece. The banks have committed a coup in Greece. They have taken over the government. Wait until the Greek People absorb that information. The riots in the past are going to look like a childs kindergarden party.

This bailout and the accompanying austerity measures will assure that Greece will never get off it's back. Papendreao was right in wanting to give the Greek people a say in this lousy backroom deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
05:44 AM on 11/03/2011
Now, the 1%, Wall Street and it's bankers, and Europe's equivalent, want to screw Democracy too !
Well, kudos to Mr. Reich and Mr. Papandreou, for putting Democracy before the financial vultures of the World! Finally, we have two leaders who do not kiss any financial a.s !
11:49 PM on 11/02/2011
It looks like the start of the meltdown will happen in a mater of hours and not days. The EU is trying to play hardball and the Greek PM is between a rock and said hardball. This means the PM has no choice but to bail on the EU and the Euro ASAP. I hope Germany and France are happy when they up holding a couple of trillion Euros in bad sovereign bonds!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aarontastic
"Mr. Cain instead decided to try to provide her wi
11:17 PM on 11/02/2011
And another thing on democracy: it's overrated. I'm not saying it's a terrible thing, and I despise the Wall Street firms and other huge, profligate banks as much as anyone else. But frankly, I would never want to stake the economic future of the country on the opinion of the masses, who are easily manipulated, emotional, and generally uninformed on how to make decisions regarding abstruse things like macroeconomics.

The author would prefer that the American people as a whole had the responsibility of voting up or down on the bailout of Wall Street, but if that had happened, and we had rejected it, we really would be facing economic armageddon. I disagree strongly with the way that it was done, but action needed to be taken, and I believe that the great majority of Americans would have supported the bailout if they knew the consequences of opposing it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Red Herring
Retired Miner, living in third world
09:00 AM on 11/03/2011
And what? All that paper, and it is just paper and accounting tricks would go up in smoke. Do you think you really would be worse off? The only people that would have gotten hurt would have been a bunch of hedge fund managers and the LLoyde Blankfeins of the world. The vast majoritie of the citisens of the USA would have been vastly better off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aarontastic
"Mr. Cain instead decided to try to provide her wi
02:22 AM on 11/06/2011
Yes I really think so. What's important isn't the 'paper' itself, but the real economy and that's what was threatened in 2008. Yes, hedge fund managers and big banks would have been the first to go. But without the financing they provide, the rest of the economy quickly would have shut down: no more loans for cars, homes, or small businesses to do their expenses. From there, the domino effect would begin--business after business would close, and the unemployment rate would make 9% look pretty.

Fiat currency itself isn't backed by gold anymore, but that doesn't mean it is unimportant. It represents a share in the American economy, in a way. To understand the importance of a credit crisis, it might help to take the money out of the equation, and just pretend that we're still using gold coins.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aarontastic
"Mr. Cain instead decided to try to provide her wi
11:11 PM on 11/02/2011
The answer to the question which Reich proposes isn't as obvious as he means for it to be. Neither financial markets or our sham democracy is worthy of much trust, I would argue.

Anyways, that hasn't got much to do with the point he is trying to make. I don't know much of anything about Greek politics, but I do think that the leaders of the Eurozone are being unfair to him. They are only considering their own respective economies when they demand austerity for credit in Greece. However, paying off their debt and retrenching public spending even more will do little to bolster the economy of the Greeks. The public knows that, and so the "rescue" package is very unpopular. The PM is not going through with the plebiscite out of any populist sentiment; he's totally on board with the EU's plan (from what I've heard)--the reason he's calling for a referendum is because he doesn't believe he has enough support in parliament to survive the confidence vote.
10:19 PM on 11/05/2011
Well...you are partially correct. Let's say Michigan just decided that they will be idle and hang out and play checkers would be how they spend the day. The rest of the nation says..."Hey Michigan...I'm busting butt...why should I pay your way to play checkers all day?" Michigan says, "Because I am a sovereign state but in your union, you can't tell me how to spend my day. Just make sure I have groceries, heat, electricity cool clothes, cell phones, and some ouzo and a checkerboard. Now go to work!" The other 49 states say..."Hellll no." I won't give you checkerboards or ouzo or cell phones. I will let you eat though." Michigan sets itself on fire. The moral of the story is it sucks to be Greece. Get to work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
10:51 PM on 11/02/2011
CME Group, the biggest U.S. futures exchange operator, said a transfer of funds from customer accounts at MF Global appeared to occur after a CME audit of the funds last week, which would be in violation of CFTC regulations and CME rules.

"It now appears that the firm made subsequent transfers of customer segregated funds in a manner that may have been designed to avoid detection," said the CME, one of MF Global's regulators.

U.S. regulators started raising concerns about MF Global's European sovereign debt exposure as early as June, according to a source familiar with the matter, some four months before the company's collapse.

While the event hit volumes in the commodities market earlier in the week, bankruptcy court proceedings on Wednesday offered hope that customers would be able to trade again by the end of the week as their positions and much of their collateral were transferred to other brokers.

As for the broader economic implications, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said they are limited.
read more....

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/us-mfglobal-trades-idUSTRE7A163Y20111103
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
10:50 PM on 11/02/2011
I'm for balancing the budget, and telling the financial speculators to go kick rocks. Of the 50 states, only 4 are solvent. The other 46 owe money, some, like California, and Illinois, owe a LOT of money. Government keeps getting bigger, more expensive, more expansive, and frankly, more dictatorial, having less and less to do with the basic balloting process with each passing year, apparently. But, you'd never hear Reich say anything that was counter to his own and his institutions' self-interest, because if they started cutting back on government spending in earnest, either in Greece, or here, well, good ol' Berkeley might find itself on the chopping block, too, leaving Reich with only 15 limousines, and nothing to be driven around in on President's Day, fate of fates. Let's be blunt, and say that stewardship of the national purse has now become a subject of intense study among those with the ambition and the ability to manipulate entire economies. How much say does the public honestly have, anymore, in their taxation levels, and for what purpose they'll then be taxed if permitted? I think the Greece story is far from over, as usual, the 'hard facts' are absent from this Reich piece, because if you really started putting solid information out there, the public might be able to reach their own conclusions about the whole thing, instead of having their opinion spoon-fed to them by presumably knowledgeable and influential persons. Clean up Greece, great place to start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aarontastic
"Mr. Cain instead decided to try to provide her wi
03:12 PM on 11/07/2011
I'd like to see the budget balanced too, but the economy needs to be rectified first. By that I mean we need to pursue policies that restore sustainable growth and put people back to work...that is very unlikely to happen if the government only focuses on retrenching its spending.

The same goes for Greece: cutting more people from the government payroll, raising taxes, and cutting social spending is going to make things a whole lot worse there before it gets better. We are fortunate enough not to be in the same position they are, and I hope the Obama administration and Congress are a little more prudent in their priority-setting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
10:47 PM on 11/02/2011
MF Global may have moved funds in final days
By Sarah N. Lynch, Christopher Doering and Jonathan Spicer
Wed Nov 2, 2011 10:25pm EDT

(Reuters) - In its final days before descending into bankruptcy, Jon Corzine's MF Global Holdings may have transferred customer funds to avoid detection by authorities, a regulator of the firm said on Wednesday.

MF Global, the futures brokerage which collapsed Monday after risky trades on European debt, faces a shortfall of $633 million in customer funds, according to an estimate from CME Group Inc.

A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that regulators are still not sure where the money is, and why they can't find it.

Read more........

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/us-mfglobal-trades-idUSTRE7A163Y20111103
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
10:42 PM on 11/02/2011
Regulators pushed MF Global on risky bets months ago
By Sarah N. Lynch and Christopher Doering
Wed Nov 2, 2011 8:33pm EDT

(Reuters) - U.S. regulators started raising concerns about MF Global's European sovereign debt exposure as early as June, according to a source familiar with the matter, four months before the company's collapse into bankruptcy.
The revelation comes as MF Global tries to account for hundreds of millions of dollars in client accounts that are still missing, according to a federal official. While the size is down from an initial $900 million that was missing, the source told Reuters that regulators are not sure where the money went, and why they can't find it.
The meltdown of Jon Corzine's firm after high-risk bets on European debt should spark reforms to separate retail from investment banking operations, according "Bond King" Bill Gross, who says it marks another example of how Wall Street has "lost its way."
Read more.......
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/us-mfglobal-finra-idUSTRE7A158J20111103
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bioShell
10:24 PM on 11/02/2011
Do not forget who caused the Greek crisis. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/business/global/14debt.html?pagewanted=all
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
09:37 PM on 11/02/2011
Would you bailout someone who doesn't want to make significant cuts in their spending?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aarontastic
"Mr. Cain instead decided to try to provide her wi
03:18 PM on 11/07/2011
People are not the same as governments. We're talking about the difference between micro and macroeconomics here--if I gave a person a loan, then yeah, I'd want them to be more frugal. But if Greece makes all of those proposed cuts, its GDP will contract, its tax revenues will decrease, and it will be hard for them to pay off their debts anyway. Granted, without the bailout assistance from the EU it would be impossible to do so, so I would say that the demands are reasonable--if you are France or Germany. If you are Greece, then it's almost a catch-22.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterNPaul
Past failure is not indicative of future success.
09:10 PM on 11/02/2011
On a lighter note, our nations debt has just exceeded our annual GDP.
10:22 PM on 11/05/2011
The average American household debt exceeds their household GDP (income) by 300 percent. I think we will be okay.
08:41 PM on 11/02/2011
"If Greeks reject the terms and the nation defaults, it will face far higher borrowing costs in the future. This may reduce the standard of living of most Greeks, too. But it doesn't have to. Without the austerity measures the rest of Europe and the IMF are demanding, the Greek economy has a better chance of growing and more Greeks are likely to find jobs."

I'm pretty shocked by these comments . . .

Greece is not rich with natural resources, 1/5 of their economy is based on tourism . . . if they go this route, this country won't be able to recover very easily and I'd expect to see 50% inflation with few people wanting to borrow them money.