iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich
 

Ponderings on the New Politics of Extremism

Posted: 06/17/2012 2:32 pm

Back from several days in Washington. The city still has all the disadvantages of being a one-industry town, with almost everyone working for the government or lobbying the government or reporting on the government or trying to influence the government or litigating on behalf of or against the government. It's like LA and the entertainment industry, or downtown New York and finance. Everyone is in the same bubble, and every conversation sounds vaguely similar.

The only difference this time is Washington feels under siege, as if marauding bands are closing in on it. Unlike Europe, America doesn't have feudal traditions that in the last century spun into fascism and communism. Our right and left are much closer to the center than are Europe's.

But the American right -- whose roots are found in Jeffersonian libertarianism and the Jacksonian alliance of small southern farmers and northern white workers -- is moving further right, and pulling the Republican Party with it. It's fueled by economic fears combined with racism, anti-immigrant nativism, and southern white evangelical Christians.

The puzzle is why Wall Street and corporate America are going along with it when their interests are so different. The new Republican right is anti-Wall Street and protectionist. It doesn't want to expand immigration. It distrusts big business and opposes the sorts of special tax cuts, subsidies, and big government contracts that big business has thrived on. The Obama administration has been far better to corporate America and Wall Street than the new Republican right would ever be.

I don't get it, but the alliance between the energies of the new right and the money of big corporations and Wall Street is formidable, and in this early summer of our discontent Washington can already sense the barbarians at the gates.

ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.

 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
notmoderate
There's always money in the banana stand
09:23 PM on 06/18/2012
I'm not sure you said what you meant to say. What you said is that if Romney wins, it will be horrible. I agree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dch58
To think is to differ.
02:20 PM on 06/18/2012
The conservative voting public is being bamboozled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taina2
Spending my money smarter than government
12:39 PM on 06/18/2012
What is extreme that wanting to follow the Constitution, not spending more money than you have, and cutting the size of government are promoted as extremist positions.
photo
SteveM39
That's how dad did it, that's how America does it
04:59 PM on 06/18/2012
"Extreme" is blindly believing in those things without much understanding of what you are talking about and letting a clever propaganda machine use you and your "common sense" to further its goals which have nothing to do with what you think you are supporting.
12:15 PM on 06/18/2012
Is it legal for an insurance company to make its customers join a conservative pac in order to buy their insurance? Country Insurance in Washington State requires you to join the Washington Farm Bureau ($15 annual fee). The 12000 member org. is made up mostly not farmers, but insurance customers. I know you could buy different insurance, but the question I have is not being notified about what the WSFB does with the money. Seems to me a hidden source of support to an organization who is powerful in political policy in the state supporting issues and candidates of a conservative nature.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gmjonn
Laughing at the Loopy Left
11:53 AM on 06/18/2012
Thanks for the good laugh. But serisouly, I can understand why you puzzle over things when you dont even know the difference between imigration, and illegal imigration. the right is not anot wall street the loopy left wing live in your parents basement osw crowd is anti wall street. The right opposes tax cuts? Really, your kidding right? You should stop worrying and writing about what a mess our counrty is and start worying about and writing about Californias monitary mess.
01:39 PM on 06/18/2012
"Thanks for the good laugh."

Right back at you!

Spelled correctly, the words are "seriously", "immigration" and "monetary". Punctuated correctly, the words are "don't", "parents' " and "California's". Capitalized correctly, the name is "Wall Street". And the snide assertion "you dont even know" and the adjectival phrase "live in your parents basement" are each part of ad hominem attacks--and groundless ones, at that.

A funnier parody of Ignorance attempting to criticize Knowledge could not have been written!

Nice work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gmjonn
Laughing at the Loopy Left
08:00 PM on 06/18/2012
The funny part is that the spelling does nothing to diminish the truth of the message.
Thanks for the laugh
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
11:19 AM on 06/18/2012
We watched what happened to Glenn Beck when he blended Mormon Belief with Ayn Rands Fiction...He got so far off the chart that FOX dumped him...It will be interesting to see where Romney the Noncreative, Money appropriator will try and take the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gmjonn
Laughing at the Loopy Left
11:59 AM on 06/18/2012
I watched and laughed when the loopy left in California ran up a 16 billion dollar budget short fall when they blended money grows on trees beliefs and left wing fiction. Now they need to cut social services, school budgets, library budgets, police and fire budgets, parks and rec budgets. Who do you think is going to suffer most under these budget short falls? Hint, It isnt going to be the rich! How do the Loopy left wing dems sleep at night after throwing the poor under the bus to support there wacky agendas?
12:53 PM on 06/18/2012
California's deficit is a direct result of direct democracy. Specifically, ballot initiatives that simultaneously mandated spending but prevented the revenue increases necessary to pay for it. The Economist (a conservative publication) did an excellent piece on California's current situation last year called "The perils of extreme democracy." Its worth a read. Here's the link... http://www.economist.com/node/18586520
photo
SteveM39
That's how dad did it, that's how America does it
05:16 PM on 06/18/2012
Of course the devastation of California manufacturing which resulted from Big Business greed and illegal manipulation of energy has nothing to do with it. It was those darn loopy liberals at Enron who thought that stealing billions by cutting off the states electricity was good for people.

My company was expanding like crazy and hiring and happily paying a ton in taxes until the first "rolling brown out". A business can not operate if they are wondering when the machines will turn off. Manufacturers had no choice. If they had to suffer from third world infrastructure controlled by monopolies they might as well get the benefits like cheap labor as well. They pulled up stakes and moved out like farmers fleeing the dust bowl.

A lot of things have contributed to that $16bil deficit. But 11% unemployment and a declining tax base are 100 times worse than any "loopy liberal spending".

And it is the exact same story Romney and his corporate masters want to spread across the country. Corporations are people my friend.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
11:13 AM on 06/18/2012
Last time around it was , Believers vs Unbelievers...Then the Tea Bangers came out with Ayn Rands , It's, "everyman for himself", Crazy Talk...Then they found out Rand hated religion, especially the Christian Religion...That was a little hard on Church attendance. So it just boils down to getting rid of the guy with the pre-existing Skin Condition. No wonder Republicans don't want thier kids going to school with real people...
10:42 AM on 06/18/2012
The alliance between Wall Street and the "lumpen conservatariat" that puzzles Reich may be an old story. How is it different from the old feudal association between the land owning aristocracy and the peasantry, often in opposition to the town's folk.

If it's idiotlogically similar, then what does it say about the direction that part of our country might be taking?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:12 AM on 06/18/2012
Key words - "anti-immigrant nativism" - why is it always "nativism" when some of us want our laws obeyed? And we are NOT 'anti-immigrant", we are "anti-ILLEGAL- immigrant".
photo
CTDFalconer
Think twice, post once.
11:50 AM on 06/18/2012
What bothers you so much about the difference between someone who comes here and fills out a form vs. someone who doesn't?
photo
SteveM39
That's how dad did it, that's how America does it
05:35 PM on 06/18/2012
Nobody likes illegal immigrants except companies that hire them at substandard wages to work under substandard conditions. And they aren't exactly running ad campaigns saying we need more illegal immigrants.

One simple act of congress could eradicate all illegal immigrants overnight. Just make them legal.

The things that makes them illegal are the laws that aren't working. Allow them to get green cards and become citizens and voila, no more illegal immigrants.

There are no illegal Cubans in the US. Zero. Nada. There are no illegal Puerto Ricans in the US. Has that destroyed New York City or Florida?

Nativism isn't about wanting the laws obeyed. It is wanting the laws that you believe you have earned. Because your ancestors came from a place that had a path to citizenship, you feel you deserve to live and work here. You think you are better than the people who aren't Americans. You don't want them to obey just laws. You want them to go back to where they came from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal Independent
Love is a Promise .. Kept
03:25 AM on 06/19/2012
Very well said.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
07:53 AM on 06/19/2012
Since I am part Native-American, where do you think I should go? Did the Native Americans come from Asia or some other area? And guess what - when I went to Mexico with a church group in the 1950s, I was discriminated against BECAUSE I was part "Indio", considered the scum of the earth in Mexico. I do NOT think I am better than others, but I KNOW I am just as good as anyone, especially since I am a law-abiding citizen and would be law-abinding no matter where I landed.
08:01 AM on 06/18/2012
To conclude my last comment

What happens if the Republicans win senate and presidency? They now control the supreme court and will control the judiciary, and with voter suppression it becomes one party rule. In time the oppressed public will raise up and the use of the patriot act, police, military, private contractors, CIA, FBI and other government agencies will keep the population under control. This is the path the American democracy is on.
photo
SteveM39
That's how dad did it, that's how America does it
05:37 PM on 06/18/2012
We already have one party rule. The Corporation Party controls it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal Independent
Love is a Promise .. Kept
03:29 AM on 06/19/2012
There is still a vestige of democracy left. But only that. I agree with steventoushin, sadly. And even more sadly, I agree with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal Independent
Love is a Promise .. Kept
03:42 AM on 06/19/2012
I agree. American democracy looks like it is in its last death throes. God help us if the R's sweep in November. And they are doing everything - legal and otherwise - to ensure that happens, unless people of good conscience rise up and fight back.

Fanned for a clear and terrifying vision of a very possible scenario.
08:00 AM on 06/18/2012
All you people here can't think beyond the obvious. Riech like all true democrats leads you to water but never drinks, meaning he see's and knows where the situation will be going if the Republicans win. He speaks about it privately but is afraid to speak up publicly.

The partnership between the leaders of the religious right (Dobson, Robertson who ran for president in the 1980's and runs regency law school. His goal is to populate the justice department with religious lawyers, which was done under Bush 2, and the judicial branch), and corporate America is cemented. The religious right (Evangelical) will help deliver the vote for a policy making voice and power in government for a state religion. Big Money Koch Brothers, Sheldon Edelson and others will not only dictate financial policy for their greed but the power to control government (through members they control) beyond any one election. These people want to be the power behind the transparent throne for decades.

This is the history of the world that keeps repeating itself. Democracies do not last long when the powerful suppress and alters the vote, while running dominating propaganda machines. The American democracy is in the throws of it's demise. The distraction is hatred, prejudice and fears, and the preoccupation to have shelter, food on the table, pay debt and have a future.
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
07:16 AM on 06/18/2012
At least your party has a lot of money. Just think what it's like for a 3rd party candidate. The media report elections like there are only 2 parties, and both parties make sure only their folks are in debates.
08:02 AM on 06/18/2012
For all practical purposes there ARE only two parties. This is due to the structural nature of our electoral process, which includes the electoral college, winner-take-all elections, and, not least, party control of the redistricting process. We do not have a parliamentary system, and that is by design, not by accident. Therefore, any success by a third party only comes at the expense of tilting an election to one major party of the other. Eventually, a third party can become powerful enough to replace one of the two major parties... but then you still have a two-party system. Seen any Whigs lately? Unless you just enjoy being frustrated, it's more effective to work to form a governing coalition within one of the two major parties and then strive to get a majority in both hoses of Congress (or in the state legislatures) - that's ultimately better than having the Presidency, as we can see from the Democrat's present situation.
01:43 PM on 06/18/2012
Accurate and well said!
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
07:41 PM on 06/18/2012
I don't enjoy voting for war mongers and liberty-haters like the 2 current nominees from the major parties.

Vote 3rd party!
photo
Snarky McSnarkster
Opposed to hypocritical Christians
07:06 AM on 06/18/2012
Simple symbiosis: Corporations get low tax rates, freedom to pollute, and less regulation. In exchange the "small southern farmer" gets to choose from a smorgasbord of wedge issues: anti abortion, anti gun guntrol, anti gay rights, anti immigration, and good old fashioned racism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ummeli
Father, husband, attorney, gadfly.
10:48 AM on 06/18/2012
Reich writes:

"The puzzle is why Wall Street and corporate America are going along with it when their interests are so different. The new Republican right is anti-Wall Street and protectionist. It doesn't want to expand immigration. It distrusts big business and opposes the sorts of special tax cuts, subsidies, and big government contracts that big business has thrived on. The Obama administration has been far better to corporate America and Wall Street than the new Republican right would ever be."

I think you may have hit upon the answer. There are many things the extreme Right supports that are against the interest of big business and finance, but the partnership works because they get some of what they want -- low tax rates, freedom to pollute, and less regulation -- things they are unlikely to get from Democrats.
madkoz
Dog is my co-pilot
06:33 AM on 06/18/2012
Corporate America is not courting the best or the brightest. They are not supporting individuals who think freely and have progressive ideas. They are not supporting those with a unifying vision for America. They are supporting those who will never question where the money comes from as long as the money keeps coming. This new class of rightwing politicians do not have Americas best interests at heart only their own. Americans who want equal rights, to be treated with dignity, who want more opportunity, who want to chase the American dream are threats to them and their belief that all of it belongs to them. Our nation depends on the best and brightest and what we have are the dumb and greedy.
01:59 PM on 06/18/2012
"This new class of rightwing politicians do not have Americas best interests at heart only their own."

You raise good points, but this new class of right-wing politicians have neither America's best interests at heart nor their own. They are, for the most part, opportunistic agents of the richest few who, as you accurately say, believe "that all of it belongs to them" and to whom, in fact, about half of America's financial wealth already does. To the greedy rich, these new right-wing politicians are, individually, quite expendable. Although not exactly field hands, they are also neither the primary nor intended beneficiaries of the services they render. Their masters are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webbandit
USAF Veteran
06:10 AM on 06/18/2012
This is somewhat identical to the past in that the southern aristocracy (planters) during the forming of the republic held the young nation hostage to its corporate interests, later the same can be reasoned as a determining factor of the civil war. It is a fascinating parallel thats repeating itself. Poor whites and their corporate betters .....one commonality .......being white. Southern planters used race to get so many hillbillies,Irish, Scottish poor whites to fight their selfish cause back then. Its going on right now. Corporate America and its confederates on capital hill rally today's poor Johnny Reb to the cause. If they only realize they are being used and vote against their own best interests, the same way they bought the white supremacy garbage 150 years ago sold to them by the planters. Today, corporate types don't give a rat's ass about evangelical concerns, they laugh at them for being such willing crash test dummies. And in the end? Higher taxes for the middle class busted unions, diminished education, diminished infrastructure etc.