iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

Robert Reich

Posted: March 22, 2011 09:28 PM

The Republicans' Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)


"And if all others accepted the lie which the party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became the truth." ~ George Orwell, 1984 (published in 1949)

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was in town yesterday (specifically, at Stanford's Hoover Institute where he could surround himself with sympathetic Republicans) to tell this whopper: "Cutting the federal deficit will create jobs."

It's not true. Cutting the deficit will creates fewer jobs. Less government spending reduces overall demand. This is particularly worrisome when, as now, consumers and businesses are still holding back. Fewer government workers have paychecks to buy stuff from other Americans, some of whom in turn will lose their jobs without enough customers.

But truth doesn't seem to matter. Republicans figure if their big lies are repeated often enough, people will start to believe them.

Unless, that is, those big lies are repudiated -- and big truths are told in their place.

What worries me almost as much as the Republican's repeated big lies about jobs is the silence of President Obama and Democratic leaders in the face of them. Obama has the bully pulpit. Republicans don't. But if he doesn't use it the Republican's big lies gain credibility.

Here are some other whoppers being repeated daily:

"Cutting taxes on the rich creates jobs." Nope. Trickle-down economics has been tried for thirty years and hasn't worked. After George W. Bush cut taxes on the rich, far fewer jobs were created than after Bill Clinton raised them in the 1990s.

To his credit, President Obama argued against Republican demands for extending the Bush tax credit on those making more than a quarter million. But as soon as Republicans pushed back he caved. And the president hasn't even mentioned that the $61 billion Republicans are demanding in budget cuts this fiscal year is what richer Americans would have paid in taxes had he not caved.

"Cutting corporate income taxes creates jobs." Baloney. American corporations don't need tax cuts. They're sitting on over $1.5 trillion of cash right now. They won't invest it in additional capacity or jobs because they don't see enough customers out there with enough money in their pockets to buy what the additional capacity would produce.

The president needs to point this out -- not just in Washington but across the nation where Republican governors are slashing corporate taxes and simultaneously cutting school budgets. President Obama says he wants to invest in American skills, but many states are doing the opposite. Florida Governor Rick Scott, for example, says his proposed corporate tax cuts "will give Florida a competitive edge in attracting jobs." They'll also require education spending be reduced by $3 billion. Florida already ranks near the bottom in per-pupil spending and has one of nation's lowest graduation rates. If Scott's tax cuts create jobs, most will pay peanuts.

"Cuts in wages and benefits create jobs." Congressional Republicans and their state counterparts repeat this lie incessantly. It also lies behind corporate America's incessant demand for wage and benefit concessions -- and corporate and state battles against unions. But it's dead wrong. Meager wages and benefits are reducing the spending power of tens of millions of American workers, which is prolonging the jobs recession.

President Obama and Democratic leaders should be standing up for the wages and benefits of ordinary Americans, standing up for unions, and decrying the lie that wage and benefit concessions are necessary to create jobs. The president should be traveling to the Midwest -- taking aim at Republican governors in the heartland who are hell bent on destroying the purchasing power of American workers. But he's doing nothing of the sort.

"Regulations kill jobs." Congressional Republicans are using this whopper to justify their attempts to defund regulatory agencies. Regulations whose costs to business exceed their benefits to the public are unwarranted, of course, but reasonable regulation is necessary to avoid everything from nuclear meltdowns to oil spills to mine disasters to food contamination -- all of which we've sadly witnessed. Here again, we're hearing little from the president or Democratic leaders.

Look, the president can't be everywhere, doing everything. There's tumult in the Middle East, we're suddenly at war in Libya, Japan is struggling with the aftermath of disaster, and surely Latin America is an important trading partner.

But nothing is more central to average Americans than jobs and wages. Unless the president forcefully rebuts Republican's big lies, they'll soon become conventional wisdom.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,229
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
absolument
Debate the policy. But first, LEARN the science.
08:04 PM on 03/31/2011
I agree, Dr. Reich. But somebody needs to first explain to the President that while those dogmas of the Milton Friedman school of economic "thought" that he undoubtedly learned at Chicago are true to a point, at least some of them, none of them are true at present. Somebody needs to explain to our President that neither dogma is true, and that since Reagan, our economy's balance has just shifted to favor corporates and the privileged so much, that any further favoritism to them only makes things worse. As you wrote, I think it was in the '80s, that paper innovation is useful -- to a point -- tax cuts on the wealthy were useful, once, in the Kennedy administration, from 90% to 80%. And cutting the top marginal rate down to 70% didn't seem to do any harm. But around 60% or 50%, incentives on the extremely wealthy started shifting, from production to reckless speculation and THAT is bad for economies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:49 PM on 03/31/2011
"Cutting taxes on the rich creates jobs" Nope - it puts less money into the gov't. that means less money for roads, schools,war spending, etc.
"Cutting corporate income taxes creates jobs" Nope - see #1
"Cuts in wages and benefits create jobs" Nope - see # 1 and in addition it effects the spending power of the consumers. If people can't buy stuff then the corporations don't make money. Less taxes collected from regular wage earners - less taxes from corporations because of less profit.
"Regulations kill jobs" - Nope - Less regulations have the potential to kill people. Less people to pay taxes etcetera etcetera.
In addition, by cutting education you might have a stupid population that would be easier to control but you also have less people capable in creating whatever you're selling or providing whatever service might be needed. Less capable people taking care of the rich when they get old and need constant care. There will be those that are smart enough to recognize this and they will be the very ones the wealthy former corporate CEO's, Senators, Representatives, Presidents will need to wipe their butts when they are too infirm to do it themselves. It will be a particular interesting form of hell for those that created this mess when that time comes....
05:50 PM on 03/31/2011
I am currently reading "What a Party" by Terry McAuliffe. He ran fundraising for Gephart, Bill Clinton and Hillary's for the Senate. Chair of DNC. His was a real outspoken advocate for the Democratic Party. One of his biggest peeves was the way Dems would not respond to the out and out lies and misinformation put out by fake news and the Republican Party.
He would go on Meet The Press or Fake news and refute every lie. And do it as soon as it was put out in the press. Not 2 days later or a week or a month. I always felt that is biggest weakness in the party right now. The people who are supposed to have Obama's back should be out every time they throw out some hypocritical statement (think Newt and his flip flop on Lybia) and attack it relentlessly. When they lie about healthcare they should be on all the channels saying "thats a lie". Not nicely either.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Imago
I thought so.
10:48 PM on 03/30/2011
I think it will be interesting to see Obama's rhetoric about this after the budget is passed.
If he gets the Republicans riled up, they'll shut down the government -- which another article on HP today pointed out could very well cause a serious recession.
I think he's playing a lot of things close to the chest right now so try to ensure they aren't empowered to do that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayjay4142
08:47 PM on 03/28/2011
What I do not understand are the reasons conservatives still keep buying into the rhetoric that conservatives will create jobs. That trickle-down economics work. So long as it was private unions being rendered useless by the corporate powers that be it was ok and it was the fault of the greedy unions for asking for a decent wage for the guy who actually put the thing together. Now that government employees see that they are out to break your unions also some of you are beginning to realize that something might smell but there are still some of you that vote conservative. When will you stop drinking the kool-aid?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
03:28 PM on 03/28/2011
Where are the jobs, John Boehner? Where are the jobs, Mitch McConnell?
01:58 PM on 03/26/2011
I don't know any Republicans who have jobs. They have "positions," but they're sure willing for the rest of us to get "jobs." Sterling Greenwood/AspenFreePress
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
03:37 PM on 03/25/2011
How has cutting back ever led to new hiring?
05:06 PM on 03/24/2011
Not a bad article, but the Democrats won't sell their message unless they change their terms. For instance, "tax breaks for rich Americans" is ineffective, because everyone wants to be rich. Tax breaks for "greedy" Americans though sends a different, more effective message. Also, "American corporations don't need tax cuts." is ineffective, because most people would prefer to have their own company. "American corporations don't need tax giveaways." though is much more effective. Putting out an ineffective message is a waste. The Democrats need to study sales and marketing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
03:38 PM on 03/25/2011
It's time for the wealthy few to throw their backs into helping out their country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
08:22 AM on 03/28/2011
From the wealthy few's point of view, they ARE helping out their country. It's ordinary Americans who are not. Why aren't they more successful? The wealthy few made it, so obviously it's possible. The only reason ordinary Americans remain ordinary must be a character flaw in them. And we're supposed to pay more taxes? No! They should be punished for not contributing as much as we do.
absolument
Debate the policy. But first, LEARN the science.
08:08 PM on 03/31/2011
un-cut taxes of the over-privileged

How's that messaging for you?
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
03:29 PM on 03/24/2011
A hundred percent agreed!

And for those who believe tax cuts will attract businesses, there are a limited number of businesses shopping for sites. They all want to pay as little as possible. So even if it works, and if half the states cut their taxes, the other half will have to follow suit until we hit the bottom; then the lowest state wins. I've heard CEOs say that taxes are low on the list of considerations.

I want my state to provide a great safe place to raise families, great public education. a clean environment, great roads, clean water, and so on. In other words, a place where companies want to be because that's where the best people want to be!

Now doesn't that sound like a better idea?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momosity
Liberal Since In-Utero
03:18 PM on 03/24/2011
"They won't invest it in additional capacity or jobs because they don't see enough customers out there with enough money in their pockets to buy what the additional capacity would produce."

Actually, it's more like they're already squeezing their workers' "increased productivity" to the max and using the threat of job security to keep them in line. Why hire new workers when you can just overwork the ones you already have?
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
04:00 PM on 03/24/2011
In fact, the latest recession combined with massive cash reserves has allowed many companies to invest in automation and learn how to do without employees.
05:15 PM on 03/31/2011
Automation needs to be regulated. What good is a mechanical increase in production without an increase of employed workers.
photo
LeftCoastEng
Obsessed with failed trade
02:36 PM on 03/24/2011
I wish the President would push back more on the lies about jobs, health care reform, etc. I also wish that he and others, like yourself, would be honest with the American people about the most damaging, job-crushing policy of the last 30-40 years - free trade. This article from the American Conservative is a great summary of the huge problems that our trade policies are causing: http://www.amconmag.com/blog/beyond-free-trade/

The article even mentions a free trade skeptic in favor of industrial policy. Someone by the name of Robert Reich.
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
03:33 PM on 03/24/2011
Actually, although you may have a case about free trade, I think the problem is that the people who benefited from it the most were at the same time required to pay less and less for the privilege, so that the people who were left behind had no compensation. Imagine if windfalls from free trade profits had been taxed to provide retraining, relocation, and so on. We could have reinvented the country. Instead, all we got were these lousy tax cuts that have bankrupted the country. It's all working out great for the architects of this transfer of wealth.
05:15 PM on 03/31/2011
Bernie Sanders for president.
photo
angry in ct
You can't fight in here, this is the war room
02:01 PM on 03/24/2011
"It is an unfortunate human failing that a full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty stomach".

-Franklin Roosevelt
01:58 PM on 03/24/2011
After the more capital intensive Bush tax rate cuts of 2003 kicked in, the economy created 7.8 million new jobs, and the unemployment rate fell from over 6% to 4.4%. Real economic growth over the next three years doubled from the average for the prior three years, to 3.5%.

Business investment spending, which had declined for 9 straight quarters, reversed and increased 6.7% per quarter. That is where the jobs came from. Manufacturing output soared to its highest level in 20 years. The stock market revived, creating almost $7 trillion in new shareholder wealth. From 2003 to 2007, the S&P 500 almost doubled. Capital gains tax revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% rate cut in 2003.
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
03:56 PM on 03/24/2011
You think it was the tax cuts. I think it was easy home equity and credit card loans, as well as an overall decline in the quality of American consumer products such as cars. I worked on an assembly line putting together HH Scott stereos. The VP wanted 100 units a day off that line, no excuses, The designs and processes were shoddy, and there was a lot of rework needed. Guess what? We didn't do it. In the 4 months I was there, we went through 4 VPs of production. Meanwhile, the Japanese listened to Dr. Deming and instituted quality control and kicked our butts. It took many years of mismanagement.

It's not tax cuts, my friend.
04:31 PM on 03/24/2011
"I think"

That was apparently your first mistake. Your post doesn't offer any factual information on why you don't think it was the tax cuts that created this growth and jobs. You think that the quality of american made products started recently? Quality has actually gone up, especially in the automotive industry, because of competition from Japanese and European manufactures starting in the late 70's and continuing through to today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
03:24 PM on 03/28/2011
I don't think it was the tax cuts. It was the stimulus from two wars and the housing bubble. If the tax cuts are so great then why aren't they working now?
10:37 PM on 03/24/2011
You offer a lot of numbers -- what is their source, where did you get them? I can make up numbers as easily as you can, and if you're going to the trouble of listing your statistical figures in detail, I presume you have your sources at hand.

Unless, of course, you're making them up.
01:43 PM on 03/24/2011
President Obama's major flaw is that he believes that the Republicans are reasonable people who will bargain in good faith and have the best interest of the country at heart. Given their actions, nothing could be further from the truth. What they are truly interested in is gaining power and looking after the interests of the richest among us. The President has to realized this and begin to act accordingly.