iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Scheer

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Scheer
 

Debt Madness Was Always About Killing Social Security

Posted: 07/27/11 05:42 AM ET

This phony debt crisis has now passed through the looking glass into the realm where madness reigns. What should have been an uneventful moment in which lawmakers make good on the nation's contractual obligations has instead been seized upon by Republican hypocrites as a moment to settle ideological scores that have nothing to do with the debt.

Hypocrites, because their radical free market ideology, and the resulting total deregulation of the financial markets, is what caused the debt to spiral out of control this last decade. That and the wars George W. Bush launched but didn't have the integrity to responsibly finance. The consequence was a banking bubble and crash leading to a 50 percent run-up of the debt that has nothing to do with the "entitlements" that those same Republicans have always wanted to destroy.

Even Barack Obama has put cuts in those programs into play, warning ominously that a failure to lift the debt ceiling could cause the government to stop sending out Social Security checks. Why, when the Social Security trust fund is fully funded for the next quarter-century and is owed money by the U.S. Treasury rather than the other way around? Why would we pay foreign creditors before American seniors? The answer, offered as conventional wisdom by leaders of both parties, is that we cannot endanger our credit by failing to back our bonds, even though the Republicans have aroused the alarm of the main U.S. credit rating agencies by their brinkmanship on the debt.

What a topsy-turvy world when the same credit rating agencies that gave the thumbs up to the bankers' toxic mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps now threaten the AAA rating of U.S. Treasury bonds. According to them, it will not be enough to merely lift the debt ceiling -- what had been assumed by both Republican and Democratic presidents to be a routine act. In addition to that, as the credit agency Standard & Poor's has insisted, more than $4 trillion has to be cut from programs that mostly benefit the victims of the banking meltdown. Otherwise the agencies will downgrade the U.S. credit rating, leading to higher interest rates that will destroy what remains of the U.S. housing market, dim the prospect for any improvement in employment and further enrich the Chinese government and other holders of U.S. debt.

President Obama and the Senate Democratic leadership are clearly poised to cave in to those demands in the spirit of "compromise," Obama's favorite word, but the Republicans keep upping the ante. The GOP is shameless: Speaker John Boehner has sanctimoniously responded to Obama's plea for a bargain that gives up almost everything to the right wing by rebuffing the president on the grounds that the Republican Party is the last line of defense against big government.

Boehner dared blame Obama for "the largest spending binge in American history," which he attributed to the health care reform, most of which has yet to be enacted, and a stimulus program that was an underfunded effort to save American jobs. Not a word from Boehner or the other Republicans about the banking collapse that resulted from their deregulatory policies, the real cause of the inflated debt.

Boehner's slogan, "I've always believed, the bigger government, the smaller the people," is downright bizarre coming from someone who supported the Bush tax cuts for the rich, the banking bailout and the highest war spending since World War II, all of which is what caused government to get this big. Was it job stimulus spending that kept GM jobs in this country that made people smaller, or the loss of their homes and jobs as a result of the policies that are at the core of the Republican program?

What is at stake is a radical Republican agenda to totally reverse the progress in economic justice that began with the great reforms of Franklin Roosevelt and his New Deal. Consider the direct consequence of the economic crisis that unfettered Wall Street greed has wrought, particularly in reversing the gains made by the most underprivileged sectors of the population. As The Wall Street Journal reported, based on a Pew Research Center study from 2005 to 2009,

"The wealth gap between whites and each of the nation's two largest minorities -- Hispanics and blacks -- has widened to unprecedented levels amid the housing crisis and the recession. ... The disparities are the greatest since the government began tracking such data a quarter-century ago. ..."

But there is plenty of suffering to go around as a result of the deep recession. The wealth of whites in that period declined by 16 percent, not to mention the ever-greater chasm between the top 2 percent and everyone else. That's the same 2 percent whose tax cuts the Republicans are determined to preserve.

 
This phony debt crisis has now passed through the looking glass into the realm where madness reigns. What should have been an uneventful moment in which lawmakers make good on the nation's contractual...
This phony debt crisis has now passed through the looking glass into the realm where madness reigns. What should have been an uneventful moment in which lawmakers make good on the nation's contractual...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 493
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
09:59 PM on 07/31/2011
Democrats need to get active, speak up and vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lee Johnston
Just my opinion I could be wrong
01:20 PM on 07/28/2011
Fear mongering at it's best. The only thing he left out was throwing old people and children off cliffs. The revenues (taxes) currently received monthly will cover our Treasury debt, Social Security, Medicare and a vast majority of bills. What it will not cover is our excesses. What excesses you ask? Washington and the federal government is full of waste. Read the report from the Heritage Foundation and learn something. Washington spends $25 billion annually maintaining unused or vacant federal properties or how about The Securities and Exchange Commission spent $3.9 million rearranging desks and offices at its Washington, D.C., headquarters. What about The Conservation Reserve program that pays farmers $2 billion annually not to farm their land. The federal government is loaded with this kind of rampant spending because no one pays for these mistakes besides the taxpayers. It's time to say no more money. Learn to spend money wisely and quit giving it away. Don't get me started on Foreign Aid. In fiscal year 2009, the U.S. government allocated a total economic and military assistance of $47.7 billion. How many Social Security checks can you write with that money?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
10:57 AM on 07/29/2011
Wish it was just "fear mongering". When you hear President Obama talk about sacrifices he has made, in spite of the opposition of HIS Party...and one wonders which one that is...you know he has already made up his mind to throw Social Security under the bus. Yes, there are plenty of excesses in Washington...and in Albany, Springfield, Austin and other statehouses...but that doesn't require any gutting of Social Security. Foreign Aid is another anti-government, isolationist hate that may indeed have many excesses within but we mostly give that kind of "aid" in the form of military assistance. Some of it goes to Israel, for God's sake, a country with the most sophisticated air force in the Middle East. None of the excesses you mention are unpreventable but you have a Congress...and a president for the most part...grateful to those who get all that funding and it is like getting candy from a four year old to pull those funds away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scheherazade Brown
11:40 AM on 08/02/2011
much of what you are saying is true. Yet I still fail to see where President Obama is sacrificing social security, etc. I continue to read comments here and there stating such. Could you please back it up?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 AM on 07/28/2011
I support every effort by the republicns to end this awful program. If I was able to direct my own investments I would be able to retire well before the age the government set for me, buy a home, pay for health insurance, and give my job to the next person and enjoy a life fishing.

But because of the greed of people wanting my money more that I do, we have this crummy plan that forces our older citizens to work at McDonnalds and Wal-mart well into their 70's just so they can eat every night.

12.6% of your salary from the day you start working to the day you retire is put into a phony account for you so you can receive on average a monthly check of just $1280. If you were able to redirect your money to US Savings bonds or a bank CD you would have close to or over a million dollars saved for your retirement. And when you pass away, this money could go to a charity or your heirs so they could better their life as they saw best. Instead it goes to the government where their greed just spends it for politicians to get reelected.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
11:43 AM on 07/28/2011
Bush said after his 8 years of war, that his only regret was that He did'nt get rid of Socal Security...The Clinton Surplus had them scared to death....so it had to be wasted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 AM on 07/28/2011
Social Security should have the ability to opt out if you are responsible and save and plan for your own retirement. No one should be forced into this plan as it does have risks and people lose everything they put into this scheme every day. While this scheme works for some, it does not work for all. For those who are harmed by soacial security, they should be given the ability to opt out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
12:00 PM on 07/28/2011
That would put too much trust in people. They elected Bush twice! How much intelligence and responsibility does that show?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 07/28/2011
Yea, we need our government to be our mommies and daddies for our whole life because some people just don't want to take responsibility for themself.

One time, freedom ment being free to live life as you saw best. Now freedom means being free from personal responsibility,
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
12:07 PM on 07/28/2011
How have people lost or been harmed???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:23 PM on 07/28/2011
You're not married, no kids, or kids older than 18 and you die before you retire. If this happens, you lose everything just like an investment in Enron Stocks, or a porfolio managed by Bernie Madoff.

With your 401k, the money you have saved can go to a charity, or to your heirs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VANDERGRAAFK
Teacher
10:35 AM on 07/28/2011
Robert, what is terribly disconcerting about this latest "crisis" is the quandry I face when analyzing Republican motives. Either this is a foil, as you suggest, to achieve what Republicans have desired since the 30s, i.e., to destroy the sketchy safety net. Or, it is the greatest display of economic incompetence since Hoover. I don't know where to come down on this because when I listen to Republicans claim that the debt limit is either not real or not a big deal, I am totally baffled. Will the stock market have to have a major correction, much like the one given to the Democratic Congress after it initially rejected the TARP? Or, are these people inherently stupid?

Hypocrisy, yes. The absolute failure to take any responsibility for the $6 trillion in debt added to the overall debt by 8 years of Bush is unbelievable, especially when Republicans controlled the House for 6 years and had complete control for 4. But, hypocrisy merely disguises perhaps the real aim: destroy the safety net.

There's a response to this. It's not Obama's constantly shifting line in the sand. It's for a grass roots revolution. What form this takes I'll leave to the imagination. But if the rich think this is going to be just business as usual, they need to review the 30s when unions occupied factories. The revolution may not be televised, but it can be tweeted.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:08 AM on 07/28/2011
Well stated - Fanned and faved
03:34 PM on 07/28/2011
I have a graduate degree in Public Policy and was trained as a policy analyst. I am also an avid student of history and fascinated by the history of the rise of fascism. I sincerely believe that the republican party has been totally taken over by far right extremists, who also have some sympathizers among the democrats. Their goal, which they have made no secret of, is to take over the US government and transform it into a far right organization. I do not think the president or his advisers can wrap their heads around this or believe that it could happen in America. I don't believe these jackels are stupid bumblers; they are acting with a clear purpose and are willing to use any means necessary to achieve their goals, including the economic collapse of the US economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fairwitness
Avid Ignoramian
09:04 AM on 08/01/2011
Watch for the Riechstag burning (no, not necessarily literally--but maybe even) and you will know how seriously these jackals are. It's the "Shock Doctrine" strategy, and they played it to the hilt over the fake debt ceiling "crisis". And Obama is their cherished, cooperative facilitator.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mascot1
09:43 AM on 07/28/2011
Every single bill for the American worker, the poor, the children, and the disabled was initiated by only Democrats under Democratic Presidents, with the exception of No Child Left Behind, which was pushed through Congress by Ted Kennedy for George Bush. Do the research.

Bush spent $1.37 trillion of Social Security surplus during his eight years as president. In his last year he spent $192.2 billion to fund huge tax cuts for the rich and two wars. During a speech on April 5, 2005, in Parkersburg, West Virginia, he openly admitted to the fact that all of the Social Security surplus revenue had been spent. He said, "There is no trust fund, just IOUs that I saw firsthand that future generations will pay—will pay for either in higher taxes, or reduced benefits, or cuts to other critical government programs." All of the actions the Republicans took in the last ten years have caused the financial debacle we are facing today. How dare they try to blame it all on Obama?

So, if you are rich, or you are part of a corporation, support the Republicans and they will always take very good care of you. If you really want to lose Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, everything you ever worked for, by all means -- support the Republicans. Their grand mission: Bring down the the economy, blame Obama for everything, totally gut your entitlements. It is all up to you.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:09 AM on 07/28/2011
Fanned and faved!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
09:36 AM on 07/28/2011
The Republicans are fronting for a reactionary counter-revolution that began with the passage of the progressive income tax in 1913. The leadership of this movement has always been a handful of cranky billonaires, who have no need for the liberal institutions of the 20th century, and they hate taxes. Whenever a troll posts here about taxes being "theft" he is mouthing a slogan straight from the Koch Boys. Despite draping themselves in self-congratulatory Constitutionalism their masters have no use for the power of taxation and the power to regulate inter-state commerce.

Sadly, the Democrats have lost their ideological bearings. This is class warfare--from the top down. The bad guys are winning. Buying into the debt! deficit! hysteria is capitulation. Our immediate need is jobs, and the road to jobs now is no different from the New Deal. Once the economy gets rolling the private sector will participate. For now they're sitting on two trillion of capital. Cutting social security allows the plutocracy to plunder the payroll tax (as they've done since Reagan) to further reduce the level of income tax at the top and justify all the tax preferences that lower their rate of taxation below that of entry level workers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
11:05 AM on 07/28/2011
Absolutely right. Already fanned. Keep saying it. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
11:22 AM on 07/28/2011
You got that right. Did you ever hear that if they eliminate the benefits they will also eliminate the payroll tax? No. They want to raise the tax and reduce the benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
12:10 PM on 07/28/2011
Despite the recession nearly half of federal revenues are the payroll tax. It is a highly regressive tax and suits the plutocracy just fine as it is capped at $106k of income. Consequently, the rate of taxation on billionaires is essentiall nil. They have used their Republican puppets to grant themselves tax preferences (dividends and cap gains) and their corporations generous perks. No wonder over the last 30 years 80% of new wealth has gone to the top one percent. The game has been rigged to suit the ruling class.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Kapner
09:28 AM on 07/28/2011
I agree with the premise, but think the goal was far wider than just Social Security. I think the entire social safety net is in the crosshairs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chixsngr
My ancestors fought the Revolutionary War, and the
10:02 AM on 07/28/2011
I think you're right...and Sheerer would agree. But SS is the big prize, at least to Wall Street.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:56 AM on 07/28/2011
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02192010.html
Paul Craig Roberts: Looting Social Security

"By Paul Craig Roberts

Hank Paulson, the Gold Sachs bankster/U.S. Treasury Secretary, who deregulated the financial system, caused a world crisis that wrecked the prospects of foreign banks and governments, caused millions of Americans to lose retirement savings, homes, and jobs, and left taxpayers burdened with multi-trillions of dollars of new U.S. debt, is still not in jail. He is writing in the New York Times urging that the mess he caused be fixed by taking away from working Americans the Social Security and Medicare for which they have paid in earmarked taxes all their working lives.

[snip]

Wall Street has got away with its raid on the public treasury. Now, pockets full, it wants to pay for the heist by curtailing Social Security and Medicare. Having deprived the working population of homes, jobs, and health care, Wall Street is now after the elderly’s old age security.

Social Security, formerly an untouchable "third rail of politics," is now "unsustainable," while the real unsustainables—a pre-1929 unregulated financial system and open-ended multi-trillion dollar Global War Against Terror—are the new untouchables.

This transformation signals the complete capture of American democracy by an oligarchy of special interests."
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:14 AM on 07/28/2011
I wish I could fan you 100 times and plaster your post on billboards all across America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:47 AM on 07/28/2011
Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
I Support President Obama
01:20 PM on 07/28/2011
BRAVO!!
08:01 AM on 07/28/2011
Killing Social Security was and continues to be the main reason for this debacle. I think you give too much credit to the Repubs on this one. They were trying to hit Medicare, because they need to get out from under the politically stupid Ryan discount coupon replacement for the highly effective and popular Medicare. They decided not to go after Social Security in this fight or Ryan's plan for that matter. They thought that was a bridge too far. Obama and his administration were the ones that brought Social Security to the cutting table. They even admitted that it does not affect the deficit, but while we are taking hard votes, what the heck? Obama is the one that seems determined to reverse the New Deal and Great Society programs. It appears that Obama has not been caving to the Repubs as much as he is trying to prove that he is one of them.
07:32 AM on 07/28/2011
I am fairly convinced that there is another point to thedebt madness--the intentional starving (by republicans) or regulatory agencies and inspectors.

The business community would love to see the end of work place, safety, and envirornmental regulations. The republicans (and blue dogs) are looking to defund to the point of killing any oversight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 07/28/2011
This short film on Nike's operation in Indonesia shows the conditions the business community wants here:

http://vimeo.com/6109896
Behind the Swoosh on Vimeo

http://www.teamsweat.org/
TeamSweat

"...By marshalling the energy of a decade and a half of organizing on the Nike sweatshop issue, Team Sweat is striving to ensure that all workers who produce Nike products are paid a living wage..."

The world needs more Jim Keadys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wontbfooledagain
Look out kid, it's somethin' you did (Dylan)
07:22 AM on 07/28/2011
We must ask ourselves, who do our political parties represent? With whose interests are they concerned? Certainly not the folks who have paid into the social security system for many years, and in good faith counted on it to be there in their senior years. The republican's show their meanspiritedness openly and unabashadly. They should look back at history and see how many have returned to their offices after threatening to water down or take away the small bit of security we hope to have available in retirement. Many have lost their 401k nest eggs because the republican leaders are were and still are bed with Wall Street. Stop picking our pockets! There isn't much left in there but some lint anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 AM on 07/28/2011
Thank you Mr. Scheer! FINALLY speaking TRUTH about what is REALLY behind this fake debt ceiling crisis.

Republicans, especially the TEA PARTY "Republican impostors" in CONGRESS are ALL about killing Government Social Security and Medicare Plans,

and I will add, Public Worker Unions...even as THEY themselves have the unmitigated gall to be a tax payer paid Government employees, receiving GENEROUS tax payer paid salaries, tax payer subsidized Health Insurance and Retirement Plans!, and BTW...who do not need to UNIONIZE because THEY simply vote THEMSELVES wage raises and nice Health care/Retirement Plans without asking/negotiating with "We The People" their employers, about IF they deserve them or HOW MUCH "WE" want to pay them with OUR tax dollars!

Wouldn't it be nice if we ALL could do that? There would be no need for UNIONS!

Hypocrites like Michelle Bachmann for example, who is a tax payer paid GOVERNMENT employee with a generous tax payer paid salary and benefits who VOTES in Congress FOR the tax payer Government subsidies that go to HER FAMILY'S personal farm business, and she and her husband's CLINIC, AND that Clinic survives on tax payer MEDICARE dollars, while she PRETENDS she is a principled CONSERVATIVE Presidential Candidate who is against, Government "spending" tax payer's dollars, and MEDICARE!
She slams Federal mortgage loans, but she and her husband have in fact, purchased an expensive luxurious home by obtaining a, wait for it....

FEDERAL MORTGAGE LOAN!

You are supporting this FRAUD!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
11:46 AM on 07/28/2011
"Wouldn't it be nice if we ALL could do that? There would be no need for UNIONS!" We could if we killed the corporations, with the exception of employee owned ones, where the employees are the workers and the stockholders both. Some kind of government financing would probably have to be included to cut out the banksters. Somehow I doubt that employee owners would be willing to give their chief executive anywhere near the salary discrepancy now enjoyed by these opportunists and we wouldn't off shore, because they would never vote themselves out of a job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:10 AM on 07/28/2011
He says killing off Social Security like it's a bad thing.
07:15 AM on 07/28/2011
One thing you have to say about Republicans--they never give up on a bad idea. Their effort to kill Social Security has been going on for 75 years. Think what they could have accomplished if they had put all that effort into something positive. But then, of course, they wouldn't be Republicans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 AM on 07/28/2011
And I support their efforts. Social security is a bad idea. One size fits all does not work in a country this diverse. How many people lose everything that they put into this scheme? For some, they get the same return as if they invested in Enron. We need to give people more choices for planning their retirement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 AM on 07/28/2011
Killing off social security is something positive. It reduces the wealth of the average American.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
11:15 AM on 07/28/2011
yeah buy your self a retirement plan from an Insurance Company then they gamble in the stock market and lose or when too many people start taking out funds they go bankrupt leaving you with nothing LEGALLY
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:44 PM on 07/28/2011
The same thing could happen with your social security.