iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Slayton

Robert Slayton

Posted: September 26, 2010 01:46 PM

AMERICAN TRAGEDY

What's Your Reaction:

Every American remembers that day, where we were, what we were doing when we heard. The attack was devastating, and horrible; it was as unforeseen as it was shattering, and the images linger in our minds to this day. Thousands were dead. And in the aftermath there was even a more fearful threat, an internal security potential disaster, of sleeper cells created to hurt America. Not only at home; our interests abroad, in so many places, were now in jeopardy, subject to attack in new and frightening ways. Even more, there was a fear, in so many ways legitimate, that our way of life was under siege; the defense of our homeland would have to be ideological as well as military.

Of course, the American people responded in a mixed manner. There was heroism and generosity beyond counting. And also outbursts, excesses. But in all fairness, the wound was raw; there were legitimate emotions at play here. And the scab kept being pulled off, the anger revived, as American service personnel died overseas. Yes, some of our countrymen did things that weren't right, but in all fairness, their antagonists were immigrants, they looked and spoke differently, and their kinsmen had killed Americans in awful numbers. These factors explained a lot of the reaction to what happened.

I'm talking about the events of the seventh of December, of course, the day that will forever live in infamy. Yet the parallels to our more recent heartbreak are striking. Then, as now, we experienced a terrifying attack, out of the blue, by an enemy we did not know, did not understand. So many American died that day, and as the violence of war ramped up, hundreds of thousands more would make that devastating sacrifice, just as now, young men defend our country in overseas places.

The Japanese were seen as demons, violent advocates of a way of life that sought to make slaves of every citizen who saluted our flag, whether they lived at home or overseas. Magazines, movies, every kind of media pushed this point home. The cinema depicted Japanese as bucktoothed monsters lusting after white women, while Time ran an infamous piece entitled, "How to Tell Our Friends From the Japs," helpfully illustrating the racial differences between the typical Chinese man and a son of Nippon. There were also enormous fears of a fifth column, of Japanese agents bombing the Panama Canal, or signaling to their submarines, waiting to launch high explosives at our shores. While most of this was exaggerated, the Japanese military had, in fact, been surveilling our interests in various locations, just as every nation did to its potential enemies; the foremost operation of this kind in America, for example, was that run by the Abwehr, the Wehrmact's intelligence arm. All of this took place in an atmosphere of hate and passion, real emotions kindled by our blood in the Pacific.

Yet, today, most Americans still feel that we went too far in our responses. Instead of using our own counter-espionage and law enforcement to defeat these threats, we instituted a mass, indiscriminate approach. Everyday Americans, as well as the authorities, labeled all Japanese-American a menace, regardless of their record or behavior. In short time, this population was even removed from public life for the duration.

Today, once again, we have undergone a monstrous attack. Wounds are still open, and as they were for the Pearl Harbor generation, always will be for some. And those scars are real, based on tragic, painful events.

But let us not repeat the outrages of the past, let us not repeat acts of unthinking anger that future generations, our grandchildren, will have to apologize for. In 1942 there were some citizens who believed that the term "Japanese-American" was synonymous with "traitor". Today, some of our people feel the terms "Muslim-American" and "terrorist" are identical. Neither analogy is accurate, neither brings our country honor. It does not serve this country to render up mass, unthinking indictments that future American schoolchildren will renounce, just as today's students show interest in World War II, but condemn the internment of Japanese-Americans. Let us live up to our ideals, not to the nightmares.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
04:18 PM on 09/26/2010
Well said!
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
03:10 PM on 09/26/2010
I would also recommend watching the 1943 cartoon "Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips", to get an idea of how popular media depicted the Japanese. I can't imagine them making a cartoon nowadays with a title like "(insert character) Goes After Muslims", but it's still important to understand popular media's role.
02:50 PM on 09/26/2010
It's interesting how the reaction against Japanese-Americans happened within months of Pearl Harbor, whereas the anti-Muslim hysteria (in some quarters) didn't rear its ugly head until almost 9 YEARS later.

The difference seems to be that as long as America was led by a white Christian, this slice of the demographic didn't feel threatened, but now that a man who doesn't look like them is in power, the bigotry/tribalism is spewing forth...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
04:20 PM on 09/26/2010
Actually, in the days after 9/11 there was anti-Muslim violence. I remember in particular the owner of a convenience store being killed for being a Muslim, when he was in fact a Sikh, wearing a Sikh headdress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
great, green, globs of greasy grimey GOPerspeak.
04:41 PM on 09/26/2010
you have a very poor memory. Muslims were attacked all over the states...as well as other ethncities (hindu children is one case I remember)who were mistaken for Muslims. It's just still going on and now we have a national party taking it up and spurring it on instead of asking for reasonable behavior,
04:47 PM on 09/26/2010
Hey, wait a minute! I did qualify my assertion! "(in some quarters)."

I reserve the right to stipulate that outside those "quarters" there was indeed violence -- and I do remember the Sikh fatality.

The difference is that now it's gone mainstream, to the extent that the GOP is actually "mainstream" any more...
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
02:38 PM on 09/26/2010
The past is not dead yet, and for some it isn't even past ( pace Mr. Faulkner) You will still hear some old reprobates say that the internment of Japanese-Americans was the right thing to do, but that it was also right NOT to limit the internment of Italian-Americans and German-Americans. needs no comment from me
02:23 PM on 09/26/2010
Yes, we should learn from the over-reactions of the 1940s. We can also learn from some of the nobler responses, most notably in Hawaii, where, I've been told, most police officials refused to enforce national orders about Japanese-Americans. Or, I love the story of a now-departed friend, Doug Yamamura. Doug told me that a Civil Defense friend showed up on December 8th and apologetically explained he had to confiscate Doug's shotgun and short-wave radio. Then, on December 9th, he returned with a machine gun and jeep, and he assigned Doug a stretch of beach to guard. Every now and then, reason raises its beautiful head. Now would be a great time for a repeat appearance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
01:58 PM on 09/26/2010
In "How to Tell Our Friends From the Japs," TIME magazine declared that the Chinese had an earthy, friendly expression while the Japanese looked aloof and arrogant(?).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tcagle
Renewable energy pro
03:22 PM on 09/26/2010
I remember the one from LIFE Magazine - during my student teaching, I brought this issue in for a group activity. We chose one issue each from the 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s. The objective was to give the students, a high school sociology class, how society had changed (or not) along the way. The issue from the 30s had an article about black ladies serving as wet nurses for wealthy whites. In all four issues, the letters to the editor were particularly illuminating.