Robert N. Stavins is the Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government, Director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, Chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Faculty Group at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and Director of Graduate Studies for the Doctoral Program in Public Policy and the Doctoral Program in Political Economy and Government, and Co-Chair of the Harvard Business School-Kennedy School Joint Degree Programs, and director of the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. He is a University Fellow of Resources for the Future, a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Editor of the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, and a Member of: the Board of Directors of Resources for the Future, the Board of Academic Advisors of the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, the Board of Directors of the Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, the Editorial Boards of Resource and Energy Economics, Environmental Economics Abstracts, Environmental Law and Policy Abstracts, B.E. Journals of Economic Analysis & Policy, and Economic Issues. He is also an editor of the Journal of Wine Economics. Professor Stavins' research has focused on diverse areas of environmental economics and policy, including examinations of: market-based policy instruments; regulatory impact analysis; innovation and diffusion of pollution-control technologies; environmental benefit valuation; policy instrument choice under uncertainty; competitiveness effects of regulation; depletion of forested wetlands; political economy of policy instrument choice; and costs of carbon sequestration.

Harvard Environmental Economics Program


Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements




Blog Entries by Robert Stavins

Approaching Copenhagen With A Portfolio Of Domestic Commitments

Posted November 30, 2009 | 09:35 AM (EST)


As we approach the beginning of the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen in December, international negotiations are focused on developing a climate policy framework for the post-2012 period, when the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period will have...

Read Post

Confusion in the Senate Regarding Allowance Allocation

Posted October 23, 2009 | 11:57 AM (EST)


According to an October 22nd story in Environment & Energy Daily ("Climate: GOP Fence Sitters Voice Concerns Over Allocations" by Darren Samuelson), several key swing-vote Senate Republicans -- including Senator Lisa Murkowski, ranking member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee -- are voicing skepticism about the...

Read Post

Cap-and-Trade Versus the Alternatives for U.S. Climate Policy

4 Comments | Posted October 7, 2009 | 02:49 PM (EST)


Let's credit Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) for raising questions in the National Journal about the viability of cap-and-trade versus other approaches for the United States to employ in addressing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions linked with global climate change.

Senator Murkowski says that only one approach -...

Read Post

Too Good To Be True?

6 Comments | Posted September 17, 2009 | 02:02 PM (EST)


Global climate change is a serious environmental threat, and sound public policies are needed to address it effectively and sensibly.

There is now significant interest and activity within both the U.S. Administration and the U.S. Congress to develop a meaningful national climate policy in this country. (If you're interested, please...

Read Post

Cap-and-Trade: A Fly in the Ointment?

4 Comments | Posted August 12, 2009 | 12:06 PM (EST)


For more than two decades, environmental law and regulation was dominated by command-and-control approaches -- typically either mandated pollution control technologies or inflexible discharge standards on a smokestack-by-smokestack basis. But in the 1980s, policy makers increasingly explored market-based environmental policy instruments, mechanisms that provide economic incentives for firms and...

Read Post

Policies Can Work in Strange Ways

1 Comments | Posted August 4, 2009 | 10:59 AM (EST)


Whether the policy domain is global climate change or local hazardous waste, it's exceptionally important to understand the interaction between public policies and technological change in order to assess the effects of laws and regulations on environmental performance. Several years ago, my colleagues -- Professor Lori Bennear of

Read Post

What Role for U.S. Carbon Sequestration?

3 Comments | Posted July 21, 2009 | 02:34 PM (EST)


With the development of climate legislation proceeding in the U.S. Senate, a key question is whether the United States can cost-effectively reduce a significant share of its contributions to increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations through forest-based carbon sequestration. Should biological carbon sequestration be part of the domestic portfolio of compliance activities?

...
Read Post

National Climate Change Policy: A Quick Look Back at Waxman-Markey and the Road Ahead

32 Comments | Posted June 29, 2009 | 01:50 PM (EST)


Like any legislation, the Waxman‑Markey bill has its share of flaws, but its cap-and-trade system has medium and long‑term targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions that are sensible, and the cap‑and‑trade system is -- for the most part -- well designed. With some exceptions, the bill's cap‑and‑trade system will...

Read Post

Worried About International Competitiveness? Another Look at the Waxman-Markey Cap-and-Trade Proposal

10 Comments | Posted June 19, 2009 | 09:33 AM (EST)


The potential impacts of proposed U.S. climate policies on the competitiveness of U.S. industries is a major political issue, and it was one of the key issues in the Energy and Commerce Committee of the House of Representatives in the design of Henry Waxman and Edward Markey's H.R. 2454...

Read Post

The Wonderful Politics of Cap-and-Trade: A Closer Look at Waxman-Markey

51 Comments | Posted May 28, 2009 | 10:44 AM (EST)


The headline of this post is not meant to be ironic. Despite all the hand-wringing in the press and the blogosphere about a political "give-away" of allowances for the cap-and-trade system in the Waxman-Markey bill voted out of committee last week, the politics of cap-and-trade systems are...

Read Post

The New Auto Fuel-Efficiency Standards -- Going Beyond the Headlines

91 Comments | Posted May 22, 2009 | 09:54 AM (EST)


On My 19th, 2009, President Obama announced new Federal fuel-efficiency standards for motor-vehicles that would make the current standards -- known as Corporate Average Fuel Economy -- or CAFE -- standards significantly more stringent. These CAFE standards measure compliance as the average of a company's entire fleet of cars,...

Read Post

Straight Talk about Corporate Social Responsibility

8 Comments | Posted May 13, 2009 | 11:52 AM (EST)


Critical thinking about "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) is needed, because there are few topics where discussions feature greater ratios of heat to light. With this in mind, two of my Harvard colleagues -- law professor Bruce Hay and business school professor Richard Vietor -- and I co-edited a...

Read Post

Does economic analysis shortchange the future?

Posted April 28, 2009 | 05:22 PM (EST)


Decisions made today usually have impacts both now and in the future. In the environmental realm, many of the future impacts are benefits, and such future benefits -- as well as costs -- are typically discounted by economists in their analyses. Why do economists do this, and does it give...

Read Post

What Baseball Can Teach Policymakers

Posted April 21, 2009 | 11:17 AM (EST)


With the Major League Baseball season having just begun, I'm reminded of the truism that the best teams win their divisions in the regular season, but the hot teams win in the post-season playoffs. Why the difference? The regular season is 162 games long, but the post-season consists of just...

Read Post

The Making of a Conventional Wisdom

Posted April 13, 2009 | 04:12 PM (EST)


Despite the potential cost-effectiveness of market-based policy instruments, such as pollution taxes and tradable permits, conventional approaches - including design and uniform performance standards - have been the mainstay of U.S. environmental policy since before the first Earth Day in 1970. Gradually, however, the political process has become more receptive...

Read Post

Moving Beyond Vintage-Differentiated Regulation

Posted April 7, 2009 | 04:00 PM (EST)


A common feature of many environmental policies in the United States is vintage-differentiated regulation (VDR), under which standards for regulated units are fixed in terms of the units' respective dates of entry, with later vintages facing more stringent regulation. In the most common application, often referred to as "grandfathering," units...

Read Post

Using Markets to Make Fisheries Sustainable

Posted March 31, 2009 | 04:46 PM (EST)


Around the world, over-fishing is leading to severe depletion of valuable fisheries. This is as true in U.S. coastal waters as it is in many other parts of the world. In New England waters, for example, after two decades of ever more intensive fishing, the groundfish fishery has essentially collapsed....

Read Post

A Tale of Two Taxes

Posted March 19, 2009 | 03:10 PM (EST)


Whether they are called "revenue enhancements" or "user charges," fear of the political consequences of taxes restricts debate on energy and environmental policy options in Washington. In a March 7th post on "Green Jobs," in which I argued that it is not always best to try to address two...

Read Post

Misconceptions About Water Pricing

Posted March 16, 2009 | 11:10 AM (EST)


Throughout the United States, water management has been approached primarily as an engineering problem, rather than an economic one. Water supply managers are reluctant to use price increases as water conservation tools, instead relying on non-price demand management techniques, such as requirements for the adoption of specific technologies and restrictions...

Read Post

Green Jobs

Posted March 10, 2009 | 11:15 AM (EST)


The January 12, 2009 issue of the New Yorker includes a well-written and in some ways inspiring article by Elizabeth Kolbert, profiling Van Jones, founder and president of Green for All. In the article, "Greening the Ghetto: Can a Remedy Serve for Both Global Warming and Poverty," Kolbert includes...

Read Post