iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert V. Taylor

GET UPDATES FROM Robert V. Taylor
 

Aurora -- No More!

Posted: 07/21/2012 1:05 pm

Beyond the grief and despair over the Aurora massacre lays an invitation -- to say "No more!" There is oneness in our responses of disbelief and anger to a massacre of those watching a movie in Aurora, Colorado. What if we believed in the possibility and power we possess to change the conversation about gun control?

Like many I've lit a candle for those killed and injured and for their loved ones. I've mindfully said out loud the name of each person killed where that information is known. Along with others I keep the grieving and perplexed family members in my intentions.

I've been surprised by the responses to my question about why we are still debating the need for tighter gun control restrictions. I know and appreciate that there are a range of views on this issue held by good, decent and thoughtful people. But I'm troubled by the despairing helplessness of so many who say that our political leaders refuse or are too scared to address the issue or that the debate is so polarized with entrenched arguments that their voice is insignificant.

They're legitimate feelings but they are a cop-out. They are a marker of disengagement and helplessness. Yes the political intransigence and cheap slogans of those on the extremes of the gun control debate are pervasive. But haven't we allowed that by our silence? Instead, be part of creating a new course of conversation.

Speak up. Your reactions to the Aurora massacre are vital. Give voice to them and the urgent need for a rational conversation about gun control. The Constitution is clear about the right of any citizen to bear arms but that is different than the arsenal of weapons that the Aurora killer was able to acquire legally. Your right, and that of every American, to safety and security without fear of being massacred is at issue.

Teach our leaders about civility. The name calling of those with opposing points of view denigrates public debate about issues and is nothing less than an abdication of leadership. Be clear that you expect adult conversation that is civil. Call people out when civility is lacking. Model civility in the midst of different opinions.

Respect differing opinions. Allowing others to be demonized because they do not share your view is the easiest way to cede your voice and power to those who have no intention of engaging in discussion that matches the seriousness of the massacres experienced in Aurora and Seattle among other places. Insist that our leaders frankly address the implications of their position so that the possibility of further Aurora's become a remote possibility if not impossible.

Assume the goodness of others until proved otherwise. Most leaders are in their fields because they have a desire to make the world a more just and better place. Engage them on gun control with that assumption. Be clear that you need to know how their position and actions will impact public safety and reduce the possibility of another Aurora massacre of innocent people. Keep asking until they can tell you about expected impacts and results.

Our voice and imagination about how things might be are vital to our own humanity and the world needs the voice and imagination of each person -- without it we are all deprived. What we say, hope and do matters!

To speak up, model civility to our leaders, show them how to respect different opinions and assume the goodness of others is a life-giving way of honoring those injured and killed in the Aurora massacre and their loved ones. How will you claim the invitation that this tragedy invites to say, "No more!"

 
 
 

Follow Robert V. Taylor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/robertvtaylor

FOLLOW POLITICS
Beyond the grief and despair over the Aurora massacre lays an invitation -- to say "No more!" There is oneness in our responses of disbelief and anger to a massacre of those watching a movie in Aurora...
Beyond the grief and despair over the Aurora massacre lays an invitation -- to say "No more!" There is oneness in our responses of disbelief and anger to a massacre of those watching a movie in Aurora...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
08:22 PM on 07/22/2012
Without the Joyce Foundation, we could have a rational conversation about gun control.
02:05 PM on 07/22/2012
The extreme position on the right has not only been staked out, it's our current reality. That doesn't seem to be working very well. There is NOBODY taking an extreme position in opposition to this madness. The tepid and ineffective proposals to ban high capacity magazines or assault weapons are ridiculously lame, and will be ignored until the public forgets the current tragedy. Instead, let's focus on changing our society.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

There, I said it. Notice, I didn't say we should take away anyone's gun, but we should definitely withdraw our implicit consent for our society's destructive impulses. Let's at least give our elected representatives a chance to pass common-sense laws to benefit us, without the arms manufacturers hiding behind language that has no meaning in a modern society.
11:10 AM on 07/22/2012
Every time a tragegy of this sort happens, we refuse to discuss what matters. Instead of discussing what we as a society might reasonably and intelligently do to reduce the senseless violence, too many of us make the discussion about us and our Second Amendment rights. The victims, and those who will inevitably be the victims of future gun violence, are not protected by the Second Amendment. If we as a society cannot do more for them, there is no hope for any of us no matter how many guns we own. There is no shortage of guns, no shortange of ammo, and no shortage of protection for those who worship in the temple of the gun, there is only a shortage of common sense and of responsible action.
09:19 AM on 07/23/2012
No, because the Second Amendment is not MEANT to protect the victims of gun violence; it's meant to protect the right of U.S. citizens to bear arms. If you truly believe that there is no hope for any of us if we can't "do more" for the victims of a madman, then I strongly encourage you to try to find a country that does meet your standards and move there as soon as you possibly can; this country will never measure up for you. I must confess that to me your point of view seems very unrealistic, since you seem to believe that the world can be made perfect if we're only willing to surrender enough of our freedoms to the government.
photo
janmB
loves life
09:39 AM on 07/22/2012
There are so many guns out there, it's way beyond control so the people who do have common-sense feel the situation now is hopeless.
12:15 AM on 07/22/2012
Maybe the violence goes deeper than gun control. Maybe it is a reflection of the fact that our society values things and money over life. If we can watch major money organizations completely destroy our economy and then go unpunished it leaves a message about what we as a society value. Maybe we should stop and ask ourselves if we value life over things. Are we so caught up with what we do not possess that we lose sight of humanity? Maybe we as a society need to rebuild the values we once had, that life was more important then objects. Our desires to obtain ownership over land, and other objects belittles the value of life. This drive we have to own things can be seen in domestic violence as well. We see people trying to rule over their partners as though the partner were a piece of property rather than human. When we can step back and recognize our own selfish behaviors and re-evaluate what we value, only then can we address the issues of violence. Because like it or not, the violence is a direct result of our societal values.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Dog loving, political junkie.
10:42 PM on 07/21/2012
To the author: Beautifully written.
Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Dog loving, political junkie.
10:41 PM on 07/21/2012
Totally agree with you.
09:27 PM on 07/21/2012
No, I won't speak up at all except to continue to fight for our right to own firearms. I understand that this is part of the price of living in a free country.

In fact I'll continue to urge a repeal of the automatic weapons ban.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NrthrnLord
Prince of a very small part of the universe.
09:16 AM on 07/22/2012
and bad stuff will just keep happening. thanks pal, I feel free.
09:27 AM on 07/23/2012
What many leftists don't seem to understand is that bad stuff ALWAYS happens! You will NEVER reach the perfect world that you apparently seem to believe is possible, if only the government can be given enough power and the citizens can be made to surrender enough of our freedoms. As history has proven such sick and unrealistic belief in utopia leads only to totalitarian governments. Yes, giving the people freedom does mean that some will inevitably misuse that freedom. As Benjamin Franklin said, however, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety".
photo
janmB
loves life
09:41 AM on 07/22/2012
And I wouldn't feel safe living near you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
07:43 PM on 07/21/2012
Good Article an while I focus on what he sets forward, I will also focus on the fact I still belief repeaters with 15 to 30 clips do not belong in our homes or streets!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
06:33 PM on 07/21/2012
I endorse Taylor's points about civil discourse. So many use namecalling as a default when debating an issue-bringing the level of discussion down to that of a playground dispute. And treating every topic in a binary fashion, when very few subjects have a mere two sides-is an attempt to make complex matters more simplistic than they truly are.This comes from conformist America's rigid view of everything in life needing to be framed in a two sided 'good guys/bad guys', 'win/lose' matrix'. The addiction to competition keeps us from finding common ground & ways to compromise....because the competition junkies would have us believe that calm, rational forms of interaction such as compromise are equivalent to 'losing'.
04:43 PM on 07/21/2012
Another answer might be to allow loved ones to have more control over a mentally ill family member. Instead of forcing family members to stand by, fettered by existing laws, while their loved ones spirals to the point of, I don't know, shooting a congresswoman in the head or shooting a theater full of people, how about giving families the ability to step into a doctor's office or courtroom and say, "We love this person and they need immediate help". Removing the guns from the hands of the mentally ill (and everyone else because, hey, we HAVE to punish the masses for that actions of the minority) isn't the solution. Preventing the mentally ill from languishing in the confines of their minds IS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:34 PM on 07/21/2012
Utter neglect in thinking. This happened not because someone was uncivil. It was an expression of GUN violence that we wee every day. Every day. Every hour of every day. GUN violence, not simple rudeness. Ignoring the GUNS in a piece of supposedly analytic writing is deadlier than writing nothing at all. -Unless it is intentional misdirection and fodder for the NRA to point to a cause other than the guns and bullets that led to these deaths.
04:15 PM on 07/21/2012
It's not the politicians' fault. It's our fault. Stop blaming the Poltiicans for what WE DID.

This is a DEMOCRACY, and the PEOPLE have a bad history of voting for NO GUN CONTROL through the politicians they choose. It is our right to vote for the country we want, and this is what we voted for. This is what we get.

Stop blaming politicians and start blaming yourself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevestrange
Knowledge..Wisdom..Understanding.
08:26 PM on 07/21/2012
"We the people"..Are the problem. I've been saying the same thing about this issue and others. Our collective voice, would give the political leaders the courage to address the issue of gun control. Great comment Ari.
11:59 PM on 07/21/2012
"Our collective voice" has said, we do not want gun control. In state after state that has made CCW available to law abiding citizens, they have seen a drop in murders and crimes against people.

We demand our rights under the second amendment of the United States and guess what, the majority of people here believe the same.
03:20 PM on 07/21/2012
@Graycrab - Why does anyone have a need for ultra light mountain bikes, fast cars, violent video games, expensive exercise equipment? We live in a free society. It is not up to the government to decide what kind of leisure equipment people need.

We did not have these kinds of vicious, senseless mass shootings prior to 1965, and we had very little gun control prior to that date either. It is not the lack of gun control that lies at the root of these incidents. We have almost 312 million people now. In such a large aggregate you get more frequent examples of rare pathologies than in a smaller population. Pathologies like people so devoid of empathy or sentiment that they will kill wantonly, and seek high body counts while doing so. We produce more empty people, lacking any moral or ethical core, than we did previously.

Infringing on the rights of normal people is no way to address the problem of abnormally evil people in the population.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
09:26 PM on 07/21/2012
Great post, ML. Faved!
06:02 PM on 07/23/2012
Good post and until people realize they cannot always have their way, it is not always someone else’s fault, maybe I am to blame, etc. these issues will continue. We have allowed progressive attitudes to infiltrate our educational system to the point we are dumbing down our young people to accept their place as being lackeys to the system in the name of “political correctness”.
03:18 PM on 07/21/2012
We live in a society where the wealthy are taught to 'lead' and the rest of us are taught to 'follow', so while we may feel the need for change most people's conditioning tells them to wait for some 'leader' to fix things for us. I wish it were as simple as just speaking out, but I am afraid we may have gone past the point where that alone can solve our problems. Ultimately, we may have to confront the possibility that we are no longer one, but two different nations with very different ethics, morals, and agendas.
09:31 AM on 07/23/2012
A very Marxist class consciousness view, I must say. I was never taught to "follow the wealthy"; I was taught that I had the freedom to choose what I want to do with my life, and so I have. Furthermore, I wouldn't offer it as a possibility that the people of the U.S. now comprise two different groups with very different ethics, morals and, agendas; I would say it is a fact.
06:11 PM on 07/23/2012
Leaders emerge because they have the willingness and ability to take risk whether emotional or physical. Most of the wealthy are that way because they take charge of their life and earn their way. Most of the followers are that way because they want to sponge off the efforts of the leaders without taking any risk themselves. Most of the followers believe in big government because they want someone else to take the responsibility of doing the sponging for them.