iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Walker

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Walker
 

7 Billion and Climbing: The Population Challenge

Posted: 10/26/11 01:00 PM ET

World population, according to the United Nations, will reach 7 billion on October 31, 2011, and judging by the coverage that the milestone has received in the print media, the challenge once posed by population growth has been solved. A writer for the Chicago Sun-Times even when so far as to say, "Hoorary! Pop the Champagne."

An article in the latest issue of The Economist ("A Tale of Three Islands: The world's population will reach 7 billion at the end of October. Don't panic.") indicates that the world's decline in fertility has been "staggering," and that, "If you look at the overall size of the world's population, then, the picture is one of falling fertility, decelerating growth and a gradual return to the flat population level of the 18th century."

There it is: problem solved. But before we uncork the champagne, it's helpful to take a quicker look at the latest population projections, which tell a somewhat different story. The UN's latest "medium variant" projection, released earlier this year, indicates that world population will reach the 8 billion mark in just 13 years, rise to 9.3 billion by mid-century, cross the 10 billion mark in 2082 and keep growing.

Just a few years ago, demographers were projecting that world population would begin declining around mid-century. In August of 1999, Max Singer, the founder of the Hudson Institute, warned in The Atlantic that, "Fifty years from now, the world's population will be declining, with no end in sight."

So what's changed? Fertility rates are not falling as fast as once projected. While fertility rates in much of Europe, North America, and East Asia are at or below the generally accepted "replacement rate" of 2.1 children per woman, fertility rates in sub-Saharan Africa and many parts of South Asia remain high.

While fertility rates in the developing world are declining, they are not falling fast enough to prevent large increases in population. Africa's population, just over 1 billion today, will reach 2.3 billion by 2050, unless fertility rates fall faster than expected. India's population, currently 1.2 billion, will likely rise to 1.7 billion by 2050, surpassing China as the world's most populous country in 20 years or less.

The principal obstacle to further declines in fertility is that adolescent birth rates in many developing countries remain stubbornly high. In many rural areas, children are married off and begin having children at very early ages.

About 25,000 girls a day become child brides. Leaving aside concerns about population growth, the practice of child marriage is very detrimental to the health and wellbeing of women in the developing world. When girls are taken out of school and become pregnant at an early age, they and the whole community suffer. Increasing access to contraceptives can help these young brides, but not if the husbands demand large families.

The principal problem with rapid population growth in developing nations is not the drain on the world's resources; it's that many of the countries that will double or triple their populations in the next 40 years are already losing the fight against hunger, poverty, and poor health. Unless more is done to expand access to contraceptives and discourage child marriage, many of these countries will become failed states.

Population growth is beginning a dangerous ascent. Twelve years ago when world population reached the 6 billion mark, oil prices were hovering at just over $10 a barrel, the prices of grain and other basic food stuffs were at or near record lows, the world economy was soaring, and it looked as though we had hunger and severe poverty on the run.

Today, with world population about to reach 7 billion, commodity prices for energy, food, metals and minerals have gone through the roof, and the world economy is trying to stave off yet another economic downturn.

The prices of basic food commodities have more than doubled in the last seven years. With more than a billion people living on less than a $1.25 a day, another doubling of food prices could create a famine without borders.

In a world where severe poverty and hunger is on the rise, particularly one that is battling the effects of climate change and struggling with water scarcity, continued population growth is not cause for celebration. It's cause for concern and concerted action.

Instead of slashing support for family planning at home and abroad, we need to ensure that women everywhere have access to contraceptives. We also need to expand programs in the developing world that empower women and allow girls to stay in school. When we have done all that, we can "pop the champagne." Not before.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:27 PM on 10/27/2011
Without a serious effort to limit population growth to one or two children per woman, by way of safe and effective birth control, there is no amount of agricultural and technical progress that can keep up with the current birth rate.
This will eventually lead to a massive population correction, far far worse than the world depression that we are experiencing now, of massive deaths in a war over resources and out right famine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Blackburn
02:50 PM on 10/27/2011
In an insane world where excessive individual wants crowd out our natural inclination to help others of our species, all manner of irresponsible behavior exists - overpopulation being just one such behavior. We keep thinking that we can somehow solve our multitude of problems piecemeal, but we can't. Until we come to understand what we've done to ourselves with our beliefs and fixed values, unnecessary human suffering and death will continue and grow. At some point, we've got to take a look at what we're doing to ourselves and stop doing it.
See: http://revolutionofreason.com and http://www.youtube.com/RobertLBlackburn
photo
stloocardsfan
Tolerance ≠ Acceptance
12:19 PM on 10/27/2011
There are still vast amounts of earth's resources that have not yet been used. Those that are being used are often wasted or used in an inefficient manner. As humans, we have always figured out how to provide for ourselves so much so that food production does outpace the population growth. Distributing food is a big problem - enough food is not a problem. Artificially slowing population will only temporarily seem to solve 'overpopulation' concerns. When there are not enough people to work in the economy to pay for the welfare state, what do we do then? Japan is experiencing this now and we are beginning to see in other parts of Asia and Europe. China's workforce is projected to shrink 21% by the year 2050. America is grappling with future solvency of Medicare and SS.
Mr. Walker's solution will spawn new problems that will need to be solved.
11:02 AM on 10/27/2011
The population explosion is occuring in countries which can afford it least. Central and South America, Africa and Asia are not even able to feed the people they already have, yet they keep adding to the pile. Some estimate the total carrying capacity of the planet at about 9 billion, which is estimated to be reached by 2050. There just isn't enough natural resources for all these people who all want a place to live, food to eat and a car to drive. Easter Island in the Pacific is a good illustration of what to expect in the future on a global basis, it is going to get really ugly. We need a bigger fence.
04:18 AM on 10/27/2011
I have felt to bleak about the seeming celebration of this point - why on earth are UNESCO throwing their arms in the air and ask us to cheer the birth of the soul that broke the camels back, it's like waving down the horsemen of the apocalpyse and inviting them in for tea. However, this is only a moment of dread in terms of resources and being able to cope, because of human nature. We DO have the resources to cope for this many, and many more, but our greed and inability to undertand the concepts of sharing, mean it is impossible for us to manage these numbers. We as well enforce streilisation programmes in some places, because such a course of action is much better than essentially supporting a system that encourages famine, drought, starvation and mass death. We are or own worse enemy.

http://eye-on-wales.com/2011/10/24/7-billion/
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
06:52 PM on 10/26/2011
Corporate media needs to quit trumping up that we need to do thus and such to accomodate 10 billion people-it's just towing the corporate line of more and more. Why should we accomodate?
And any discussion of food or environment or related needs to discuss this, sadly it's TOTALLY left out of the discussion (they're too scared of the RWNM and the religionists). And it's typical of what was in the post that the problem is solved---typical RWNM pro growth at all costs corporate line. Problem is NOT solved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niumarmion
a temporary being
06:20 PM on 10/26/2011
The religious people who coerce and encourage over population are the worst of cruel sadists.
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
02:58 PM on 10/26/2011
We only have one small planet. In 1970 my generation started pointing this out. Then Reagan and his religious fanatics came along, and suddenly womens´ choice was highjacked by the right ... throughout the world. How not to be a world leader when it mattered most!
01:47 PM on 10/26/2011
Bravo. World population is at least one billion too many already. Who looks forward happily to a Nigeria with 350 or 400 million people? How many million of them will try to enter the EU or the US?