More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Weller

Robert Weller

Posted: September 30, 2010 05:01 PM

A California man convicted of rape and murder 30 years ago has asked that his execution be stopped because the state can't guarantee it will be pain free.

And for the time being, possibly until early next year, Albert Greenwood Brown has won his appeals to block his execution. The issue could spread to other states with prisoners on death row.

U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel, reviewing California's new execution procedures under orders from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled there was not enough time to verify their reliability in time to execute Brown this week.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger already had given Brown a delay of 24 hours because the federal court order authorizing his execution only took effect on Thursday. Brown was scheduled to die Wednesday. The California Supreme intervened and said the drugs to be used had expired and the execution could not go ahead this week.

Meanwhile, the 9th Circuit told Fogel to ask lawyers for both sides for briefs on whether Brown should be executed this week.

It would have been the first execution in the state in nearly five years. Fogel is the same judge to have effectively ordered them stopped because the state was using a sequence of three drugs, and the process had resulted in unnecessary pain and failure to immediately end the life of the condemned person.

Sounds a bit like the 1972 Supreme Court decision that had determined executions to be "cruel and unusual," though never meant so literally. It was later overturned.

The state of California rebuilt its death chamber after Fogel's ruling. Critics argued that some previous executions were botched because there wasn't enough light in the existing chamber and the administering of three drugs in sequence was mishandled.

Brown, 56, is not contesting that he raped and murdered 15-year-old Susan Jordan of Riverside in 1980.

Jordan's sister Karen, who was nine when Susan was murdered, condemned the appeal process in an email to the Riverside Press-Enterprise:

"The appeals process in California has proven to be nothing more than a never-ending war of attrition against justice and the rights of victims and their families," Karen Jordan Brown said in the statement.

"The distress that this process has brought upon the Jordan family is profound and unfathomable, but has only tempered our convictions in favor of capital punishment.

"We denounce all of those who defend and seek clemency for Susan's murderer, and hold them accountable for preventing closure for our family these past 28 years.

Some executions may have to be delayed in some of the other 35 states who use lethal injection because of a shortage of the drug or drugs needed and questions about whether what is available is reliable.

In some cases the drugs or drug cocktails used for executions are not allowed to be used to put pets down.

 

Follow Robert Weller on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mozart99

A California man convicted of rape and murder 30 years ago has asked t...
A California man convicted of rape and murder 30 years ago has asked t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:07 PM on 10/02/2010
We're such a sick fing country. Make a list of the nations that kills it's own citizens. It's short and filled with dark ages jokes like YEMEN, Saudi Arabia, who dosent let women drive cars, North Korea and Iran. It's basically a short list of the Axis of Evil, plus the US.

A nation should be judged by how it treats its prisoners.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Weller
Retired AP Foreign Correspondent
10:03 AM on 10/01/2010
Noting the comment about Brown calling Susan Jordan's mother I checked further. It is true. And in the search I learned that Brown had been convicted of a rape just two years earlier and was released after a short prison term.
11:08 PM on 09/30/2010
ACADP has the deepest sympathy for victims of crime and their families, as it does for the innocent family members and loved ones of executed offenders. There is no such thing as a 'humane' execution - there is no humane method for exterminating a healthy human life. Whatever method is used to achieve the kill, it is wrong, wrong, wrong. Killing offenders does not close any doors. Justice served is when the hurt of crime victims and their families comes to an end. No amount of punishment for offenders can make the hurt go away. There is never an end to the hurt from violent crime. Killing offenders based on what might make some victims feel better, is not justice served. The only satisfaction that a state-sanctioned execution brings to victims of crime and their families is that another human being has been killed (anger, hatred, revenge) and more innocent victims family members are created. Justice is a myth, just like deterrence and all the fancy words used to justify state-sanctioned killing in the name of justice.
photo
skexie
My micro-bio is not empty
08:32 AM on 10/01/2010
Rapists and murderers of CHILDREN deserve to be executed. Who cares if it's not pain free?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:17 PM on 10/02/2010
What if YOU get unjustly convicted? Wrongful convictions in rape cases were estimated to be at 25% in the United States. The use of the PCR, or "DNA TESTING" showed that about 25% of people convicted of rape are EXCLUDED, based upon DNA testing. Wrongful convictions happen all the time. Ever BEEN on jury? Ever BEEN through that process? The Judge, a very intimidating position, gives the frightened jurors "INSTRUCTIONS", which has the ring of an order to "CONVICT". I talked to a juror who explained why he was voting to convict as "I don't want to lose my job". It's a flawed system, which means that YOU could EASILY be accused and convicted and sentenced to death.