iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robyn Greenspan

Robyn Greenspan

Posted: October 8, 2010 02:30 PM

Not on stage at Radio City Music Hall during the two days of the World Business Forum but omnipresent, was the economy, and with an upcoming election, President Obama took a few jabs from Jack Welch and political advisor David Gergen. The former CEO of GE, who openly endorsed John McCain at the 2008 World Business Forum, criticized the President as being anti-business and improperly handling the auto bailout by "cutting the throats of investors." Gergen accused the White House as suffering from groupthink and alienating the business community, which, he said, is hurting the recovery. "He needs to bring some CEOs in. They are sitting on cash."

Obama might also want to invite Al Gore in for another look at his awesome PowerPoint, too. The former Vice President -- or as he said, "he used to be the next President of the United States" -- again expertly connected the dots between the climate crisis, sustainable capitalism and opportunity for global environmental and economic improvement.

While he avoided reopening the debate on reasons for invading Iraq, Gore began by affirming the global economy's dependence on an oil market dominated by the Persian Gulf, and "the thought of it being disrupted or under control of those who could use it as a geopolitical weapon is something not easily dismissed."

Abandoning the polluting 100-year-old technologies of the past to prepare for a sustainable 21st century could break our dependence, put people to work and save the economy, asserts the former Vice President, but we collectively suffer from inertia, which works as the enemy of change. It's partially because we can't wrap our heads around something that's unprecedented.

"We have a tendency to think if it didn't happen in the past, it's not likely to happen in the future. We never had to think about the relationship between us and the environment."

Gore cites three major contributors to the climate crisis: the global population explosion, which taxes resources; the dramatic expansion of the power-draining technologies we use; and finally, the way we think about capitalism.

"Capitalism is the most efficient form of organizing economic activity the world has ever seen. It unlocks the human potential. It has a set of organic and ubiquitous incentives. It's great that capitalism is our system," asserted the Nobel Prize winner, however, he argued, it is long past time to address the structural problems that distorted the way we operate. It's the short-term thinking that recently brought down the financial system and how that same lack of vision prevents long-range environmental solution planning.

We're entering a period of consequences, he said, leading to eventual collapse.

Michael Liebreich, chief executive of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, asked Gore why there was so much polarization around global warming in the U.S.

"There is a disinformation campaign going on. Large carbon polluters spend money to create false doubts on things that are real. The ship is bearing down, but large carbon polluters are in the boat saying it's not real."

Gore urged World Business Forum delegates to affect change through political action, and press the Senate to release their stranglehold on policies through filibusters, which, he said, are influenced by special interest groups. "It's important to change light bulbs, but it's more important to change the laws."

Economist and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz advocated for political action of another kind -- more stimulus money, as the initial package was too small and not well-designed, he said.

"If it hadn't been for the stimulus, the unemployment would have peaked. Millions of Americans who had jobs otherwise would not. It's clear, that with the end of the stimulus the economy is getting weaker. Something has to be done."

Unfortunately, the optimal time may have passed, as Obama had opportunity after the election. Today he is more politically constrained. "When you hear we can't afford another stimulus, it's not true. We can't afford not to."

Stiglitz didn't rule out the dreaded "double dip," as there are too many potential influencers, but he did say with certainty there was not enough job creation. With 1-in-6 Americans out of work and a labor force growing at one percent per year, a large number of long-term unemployed is likely. "Getting back into the market is much more difficult. The new normal will be high unemployment."

 

Follow Robyn Greenspan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RobynGreenspan

Not on stage at Radio City Music Hall during the two days of the World Business Forum but omnipresent, was the economy, and with an upcoming election, President Obama took a few jabs from Jack Welch a...
Not on stage at Radio City Music Hall during the two days of the World Business Forum but omnipresent, was the economy, and with an upcoming election, President Obama took a few jabs from Jack Welch a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
10:08 AM on 10/11/2010
We must counter the reichwing science-denying liars as often as possible. We must drown out their unscientific comments with reason and data. We must not let their BIG LIE get through to uninformed citizens who blindly believe them.
photo
Mojovator
Host of 30 Minutes of MOJOVATION. Developed The PA
06:20 AM on 10/11/2010
Whether one believes or denies the existence of global warming, one cannot refute the changes in the world's climate and the IMPACT that is being felt by humanity on so many ecological levels. Is it wrong to continue the debate? Not as long as we're taking ACTION in the meantime. It matters not who is "right or wrong", what is most important is that we act NOW by expanding the development, use and distribution of alternative energy sources. We must START somewhere, LEARN from the successes and failures, COMMIT to continuous improvement and the DISCOVERY of new and better methods. This beautiful country will be better for it and we will be better global citizens by LEADING ourselves to energy FREEDOM.
10:50 PM on 10/11/2010
It does matter who is right and who is wrong. If one does not understand the science, one could easily endorse the wrong solutions and make matters even worse. How can you decide if an alternative energy source is better or not if you don't understand the science or at least trust the scientists who explain the science?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Dubacher
12:00 PM on 10/10/2010
http://planetsave.com/2010/10/09/emf-for-101010-global-work-party-music-video

Dear friends,
The above link is a music-video (project)
which I recently did with EMF (Environmental
Music Films) and would like to share and spread the with word with you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Minolta
09:00 PM on 10/09/2010
I believe Al Gore made so many mistakes in his science....in his book that in the minds of most folks he has been thoroughly discredited and isn't doing the global warming crowd a lot of good at this time.

I'm sure he's still making a fortune on it though.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
03:34 AM on 10/10/2010
Yes, the deniers say he's made many errors or just lies.
03:12 PM on 10/10/2010
What's the 800 year lag?
05:48 PM on 10/10/2010
And an English judge too. In that country, it is now illegal to show his junk movie in schools without at the same time pointing out the various nonsenses.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
06:49 PM on 10/10/2010
"I'm sure he's still making a fortune on it though."

Gore donated the proceeds of the documentary and much of his other work as well. The documentary has withstood the test of time. A conservative British judge pointed to certain predictions and calls to action which he felt were political. He added comments about them to the teachers' guidebook. However, the documentary is an approved part of the curriculum.
03:05 PM on 10/11/2010
How can demonstrated lies and distortions 'stand the test of time'? Only the most committed zealot can have such an opinion of this tawdry and misleading movie! Monckton (I fear you may have been conditioned to enjoy two minutes of hate when his name appears, but nevertheless I persevere) has carefully documented 35 errors here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
03:42 PM on 10/11/2010
"Monckton... has carefully documented 35 errors"

Gore's film is backed by peer-reviewed science. As you well know, Monckton isn't a confidence man who has no scientific training but pretends to critique science. He appears to be arguing with someone named Kreider rather than referencing the documentary. In nay event, his comments are obviously false. For example, in number one he seems to think that CO2 didn't increase before 1930 or so, when his own chart shows coal consumption. In the next graph in number 7, Monckton attempts to quantify hurricanes but counts only Atlantic storms which make landfall.
03:32 PM on 10/09/2010
_______________________________________

No economic policy, whether fiscal, monetary, or else, can pull us out of the Deep Depression.

I am inviting you today to

Vote for Your Economy, Now.
_______________________________________

When was the last time you were given that opportunity?

We don't intend to replace the prevalent system but to expend the number of your options.

We will add a significant amount of jobs, income and investment.

This is the only election in which the law of the majority is not binding on the minority.

If you don't participate you are still be making a choice:
the choice of relying exclusively on the prevalent system.
_______________________________________

Vote Now for the Credit Free, Free Market Economy
Add Jobs, Revenues & Investments.
Prosperous, Fair, Stable & Peaceful.
http://post-crash.com
_______________________________________

Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.

I am sure that the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual encroachment of ideas.

The ideas which civil servants and politicians and even agitators apply to current events are not likely to be the newest. But, soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil.
_______________________________________

Note: I am grateful to the owners of this publication to let me publish my Ideas on their Internet Property. I am ready to publish free articles on any media. I would be glad to reciprocate on my own Blog: http://no-w.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
02:41 PM on 10/09/2010
I'm often confronted by someone who says that they "don't believe" (always loved that term) in human caused, or at least human aided global warming. My first question to them is - Can't you think of at least a few more good reasons not to fling billions of tons of burnt carbon and gases into the air every year? - Blank stares.
10:46 AM on 10/10/2010
If you can explain AGW to me, I'd certainly appreciate it.

****blank stare
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
11:31 AM on 10/10/2010
The concept that global warming is a combination of natural and human-induced forces.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
05:04 PM on 10/11/2010
DownBeatLounge: "If you can explain AGW to me, I'd certainly appreciate it."

Way too complicate to fully explain in a forum like this one (and to do if correctly requires a substantive background in the applicable areas of science and statistics, which you DownBeatLounge have already noted you do not have), but here's a start:

These are scientific facts:

* The Earth has warmed significantly over recent decades, to what may be the highest level in 2,000 years or more.

* Anthropogenic greenhouse gases including CO2 -- which is generated mostly by fossil fuel burning -- warm the Earth. Without greenhouse gases including CO2 the average temperature of the Earth would be below freezing.

* The atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased by more than a third since the dawn of the fossil fuel era, to the highest level in at least 800,000 years.

* The scientific evidence strongly indicates that said increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and there is no other viable scientific explanation for said atmospheric CO2 increase.

* There is a strong correlation between said atmospheric CO2 increase and said recent warming.

* Known natural forcing agents of past global warming - including changes in orbital cycles and increases in solar radiative output - cannot explain the bulk of said recent warming. Neither has any scientific theory to explain the bulk of said recent warming other than anthropogenic global warming (AGW) survived scientific scrutiny.

Again these are all scientific facts. Which is
05:47 PM on 10/10/2010
I can't think of reasons not to, but I can think of countless reasons to. Food, shelter, reduction of toil, quality of life, stepping-stone to the future. That'll do for now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
06:17 PM on 10/10/2010
What brilliantly forward thinking. All your "needs" are achievable in far more sustainable ways. AND your kids and grandkids will be able to enjoy those things too!
09:04 AM on 10/09/2010
Just as McConnell and Boehner kept their members united in almost-total obstruction of the President's initiatives (look how much Obama accomplished despite that!), so the bailed-out banks and other business interests like the Chamber of Commerce have made a determined calculation to sit on their cash and jobs purely in order to deny the White House any midterm political advantage for turning things around. Aided by Fox News, Palin, the Tea Partiers and Karl Rove, these forces are trying to "punish" Obama for having rescued the American people from the Great Recession. Hope the voters see through that.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
08:21 AM on 10/09/2010
Until alternative energy is competitive in delivery and price, it will sit on the sidelines. Cape Wind is a prime example. It took ten years to permit and the Governor of Mass had to approve rates it will charge that will be 3 times conventional sources. This has rate payers and business up in arms becuase you cannot opt out of having these charges in your bill. So, this mess is being funded by the taxpayers and then paid for again by the ratepayers, who also are the taxpayers. It is twisted logic to think you can get off enough conventional sources to make any difference with this strategy.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
08:32 AM on 10/09/2010
No. The problem is that other energy sources are heavily subsidized. That needs to stop.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
08:40 AM on 10/09/2010
This is true, but you don;t have an infratructure or delivery system for alternative energy. It will take decades to get there. Simply turning off the subsidies for conventional and switching them over to alternative will not yield instant results but will cripple an economy already in trouble for years to come. If it was that easy, it already would have been done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Minolta
09:02 PM on 10/09/2010
Dead on.
03:28 PM on 10/08/2010
As "Freakonomics" author Steve Levitt said at the World Business Forum, "the best ideas are the simplest ones. And after you hear them they’re totally obvious, and yet they evade us for years and years and years." To me, that's what Al Gore's presentation represented -- a super obvious idea to invest in alternative energy options that create jobs, help the climate, and reduce our dependence on oil and the unstable political issues that come with that.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
08:54 AM on 10/09/2010
Al Gore is a very smart man. He may not have invented the Internet as the Republicans incorrectly say he claimed. But as a Senator he almost single-handedly made the Internet available to the greater public via the 1991 "Gore Bill", also known as the High Performance Computing and Communication Act. He had an idea how important the Internet would become before it happened.

Those that invented the various parts of the Internet have much to say about his important contributions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore_and_information_technology

(Another important development made possible by government.)