iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rocky Kistner

GET UPDATES FROM Rocky Kistner
 

Protesters to Keystone XL Pipeline: Don't Mess With Texas

Posted: 02/19/2012 9:16 am

As Congressional Republicans and Big Oil allies in Washington try to resuscitate the massive Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, people on the front lines have opened a new campaign to stop the massive $7 billion project. In Texas, landowners are locking arms to fight would-be pipeline builder TransCanada over eminent domain cases that may determine where the 1,700-mile project will be built.

On Friday, protesters gathered in Paris, TX, and in Austin to voice their support for Lamar County farm manager Julia Trigg Crawford, who runs a 600-acre farms that grows corn, soybeans and wheat along the Red River near Paris, TX. More than 50 protesters traveled from nearby counties to wave flags and signs on the Lamar County courthouse steps, shouting slogans like “Don’t mess with Texas” and “This is what democracy looks like.”

Check out this video of the protest and interview with Julia Trigg Crawford:

 

The raucous protest included an unusual mix of Tea Party supporters, independents, Democrats, Republicans and even Occupy Dallas protesters. They were all there to support Crawford’s eminent domain court fight with TransCanada, which wants to run the Keystone XL pipeline through her property.

David Daniel, a landowner near Winnsboro, TX, has been fighting TransCanada for four years over their plans to run the pipeline though his wooded, spring-fed land near Winnsboro, TX. Daniel says he learned about the plan only after the company had already come on to his land and staked out its pipeline route, a route he says will threaten natural springs that communities depend on for drinking water. 

“The more people find out about the safety risks and that the oil will be exported, the more they are opposed. People in Texas are used to oil pipelines, but this one is different. It’s more toxic and more dangerous and threatens our groundwater. A lot of people feel they’ve been lied to.”

Daniel, who helps run a Keystone XL pipeline opposition group called Stop Tarsands Oil Pipelines, says local landowners are not going to give up, even though they are vastly outspend by TransCanada and its oil industry supporters.

From the looks of those who attended the rally on Friday, TransCanada has a big fight ahead with some angry folks in the Lone Star state. You don't mess with Texas without getting one. 

 

Follow Rocky Kistner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rockyatnrdc

As Congressional Republicans and Big Oil allies in Washington try to resuscitate the massive Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, people on the front lines have opened a new campaign to...
As Congressional Republicans and Big Oil allies in Washington try to resuscitate the massive Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, people on the front lines have opened a new campaign to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:33 PM on 02/25/2012
How can a foreign company declare eminent domain in America? And how can they trespass on private property for a project that hasn't even been approved or proved to be for the common good?
11:25 PM on 02/24/2012
Seems TransCanada puts profits over safety:

http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/mike-klink-keystone-xl-pipeline-not-safe
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mzkitti
6/3/1927
11:31 AM on 02/22/2012
President Obama did not say the Keystone Piopeline would not be built. He said some time would be needed for more environmental issues to be settled. Republicans gave him two months. When he said that was not enough time they were adamant about it and the deal fell through. The R'THUGS always create a crisis, a problem out of nothing so then they can lie, and deceive people. Something they can get hysterical about. Something that will distract peoples thinking about what is really going on. It is always the same old story. And of course, RTHUGS can always depend on idiots screaming about something they know nothing about. Now, why do you think BIG OIL cannot let the environmentalists take some time to see what works in this deal, what does not work and how locations could be tweaked to minimize damage to the environment.? WHY? THINK. What exactly is the difference, in such an important project, whether it takes two months or six months????.Ninety percent of what you see in the Press about Keystone is in favor of it... RIGHT NOW. Do you not notice that almost nothing is actually in the Press about the negative parts of this deal. THINK.
03:07 AM on 02/22/2012
No pipeline, more/longer dependence on OPEC.....We also need a couple more refineries in this country. Yes I know we have plenty of oil here in the states but SOMEONE doesn't want to let us get it..... Also , we shouldn't export any oil until we no longer import it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Errant
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
03:04 AM on 02/21/2012
What the hell? So much for private property. The company up and went on his land and scoped things out?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LFox6
Always remember you are unique, like everyone else
02:12 PM on 02/20/2012
OMG just saw the funniest interview ever on Fox News with Megyn Kelly, interviewing I believe the SC head of the Democratic party. She asked him, what about the pipeline and why did the president say no to it. He responded, #1 he did not say no, he just doesn't want it running near water supplies". He then said, "Even my cat knows not to poop by the water" which had the crew in stitches - hilarious!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iknowscottyknows
06:48 PM on 02/20/2012
Many cities are turning sewage water into drinking water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LFox6
Always remember you are unique, like everyone else
09:47 PM on 02/20/2012
Yes, that's true. My dad worked for a large southern city back in the 60's, and made a sign to put up on the wall: "It might be s**t to most people, but it's gravy to us" hahahaha...the inspectors made 'im take it down
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
01:49 PM on 02/20/2012
I just watched Dylan Ratigan on NOW with Alex Wagner. He says that 90% of American domestic oil is shipped off shore for refining. That off shore arguement, at least, is a Red Herring.

Why don't these people take their flags and their "don't mess with texas" message down to Galveston, see how warm a welcome they get there.
12:36 PM on 02/20/2012
WE DONT NEED OR WANT THE PIPELINE:
In a first, gas and other fuels are top U.S. export from USATODAY
"There's at least one domestic downside to America's growing role as a fuel exporter. Experts say the trend helps explain why U.S. motorists are paying more for gasoline. The more fuel that's sent overseas, the less of a supply cushion there is at home. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/story/2011-12-31/united-states-export/52298812/1
JOBS CREATED OVERSTATED:
Cornell GLI Study Finds Keystone XL Pipeline Will Create Few Jobs
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/globallaborinstitute/research/Keystonexl.html
TEXANS SAY NO TO TAR-SANDS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmcTzht2XH8
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scole77777
Here to point out the obvious...
04:36 PM on 02/20/2012
Facts with quotes and sources? Jesus, F & F.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vkmo
12:04 PM on 02/20/2012
US should buy all Canada's shale oil. Reduce dependence on Saudi Arabia (transporting over 9,000 miles through risky Suez Canal to US- burning lots of fuel) and Venezuela (transporting 2,000 miles, burning fuel). Canada is right next door. Transporting shale oil from Canada to communist red china- 10,000 miles will burn a lot of fuel across Canada which will flow pollutants into US and all over the oceans. It will take less resources than a freeway. Otherwise, a war in mideast will raise oil price above $10/gal
01:27 PM on 02/20/2012
You really need to learn more about this "oil" they're trying to pawn off on us. Setting the pipeline aside altogether, this stuff is a complete disaster and should not be extracted at all. Search for "Oil shale EROI" but here's a brief summary:

In terms of how net energy produced, traditional crude costs about 1 barrel's oil worth of energy to extract and refine 20-40 barrels. This stuff costs 1 barrel to extract and refine 2-4 barrels. To say it's extremely dirty and inefficient is the understatement of the century and it won't really add that much to the world's daily production.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
05:16 PM on 02/20/2012
Fanned, we must get off oil, where no matter where it comes from. Yes, it will cost us. But which had you rather have a liveable planet, or cheap oil?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:11 PM on 02/20/2012
Your statement presumes that oil on the west coast of Canada will be sold to China, rather than refineries on the west coast of the United States. It also presumes that the supply of this commodity to the world markets will benefit Americans, and only Americans, only if it is delivered to refineries in Texas. And that a 2,200 terrestrial pipeline is intrinsically superior to 2,200 miles of ocean. Alberta is not right next door to Texas; pipelines burn fuel to pump just like tankers use it to move forward. If there is a war in the middle east, Alberta crude and Alaska crude and Texas crude and North Sea crude will all go up in price regardless of how easy it is to transport between Canada and the United States.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vkmo
02:26 PM on 02/21/2012
If there's war in the middle east, their oil may NOT ARRIVE HERE AT ALL!!
11:23 AM on 02/20/2012
I think it is really cute (sarcasm intended) that a foreign country albeit a neighbor can come into our country and use OUR imminent domain laws against us and expect us to swallow it and let them get away with it. this doesn't fall under imminent domain whatsoever because it only benefits that company, not us. heard on the news today that a lot of our gasoline is being refined here and then sent to europe to sell at a higher price!! now that is plain greed. if this is what is going to happen to a majority of the tar sands oil then it is of no good use of any of our property that it would take up. send it here and use it here or send it elsewhere!!!!
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
11:54 AM on 02/20/2012
But is it ok to use eminent domain for massive wind power transmission lines, and is it ok to destroy federal endangered species habitat (that land belongs to all Americans) to build massive solar arrays?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
06:39 PM on 02/20/2012
The problem is, Julie, almost everyone is illiterate in ecology, the study of man's house. Ecology explains how Earth functions and cycles to create and support all life.

Earth is the great web of all life, and her strands are her ecosystems; Ecosystems are the great web of all life, and their strands are native species of animals and plants or biodiversity. Ecologists report, pushing biodiversity extinct, is about as safe for mankind as thermonuclear war.

A solar panel construction in our desert ecosystem was just halted as it was making a rare fox sick. The animal was stressed-out to witness his planet, his habitat, his food, cover and shelter being entombed for eternity under the dead fields of solar panels. Obviously, man is clueless as to his killing his planet, his habitat as witnessing it being raped and butchered bothers him not a twit. What animal is so stupid as to kill his only nest? Certainly not homo sapiens!
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
11:22 AM on 02/20/2012
The unions want this pipeline, a fact that the article conveniently leaves out. It will probably be okayed after the election, regardless of the outcome.

The president was caught between a rock and hard place with so many Dems wanting the pipeline for jobs, so he bravely put off the decision until after the election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
11:27 AM on 02/20/2012
WHAT AN AMUSING SIGHT......

SEEING YOU SPEAK FOR THE PRESIDENT'S MOTIVES

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
08:29 AM on 02/20/2012
Canada threatens trade war with EU over tar sands
The row over the EU's plan to label tar sands oil as highly polluting escalates as Canada says it 'will not hesitate to defend its interests'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/20/canada-eu-tar-sands
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SecondBestTheorem
01:25 AM on 02/20/2012
And why can't they build a refinery in Canada?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
08:55 AM on 02/20/2012
Canadian taxpayers won't give them as much help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
11:34 AM on 02/20/2012
It would take 20 years and billions of dollars to get permision to build. By then it wouldn't be needed even if it passed the NIMBY stage.
They might try what we tried in New Mexico in the 1970s. We were researching the feasability of setting up fermentation vats with microbes to break their thick (tar sands) asphaltenes into pumpable crude. The only problem was that every bacteria we tried ended up eating all of the tar and leaving us with plain water and CO2. We couldn't slow those voracious microbes down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SecondBestTheorem
01:23 AM on 02/20/2012
"A lot of people feel they’ve been lied to."

Glad to hear people there waking up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
11:35 AM on 02/20/2012
We lie to ourselves. We pollute just as badly as industry. We pay industry to supply us with the toxins we spew into the environment.
12:47 AM on 02/20/2012
and from the HUFFINGTON POST....