iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ronnie Shows

Ronnie Shows

Posted: October 29, 2010 12:49 PM

I don't make predications, but the midterm elections aren't going to be pretty for a lot of moderate Democrats. The loss of these centrist Democrats - known as the Blue Dogs - may also mean lost control of the House of Representatives.

Anyone who has been following my blog on the Huffington Post knows that I believe that what is bad for the Blue Dogs is also bad for the progressives. Why you may ask? It's very simple; retaining Blue Dogs in swing congressional districts are the key to keeping control of Congress and all the benefits that come with being in the majority.

While there are some Blue Dogs in key positions of power in the House, many of the most powerful positions are held by prominent progressives. These include Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and the chairmen of several very influential congressional committees, including: Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Judiciary, Financial Services and Appropriations. Being chairman allows the majority -- currently, Democrats -- to call hearings, launch investigations and even issue subpoenas for witnesses and relevant information that companies or government agencies won't give up nicely. Today, the Republicans on those committees cannot do any of those things. Having been in Congress, trust me, having that power means a lot.

Something else to consider, on the House side, only the majority can bring legislation to the House Floor for an up or down vote. This means that many bills important to progressives simply won't ever have a chance of becoming law because the Republican Speaker of the House simply won't allow it.

What else does Republican control of the House of Representatives mean? It means investigations of the Obama administration, some of which will be nothing more than political witch hunts. So rather than the President and his team working to pass their legislative agenda, they will be fighting off political attacks from Capitol Hill (remember the impeachment of President Clinton?). It also means that powerful committee chairman will hold hearing and advance legislation that will seek to undue or weaken many important Democratic priorities like Healthcare Reform or efforts to fight to improve the environment. In other words, control of Congress is no small potatoes.

Reading the comments posted on some of my previous columns, I kept seeing people say that Blue Dogs are bad for Democrats and that not having them around would be better for the party. Well, if we lose the House of Representatives, it will be precisely because many of those Blue Dogs have been replaced by extremely conservative Tea Party supported candidates. This won't be good news for progressives, and frankly, it won't be good news for our country either.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 162
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
badmama3
01:20 PM on 11/03/2010
Unfortunately, your prediction has come true - blue dogs fared poorly at the polls yesterday. I understand all too well the other comments expressing frustrations with the blue dogs. Gene Taylor was my rep, and I was certainly no big fan of his, but I do think he represented the wishes of the majority of his South Mississippi constituents. I'm convinced Palazzo will be 10 times worse, and I am dreading watching the house devolve into total chaos as the republicans try to repeal healthcare, launch meritless investigations, etc, etc...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Theo
09:31 AM on 11/01/2010
The simple truth is that when the vast majority of people go to vote they vote based on Party Identification, not based on the individual politics of the candidates on the slate. That makes the Blue Dog argument, that you need Conservative Democrats to win swing districts, irrelevant. People don't think they are voting for Conservatives when they vote for Blue Dogs, they think they are voting for Democrats, and they are predictably disappointed by the results when Blue Dogs take office and refuse to act like Democrats. That disappointment in the disloyalty of Conservative Democrats turns into across the board rejection of Democrats, which is what we're seeing this election season.

The basic fact of the matter is that if Conservative Democrats (both in the congress and in the Obama administration) hadn't crippled the stimulus, the economy would be in better shape and unemployment would be lower. With a better economy the Democratic party wouldn't be facing a loss of their majority.

Above all else it is the economy which matters. Would Blue Dogs have supported a second stimulus? Would Blue dogs have supported massive aid to the states? Would Blue Dogs have supported an out and out jobs program, with Big Government acting as an employer of last resort? We all know the answers to those questions are all NO, and that is why the Blue Dogs need to be driven out of the Democratic party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:56 AM on 11/01/2010
And what do you say every time these corporatist sell you out again and again and again! Do you say "Thank you may I have another!" Forget blue dog these are corporatist republican who could not get elected under the GOP banner in their state a couple of years ago so they jumped ship! Know your enemy and chose your friend carefully!
11:57 PM on 10/31/2010
The real irony is that the so called Blue Dogs are going down because they stymied real reform which made Democrats look WEAK and unable to deliver what was promised by Obama and progressives. So they not only failed to save themselves by destroying any chance for real health care reform, but they screwed all Democrats as well. It will be good riddance to them since they cost more than they were worth.

As we are seeing in the Tea Party, even a wild left wing progressive could have been elected in those Blue Dog districts when the voters were tired of the GOP. Instead of change, those poor voters got GOP lite which was no difference except to career politicians.
photo
kamachanda
Mr. President, Tear this Wall Street down!
07:53 PM on 10/31/2010
Blue Dog Democrats, though giving a "numerical" advantage to the democratic party, undercut or weaken any progressive bill that might get to the President's desk. By doing so they disrupt or destroy the Party's efforts to address the problems we face as a nation and give the Democrats a deserved reputation as being unable to govern.
The Blue Dog Democrats are little more than a poison pill who block real reform, they will not be missed. The Democratic Party needs higher standards than simply being the lessor of two evils.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
07:05 PM on 10/31/2010
I understand where you are coming from, but I would rather sacrifice both the House and the Senate, then to be put in the position we have been in the last 18 months.

I feel like I have been mugged by Corporate America and held for ransom, just to get some votes. To he&& with that.

If this country needs more pain in order to understand what reality really is, then so be it.

Besides, if we just do our duty as citizens and go vote, we will lose nothing. These polls have people spinning, and it really is a massive game. Scare you into thinking all is lost if you don't go vote, because they know low Democratic turnout will be a disaster.

Have some faith in the people that understand the difference between reality and fantasy, we certainly did yesterday.
06:40 PM on 10/31/2010
The author confuses what is good for the Democratic Party in the short term (i.e., retaining control of the House so that party members continue to hold committee chair positions) with what is good for the country in the long term.
We don't need a "big tent" party just for the sake of maintaining control of Congress. Instead, what this country needs are parties that stand for distinct views on the issues, so that a voter knows what he/she is likely to get when a particular party is voted into office.
At the moment, we have two main parties that are similar in their support for policies that benefit big business and the rich at the expense of small businesses and wage earners. Assuming the Republican Party will continue to be on the side of big business and the rich, we need a Democratic Party (or another party if the Democrats aren't willing to assume the role) that will consistently support policies and programs designed to have a beneficial impact, particularly in the long term, on small businesses and wage earners.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
amleth
big fan of humanity - very often disappointed
05:49 PM on 10/31/2010
While there are unquestionable perks and advantages to having a numerical majority in congress, there is no "control" of the congress as long as blue dogs are there.

They are in effect a third party which has a similar but separate agenda from the mainstream of the party.

They are responsible for the failure of several important Democratic goals and initiatives, and for the watering down to ineffectiveness of some entire bills.

They ought to have been called on the carpet by Obama during the health care struggle and jawboned into compliance as Kennedy or Johnson would have done.

They are a self seeking self serving group that often act as enemies of the Democratic party's platform and ideals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
03:43 PM on 10/31/2010
This author is making an argument that, in spite of the fact that the Blue Dogs have not made the voters want to re-elect them, in spite of the fact that Blue Dogs have angered the voters with their selfish, childish, cowardly betrayals, nevertheless, the voters should vote for them again, because of some alleged marginal benefits which the voters don't consider important. That argument is ridiculous.
03:36 PM on 10/31/2010
Wait wait wait...how is what is good for the Blue Dogs (who helped kill the public option and draw out the healthcare debate) good for progressives? How are these pathetically narrow-minded "Democrats" useful? They don't vote with the party enough to be a necessary evil, they just gum up the works and do little else than fill a seat.

In short, we need to send all the Blue Dogs to the Pound
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:03 PM on 10/31/2010
The Blue Dogs are not centrists, they are fiscal conservatives. Yes vote to stop the GOP now, by voting for the democrats. But the people wanted more liberal democrats, not these DLC and blue dogs. So vote liberal in the primaries.
photo
Swegin
the "collective" is part of our human nature
12:21 PM on 10/31/2010
Blue dogs only serve to give the corrupt minority of Republicans that serve corporate interest, the ability to obstruct congress from passing any progressive legislation that will serve middle America. Blue Dogs are lukewarm fence sitting opportunist that hurt rather than help promote a healthy functional responsible progressive agenda.... Blue Dogs need to go.
11:57 AM on 10/31/2010
One has to ask why a Democrat would run in a red district? In order to appease their constituents they would have to vote conservative or they don't hold their office. Sometimes they want to vote independent of party which a Republican definitely can't do, and a Dem is ostracized for doing. In today's Republican party elected office holders have no choice of how they would prefer to vote on any issue with the exception of Snowe and Collins who are firmly entrenched in their state. Remember, some of the old Rep. guard quit because they were not allowed to vote their convictions.

It is possible to be a conservative Democrat isn't it? The next few months will tell whether the Blue Dogs are worth their salt. Their opposition to Nancy Pelosi has been an eye opener. None of them can do the hardest job in Washington (besides the Presidents) and one wonders if they don't want a woman in that position of if they are really DINO's.
marka
A Purple State Progressive
11:50 AM on 10/31/2010
If Blue Dogs were really centrists I could live with them, but from what I can see they are wishy-washy Republicans who operate under a false badge of party affiliation. The last two years have seen effective obstruction from lockstep Republicans and the Blue Dogs that side with them. Given that recipe, why would Dems want to continue in this vein? It is better to be defeated by a true foe, than by a so-called friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hounds
Republicans are job-creating fact-checkers!
11:24 AM on 10/31/2010
Blue dogs be gone!!! This country has gone backwards far enough, thank-you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestParkGuy10
We need a Clinton back in the White House
05:58 PM on 10/31/2010
Thank you and fanned