iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rose Hayden-Smith

Rose Hayden-Smith

Posted: December 23, 2008 07:06 PM

Advice to New Agriculture Secretary Vilsack: Channel Another Son of Iowa


This selection of former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack as Secretary of Agriculture lit up sustainable food systems listservs like a switchboard. Vilsack's nomination is not without controversy. He has been criticized for his ties to agribusiness and his support of biofuels and biotechnology. To many, Vilsack represents "agribusiness as usual." But Vilsack also has a reputation for being a good listener and being able to work successfully with those who hold differing viewpoints. Those are reasons to be hopeful.

Being Secretary of Agriculture is a big deal in America. The USDA is not only one of the oldest federal agencies, but one of the largest. Boasting an annual budget of more than $90 billion, the USDA employs over 100,000 people throughout the U.S., many at the county level. In addition to overseeing ag (including some aspects of food safety, like meat inspection), the USDA is also responsible for national nutrition programs, including food stamps and school lunches, programs that daily impact the lives of urban and rural residents alike. Perhaps more than any other U.S. agency, the USDA directly impacts the daily life of Americans. In a nation that has often defined itself by its agricultural productivity and special relationship with the land, the USDA has perhaps also been invested with a more special meaning. We were a nation of farmers at origin: we are still a nation of farmers at heart.

Anticipating an announcement of Vilsack's selection, I stayed up half one night re-reading one of my favorite books, New Frontiers, written in 1934 by another Secretary of Agriculture, Henry Agard Wallace. (There have actually been two secretaries of Ag named Henry Wallace. Henry A. Wallace's father, Henry Cantwell Wallace, held the position from 1921-1924. Henry A. Wallace, the 11th Secretary, held the position from 1933-1940, when he was elected to serve as FDR's wartime Vice President. He also served as Secretary of Commerce for one year, under Truman).

Those who know me well quickly learn that I deeply admire Henry A. Wallace, who oversaw the most radical and sweeping restructuring of agricultural life in America's history, as part of Roosevelt's New Deal. My affection is not unexamined: Wallace's work was controversial then, and the policies he helped develop and implement are often criticized today. Some were indefensible; the destruction of crops when millions of Americans were starving led even Wallace to concede that these "were not acts of idealism in any sane society..."

But Wallace had vision. He understood agriculture. And he understood that his generation needed to face two ways: to pull strength from the lessons of American pioneers and frontier experiences, but also to develop new ways of thinking and responding to the enormous challenges presented by the Great Depression and a changing American cultural and economic landscape.

Wallace sought economic equality and balance, and knew that any possibility of achieving that required some sort of reform that would challenge long-held beliefs. "The hard but necessary first lesson we must all learn is that we cannot prosper separately," he once wrote. While I don't fully agree with Wallace's acceptance of the inevitability of "bigness" in American life (government and business, including agriculture), he helped initiate changes that were needed during that period to make agriculture and the nation more vibrant.

While Mr. Vilsack may not have been the first choice of many people, I think he has an opportunity to make an enormous and positive impact. My advice to the incoming Ag Secretary: Channel another son of Iowa, Henry Agard Wallace. Read everything he wrote. Focus on Wallace's visionary nature and the size of his ideas, not necessarily the specifics. And don't accept the inevitability of bigness in the food system. Instead, perhaps the "big idea" here represents a smaller focus: to help recreate local and regional food systems. Take incredibly good ideas -- like school lunch programs - and incorporate new elements that encourage local sourcing and the consumption of more fruits and vegetables.

Take USDA-sponsored programs, such as the Master Gardeners and 4-H, and leverage these hundreds of thousands of youth and adult volunteers to create an army of foot soldiers to support school, home and community garden and food projects across the nation. Take a really good idea from the USDA/Food Administration, and revive Victory Gardens. And like Henry Wallace did in WWII, make sure to cultivate your own garden at home. As someone who has worked extensively with Master Gardeners, 4-H and the concept of Victory Gardens, I'd be happy to chat with your staff about these ideas, on my own dime. They're good ideas. As Secretary of Agriculture, you could make them happen.

The basic idea of all of the above: use the USDA's vast resource base of employees, volunteers and cooperating agencies (states, school districts, etc.), and capitalize on the agency's geographical reach to build sustainable and healthy American communities in all senses of the word.

I'd also suggest that if you haven't already, that you read about the cultural, intellectual and social life -- and the policies -- of the New Deal. Something tells me there are some good lessons there. In addition to Wallace's own words, David Kennedy's Freedom from Fear is a rollicking good read (it won the Pulitzer Prize). If you don't have time to get through all 936 pages, read the sections on the New Deal and agricultural reform. (And to get an idea of how this all got set up, read chapter 13 of William Leuchtenburg's Perils of Prosperity, appropriately entitled "Smashup." Heck, read the whole book - it's short and you won't be able to put it down). You may also wish to snag a copy of Richard Pells' Radical Visions and American Dreams: Culture and Social Thought in the Depression Years.

Near the end of New Frontiers, Wallace wrote "Too many of is want to see "normalcy" restored, in the old sense, and live again in plenty without facing facts. That cannot be. The world has changed."

Indeed it has. And under your leadership, the USDA has an opportunity to respond in new and visionary ways to these changes and the challenges and opportunities they present. Please consider and effect real change, Secretary Vilsack. And count me in to help.

Follow Rose Hayden-Smith on Twitter: www.twitter.com/victorygrower

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoAnnCr
08:02 AM on 12/25/2008
Yes to Victory Gardens! Organic Victory Gardens!
02:12 PM on 12/25/2008
I love it...! Please visit the UC Victory Grower website or Eat the View to find like-minded people!
02:41 PM on 12/24/2008
All GM food for people or animals should be outlawed. The 3M's of the world are not interested in the health of people or animals, all they care about is the bottom line. We need to tax it out of business.
02:35 PM on 12/24/2008
I'd like to recommend other essential reading/viewing for all Americans -

http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/Home/index.cfm
Genetic Roulette and Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey M Smith
The World According to Monsanto DVD
Unnatural Selection DVD

www.TheTruthAboutGMOs.com
Shedding Light on Genetically Engineered Food by Beth Harrison
(because Arpad Pusztai recommends the book to the American public)

Eating in the Dark by Kathleen Hart

Perhaps the recent explosion in childhood autism, obesity, diabetes, allergies and GI disease of unknown etiology is related to the presence of genetically modified ingredients in 70% of processed foods found in our supermarkets for the past 10 years. And why was this allowed, after all, studies of laboratory animals fed GM foods showed impaired growth and development. Rhetorical question - safety testing was corrupted/bypassed because regulators previously and subsequently worked in the biotech industry - that old revolving door, again.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/vilsack.cfm
Please explore the excellent organic consumers association website.
07:41 PM on 12/24/2008
Have you read "Uncertain Peril: Genetic Engineering And The Future Of Seeds" by Claire Hope Cummings? Publisher: Beacon Press. Excellent book, and I highly recommend it. I read all her work.
12:56 PM on 12/25/2008
Thanks for the tip, I'm very new to this subject, which is one of the reasons I'm in shock over the current state of affairs. Food safety is political? I select, purchase and cook all of the food for my family, considered myself well informed, and yet was oblivious to these health and safety issues until recently.

Here's to the implementation of the only 'change' I can totally control - my spending.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
01:55 PM on 12/24/2008
And, to look outside our selves for a moment, the way we allow living animals to be treated must be addressed. There is no excuse to continue the needless infliction of suffering upon those from whom we take everything. We lose our dignity as a species when we deny them theirs.
07:36 PM on 12/24/2008
I agree. California recently passed Proposition 2, which will address some issues relating to the (more) humane treatment of animals. It will be interesting to see if other states follow suit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dougbob
blogger from san diego
12:39 PM on 12/24/2008
The concept of building local and regional food distribution, in addition to (in theory) offering some level of protection to the consumer against the corporate mono-culture (king corn), also offers the opportunity to help protect us from natural (hurricanes), industrial (melamine) and so-called terrorist disasters. So, in addition to being better for our collective health, it's a national security issue.
07:37 PM on 12/24/2008
You make many of the same arguments I make in my work. I agree with your observation about national security. The Victory Garden programs and U.S. School Garden Army Movement of WWI had as explicit goals improving national security.
07:43 PM on 12/24/2008
Dougbob, here's a link to an article about a WWI program that may be of interest to you. http://groups.ucanr.org/victorygrower/files/47755.pdf
12:10 AM on 12/24/2008
Very interesting. I hope they will label all foods. I want to know if potatoes are GM. I'm concerned about ethanol, but am somewhat agreeing with Pickens, that it may be an ugly baby, but it is our baby. I guess sometimes the gains outweigh the costs. I have read that America does not even have enough fruit and veg for each person to eat the recommended 5 servings. I think this should provide an opportunity. American healthcare costs will not go down unless people eat better and people will only be able to choose healthy options if they are affordable. The more supply the lower the prices.
I think Americans, especially in some urban areas should start community gardens. Trees, plants and flowers create a more pleasant living environment. Caring for plants is spiritually rewarding. Sunlight, fresh air, community and a mutual purpose could turn gardening into a fun active activity, that will beautify peoples daily lives. Seeds and small plants are relatively inexpensive too.
This whole depression thing is, I hope, being exaggerated.
07:39 PM on 12/24/2008
I'm with you on food labeling and the idea of creating more community gardens. All the benefits you describe are good reasons to support the revival of a national Victory Garden effort. But there is another reason: increasing community-based food security. Too many Americans are food insecure, and access to fruits and vegetables must be improved in order to address a big national concern: improved health, and the prevention of chronic disease.