More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Roslyn Zinner

Roslyn Zinner

Posted: March 3, 2011 04:33 AM

Unhappy couples today cannot afford to split up.

Consider a typical couple I'll call Joan and Gary. The kids were stressed out by the high level of tension in the home. Both were anxious for Joan to move out, but their two incomes did not provide enough cash to pay for the rent for a separate apartment. The monthly minimum payments on their $30,000 of credit card debt compounded the problem. Their house was under water, so selling the house wasn't a viable option for obtaining cash. So they postponed separation, and Joan moved into the basement of their home to minimize their contact. Their plan is to put the house up for sale when the market improves. As their mediator, I wondered about how long this plan could work, and what they would do if the market didn't improve in the coming year.

Before the recession, divorce was easier, especially for home owning, dually employed couples. In most cases their home's value had appreciated, so the house could be sold and the equity used to pay off credit card debt many had. And there was often still enough left to provide a down payment for each to buy a smaller place.

When house values plummeted and unemployment rose, this neat solution all but disappeared. It had never been easy for couples to divide assets, like houses and retirement accounts, that they spent many years building up together. But dividing debt is even more painful than dividing assets. The problem is exacerbated when is unemployed

In today's economic climate, many couples who enter divorce mediation do not have any equity in their house, or it is under water. If they do have equity, homes in their area are often sitting on the market for long periods of time. As credit has tightened, fewer can qualify for a refinance that will enable them to buy out their spouse's share of the equity. This triple whammy leaves couples with fewer choices. One can move in with relatives, they can cut expenses to the bone, or one or both can get a second job. But part-time jobs that fit the single person's parenting schedule can be challenging to find.

Couples used to fight over who got to keep the house, but now nobody wants it due to the exorbitant costs involved. So the ties that bind may be broken emotionally, but the financial ones resist splitting. Low earners, typically the wives, blame their husbands for the need to be financially dependent on them. Often I hear, "You agreed I should stay home with the kids, and now I have no skills for any job that pays more than $10 an hour." Higher earners, typically husbands, blame their wives for not contributing enough income, and for spending too much money. "We'd be fine if we didn't owe VISA $40,000 for a bunch of electronic toys the kids don't need."

Are there exceptions? Yes, the younger couples where both partners have a college degree and a well paying job. When each person knows they can support themselves and their children on their solo income if needed, both approach separation with more confidence. Property division is also easier because each their own retirement funds, and sees no reason to make any claims on their spouse's revenue streams.

Divorce wannabees, couples that cannot afford to split up, are now waiting for the housing market to improve. Without a profitable house sale to bring in cash after separation, couples are left with several undesirable choices. Some couples are remaining in the same house, with one spouse moving to the basement. Others separate by going to stay with relatives.

Another common strategy I'm seeing is for the higher earning partner to remain in the house and pay the mortgage, while the other partner moves to a small apartment. This is the opposite of the traditional practice of Mom remaining in the house with the kids. The couple continues to own the house together, and plans to sell (and hopefully reap the profit) when the market improves. During this time, each operates on an extremely tight budget, and uses credit for urgent needs. But what if the furnace breaks and they've already passed their credit limit? It's a shaky plan at best, since no one knows when, if ever, housing values will go up.

Divorce is never easy, but during tough economic times it's downright scary.

About Roz Zinner, LCSW-C
Roz Zinner is the president of Divorce and Family Mediation Services, mediate-divorce.com, and
has mediated with hundreds of couples privately and with the Maryland courts in the past eleven years. She also helps other mediators develop successful practices through Mediator Mentor, mediatormentor.com, a distance mentoring program. She is the immediate past president of theMaryland Council for Dispute Resolution, a mediator practitioner organization.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
hp blogger Kelley Harrell
Neoshaman; author of 'Gift of the Dreamtime'
08:56 AM on 03/07/2011
Insightful article.
12:18 PM on 03/06/2011
How about not getting married.
08:20 AM on 03/06/2011
Insightful but there plenty of grammatical errors and redundant sentences.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:05 PM on 03/04/2011
In the "Good Old Days," couples stayed together for several reasons, one of which was that married women had no property rights nor rights to children. There was the added social stigma that was promoted by religious institutions, which were much stronger then than now. In those days divorce was more serious for the wife than for the husband. The "Gay Divorcee" syndrome, which painted the wife at fault, no matter what the real situation, was pushed by male dominated religious institutions. Many long term marriages were far from happy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momstudent
11:53 AM on 03/04/2011
Excellent article. This is life of possibly thousands of households.
08:32 AM on 03/04/2011
As a divorce mediator in NJ myself, I've seen my fair share of situations like these but couples need to be careful about what the true cost to keep the house is. While yes it may be "underwater" and this market not the best time to sell, the additional carrying costs that come with a house coupled with the potential loss of deductions (that mortgage interest and those real estate taxes may no longer be deductible once you divorce) make keeping the home suddenly not such a great option. Before you decide to keep the home and wait for the market to rebound, consider the short and long term costs (including the emotional ones of being tied to someone you are no longer married to) before you agree to do this.
08:36 PM on 03/03/2011
How about a marriage contract that only lasts 10 years. You must pay to renew it
or it automatically expires and is no longer valid. Who thought up this forever thing?
08:34 PM on 03/03/2011
From what my grandmother told me, this is exactly why people used to stay together. If you know that you each depend on each other to sustain quality living, you'll do more to keep yourself from even getting to the point of discussing divorce. We don't need each other anymore. There's no community accountability and no sense of duty, so why stay married? why get married at all?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John C Osborn
Sanity plz
04:46 PM on 03/03/2011
Oh, I thought it was because the sex was REALLY good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hedah
Live and let Live.
04:05 PM on 03/03/2011
Everything IS about $$$. Lots of people get married 4 $$$. Lots of people STAY married 4 $$$. Lots of people never divorce bcoz of $$$. Lots of people r happy n/or miserable bcoz of.....MONEY !!! Very often men use $$$ to get sex n women use sex 2 get $$$. LOL.....S A D.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbertaud
Je ne regrette rien, rien de rien
01:57 PM on 03/03/2011
Not having a prenup is one of them...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
13champlain
Trolling for grouper at 40 knots
02:27 PM on 03/03/2011
ugh...so so true
12:54 PM on 03/03/2011
Before I even read the rest of this article, can someone tell me why this fictional couple has $30,000 of credit card debt?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
02:44 PM on 03/03/2011
Because they needed stuff and didn't have the cash to buy it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uncc49er
Only the truth and nothing more
09:18 PM on 03/03/2011
they necessarily didn't need. They just wanted.
nancynancy
Atheist.
06:27 PM on 03/03/2011
Medical bills are the leading cause of bankruptcy in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawrenceRoth
Real Liberal. Real American.
09:07 AM on 03/03/2011
Marriage and divorce need to be made more affordable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 03/03/2011
I got a divorce and lost my house at the same time. I didn't care about "scary." It was the best thing I could have done. The "scary" thing was living with my ex in ANY house.
10:54 PM on 03/03/2011
You said it! I filed for divorce and short sold the house. The divorce isn't scary. Recession or not he planned on leaving me with nothing. Living in the same house was a nightmare that never ended.
photo
CoastalNC
Good thoughts create good things
09:37 AM on 03/07/2011
Been there myself!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katieandtom
08:26 AM on 03/03/2011
we had to put off our split for a year waiting for the economy to turn and securing our investment properties. well, the economy still hasnt turned, but we did secure the investments and decided now is better than never and did it about a year ago.

this economy stinks.