More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rowan Moore Gerety

Rowan Moore Gerety

Posted: March 29, 2010 11:00 AM

Relocation Plans for Port-Au-Prince Are Unrealistic

What's Your Reaction:

In Haiti, the rainy season is about to begin, necessitating relocation of the scores of people displaced by the earthquake and currently living in over crowded camps. There are plans to move roughly 150,000 people currently living in the camps to the center of Port-au-Prince by May, yet only one site with a capacity of under 4,000 people has been secured to date.

When rains drenched the capital on Thursday night, the Golf Club de Pétionville turned to mud. It was a frightening preview of what the rainy season will hold for the 45,000 people who live there if they stay. Tents collapsed. Ditches overflowed with sewage. People and their belongings were swept downhill.

And yet the people who are to be moved have not yet been told what choices lie before them. Why the wait?

Acting in concert with the UN and the US Army, the Haitian Government's intended strategy for relocation has been to allow Port-au-Prince residents to return home or to their neighborhoods, but the large-scale rubble removal that would require has yet to begin, shifting the focus of the effort to temporary camps on the outskirts of the city.

With negotiations for several privately-held sites ongoing, the time frame for planning and preparation in advance of the rainy season is shrinking. On February 19, the Government identified 5 potential sites to be laid out and prepared as temporary camps able to host 110,000. More than a month later, only one of these sites is available for use as a camp, suitable to host less than 3% of the population that the government plans to move by May.

The first wave of relocations was initially planned for March 25th; it is now scheduled for April 12th.

Meanwhile, at Tabarre Issa, the smallest of the camps and the first one where relocation is to proceed, it seems that there will not be room for as many new people as the plans call for. Local residents have begun to move onto the site in greater numbers each day, in structures made of bedsheets, cardboard, tarps, and long sticks. While some families moved out into the open in response to aftershocks throughout February, more have come in anticipation of the arrival of aid and services in an area that has been mostly without supplies to-date.

Last week, there were some three hundred makeshift houses dotting the plain. Residents in Tabarre were moved to the planned camp even before any leveling or groundwork. Bearing this, there is an apparent need for greater communication between the planning agencies and host communities and for the integration of services provided to camp into the surrounding area. Both are sure to be a part of the strategy of Concern Worldwide, the lead agency for programming and services there, but every aspect of planning will be complicated by the presence of so many people on an unprepared site.

If the incident at Tabarre -- proposed as a home to 3,500 new arrivals -- is representative, what will happen at Sibert (40,000) or Des Antilles (30,000)?

The longer preparations are stalled, the more hurried and less explained the relocations will be. The more stressed, the more confused, the more angry, the more desperate.

The public health concerns that motivate relocation are undoubtedly urgent, but if it goes forward with poor planning, the authorities won't soon forget social health is every bit as important.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:44 AM on 03/31/2010
,An unprecedented opportunity is up for grab to in time redress the ecological disaster that the Port-au-Prince has become and to rationally address the geological concerns that the fault lines present.
This is also the time when the least resistence will be met from the army of squatters that has occupied the surrounding hillsides since most of their makeshift dwellings have either collapsed or can be declared unsafe as they mostly are anyway. The lands that were seized de facto can thus be peacefully reclaimed, properly managed and redistributed in an ecologically, economically and politically sound manner.
This is the time to undermine the secular untrenchment of the oligarchies that are chocking the republic of Port-au-Prince specially since all the political and financial power are concentrated in that small peice of valuable real estate. . Outside of the boundaries of the city there is still a vast country that can benefit from developmental strategies and help ease the pressure on the capital. Those same oligarchies do not hold the same interests there. .Right after the earthquake, thousands have relocated on their own to other parts of the country. At this time, this internal migration is possible, desirable and should be encouraged. Aditionally, since all the government apparatus lies in shamble it might be a good idea to start with the decentralisation process and empower the other cities. If all the eggs are not in the same basket, the same causes will surely not produce the same effects.
08:24 PM on 03/23/2010
It's outrageous that local and national governments allow for cities to be rebuilt right upon earthquake-causing geological flaws and/or right on the path of hurricanes. New tragedies cannot be far away.
The sane solution would be to move and build an entirely new city somewhere else. But they dont want to do it in Port-au-Prince, just as they didnt want to do it in New Orleans after Katrina - although some voices asked for it in New Orleans, but the political and commercial interests spoke louder than the concern for people's lives.
In fact, more and more people are living in these dangerous earthquake-prone areas, like the coast of California and the whole Pacific coast.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charmante
07:31 PM on 03/23/2010
The problem for the political class is how do you get an entrenched oligarchy -- the 1% of the population who controls 50% of the wealth-- to give up an inch of land when they are accustomed to get their way at the expense of the vast majority of the Haitian people and with the full financial and military backing of their allies in Washington, DC, Ottawa, and Paris?

They will not give up anything unless their demand for compensation is fully met. In other words, they want their share of the billions dollars going to Haiti's reconstruction in return for the land the Haitian people ancestors fought and died for.

QUOTE: The government's chief advisor on relocation, Gerard-Emile ``Aby'' Brun, says it will take $86 million to build relocation sites and another $40 million to secure rights to the land.
At this stage, money should not be the problem. More than $1 billion in aid has flowed into Haiti, and more is coming.
Nor is there a lack of suitable land. At least five sites have been deemed potential resettlement terrain by U.N. officials and other experts, but closed-door negotiations with the landowners have been slow -- too slow to avert the impending disaster.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/03/21/1539810/haitis-next-disaster.html#ixzz0j2sxhABP