iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Roy Speckhardt

GET UPDATES FROM Roy Speckhardt
 

The Equal Rights Amendment Finally Arrives

Posted: 04/10/2012 4:56 pm

Today's political climate makes it abundantly clear that American women need to have their rights and freedoms permanently protected through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. New laws and regulations being pushed by the Religious Right are an open violation of every woman's basic dignity by forcing them into a position where they can be legally mistreated.

Several bills were recently introduced by religious political extremists in Congress to restrict women's access to necessary health services, such as the one introduced by Senator Roy Blunt which would have exempted employers from providing contraceptive care to their employees for religious reasons. While Sen. Blunt was unsuccessful, additional legislation would defund reproductive health services and elevate the rights of a fetus over that of a woman. And in Wisconsin several bills were just passed that repealed the state's 2009 Equal Pay Enforcement Act and degraded health services for women. Members of the Religious Right have cheered at these and other measures which are predicated on an assumption that women are inferior.

It appears as though religious fundamentalists and their allies in elected office are committed to legalizing open discrimination against women, who are now a major focus of presidential and congressional campaigns as members of the political establishment spar over women's rights and jockey for votes.

In this modern era one might think that any form of gender prejudice or discrimination would be widely rejected. However, in addition to the new attacks on women's rights, pay inequity and other forms of institutionalized discrimination continue to plague women, who are often relegated to second-class status by employers. Now that the basic health requirements of women are also under attack, it is essential to step up and guarantee the equality of women in America once and for all.

Thankfully, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) did just that when he introduced a joint resolution initiated by Carolyn A. Cook and United 4 Equality to remove the deadline for the states' ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. The ERA, which was originally presented to Congress in 1923, would ensure through a constitutional amendment that all citizens are afforded the same civil rights and liberties regardless of gender. A constitutional amendment like the ERA would be a strong safeguard because it couldn't be repealed without both chambers of Congress, as well as the legislatures of at least 38 states, approving with a two-thirds majority.

Humanists have a long history of consistently supporting the ERA and advocating for its ratification, often against opposition by religious and conservative groups. Now that these same groups and their intellectual offspring are on the offensive again in regards to discrimination against women, humanists and religious allies are determined to see the ERA finally passed.

The largest obstacle that hinders the passage of this amendment is the deadline by which individual states must ratify the amendment after it has been approved by Congress. This deadline blocked the passage of the ERA in 1982, 10 years after the amendment was initially accepted by both houses of Congress and by President Nixon. It is essential that we remove this unnecessary deadline through passage of Senator Cardin's joint resolution and allow previous ratifications by states to apply in the ongoing ratification process.

If America wishes to serve as an international example of liberty and just governance, we must ensure that all citizens are afforded the same rights and that institutionalized discrimination is made illegal. We must all come together, regardless of religious beliefs or political opinions, in order to guarantee equal treatment under the law and the end to gender discrimination.

 
 
 

Follow Roy Speckhardt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/americnhumanist

Today's political climate makes it abundantly clear that American women need to have their rights and freedoms permanently protected through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. New laws and regulat...
Today's political climate makes it abundantly clear that American women need to have their rights and freedoms permanently protected through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. New laws and regulat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuldLochinvar
01:44 AM on 04/20/2012
Free access to contraceptive services is the only serious approach to the fact that the Earth's human population is already beyond the numbers that can sustainably be maintained for another century. There is no issue more vital to environmental ethics, nor energy sufficiency, nor the prevention of disastrous global warming, nor peace in the world, than to set an example of restraint in our own numbers.
10:29 AM on 04/12/2012
The ERA is already in this session of Congress as bills SJ Res 21 and HJ Res 69. The Senate bill only has 14 cosponsors. The Democrat leadership is not cosponsoring the bills. Each person reading this should contact their US Senators and urge that they cosponsor the bills and urge that the full Senate be allowed to vote on the ERA bills. These bills have been introduced since 1985 but the men do not let the bills out of committees. These men are from both parties and liberals and conservatives. It is the men ruling Congress who do not allow the ERA bills to come to a full vote of either house of Congress. Women and men who believe in sex equality under the Constitution should join with others and millions of people should march on Washington and demand the ERA be voted on by the full Congress. 230 years and still no guarantee of Constitutional equality for women. This is a violation of human rights. We are not a real democracy until women have equality under the Constitution. If the men do not allow and vote for the ERA then they all should be voted out in Nov 2012. The President and Gov Romney should both be asked to support the ERA bills - so far neither of them supports the ERA bills.
08:07 PM on 04/11/2012
Thank you to the American Humanist Association, AHA's Feminist Caucus and Roy Speckhardt for their commitment to equality and justice for All! We need more allies to stand as you have for women to no longer be restricted by those who use the fact that ERA never passed to continue to oppress women. A great post!
10:02 AM on 04/11/2012
An Equal Rights Amendment for women would, no more than the existing Equal Protection clause, have any impact at all on the sustainability of recent proposals relating to birth control, reproduction, and abortion. About the only impact it could have would be that IF a health plan covers female-implemented birth control, men could argue that male-implemented birth control (condoms) should also be covered. (It would also mean that if condoms are covered, then certainly birth control pills should be covered, but I don't think any health plan covers condoms so that point is moot.)
10:58 AM on 04/11/2012
this comment is total nonsense
08:54 PM on 04/11/2012
The Equal Rights Amendment is the 14th Amendment for Women. Ask Justice Scalia who said sex discrimination is not prohibited under the Constitution. Susan B. Anthony proved this fact in 1872 when she was arrested for the illegal act of voting as a woman. The brilliant strategist that she was, she tested whether the 14th Amendment applied to women and it didn't.

ERA is not about Issues. It is about the fundamental principle of our democracy - equality and justice for All. It outlaws sex discrimination and expands the principle that All Men and Women are created equal.

ERA is a win-win for men and women because whatever negatively impacts 52% of Americans impacts society as a whole. While other countries proactively address the gender imbalance as part of their economic recovery and sustainability efforts, America is falling further and further behind. Wake up, Bipartisan Congress! To continue to obstruct ERA is to do so at our own peril.
10:50 PM on 04/10/2012
Because four states have rescinded their previous ratifications and a fifth has effectively placed a time limit (which date has passed) on its ratification, it's a dead issue until the composition of the Supreme Court changes. Also, the political question doctrine is dead when the Supreme Court itself is so blatantly political. Want social justice? Elect a Democrat President who will appoint more liberal justices!

Chevy
10:29 AM on 04/11/2012
"Also, the political question doctrine is dead when the Supreme Court itself is so blatantly political. Want social justice? Elect a Democrat President who will appoint more liberal justices!"

I sincerely hope that I'm reading this wrong and the above comment was meant to be sarcastic in nature as you go from condemning the Supreme Court for being to political (which it is not) to advocating exerting political influence on the court in order to bring about legal decisions you would approve of.

The court is not designed for you to legislate from. That's the job of the Legislature.

Again, I hope I misread the original comment.
12:37 AM on 04/12/2012
You are a fool if you think the current supreme court is anything but political.
11:48 AM on 04/26/2012
Do you really believe the ruling in Citizens United vs. FEC was a non-political decision?
05:29 PM on 04/10/2012
I hope Phyllis Schlafly doesn't hear about this...
08:56 PM on 04/11/2012
No doubt she has and I would welcome a debate with her any day. She can forfeit her equality under law all she wants, but I want to achieve mine....