Stark Contrast at Health Care Town Hall in California

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The crowds that jammed Fremont's Senior Center and Alameda's City Hall yesterday came to be heard by--and not listen to--Rep. Pete Stark, who tried to explain his support for HR 3200, America's Affordable Health Choices Act, which he co-authored. Members of the Minutemen, supporters of the LaRouche movement, and other conservatives loudly brought their agendas to the public meetings.

What occurred at the meetings was deceptive. The crowd that gathered before 8 a.m. at the Fremont Senior Center seemed benign. Mrs. Marie McKeever, a resident of Freemont for thirty-seven years who has voted for Stark repeatedly, said "I love my Medicare and I want to leave it for my kids." She commented positively on the bill and on Stark's frequent town halls.

Before the meeting, local leaders for Organizing for America instructed supporters of health care reform not to engage in name calling, but by the time the meeting ended at 10 a.m., they were facing off with the bill's opponents, chanting--and sometimes screaming--so loudly that they blocked the debate inside.

A few conservatives carried copies of Mark R. Levin's Liberty and Tyranny. They feared that new health care legislation would bring increased taxes and government access to their medical records. In Alameda, Stark spoke firmly against the misinformation circulated by health care reform foes, the "myths" that worry his constituents. "Illegal residents will not be covered by the bill," he said. "They will receive no federal payments." Stark refuted Governor Sarah Palin's claim that reform would lead to the creation of "death panels," explaining that under the proposed bill, Medicare would offer patients with terminal illness the option of voluntary counseling by a physician regarding end of life decisions, e.g., living wills and hospice care.

When Don Bechler, chair of Single Payer Now, asked if Stark supported the Kucinich Amendment, the congressman ducked the question, noting that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called for a vote on the subject when the House of Representatives reconvenes.

While Stark is not totally satisfied with HR 3200, he nonetheless urges its passage, noting that within five years 90 percent of Americans would be covered by affordable health care.

Correction (8/21): My apologies to the East Bay chapter of Democracy for America (DFA). It was Organizing for America (OFA) members who had the table at the Fremont meeting and who instructed the crowd before the Town Hall on behavior. But some of the OFA and unidentified folks outside the meeting got caught up by the rhetoric, the signs, and the chanting.
The crowds that jammed Fremont's Senior Center and Alameda's City Hall yesterday came to be heard by--and not listen to--Rep. Pete Stark, who tried to explain his support for HR 3200, America's Afford...
The crowds that jammed Fremont's Senior Center and Alameda's City Hall yesterday came to be heard by--and not listen to--Rep. Pete Stark, who tried to explain his support for HR 3200, America's Afford...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
2
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I also attended the Fremont Town Hall. I'm disappointed about what your article doesn't say, rather than what it does say. It's important to note that of those that got inside, many were in fact "organized" and they were in support of Mr. Stark. They had signs and buttons and stickers on their shirts. They were there to "shush" those that had legitimate concerns and questions about the proposed legislation. They represented they were there to keep it "civil" but in fact were very disrespectful and rude of concerned people. Those that were there in opposition, did not appear to be organized, but were private concerned citizens. Many of them have never been "vocal" or "active" until the current Administration started it's whirlwind driving force of increasing the size of government in recent months. And while YES people did get loud - it was in efforts to be heard and to insist that their questions in fact were answered. Mr. Stark did NOT answer many of the questions posed to him. He really didn't. Lastly, those few that did get called to ask their questions that were in support did not appear to have read any part of the bill. They merely told their sad story and stated they were in support. Those that raised difficult questions and were in opposition had done EXTENSIVE reading of either the bill entirely or parts thereof.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 08/19/2009

I attended the Town Hall with Rep. Stark in Fremont on Saturday, and this article is misleading. Opponents of the proposed Health Care Reform showed up to engage in discussion and debate, and the vast majority of them were most civil in their attempt to do so. Some of the opponents only started to get loud during the meeting after Rep. Stark repeatedly flatly refused to provide substantive answers to several pointed questions, choosing instead to either (1) provide canned non-responsive irrelevant speeches, (2) attempt to deflect the inquiry with humorous responses rather than real answers, or (3) simply insult his constituents to discredit them. If Rep. Stark had simply answered the questions, answered them fully and truthfully, or even simply admitted that he didn't know the answers to the questions, things would have gone much more smoothly for him.

If you want to see what happened inside for yourself, video clips from the meeting can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/user/AnAmericanCapitalist#play/uploads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 08/18/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect