iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Russell Bishop

GET UPDATES FROM Russell Bishop
 

Soul-Talk: You Don't Have to Be an Addict to Recover

Posted: 03/13/2012 7:00 am

Do you know anyone suffering from some kind of addiction or addictive behavior? While most of us think about addiction in the more common uses of the term, such as alcohol or drug addiction, people can also become addicted to emotional patterns, food abuse, or simply to their own self-appointed sense of righteous indignation and intellectual superiority (Rush Limbaugh, anyone?).

If you or someone you know is struggling with addictive behaviors, then you might want to pay close attention to a few of the concepts contained within this post. To be clear, I am not holding myself out to be an expert on addiction or recovery in the clinical sense; however, I do wish to point out some relatively small issues that, if addressed properly, can make a world of difference.

Could the most sensitive be the most prone to addictive behavior?

Not only are those who enter into drug and alcohol abuse the most sensitive people around, but also those who have not developed skills or abilities to deal with their sensitivity. Sensitivity is often looked upon by traditional society as a form of weakness or vulnerability. The more sensitive amongst us often struggle with how to survive, let alone thrive, in a world of criticism. For those who lack sufficient skills to address their sensitivities, alcohol and drugs appear to be temporary means to numb themselves from their highly-sensitive natures. The same can apply to those who overindulge in food, with food being used to first try to soothe an uncomfortable feeling and ultimately to provide a layer of protection against the world.

However, none of these "fixes" actually fix anything for very long, and so the need to return to the bottle, needle, or food binge comes back with a vengeance. From here, it is pretty easy to imagine the downward spiral that is about to take place. When "friends" or "family" notice that something is amiss, they rarely possess the skills or sensitivity to support the individual; instead, they either ignore the situation, hoping it will get better, or they go on the offensive, blaming the individual for their suffering, which only drives them further to the substance of choice.

Recently, the son of a friend relapsed into a form of drug abuse that may or may not be part of an addictive pattern. By relapse, I mean that he had undergone a previous set of instances wherein he wound up doing a fair amount of "recreational drugs" -- cocaine, marijuana, etc., -- got himself "clean" again, and then recently relapsed. The relapse wound up quite serious with a trip to the ER for a drug overdose.

Please notice that I did not say he was or is "an addict." While he has engaged in some addictive behaviors, and while he may be what people generally call an addict, who he is as a person is quite different from his behaviors (aka drug abuse).

You don't have to be an addict to recover

While the distinction between addict and addictive behavior may seem like splitting hairs, successful recovery may in fact lie in a seemingly-small distinction. There are any number of reasons why this apparently minor distinction matters. Before we can address the process of recovery and the near-fatal flaw of many recovery programs, we need to first understand what it means to recover.

According to Merriam-Webster, recover means:

  1. to get back : regain
  2. to bring back to normal position or condition

Notice recovery doesn't mean fixing anything that is broken, or making up for some kind of flaw in the person. It simply means to restore oneself to a prior condition, in this case that of a normally-functioning human being. However, even this definition of recovery is problematic -- what the heck is normal? Texting all day? Some 895 Facebook friends and no real connection?

Perhaps the best known of the recovery programs is Alcoholics Anonymous, founded in 1935 by Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob Smith, and later supported by a landmark book of the same name published in 1939. While AA has certainly had its successes, it also relies on a certain kind of negation which may not be all that helpful, especially when you realize that the Harvard Medical Health Letter wrote in an article called Treatment of Drug Abuse and Addiction -- Part III (October, 1995) that 80 percent of all alcoholics who recover for a year or more do so on their own.

Do we need the AA negation?

AA meetings begin with an introduction by the chairperson, who introduces himself simply as, "Hi, my name is Bob, and I'm an alcoholic." Shortly thereafter, attendees read the section on "How It Works" from the AA book. The "How It Works" section includes the following passage, which again is read aloud:

Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program, usually men and women who are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves. There are such unfortunates. They are not at fault; they seem to have been born that way. They are naturally incapable of grasping and developing a manner of living which demands rigorous honesty. Their chances are less than average. There are those too who suffer from grave emotional and mental disorders, but many of them do recover if they have the capacity to be honest.

The opening introduction is an unfortunate affirmation of a negative state: Hi, my name is Bob and I am an alcoholic commands the person seeking support to affirm that he or she is in a losing position, if not doomed from the outset. Bob is not asked to affirm that he is on the road to recovery having struggled with alcohol; instead, he is asked to affirm that he is forever more to be known as an alcoholic.

Sadly, this kind of negation is all too easily overlooked these days as people routinely affirm that they are their behavior or profession. "I'm gay," "I'm a banker," or "I'm unemployed" all miss an essential point: you are not what you do either as a profession or as a behavior. Instead, you are a human being who may or may not have a job or a behavioral preference. While this may seem trivial to some of you reading this article, I invite you to look more closely at the implications of affirming that you are your behavior. What progress can you ever hope to achieve if you are forever going to be labeled by your own self as saddled with any particular behavior or preference?

Even more problematic is the "How It Works" claim that "Those who do not recover are ... men and women who are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves, (people who) seem to have been born ... incapable of grasping and developing a manner of living which demands rigorous honesty."

That's a curiously damning beginning to something intended to be positive. These kinds of recovery programs begin by insisting that you proclaim yourself to be forever lost and then further demean those who struggle by asserting a series of natural-born defects.

What's so comforting and supportive about AA meetings?

As my friend's son discovered in his first AA meeting, there are many other sensitive people out there suffering as he has, people who lack meaningful, in-depth contact with other friends on a day-to-day basis, people who find some kind of relief in being able to share their struggles with others in an apparently open and transparent manner. What works about an AA meeting may have little to do with proclaiming a fatal flaw or emotional defect; instead, what may be working has a lot more to do with allowing a more vulnerable, open level of communication that most do not find in their daily lives.

This is where the AA meeting appears to work, at least for a while. After going through the negation exercise of asserting being lost, at least those attending get to share with one another at a deeper level of reality. Even though that reality is one of pain and suffering, at least it is shared and discussed with apparent vulnerability and community. For many, these AA sessions may be the first time they have ever experienced their sensitivity as a sign of normalcy, if not an actual source of strength and connection with others.

Next week, we will go deeper into the power of affirmations, how they work, and how you can begin to build a positive foundation upon which to build an even more positive life. If you or anyone you know are suffering from addictive behaviors, do yourself a favor and tune in next week to begin a process of affirming your own strength and inherent ability.

I'd love to hear your take on this subject. What has been our experience with sensitivity? How have you attempted to protect yourself or use your sensitivity as a source of strength? Please do leave a comment here or drop me an email at Russell (at) russellbishop.com.

---

If you want more information on how you can apply this kind of reframing to your life and to your job, about a few simple steps that may wind up transforming your life, please download a free chapter from my new book, "Workarounds That Work." You'll be glad you did.

You can buy "Workarounds That Work" here.

Russell Bishop is an educational psychologist, author, executive coach and management consultant based in Santa Barbara, Calif. You can learn more about my work by visiting my website at www.RussellBishop.com. You can contact me by e-mail at Russell (at) russellbishop.com.

For more by Russell Bishop, click here.

For more on addiction and recovery, click here.

 
 
 

Follow Russell Bishop on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Russell_Bishop

FOLLOW HEALTHY LIVING
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:38 PM on 03/30/2012
I agree that the simple act of being able to share and be vulnerable and safe in meetings is tremendously helpful for many people who are not fortunate to have loving, caring, non-judgmental people in their lives who are willing to listen, help and support. The feeling of fellowship helps many, even those who don't adhere to the 12 steps.
10:27 AM on 03/20/2012
Having alcoholism -and admitting it- isn't a negation or statement of doom. For the recovering alcoholic, it's a simple statement of reality, which active alcoholics avoid like the plague.

AA's well-known affirmations have spoken so loudly to so many that it's difficult to hear what Russell is trying to say. The AA program comes out of the same '30's tradition as "The Power of Positive Thinking." Positive affirmations are powerful. And they are not new.
04:52 PM on 03/17/2012
Hi Russell,

I am the mother of two children who abused drugs and I do cringe to think about calling them addicts, because they are so much more than that. I'm not sure the word addict fits at all for one of them, but who is to say. My daughter attended AA for several years and the support was extremely helpful to her. I have attended Al-Anon and the sharing that you mentioned was key to my being able to work through the despair I have felt at certain points.

Parents also need a group to share their innermost feelings about their child's drug or alcohol use. My close friends were sympathetic and they seemed to be non-judgemental, but no one understands your pain like someone who is in the same situation.

AA does not work for everyone, but I can't imagine anything better than being accepted into a group that supports you, flaws and all. You make an important point in your post. Thanks for sharing.
07:09 PM on 03/15/2012
My name is Allen, and I am an alcoholic. I attended my first AA meeting in August 1974 and have not had a drink since.
I am not an alcoholic because I am one of the “most sensitive people around.” I am an alcoholic because alcohol does absolutely wonderful things for me. If you felt like I do after one shot of gin, you too would want to bathe in the stuff. My problem is physical, not psychological.
Saying that I am an alcoholic in an AA meeting is not “proclaiming a fatal flaw”. It is a statement of fact. I won’t drink alcohol because I’m unlikely to stop until bad things happen. There is no shame in acknowledging this fact.
Meetings are crucial because there I meet people who understand at a gut level precisely what it means for me to forgo the delights of demon rum. I have a 42 year-old son who once told me that he didn’t like the way he felt after more than two or three beers. How on earth could he possibly be expected to understand my good friend who left his girl friend and her family at a party so he could drink warm vodka alone in the car? I absolutely understand why my friend would do such a thing; my son could not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
03:41 AM on 03/17/2012
Please don't confuse us with the facts.
02:01 PM on 03/14/2012
As a recovering addict, I must say that "12 step programs" have me baffled. I detoxed by myself, was clean for three months, and began attending NA seeking fellowship. I thought that in a room full of addicts, I'd find camaraderie. Suffering from severe social anxiety, I found that talking to individuals one on one was a lot less stressful for me, so I made it a habit to approach people before and after meetings to talk. Apparently, this qualifies me as "abstinent", not "in recovery". Before long, most old timers wouldn't even give me the time of day. On top of that, sponsors began telling people to stay away from me because it was only a matter of time before I relapsed. I'm coming up on one year "abstinent", and to be honest, I'm amazed at how many people(with time) I hear expressing a desire to use; people with "strong programs". I never feel that desire. In my time clean, my life hasn't dramatically improved, but I have. Thanks to me. "Progress not perfection","principles before personality", the belief that its okay to continue to strew wreckage in your wake because your "higher power" will help you overcome your character defects; these are all just excuses, made by and for addicts to ease their consciences. The newcomer is the most important person in the room, as long as he toes the line. I'm just saying, use your brain before you drink the kool-aid.
01:16 AM on 03/14/2012
After 4 years of abstinence from alcohol I can tell you AA did not save my life. I did. I agree w/the author. I find no purpose in walking into a meeting and proclaiming that "I AM an alcoholic." I am a mom, I am afriend, I am a daughter, sister, so many things. I find no comfort in focusing on addiction. Yes its there, some times I struggle but all the things that I *AM* keep me sober and grounded. I see so much animosity from devout AA'ers. That my friend is the close minded, all or nothing thinking that will keep you in "recovery" and away from actually living your entire life. If you find comfort in AA, I'm happy for you, but don't blow a gasket because someone disagrees with AA.
4.5 years and counting!!!
ndmy
Who, me?
09:29 AM on 03/14/2012
Congratulations on 4.5 years! It was interesting to finally read an article that put my thoughts to words. My boyfriend is an alcoholic and I couldn't understand why he didn't go to AA and get better. When I attended Alanon, I began to understand their program better and I just couldn't agree with them. Alanon teaches you to "detach" from the alcoholic and that "you wouldn't blame a person with cancer for their disease, why would you blame an alcoholic for theirs"? As far as "detaching", I am no robot. I can't command myself to not let my boyfriend's problem drinking bother me and that I don't have feelings about what is going on in my home and life.
Anyway, I don't have the answers, I just know that AA is not for me or my boyfriend. He is sober most of the time; I am grateful for the sober periods of his life.
09:38 PM on 03/13/2012
I love when people who have never eaten chocolate tell me how it tastes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN4th
Southern Thinker
06:54 PM on 03/13/2012
I have gone to Al-Anon, which closely follows the a pattern. What struck me most is that the program is mired in the 50's, and in religion and self-aggrandizement. It hasn't incorporated any science from the last 60 years, and it forbids the introduction of any thinking that is not in line with its own dogma. I could find little research that validated its approach. Despite some weasel-words about "the god of your understanding" its literature is heavily based in Christianity, and it's basic tenets insist that it is god, and not the person's own strength, that will help them, which I found to be undermining of self confidence.
06:28 PM on 03/13/2012
Want the real truth about AA? Google 'orange-papers'.
05:52 PM on 03/13/2012
Why do you define yourself as an author, consultant and Executive coach?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
07:20 AM on 03/14/2012
First amendment.
04:39 PM on 03/13/2012
Oh Russell, now you have stirred up the true believers. They are running to AA's rescue, claiming great success (when AA's 'success' is 5% or less, and of course over 80% recover without any intervention at all) and questioning scientific studies, claiming anyone who didn't need AA couldn't have been a 'real addict', and of course accusing you of misunderstanding their beloved program. You made excellent and quite succinct points, although I (as someone who has 'recovered' with and without AA, and been to thousands of meetings over 20 years) would venture to say you didn't go far enough. I would hypothesize, and believe there are some studies that point in this direction, that AA has actually harmed more people than it has ever helped. That harm, and those people - many of whom died after 'not working the program' properly, were negatively impacted by the issues you mentioned of course, but also the very idea of powerlessness central to 12-step dogma. I am not going to give anecdotal evidence (people I have actually seen harmed), as that is exactly what the 12-step zombies do, 'oh, I know it works, because it's working for me and I see it working in others at every meeting', but at least one study has shown that people given 12-step concepts fair worse long term (in relation to relapse rates, severity of relapse, and death), than those treated with other methods, or of course not treated at all. One thing you did overlook I
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke1225
10:15 PM on 03/13/2012
Where did you get your stats?
12:06 AM on 03/14/2012
That figure is from a study done by Harvard Prof. George Vaillant on over 1,000 alcoholics, Prof. Vaillant was also a member of AA's board of trustees and was naturally predisposed to favor AA. However, results are results, and even an AA board member can't fake the fact that AA works equally well to no treatment at all (annual spontaneous remission rates, people simply stopping on their own, is also 5%), and simply attributes members success to 'the program', when the only people who stop in AA are those motivated and ready to stop anyway. Open your mind and do a little research...
01:19 AM on 03/14/2012
Thank you! Perfect comment.
04:20 PM on 03/13/2012
Thank you! I spent 20 years in and out of the AA rooms and was never able to string together more than 5 months of sobriety until I walked away from AA. AA relies upon the self-fulfilling prophecy of failure and the revolving door to keep their clubhouses funded. I am happy to say that I am now 15 months sober through cognitive-behavior therapy, SMART Recovery and a program of diet and exercise. I am no longer in the AA alcohol-obsessive mind trap but consider myself RECOVERED from destructive behavior.
05:51 PM on 03/13/2012
Congratulations, not only for saving your own life, but for being able to break free of the omnipresent 12-step dogma forced on anyone with a substance abuse problem. I have also been clean and sober, and happy and productive, for over a year (this time). I follow a personal recovery program similar to yours, exercise and healthy diet being crucial, as well as high dose B vitamins (interestingly, something used by AA founder Bill Wilson, but not recommended by the official program), living in the present and accepting life's difficulties unconditionally, and SMART Recovery and Lifering meetings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
C Karen Stopford
04:02 PM on 03/13/2012
My take on this subject is that you do not have sufficient direct experience to criticize a program that works. But it only works if you do it the way it's written. "Recovery" is a temporary phenomenon, and one that has to be worked at. Your statement that "AA meetings work, at least for a little while" indicates that you really don't have an understanding of the program nor the issues of addiction it addresses; so I have to ask myself, why would I read your book? If I were trying to recover from addiction, I would take my advice from someone who had done it successfully and had found a solution that worked just as well when others applied it to their own lives.
ndmy
Who, me?
09:38 AM on 03/14/2012
AA works for you, good. It doesn't work for everybody as evidenced by all these postings. Everyone needs to walk in their OWN shoes. Everyone has their own paths to salvation.
02:38 PM on 03/13/2012
AA's 12-step program has been modeled and re-modeled to fit many types of issues for people that are "sensitive" in a lot of areas - because it works. If it works, then it works. Why knock it? 76 years of success should prove that. AA is not for everyone, but it's wrong to insinuate that is not for ANYONE. One size doesn't fit all.

Identifying oneself as an alcoholic is no different from saying that I am diabetic, or any other chronic condition that requires daily maintenance so that we don't SUFFER from the condition, As many people do, there is a misinterpretation that equates alcoholic with drunkeness.. Being alcoholic doesn't mean that you are drunk. I didn't stop trying to be a social drinker (unsuccessfully) until I understood alcoholism - haven't had a drink since I went to AA almost 25 years ago. If it's not broke, then why try to fix it?

Please don't ruin the chances of those that AA can work for..
photo
onethot
D.I.P.
02:24 PM on 03/13/2012
I'm curious as to how these statistics re: 80% were compiled & how many relapsed. There is a distinction between a heavy drinker & an alcoholic
I can understand that stating one is an alcoholic could appear demeaning depending on one's perspective. Admitting one has an addiction is a first step in any recovery process. It takes courage honesty and humility. For a newcomer, hearing others admit it could save his/her life. Yes some say " I am an alcoholic" Others say" I am a recovering alcoholic.The first step actually states: We admitted we were powerless over ... and our lives had become unmanageable. If you are saying that addictions are caused by sensitivity or that all people who have addictive behaviours are highly sensitive, I would have to respond that having worked with people who have addictions what you say is a fallacy. Each individual is unique and some people with addictive behaviours can be highly sensitive; others can be quite insensitive. I do not see the correlation between addictive behaviour and sensitivity. Your question re how does one deal with sensitivity comes out of left field in this article.
AA doesn't work for all and some people do change their behaviour on their own or with the help of significant others. However AA is not simply about getting rid of an addiction although for some that is as far as they want to go. In one sense it is a very powerful affirmation that there is a solution.
10:59 PM on 03/13/2012
Fanned and Faved. You wrote a very thoughtful comment and I am in agreement with you. Science has a lot of research yet to do on addiction. I have also seen a great difference between
addicts and their personalities and actions. One size does not fit all. Seeing the world through
the eyes of an addict, I can not comprehend, and would not advise them. I would only say that I admire those who lose their way in life and fight to find their way again.
photo
onethot
D.I.P.
12:15 AM on 03/14/2012
Hi " whatathought"
Thanks for your feedback. I like what you say about " one size does not fit all." And, yes, I totally agree that one has to admire those who lose their way in life and fight to find their way again, in whichever way works for them.

I do wonder if science, or anyone for that matter, will ever discover what causes addictions; however, more important than the cause ( s) is finding solutions.

Much appreciation for the F's...

All good your way....