iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Russell Bishop

GET UPDATES FROM Russell Bishop
 

Are You Pretending to Be Independent?

Posted: 07/04/11 11:21 AM ET

Independence Day is a great and proud day in our country's history, one in which we might benefit from reflecting on what independence really means. My experience suggests that most people who proclaim independence are living an illusion and actually wind up denying themselves the very freedom they are seeking.

What about you? Do you like to think of yourself as independent? Do you have friends who also like to think of themselves as independent? If so, I respectfully suggest that you both may be pursuing a myth.

In my experience coaching and consulting with thousands of people, I have found that most people are seeking freedom and settling for the myth of independence. If we could solve this riddle, I think we would go a long way toward solving much of what pains us in today's world of volatile economics and vitriolic politics.

Merriam-Webster tells us that being independent means a few very different things. The first definition, "not subject to control by others" or "not affiliated with a larger controlling unit" is workable for the most part and reflects the meaning and significance of Independence Day.

However, the next several definitions point out some deeper challenges; for example, "not requiring or relying on something else ... (or) someone else" is pretty much a non-starter for darn near every one of us. It's not until the fourth definition that we find the real source of the problem I want to address today: "showing a desire for freedom."

The Independence Myth

If you consider yourself to be independent, try this little test: do you make your own clothes? Ever? Did you raise your cotton? Do you make your own sewing needles? You get the drift; just about all of us are dependent on others for a wide variety of life's necessities, ranging from jobs to clothes. We're even dependent on other people following some basic "rules" -- on which side of the yellow line would you like to see others driving?

The lesson here is more about freedom than it is about independence. If you like to think of yourself as independent, could you imagine substituting the word freedom, the experience of being free, for independence? Would you like to think of yourself as free, of having freedom? One definition of freedom might have something to do with the freedom to experience your well-being independently of what others might say or do.

I know this may sound goofy to you, but stop for a moment and ask yourself what it means to be free: I am referring to true freedom, the only freedom that you have 100-percent control over, regardless of your physical circumstances, the only freedom that no one can take away from you. Perhaps the best way to understand the concept, and more importantly, the power of the difference, is to consider the life of Victor Frankl.

How To Be Free Regardless Of Your Circumstances

Victor Frankl was an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist working in pre-World-War-II Vienna, helping troubled people who were considered suicidal. His work was incredibly successful and caught the attention of some prominent thinkers in Germany.

As the war grew, he wound up being deported to Theresienstadt, a concentration camp, along with his wife and parents. They were quickly separated and sent to different camps. Frankl himself was transferred to several, including Auschwitz and Turkheim (near Dachau). All of his family members, except his sister who escaped, died in one of the concentration camps.

On his arrival at Theresienstadt, he was selected to live, rather than be immediately executed. Once that decision was made, he was sent to the "showers," where he was stripped, completely shaved and clothed in prison garb that intentionally was the wrong size (large people were given clothes way too small, while small people were given clothes way too big). He quickly reasoned that the process was intended to strip the individual of any sense of being, importance or relevance.

Next up, the Nazis gathered up his huge collection of research, records and writings, and burned his life's work in front of him. From there, he endured all manner of cruelty and inhumanity, including various forms of physical suffering and torture.

Along the way, as he struggled to maintain his sense of self and his dignity, he came to formulate some compelling thoughts and bits of awareness, which together allowed him to live, and to exude a dignity that the Nazis could not extinguish.

For Frankl, the critical realization came as yet another indignity was forced upon him. That realization was about freedom. His simple yet powerful realization goes like this: "Freedom is that place in time just after they do something to me, and just before I choose my response."

The following are some quotes from Victor Frankl's seminal work, Man's Search for Meaning, which was published in 1946, after his long ordeal in the various concentration camps. You may find something profoundly resonant with these quotations, something which seems ever more current in today's challenging times:

When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Everything can be taken from a man or a woman but one thing: the last of human freedoms, to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way.

As we move through the coming days and months of unsteady economic challenges and the prospects of more partisan strife, I encourage you to remember that as bad as things are, you still have a choice about how you respond. Don't get me wrong; I'm not saying that the shenanigans being pulled off politically or economically are anything close to fair or that what the Nazis did to Frankl was fair or just. However, you still get to choose how you respond.

Try following Frankl's advice: think about where you are headed in your life, what experiences you are having, and what choices you can make about them. How could you choose freedom even in the worst of circumstances? How could you change yourself?

If you can master theses simple questions, you may find that you can achieve freedom in a highly interdependent world.

How about you? What is the freedom that you seek? What are you doing to create that experience for yourself?

I'd love to hear from you, so please leave a comment here or drop me an email at Russell!@russellbishop.com.

If you want more information on how you can apply this kind of reframing to your life, and on how you can take a few simple steps that may wind up transforming your life, download a free chapter from Russell's new book, "Workarounds That Work."

You can buy "Workarounds That Work" here.

Russell Bishop is an educational psychologist, author, executive coach and management consultant based in Santa Barbara, Calif. You can learn more about his work by visiting his website at www.RussellBishop.com. You can contact him by email at Russell@russellbishop.com.

 
 
 

Follow Russell Bishop on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Russell_Bishop

Independence Day is a great and proud day in our country's history, one in which we might benefit from reflecting on what independence really means. My experience suggests that most people who procla...
Independence Day is a great and proud day in our country's history, one in which we might benefit from reflecting on what independence really means. My experience suggests that most people who procla...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 184
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justannesopinion
06:56 PM on 07/18/2011
Maybe I know people very dissimilar to Mr. Bishop's acquaintances, but when people I've known through the years have called themselves independent, they usually mean one or more of a) that they don't subscribe to a political or ideological platform, b) that they prefer entrepreneurial situations over work for large organizations, c) that they prefer living alone over marriage or cohabiting, or d) that they have enough money to live on without paid work. I don't think I know anyone, self styled independent type or otherwise, who would be shocked and chagrined to realize the live within a social and economic context.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
solitude1951
09:21 PM on 07/11/2011
We're all interconnected and interdependent. That is reality.
HenryT2
You can't fight a fire or THE SYSTEM from within
05:19 AM on 07/08/2011
I retired at 40. And I was able to do that because I reduced my desires in order to gain the freedom I desperately wanted. I am happier with a far less extravagent car which I choose to drive wherever I want rather than a more luxurious one which I drive to places I don't want to go. I choose a less ritzy house that is paid for rather than the nicer house which I have to continue to work to pay for.

I still have to do many things I'd prefer not to do, but how would anyone ever avoid that? Does anyone LIKE brushing their teeth? The main point is to keep the number of things you'd rather not do down to a minimum while spending more time doing that which you like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RoughCollie
Destination: A new way of seeing things.
08:58 AM on 07/07/2011
Mr. Bishop,
As always, you have written a deeply thoughtful and provocative article that many readers probably feel is intended for a bigger picture but that I am placing within the framework of my marriage.

Though I have never read Dr. Frankl's book, I am always touched by the passages I come across. What kind of inner strength and mental equanimity did this man possess to find peaceful moments between such horrible abuses, but more than that, what is it that so many of us today lack that we cannot emulate his example and instead become enmeshed in the mental helplessness of depression from situations that are a walk in the park compared to his torture?

The emotional despair of finding oneself in the downward spiral of an alcoholic marriage (with no physical abuse) can be like a mental prison. With retirement not far away, the choice is between the pre-frontal cortex's logic of maintaining physical security and stability and the limbic desire to run away, to hunt for the intimacy that is so desperately missing.

I like the idea that somewhere, between these two states, there is a moment of grace. A reprieve from the weighty awareness of what is missing gives way to a momentary blessing of the abundant awareness of choice; since choice embodies freedom and freedom is empowerment then, reason dictates, there is no helplessness... only a vague sense of discomfort as a new way of thinking attempts to push out the old.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
02:29 AM on 07/07/2011
In the national sense, independence means that our country is not subject to foreign rule, that we retain our political and economic autonomy. But, that may be just as much a myth in the 21st century as personal independence is, in our modern mass-produced online society, or at least a relic of yesteryear and times gone by in which times a person was REQUIRED to be much more independent than they are today.  In the personal sense again, though, independence might be referenced or seen as: Able to make one's own decisions, independent of interference from friends, family, or other outside persons, the status normally associated with adulthood, having one's own money, being able to pull up stakes and relocate at-will, voting rights, civil rights, liberties, that kind of thing. And, in an era when government, organized religious entities, and others are trying to use various modes of communication to assert influence, and ultimately also control, you have to be a little skeptical when anyone brings up the subject. There's no END to the number of people that'd just love to start telling you how to live your life, if you look like you need any help in that area, which is why independence, in the truest sense, starts with the individual spirit. When people become dispirited, adopt a demeanor and outlook of dependency and defeatism, then they truly have lost their independence in ways that are barely and poorly understood. And, to that, there's only one thing to say: Non Illegitimati Carborundum, don't let the blankers grind you down.
02:54 PM on 07/05/2011
Sure no one is truly "independent", we all need support to function in civilization but when most people refer to themselves as independent I think they mean they are independent from subscribing to the idiotology of either of our two political parties. Being an "Independent" means looking at each issue with an open mind and making a decision based on the facts at hand and the willingness to change your mind when new or previously unknown facts are presented. Being a Dem. or Rep. has become to mean holding on to a view point regardless of new information and to support ideas based on party platform. I think that turns a lot of critical thinkers off.
02:01 PM on 07/05/2011
Just because you get your clothes from someone else doesn't mean you are dependent upon them. Mutually beneficial transactions are the basis of society, but you retain your independence from the rest of society by virtue of being able to decide with whom you transact, and what benefits you the most.
01:13 PM on 07/05/2011
No one is really independent. On some level, we all need help from others.
11:31 AM on 07/05/2011
CAuse I climbed the tree of life and that is why.. no longer scared if i fall.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
07:08 AM on 07/05/2011
The sort of "I'm independent!" attitude this brings to mind is the teenage-rebellion one - nobody can tell me what to do, I'm my own boss, blah, blah, blah. Which is unrealistic, and if one doesn't grow out of it, immature. It also seems to devalue the involvement and yes, dependence, we have on others (love your examples about making clothes or planting food).

We certainly do have the freedom to change our minds and behaviour, to some degree at least. I always read about Frankl with a degree of unease, because he seems so radically far from the norm in his response to that most horrific situation. I haven't quite the words for it; it's not a case of "setting the bar too high" but it's something along those lines; I don't think he's an example to use for other victims of trauma, for instance. (No, I'm not thinking at all that you're suggesting that; it's just a feeling I get whenever I see him mentioned.)

Good article, I enjoyed it, thank you.
10:22 AM on 07/05/2011
If Frankl is a step too far for you, I suggest reading the stoics (Epictetus is an easy starting point, as is William B. Irvine's book, A Guide to the Good Life).

I have not read Frankl, but everything I've read about his stuff seems to fit nicely in the stoic way of thinking.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
04:00 PM on 07/05/2011
That certainly makes sense! Cheers. :)
Dayne
People are people
04:29 PM on 07/05/2011
Another interesting read is Seneca. His works can be a little difficult, but it makes for interesting reading.

Later,
Dayne
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
02:37 AM on 07/05/2011
A thought-provoking article, and one which will occupy my mind on and off for quite some time to come I expect.
02:36 AM on 07/05/2011
You should read Sam Harris's recent posts on free will. There appears to be reason to believe that we don't have free will. Thoughts simply pop up inside of our minds due some prior unconscious activity. So when it comes to "choosing" how to respond to a bad situation, you will end up "choosing" whatever output your unconscious brain came up with. This explains why different people respond differently to a given situation which means that you can't really hold them accountable for their "choices". It also explains why some people are able to overcome trauma better than others. I never really understand the self-help articles that say that you should "choose" to respond in a certain way. From personal experience, if I react or resist a negative situation then it doesn't make a difference whether I'm aware of my reaction or not. I still feel horrible, even though I launch a self-calming dialogue inside my mind. As someone is known to have said, in each one of us there is another whom we don't know.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
07:01 AM on 07/05/2011
It is possible to change one's responses and attitudes towards things, people or events - cognitive behavioural therapy works around that and it DOES work; I speak from having had a year of it. Whether one wants to follow a rather reductionist line like Mr Harris's or not, it doesn't mean one has to be a prisoner of one's existing attitude. That, to me, is a good enough definition of free will. Expecting our thoughts to be utterly free of prior experience's influence seems to me to go back to the sort of claims of independence at the start of this article - rather a teenage "nobody can tell me what to do!" attitude, I always think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
02:10 AM on 07/05/2011
Very good. Continuing with the Independence Day theme, our nation's founders ideas on the ideas of freedom (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness) quite nicely parallel with the story about Mr. Frankl. Too many of our fellow citizens, many in government and private business positions of leadership, proclaim only the outer aspects of what our founders meant by freedom. Our contemporary leaders have forgotten, either intentionally or not, about the kinds of inner freedom the US' original leaders wrote and spoke of. In essence, the freedom to become virtuous, to strive for what could be considered the ideal form of humanity, that's what motivated the founding individuals as they formed the idea of independence. I'm glad that I'm fortunate enough to have lived in the wake of these great humans, and to be able to keep learning from them. Happy 4th everyone!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
01:44 AM on 07/05/2011
When will we ever learn?

What obscenity will we commit against freedom...the next time we are attacked as inevitably we will be because of how we responded slavishly the last time...what obscenity is next...what escalation of stupidity?
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
02:26 AM on 07/05/2011
Don't get so dark- yeah it sucks- but "we" did not respond to 9-11, Bush did. I refuse to accept the responsibility of that man's actions. I protested his actions numerous times, I used every action I could think of (non-violent of course) to change the course of his policies.

And I will never give up the hope that we can better this democracy or what comes after it. I can't.
08:47 AM on 07/05/2011
OHHH..Will the Bush bashing ever end??
Can you EVER make a point without it??
First of all, it was NOT the decision of ONE MAN to counter-attack and target Iraq! There was CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL, by a Democratically ruled house, that allowed our troops to defend our nation.
Seriously, Do you still think you can just sit-down and chat over a cup of tea with these terrorist?
Do you think you can come to some "mutual understanding" with people who strap bombs to their own children?
These terrorists want Americans and the American way of life to conform or die.
We, the American people, were the VICTIMS of a war that began on September 11th. We didn't start it, nor did our President.
It was thrust upon us in a heinous way.
I guess it is easy to do nothing but "Bush Bash" when you never sorted through the rubble, in the aftermath of these atrocities. Or stood next to a family member or friend of a victim that lost their lives. I guess if you never had to comfort one of those desperate people who prayed for days, that turned into weeks, for a miracle that survivors still hung on under the tons of rubble, then you truly can not understand what it means to be a victim yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
01:42 AM on 07/05/2011
We might have chosen as a nation after 9/11 to never bomb any nation again...or invaded any nation again...or harmed anyone at all again...in the name of Democracy and Freedom.

"Freedom is that place in time just after they do something to me, and just before I choose my response."