More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Russell Bishop

GET UPDATES FROM Russell Bishop
 

Workarounds: Who Holds Power over You?

Posted: 03/14/11 05:50 AM ET

Last week, I posted an article about the apparent need so many feel people to defend, explain and justify themselves. I was a bit surprised by how many people viewed the article and how widely it spread across the Internet. For the most part, readers seemed to resonate with the notion that defending, explaining and justifying can have a toxic effect on life.

Many of the comments were thoughtful and brought a variety of perspectives to the conversation. Leaving aside the usual suspects and their invectives, I'd like to focus on an important element raised by "Xira," who seemed to miss the point in several important ways. Although Xira seemed willing to dismiss, even distort, a key distinction in the article, s/he raised an important area for consideration: that of approval and the question of who holds power over you.

Xira wrote:

This sort of blanket recommendation is in very poor from and also very bad advice.

From what I've been able to tell weather [sic] or not you owe someone an explanation depends entirely on who's got the power in the relationship. If you value the person's opinion, that's a sort of power over you. They can withhold approval. If they can hurt you or other's [sic] opinions of you, that's a sort of power too.

Worse, if they have real meaningful power over your day to day life, say a boss or judge, and you refuse to provide an explanation, you are setting yourself up for a world of hurt.

Try that next time you get pulled over by a cop. When he's sitting there asking you why you did X just say "Thank you". When you get hauled in front of the judge, try it there too, and see what it gets you. Next time your boss catches you doing something not on the official list of things you are allowed to do try refusing him an explanation, see what that gets you.

If a person has power over you, you must explain to their satisfaction. If they do not, you don't need to. A lot of people fail to understand power dynamics in general and explain when they shouldn't or don't when they should.

Several others raised similar red herrings about appearing before a court of law or authority of one kind or another. Perhaps Xira and others either skipped over or failed to understand the fifth paragraph, where I wrote:

However, I am not referring to the kind of self-defense you might need when wrongly accused of something, especially something heinous or criminal. However, there's a difference between that kind of self-defense and the more common defend-explain-justify behavior that many of us seem to engage in almost daily.
This kind of distortion aside, Xira's implied question of who has power over you and whose approval is driving your behavior deserves deeper consideration. The transformation work I have been doing with people in both business and personal life settings often points to approval as a significant issue in well-being.


Keeping in mind that this is just a blog and not a treatise, let's begin a conversation on the power of approval and approval-seeking behavior, a conversation to which I invite your participation, which may extend over several articles. In particular, let's examine this part of Xira's comment: "[Whether] or not you owe someone an explanation depends entirely on who's got the power in the relationship. If you value the person's opinion, that's a sort of power over you. They can withhold approval."

Indeed, who has the power in a relationship is a great question. Not just a great question, but one that can be life-changing if you get it clear. Power? Power over what? What actual power does someone's opinion or approval of you hold, in fact?

Even if we're talking about the kind of power that comes from being incarcerated, tortured and abused, there is a massively important distinction to be made here: even your abuser does not possess the power to determine what choices you make internally, or even the power to require that you "explain to their satisfaction." Just ask the likes of Nelson Mandela, or read the work of Viktor Frankl; both men, and many others, have noted that they neither owed their abusers explanations nor did those "in power" control their thoughts, beliefs, feelings or choices. Each chose to be free inside himself despite the horrific conditions in which he found himself.

Power? Power over what? Power to "approve" of who you are or what you think? Indeed, that is a good question. How often have your sacrificed your own self-approval in favor of that short-lived approval from another to whom you have assigned power over you? I would strongly encourage you to consider the power of the provocation implied within my statement, "to whom you have assigned power over you."

Have you, in fact, given over your own power, your own self-approval, to the opinions of another? Have you surrendered authority to someone else in exchange for something as fleeting as the approval of another? Even if you work in a job where the boss is a jerk, you still have choices, many choices, not the least of which is what you are willing to tolerate. If you choose to go along with abusive or disrespectful behavior at work, at least own up to the fact that you are the one choosing to stay in that situation. Notice that I did not say these are easy choices, but choices they are.

In less dramatic terms than Robben Island or Auschwitz, how many times have you acceded to a demand or made an agreement with someone else only because you did not want to risk disapproval? Have you ever fibbed to the other person for the same reason? "Oh, I'd love to come to your party, but I'm already committed." Or, how about, "Sure, I'd be glad to have lunch with you next week," when some part of you dreads the idea. When the lunch day comes around, have you ever made up a convenient excuse to beg off?

If this sounds familiar, then consider the impact on the only approval that really matters: your own. By assigning power or some sense of being approved to another person, you may actually be damaging your own self-concept and self-approval. The more you drain off your own approval, the more you may wind up seeking that of another. And thus begins the downward spiral into shrinking self-confidence and diminished self-approval.

If you recognize this behavior (and most people seem to have done this kind of thing more than once), then ask yourself what it is that impels you to agree to something that you don't like. What could you do today or this week that would allow you to at least stop the drain on your own approval? What could you do to begin transforming your own sense of self-approval and begin reclaiming the power you may have assigned to others?

I realize that this short article opens a number of issues for which a more in-depth conversation is required. I encourage you to join in and offer your thoughts and experiences. The only caveat: transforming your life requires that you transform yourself, including your thoughts and beliefs. Are you willing to consider the possibility that you have more power than you have experienced so far in your life?

Please leave a comment here, or drop me an e-mail at Russell@russellbishop.com.

***

If you want more information on how you can apply this kind of reframing to your own life, and how you can take a few simple steps that may wind up transforming your life, download a free chapter from Russell's new book, "Workarounds That Work."

You can buy "Workarounds That Work" here.

Russell Bishop is an educational psychologist, author, executive coach and management consultant based in Santa Barbara, Calif. You can learn more about his work by visiting his website at www.RussellBishop.com. You can contact him by e-mail at Russell@russellbishop.com.

 
 
 

Follow Russell Bishop on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Russell_Bishop

Last week, I posted an article about the apparent need so many feel people to defend, explain and justify themselves. I was a bit surprised by how many people viewed the article and how widely it spr...
Last week, I posted an article about the apparent need so many feel people to defend, explain and justify themselves. I was a bit surprised by how many people viewed the article and how widely it spr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & blogger
07:44 PM on 03/17/2011
It all depends on how level the playing field is to begin with. Parents have power over their young children. As children get older, the playing field levels. Peers, whether it be children or adults, only hold power over each other if it's freely given. Nobody can just take another person's power. To be fair, sometimes it is just easier to go along to get along. It doesn't have to result in "shrinking self-confidence".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flaghag
05:25 PM on 03/15/2011
In the workplace, power is often given to people as part of their professional responsibilities. Those who abuse that power usually get noticed and are dealt with...
In familial relationships with children, power lies at the top, with parents. As children grown, they gain some power through independence and development. The relationship hopefully adjusts in a healthy way. If those with the power in the family feel threatened by the weaker becoming stronger and more independent, they shift to a mode where they can keep their power over others. When children, teens, and even grown children are constantly questioned about their choices, actions and ideas, they can doubt themsleves, thus giving more power to those questioning them. "Why don't you dress like her?... Why do you want to spend the holiday with your other parent?" etc. Questioning oneself along with self-doubt (in a family) can give away a person's power and the power mongers will take it! I liken it to emotional abuse if it's allowed to go unchecked.
12:54 PM on 03/15/2011
Many people believe that they are entitled to information, apologies and deference from others. This is not because they need these things, that they will use them to effect some positive change or because their legitimate activities require them; it is merely because they can.

While it is convenient to say that we degrade our own dignity when we provide justifications, this is only half the story. We clearly make the choice to accomodate unreasonable demands, but failing to look at what we are choosing in exchange misses the point entirely. Some examples:

Providing no explanation to an unwarranted question in a job interview is bad employment strategy. Employment counselors recommend heading off inquiries into things like jobless periods and disability by offering explanations, however irrelevant the topic is to job performance.

Those receiving public benefits are expected to give up privacy, dignity and Fifth Amendment rights. The pensioner in a Section 8 apartment, for instance, must open and justify his home, bank account, medical records and personal history. Refusal to do so is grounds for termination - effectively suicide if the person cannot work.

Authoritarianism gets us to oppress ourselves. It spreads from the clearly abusive to infect all of society once we accept the premise that power is only constrained by more power. Like other forms of unquestioned obedience, we internalize the justification for justifications.

America is all about blame and blaming the powerless. If you don't want to hear apologies, don't make people apologize to eat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purenergy
09:03 AM on 03/15/2011
No one has power over you that you don't give them yourself.
06:34 AM on 03/15/2011
The apparent inability of people to decide or to act on a decision appears to usually be a result of powerlessness patterns laid in so early in our lives that it's difficult to find contradictions to them in our memories. One technique to free them is the systematic statement and application of the decision that "I can" (whatever we wish to do but have not done yet) and "I will." If even one person reclaims her or his power, and acts on it, that person can guarantee the future of the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
02:24 AM on 03/15/2011
The ultimate realization is of a spiritual dimension: that there is nothing outside you at all; nothing to give your power away to. However you choose to interpret that, at it's simplest it is the lesson you see repeated in the experiences of the people related here, that they realized that it was their choice whether or not to make the external threat that would induce them to give their power away real. If you realize, as Mandela did, that you have the choice to not make external threats real, then eventually you come to the realization that the outside is NOT real. The trick is, as another poster pointed out, that you must realize that your childhood experiences which program your reactions to the world are also not real, just frozen trauma as perceived by the child you were, and no logger applicable to the adult you now are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zapyourappetite
01:06 AM on 03/15/2011
Why does it have to be approval-seeking. I couldn't care less about "approval" - I want to be abundantly clear, with no misunderstanding so that people can't say they didn't know.

People liking or approving of you can change in no time - it's like chasing the wind. I approve of myself - how about THAT?!
12:40 AM on 03/15/2011
A lot of this has to do with events in your childhood which will determine whether you will seek approval from others as an adult. If your folks always compared you with others when you were a kid and didn't show unconditional acceptance and support then this can make you behave in approval-seeking ways as an adult (because you'll have the belief that your own way of thinking and behaving is probably wrong). I personally find it hard to go about doing things in everyday life without providing explanations to some...the boss is a good example because you gotta defend your work and ideas and provide counter arguments to criticisms, and justify why people should consider your work groundbreaking. Jobs where this type of behavior is required can put you in a mode where you end up rationalizing other things in life and also start asking for explanations from others.
08:37 PM on 03/14/2011
In a successful relationship; power is shared depending on the situation. No one has power over me that would make me feel it necessary to justify my actions to them. This need to seek approval was abandoned when I became a mature adult.
08:00 PM on 03/14/2011
One of the valuable things I learned in therapy after a disastrous abusive marriage and divorce: " You cannot change another's behavior. All you can do is change your own reaction to that behavior. " If you don't like someone's behavior or how they treat you, you then get to decide what you want to do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:41 PM on 03/14/2011
it is difficult to have a new way of thinking communicated in one blog. perhaps another one that addresses what you feel are misunderstandings of what you intened to communicate.
i do hope you did change the name of the person whos post you held up as an object of not getting it.
we are in control of ourselves even tho it doesnt feel that way. i think about Bush and how his admin rerally worked to instill fear re the other. so people in this country for the most part have regressed.
kindness and education is our only hope to start to change that mis understanding.
you would be surprised the words and sayings to me. i am the product of my fathers and a camel.. need to be put in an internment camp, even me, american born. i was standing in my corner office in del mar wondering why all of a sudden i needed to be put in an internment camp.( i have cleaned up the comments) syrian heritage on my moms side. so i have gotten some experience on the other end. either way we need to start by being kind to each other.... listening to each other. until then nothing happens.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
05:39 PM on 03/14/2011
What a delight to be free. In 1993 the youngest son from my first marriage was killed in a traffic accident (he was 18). We lived several thousand miles from his mother. I had no way to get in touch with her, so was surprised that her call to the funeral home was hooked up before I ever got there. They told me she was on the phone. The also informed me that if I didn't want to talk to her, that was okay too. I told them I'd take the telephone. This was a woman who had made my life miserable for twenty-four years--only six of which were when we were married. I paid all my child support, but every few months she'd claim I hadn't, and I had to get a lawyer to access the court records to prove I had (Obviously expensive). But as I talked to her, I realized a very liberating fact. She could scream, rant, and rave (which she freely did--to where even the morticians (not on speakerphone) could hear her screams. The more she screamed, the more free I felt. For the first time in the last 24 years, she had absolutely NO power over me. She declined to come to our son's funeral. And for the first time since we had married, I actually felt sorry for her. Then I knew that I had not been beaten.
07:46 PM on 03/14/2011
Powerful writing!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
01:59 AM on 03/15/2011
Thank you so much.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:49 PM on 03/14/2011
WOW. you have really earned your stripes of freedom. and your so kind to feel bad for her. i am impressed with your being able to go thru that and come out the other side enlightened.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
02:03 AM on 03/15/2011
It may take decades, but I have found the old adage, "The truth will set you free," to be a lofty goal to which I may aspire. Thirty-seven years ago I could never have envisioned things turning out good for me. And I don't want to blame her. She has her own burdens to bear, and I try not to be closed off from communications. We had children together, and I would like to think that we would honor the person(s) that our children have become. To do that requires that we sometimes have to set some things aside--for the good of all concerned, but especially for the children. Thank you for your comment.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
04:58 PM on 03/14/2011
power over me? well, I admit to being submissive to the laws of gravity and physics. Other than that - there is only ONE thing I MUST do, and that's die.


everything else is contingent on what consequences I foresee and how I choose to react to that forecast and its followup
04:44 PM on 03/14/2011
Nobody
photo
GaiasChild
loves oregon & a green portfolio . . .
04:35 PM on 03/14/2011
beng simple about it, i'd say whoever we love has power over us. however, if that person is accusingly critical, prompting the defensive reflex, maybe the question is, what in that person are we loving? sure it is simple but many times when we think we love someone, we can be engaged in a toxic codependency that will reveal itself by lack of coequality and mutual respect. lurking pathology.