More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Russell Simmons
 
GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Benjamin Chavis
 

Stop the Bribery!

Posted: 12/05/11 06:14 PM ET

It's time to free American democracy from the devastating social and economic consequences of the systemic and wholesale bribery of politicians and elected officials. Thanks to the growing Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, the consciousness of millions of people across the United States has been irreversible raised about this counterproductive predicament.

Public politicians ought to be "free" from the monetary bribes of the avarice and psychotic greed of the 1% who, many of whom, do not give a damn about the masses of poor and working class people.

There are some who have shown an arrogant disdain for the democratic principles of fairness, equal justice and opportunity, inclusiveness, and diversity. They openly buy politicians and pimp them to do whatever they want to obtain their insatiable desires for monopoly control.

As a means of stopping the bribery, there needs to be a Constitutional Amendment to make it illegal to buy, financially contribute to or to use money to influence federal elected officials. That would mean that the future election campaigns for all members of Congress as well as for the office of the President and the Vice President will be totally publicly financed. This will stop the partisan gridlock that has plagued Washington for too long, because the politicians will be working for the people again, not for the corporations who line up outside their office to lobby.

This would definitely not limit or deter freedom of speech, but would rather significantly enhance public political accountability, transparency and the "freedom" of political discourse from the often hidden reactionary hands of a few who would only manipulate the political system for their own narrow exclusive gains.

We welcome the sight of increasing numbers of people in protest actions that have been re-awakened on this issue. In order to effectively challenge income inequality, there needs to be a focus on establishing greater accountability between elected officials and the people who vote for them.

As the nation is about to go into full gear once again with the fast approaching 2012 national elections, there is a sense of urgency about making sure that the elections will be not be brought and controlled by the 1%. "Power to the people" ultimately means the empowerment of the masses through full participatory democracy and sustainable development. This idea benefits every American, whether you belong to the Tea Party, Democratic Party, Republican Party or no party.

There is a good regulatory resolution pending before the Los Angeles City Council that also calls for a Constitutional Amendment that would ban corporations from using money under the disguise of free speech and to further prohibit money from corporations to use to influence elections and political campaigns. The resolution was brought before the LA City Council by a national grass-roots group know as Move to Amend. Other anti-bribery coalitions are springing up across the nation. Much respect goes out to the Occupy Wall Street movement as the most visible and diverse movement for economic justice and equality.

We cannot afford to let the current status quo inequities continue without a nationwide show of solidarity and demand for change. It's time for the 100% to demand a stop to the political bribery system.

 

Follow Russell Simmons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/unclerush

 
 
  • Comments
  • 267
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
groland
socially left, fiscally right
10:18 PM on 12/11/2011
Money spend lobbying or publicizing positions on issue cannot be regulated, because this is indeed free speech. However, money given to candidates is not speech at all, it is a campaign contribution. Contributions are not equivalent to speech. Regulating contributions in no way limits anyone's right to speak or lobby on any issue.

If indeed you donate money to a candidate because they speak on your behalf, you could consider this interstate commerce since they go to Washington and speak for you. In fact the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. Of course asking Congress to regulate itself is Catch-22.
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
09:53 PM on 12/11/2011
Yes!
Thanks Russell, Thanks Dr. Chavis.
This follows in the heels of a decent post by Steven Van Zant reminding us that free speech should not be for "those who can afford it". Neither should there be a benchmark "price" associated with a seat in Congress or the Senate.
We've lost our way and it's time to reach down deep - and become the "example" and the"beacon" for the rest of the world (again).
photo
WILLIEMOJORISIN
USN 1978-1984
09:01 PM on 12/11/2011
I came here expecting a left slant,but I was happily surprized, good article guys.
guajiro
posted 5 minutes ago
10:35 PM on 12/11/2011
It IS a left slant, especially since conservatives are so adamantly opposed to the principles set forth in this article. Jesse Jackson Jr. has argued for these principles for years and has even written a very good book about it "A More Perfect Union". ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_More_Perfect_Union:_Advancing_New_American_Rights
All Republicans and a good deal of conservative Democrats (Blue Dog Democrats) have consistently failed to support any legislation that brings forth those postions mentioned in this article despite the fact that the majority of Americans, Republicans AND Democrats, support those positions. The emphasis by American media like CNN, Fox, etc. instead focuses on issues that DIVIDE Americans. Sad.
photo
WILLIEMOJORISIN
USN 1978-1984
10:53 PM on 12/11/2011
Very sad.
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:47 PM on 12/11/2011
Sadly, at this point, the Right is so far out that it really IS a Left slant to say a truth so obvious. Right-wingers won't allow for any talk of oversight, campaign finance reform, or regulation, let alone admission that the system is rigged for the few at the cost of most of us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:49 PM on 12/11/2011
Calling it what it is - legalized bribery - is the first step.

Every time the networks talk about which candidate is winning the 'money race' we are all diminished as Americans.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:09 PM on 12/11/2011
Outlaw ALL contributions as the bribery they are, publicly finance election with equal prime time for all candidates. Duh.
02:44 PM on 12/11/2011
true, we need to have a legal limitation (strong limitation) to the lobbying budgets of everyone. We also need to have people able to think before voting to avoid advertising and especially political advertising to have any impact.
Truth is, if people were just using their brains, no lobbying would work... but this is far fetched...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
When discussing tax revenues don't feel, th
01:26 PM on 12/11/2011
You have hit upon half of the solution. The other half is to figure out how to stop politicians from using our own money to bribe us into voting for them.
12:55 PM on 12/11/2011
Of course not electing crooks might be a option.
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:48 PM on 12/11/2011
Depending upon the public to simply not elect crooks would be rather inane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Alton
12:41 PM on 12/11/2011
Since a Constitutional Amendment cannot originate from the people (say, by a petition or ballot measure) but requires an act of Congress...

What is more interesting has been watching the unfolding of the current GOP primary and the role of the media in either ignoring, selecting, or tearing down various potential candidates. I'm not sure "air time" and actual popularity or intrinsic voter interest are in any way related.

Also interesting is the degree to which incumbency still seems to confer a general tactical advantage (despite polls showing that voters universally want to "throw all the bums out"). What is actually happening and what people say they want happening seems... out of sync.

The system is flawed in the eyes of the people - but oddly it seems to work very very well for the candidates (and the powers that be).
12:13 PM on 12/11/2011
Yup, let's call campaign contributions for what they are: bribery, plain and simple. And thanks to the Roberts Supreme Court, the sky's the limit.

A travesty!!!
01:04 PM on 12/11/2011
Nothing can stop you from voting against these people, well except that damn D behind their name. You are the problem, not the courts.
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:51 PM on 12/11/2011
You REALLY missed the point.

When all the choices are paid-off by somebody, the best we can do is vote for those who adhere to what is nest for the nation and its majority--i.e. Democrats, for those of us not in the top 1% of wealth or pliability--UNLESS and UNTIL we get a better solution in place, preferably removing the paying-off aspect of things.
09:11 AM on 12/12/2011
Haha. Not even a good try. But thanks to egal below.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LouGots
05:22 PM on 12/11/2011
The travesty is presuming to attack a Supreme Court precedent which you obviously jave not read and do not understand.

Citizens United did not change that part of McCain-Feingold which pertained to campaign contributions.
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:39 PM on 12/11/2011
Citizens-United is far from the only relevant issue under the Roberts Supreme Court.

Making assumptions about what somebody has or has not read or understood is supercilious enough without throwing in an abject lack of understanding that it isn't only the ONE case this person could have been referring to.

But you had to take that extra step into irony as you attacked a comment you obviously have not read or else the background supporting which you do not understand.
09:17 AM on 12/12/2011
As egal stated, you need to read my comment more closely. But let me clarify: Campaign contributions ARE a form of bribery. And though Citizens United pertained specifically to the part of McCain-Feingold relating to corporations funding "electioneering communications", I think we all know that it opened the floodgates for corporate election-related financing. To pretend otherwise is either extremely myopic or extremely disingenuous.

Take your pick.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Briteleaf
12:04 PM on 12/11/2011
Sure, we'll just ask those same folks who get millions for their re-election campaigns to vote a law to stop the bribery money train. They will see the light and vote away the only leverage they have to keep being re-elected. Good luck with that! This is a much needed change that will not get voted in by the house and senate. When we have a million person march on congress, we will begin to have a chance of getting money out of the political process. We need to find a way to defeat the army of 25,000 lobbyists who arrange billions of dollars of campaign money in payment to get the kind of favoritism that has allowed Exxon and GE to PAY ZERO TAXES and maintained tax write offs for their personal jets. The 99% will have to bring congress BACK TO THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
05:18 PM on 12/11/2011
Answer: RE ELECT NO ONE
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:45 PM on 12/11/2011
That solves absolutely nothing.

In the short run, you just end up with come new, and often flagrantly worse, politicians who will busily line their pockets as they sell THEIR votes just like the last ones (or far moreso, in the cases of most of the new GOP you could vote in, since they have by ffar the strongest Wall Street backing and least Main Street empathy at the moment).

In the long run, it just results in a bunch of people spending their single term racking in as much lobbying money as they can and doing as they please despite the will of the people because they know we're not going to re-elect them anyway.

Short-sighted solutions are worse than none at all, at this point--which is why the upper-class tax-breaks can't be extended again, even if it's the GOP demand for continuing needed relief for the rest of us.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
11:50 AM on 12/11/2011
One person.
One vote.
One (limited) contribution.

No corporate ads, no lobbies, no pacs.

The solution is simple. Get the money out, and level the playing field.

Getting it passed by a congress whose current membership owes their elections to a system of state sanctioned legalized bribery? That have spent their entire political life on the gravy train?

There's the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScorpioRN
Dom Lives!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
02:51 PM on 12/11/2011
Well put just don't think we can ever change the monster we created.
08:43 PM on 12/11/2011
Good points, and yet no woman was ever able to vote to extend voting rights to women. And yet, the Suffragette movement prevailed in getting women the vote. Something similar can be said for every human rights movement. It is those who have the power who ultimately decide to share it with others who are different in some way from themselves. So as hard as it may be to imagine a world in which people who have succeeded in getting elected in a "pay to play" system would vote to end that system, stranger things have in fact happened. We have to pursue the solutions we believe in with full force if we are to give history any chance to bend toward justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rothomaha
The Truth will out
10:13 AM on 12/11/2011
I would support such an amendment, but trust me - it ain't gonna' happen! What you are asking for bucks the inexorable trend of history, which clearly shows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few, until the many revolt, chop off their heads, and the process starts all over again. There has NEVER been a wealthy elite which has volitionally turned over their wealth for equitable distribution, and there never WILL be! So, since CorporoAmerica already has bought and paid for this country's government, they are in the driver's seat and all of the clamor for constitutional change just won't move anything forward. It is going to take some very ugly methods to dislodge their fangs!
06:09 AM on 12/11/2011
Our politicians are bought. Everyone knows it. Conservatives know it. Liberals know it. The Democrats are bought. The Republicans are bought. They don’t represent us. They represent their corporate donors who fund their campaigns and promise them well paying jobs after they leave office. Our democracy is in serious trouble. Donations from union treasuries should, naturally, be disallowed also so that it couldn't be spun into a left v.s. right thing.

Our Congress is completely infected with the virus. So proposing an amendment through Congress seems hopeless. But luckily there is another way. We can do this purely at the state level. The states can call for a constitutional convention and they can ratify an amendment that comes out of one. And there is nothing our corrupt federal government can do about it. We must occupy the states.

http://www.wolf-pac.com/ OR http://www.getmoneyout.com/

Please sign the petitions and spread the word. Nothing will ever really change unless we get the money out - its our only hope.
05:11 AM on 12/11/2011
We need this, we need that, it's time to do this, it's time to do that. All these type of articles are the same old crap. Everyone can imagine some utopia where, for example, bankers and politicians give up their power and money, or all the people "rise up" and fix everything.
All of it amounts to childish Utopian fantasies that divert from facing reality.
There is no political solution, never has been.
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
10:56 PM on 12/11/2011
Or people could actually do something to make things better.

Nobody's aiming for Utopia--that would be as pointless as nihilistically claiming there's nothing we can do.

But settling for something so corrupt that it's destroying itself isn't working, and we have this funny history, as a People, of improving what doesn't work and making thaty effort to become "more perfect" even though we know we cannot become perfect.

Otherwise, there'd be no point to existing at all.