iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Russell Simmons

GET UPDATES FROM Russell Simmons

The 40-Year War On American Families: It's Time To End This Madness!

Posted: 06/17/11 10:08 AM ET

Co-authored by Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr.

40 years ago today, President Richard Milhous Nixon declared America's "War on Drugs." This failed war continues even today to have a devastating and debilitating impact on the lives of millions of Americans. We add our voices to the growing number of people of good conscience to demand a resolute end to this awful destructive and nonproductive war.

The "War on Drugs" has not only wasted more than a trillion dollars over the last four decades, but this misguided war has also caused millions of families and communities to be injured and decimated. Instead of a "War on Drugs," President Nixon should have declared a "War on Poverty," because we all know the bitter truth that the prolonged social disillusionment and self-destructive consequence of the petulant mire of decades of poverty for millions of Americans actually sets the stage for the persistence of drug abuse, violence and hopelessness.
It's most regrettable that the majority of voters in November of 68 underestimated Richard Nixon's repressive policy intentions. How did Nixon manage to become president of the United States in the first place? The answer to this question is important in 2011 as the nation prepares for the 2012 elections.

The current sentiments of the so-called Tea Party are very similar to the regressive views of Nixon and Agnew back in the late 1960s. Nixon and Agnew ran a divisive but successful "law and order" campaign and were elected in 1968 in direct counter action to the profound social and political change in the consciousness of the majority of people who wanted real change in their lives. Thus, President Nixon was elected during a reactionary period in American history. It was a period of repression, and the so-called "law and order" theme really was a code phrase for solidifying the "status quo" on the right to prevent further progressive social change that had become characteristic of the early and mid 1960s.

We should be mindful not to let history to repeat itself today as we approach the 2012 elections. President Obama has to continue to strive both to put an end to the failed drug policies of the past and to promote more treatment for drug-related illnesses, rather than to build more prisons. We applaud him for the crack/powder disparities being brought down; however, we all know that America needs more public policy rehabilitation from the punitive and careless drug policies that have led to the United States to have highest incarceration rate in the world, while expanding the ranks of the poor and destitute. We will proudly work with this administration to further fix these decades-old problems.

The consolation is that we have won some victories, even in the face of the failed War on Drugs. We recalled that in the aftermath of Nixon's declaration, the state of New York passed one of the most draconian drug laws ever enacted by a state: The Rockefeller Drug Laws in 1973. The results, in particular for African Americans and Latino Americans, were horrible and thousands were unjustly imprisoned for long prison terms, even for first-time, nonviolent offenders. But we thank the hip-hop community for helping to lead the way to successfully challenge and end the Rockefeller Drug Laws.

Let us all on this day re-dedicate ourselves to the struggle to end poverty and to further dismantle the drug policies of the past that have had such a negative impact on the soul, spirit and life of our nation. Let us on this day prepare ourselves to push for more reforms and effective strategies and policies that will enable more people to become self-empowered and compassionate for the whole of humanity. And finally, on this day let's work harder to end the madness of ineffective drug policies. We should learn from the past without repeating it.

 

Follow Russell Simmons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/unclerush

Co-authored by Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr. 40 years ago today, President Richard Milhous Nixon declared America's "War on Drugs." This failed war continues even today to have a devastating and debi...
Co-authored by Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr. 40 years ago today, President Richard Milhous Nixon declared America's "War on Drugs." This failed war continues even today to have a devastating and debi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 512
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
01:27 PM on 06/20/2011
Love the jump to pointing figers at Tea Partiers and republicans..

Does he not realize, if there would be a shift of cultural thinking towards education, drugs would not be the massive problem they are today. People raised around poverty tend not to value education the way middle class does and often make fun of people who try to better their life through education (this goes for EVERYONE, including whites).

"America needs more public policy rehabilitation from the punitive and careless drug policies that have led to the United States to have highest incarceration rate in the world"

People also need to realize that there are consequences for their actions. Rehab is great, but if you don't punish people for their actions, most likely they'll continue to make the same mistake over and over and over and over. I can't get behind the idea that rehab policies will change the world. Drugs and crime typically go hand in hand.

For everyone in prision on a drug charge, was it their first time doing drugs? typically not. was it their first time committing a crime? typically not. was it their first time getting caught? who knows.
10:48 PM on 06/19/2011
After leagalizing marijuana for health reasons and allowing users to grow their own Ottawa saw a rise grow-ops and excessive growth far beyond consumption by the grower. Legislation is coming forth soon the allow only the private sector to leaglly grow the plant for medical use which will be regulated both as to quantity and quality. The hope is that an original good idea that was co-opted by the drug gangs can revert to the original concept, for posession alone is not a crime but dealing is.
01:34 PM on 06/20/2011
i doubt pot is the drug people are worried about. most people who have been arrested or become an addict don't stop with pot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Codeine Priest
09:52 PM on 06/19/2011
22 shot in Mexico as FIFA tournament opens

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/22-shot-in-mexico-as-fifa-tournament-opens-20110620-1gamz.html?amp&&&

Here's your War on Drugs in action, Uncle Scam.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Codeine Priest
09:04 PM on 06/19/2011
There is simply too much money (for BOTH sides) to be made for the War on (some)Drug(-users) to end voluntarily - both sides are addicted to it. The impending collapse of the US gov't (a la Soviet Union), however, will see an involuntary, de facto end to the drug war, as States and local govt's finances dry up to the point where anything beyond the basics can no longer be funded. there simply won't be any money to chase down pot smokers, or arrest and prosecute peaceful drug users, because police, court and prison resources will be severely stretched and underfunded. ;

Party ON, Dude! ;-))
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
troutster
Fish fear me. Otherwise, I'm pretty harmless.
07:53 PM on 06/19/2011
You ever hear the little rhyme: I don't rub, drink, dance or chew and I don't go out with girls who do? The religious right is never gonna be in favor of legalizing pot. But it'll be fun watching the tea party tear itself apart over this...if we legalize it, we can save money; but we can't legalize it because jesus won't like it. We may miss out on the next rapture. Oh, the choices!
conservo
Tea Partier, Atheist, Libertarian, Objectivist
11:39 PM on 06/19/2011
You should really do some research on what we (the Tea Party) stand for. Although most all Tea Partiers have an opinion on social issues, our primary concerns are governmental fiscal prudency and state sovereignty. Sure their is some economic significance to the issue of drug legalization but you are going to be disappointed if you are hoping to see us "tear each other apart" over this issue. I always have to laugh at liberals who are so certain of what we stand for ----and the truth is they are completely wrong becase they have been believing what left wing bloggers and the media have been feeding them instead of researching things for themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
troutster
Fish fear me. Otherwise, I'm pretty harmless.
11:15 AM on 06/20/2011
OK. Thanks for the reply. Here's what I think I know: Although the tea party is primarily about small government, i.e., enormous cuts in government spending, there is also a very significant proportion of its membership that cares deeply about the traditional "family values," social issues of the republican party, like circa 1980 and the moral majority. I think these two issues occasionally bump up against each other and the drug war will be one of those places. As I commented earlier, if we legalize pot we can save lots of money...really big money (and increase revenue by taxing it.) But if we legalize pot, the religious right is gonna have a cow.

So, in all seriousness, I'd like to hear your take.
01:32 PM on 06/20/2011
Go on and legalize pot, acid, X, meth, cocaine, heroin, etc.. That will totally take care of the problem. Next thing you know they'll say that the rich and politicans are trying to k*ll the poor by handing them drugs to do. They are trying to keep the poor down.

People choose to do drugs (MOST of the time, pain killers different story). I do not feel horrible bad for addicts since their initial decision put the needle in their arm or pipe to their mouth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
troutster
Fish fear me. Otherwise, I'm pretty harmless.
03:40 PM on 06/20/2011
Oh, the slippery slope argument. Well, actually, I was only speaking of pot. Sorry to disappoint you.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mort
Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken.
05:08 PM on 06/19/2011
Drugs aren't the problem. They're a symptom, an escape choice and a scheme for "easy" money. They affect every level of society, ruin lives and encourage criminal behavior.

The biggest culprits here are education and poverty. We keep cutting back on schools until there's very little left of our archaic system. And government dole out programs encourage people to stagnate.

We need to put the money we have into education. Better schools, updated technology, pay teachers what they deserve, cut out most of the administration which only drains the budget. Teach kids the basics, and add how to communicate, overcome problems & stress, values, arts, and building relationships. Also have vocational classes as a requirement.

Change govt programs to provide needed care, but require that recipients actively attend school or work. Have mandatory workshops, GED and parenting classes, drug and gang intervention, etc. That way help is available to anyone as long as they are moving toward a better way of life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fb0252
04:50 PM on 06/19/2011
war on drugs--war on family lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
11:38 AM on 06/19/2011
You are definately on the right track Russell but we have also been fighting and losing the war on poverty even longer. What is required is a fundamental shift in consiousness in America from seeing themselves as Worker/Consumers to Soverign Citizens/Guardians of the Environment.

Soverign Citizens would never allow a corporate owned government.
Soverign Citizens would never allow a monetary system that penalizes them while rewarding a few elites.
Soverign Citizens would never allow the government to control 30% of the land mass of the United States while forbidding them to use any of it to form free & self sustaining eco-villages for the unemployed, elderly & homeless.
Soverign Citizens would never allow people to be only considered valuable as long as they support the corporate Profits- WageSlave paradigm and criminal if they do not.

Guardians of the Environment would not allow the suppression of free energy inventions to protect the interests of Corporate Profits.
Guardians of the Environment would not support vast, sprawling suburban McMansion settlements that exhaust the resources of the planet while promoting a planet wide culture of spend, then waste, then spend again on the limited resources of the planet.
Guardians of the Environment would demand that people live in self sustaining, shared resource eco-villages which minimise the need for materials and the destructive harvesting of Earth's gifts.
11:36 AM on 06/19/2011
Still clueless!
11:12 AM on 06/19/2011
http://www.amazon.com/DISCOVERING-SELF-EXPERIENCES-THOUGHTS-ebook/dp/B004YDQX7I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1308493347&sr=8-1

In order to solve the abuse of drugs by people, I think that we should look at Maharishi Mahesh Yogis past comment on solveing problems. We should ignore the problem and insert the second element. For example, if we walk into a dark room and we want light, we turn on the light.

We need to have a program where we can teach TM to all those people in jail for drug violations. We need to make available TM for anyone who wishes to learn.

Ignore the drug issue and teach TM.

Drugs work, they do what they claim on thier labels both legal and illegal. If they did not work, so many people would not be useing them. TM is also proven to work.

There are sinister agents at work that keep the prohabition industry going. Any one who has studied the war on drugs ( war against the ruled ) know that its a medical, mental issue and that makeing it criminal is in itself a crime.

When the railroads were complete in the west, they had to find a way to move the mexicans back to mexico. The mexican workers, many of them carried with them a bag a marijuana, so the lawmakers made it illegal to have marijuana. Drug policy is a social controll tactic used by those who rule, to make laws to protect thier interests.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. crowsnest
11:12 AM on 06/19/2011
I have a hunch that reducing the use of harmful drugs in our nation can only succeed with a program that states: "Jesus does not want you to use.....(fill in the blanks).
10:53 AM on 06/19/2011
if you want to get serious about the social problems facing this country, you have to stop pinning blame on one politician/political party or the other. Simmons says it's Nixon's fault, others would say LBJ and yet more would say Reagan or Clinton etc etc etc. It doesn't really matter. In the end, one theme seems to run through all of this--government intervention and spending has been an abject failure. I'm not arguing for an end to government programs, but I do believe it's time for a wholesale review of just about everything the feds and states do to combat these social problems. It appears the programs make these problems worse. Whether it is drug use, family problems, poverty, etc etc. So we are trillions of dollars later in spending and we have worse problems. Any sane person would stop and evaluate what the hell has happened and change course.
09:53 PM on 06/19/2011
"Any sane person would stop and evaluate what the hell has happened and change course."

That would work IF the people who could actually do something about the problems we face (i.e. the rich and powerful) actually wanted to help the country. They don't. They want to help themselves which is precisely what they are doing and quite successfully I might add. The rest of us can all fight amongst ourselves until we kill each other. Notice how combative most of the people who post here are? We point fingers all around, blaming "Liberals" and "Conservatives" which does nothing to solve our problems.

The master plan of the plutocracy is already working. Brace yourself for the next act and get a helmet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mauibob
I am a recovering Liberal. I apologize for my past
10:38 AM on 06/19/2011
First off, we have had a war on poverty for decades. The result? Highest poverty in history. Your article states no limits to drugs so we are left to assume that you have no problem with dealers getting the black community even more addicted, adding even more to poverty and needless death. Also, selling to children is fine with you i suppose. I say this knowing that is not what you believe, but if you are going to seriously want to discuss this issue, you must talk about what limits you DO agree with and not just a blanket end the war on drugs.
11:43 AM on 06/19/2011
Wrong, we have never had a true war on poverty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mauibob
I am a recovering Liberal. I apologize for my past
12:19 PM on 06/19/2011
Since someone who wishes to live completely off the backs of others can get benefits far better than a hard working minimum wage worker, what would a "real" war on poverty cost us?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler James Lee
10:23 AM on 06/19/2011
Our political class, too attached to their ideologies to recognize reality, have forgotten all they ever knew about economics. Declaring "war" on something (anything!) is the American way, but it is self-defeating. Create a price differential, create a black market, build it and they will come: drugs, weapons, cigarettes, slaves - any contraband will make a profit for the traffickers under these circumstances. Take out the profit, and....that's all, folks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
05:09 AM on 06/19/2011
The war on families started with the welfare system. People that went to jail for selling crack need to be in jail. Those people are the ones that declared war on families, not the gov.