iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Sasan Shoamanesh

GET UPDATES FROM Sam Sasan Shoamanesh
 

What of Persian and the Lingua Franca of the New Century?

Posted: 07/07/11 12:45 PM ET

In Global Brief magazine's Strategic Futures segment recently published, experts and pundits were asked, what will be the key language(s) of this new century? Opinions were offered on why Chinese, Russian, French, Arabic, and Persian could be the lingua franca of the 21st century.

Persian! ('Persian' is the correct reference to the language in English, according to the Academy of Persian Language and Literature). Could it be? Could the tongue of Mowlana (Rumi), Omar Khayyam, Rudaki, Ferdowsi, Sa'adi, Hafez, Jabir ibn Haiyan (Geber), Ibrahim Fazari, Al-Ghazali (Algazel), Kamal al-Din Farsi, Musa Khwarizmi, Razi, Biruni, Farabi (Alpharabius), Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Ibn Haytham (Alhazen), Tusi and, among many others, Abu Nasr Mansur once again rise to prominence on the world stage?

2011-07-07-Hafeztomb.jpg
Tomb of Hafez (the revered Persian poet) in Shiraz, Iran

Photo courtesy of the author


Persian is widely recognized as the language through which a rich body of literature, music, scientific and philosophical thought have entered the annals of intellectual achievements and civilized heritage. The language of the Persian people -- belonging to the Indo-European branch of languages -- apart from having a considerable influence on neighbouring languages and beyond, was once the lingua franca (lingua persica) of the central part of the Islamic world in the East, as well as in South Asia. After Arabic -- the language of the founding Prophet of Islam -- Persian was the most important language in the Islamic empire; in particular, during the Abbasid Caliphate and throughout the period referred to as the Islamic Golden Age (ca. 750 CE to 1258 CE) -- an era recognized for its opulence and, more importantly, for its great artistic, technological, scientific and intellectual innovations.

While countless dynasties came and went with the winds of time, constant remained the Persian language, which continued to serve as the official and cultural language of state and empire. From the royal courts of the Moghuls -- even Marco Polo, during the course of his famous travels, learned and spoke Persian -- to the Seljuks and the Ottomans, to name a few, Persian served as the language of the elite, of high culture, and as the official language of the royal court. It was not until the 1840s that English started diminishing the role of Persian -- through the vector of British imperialism no less -- as an influential language in the region (in particular, in South Asia).

Today, Persian (with slight variations of the language) is spoken by approximately 125 million people in Iran, Afghanistan and Tajikistan. This is a conservative estimate, as it does not take into account the diasporic communities spread across the globe, as well as other pockets of Persian speakers in Iraq, Bahrain, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Armenia, Turkmenistan and Israel.

In many ways, Persian has seldom been simply a vernacular language. From the engravings on the walls of Topkapi Palace -- the official residence of the Ottoman Sultans -- and the calligraphy which decorates the interior of the Bahá'í House of Worship situated on Kikaaya Hill in Kampala, Uganda, to the pages of the Torah, to Zanzibar and its 'Shirazis' population, to the pioneering works of science and philosophy, which made their way to medieval Europe, sowing the seeds of European Renaissance (Huntington do tell, what clash of civilizations?), to countless loan-words found in the English language and others, the Persian language and the by-products of Persian thinking have pulsated, and continue to pulsate, in places and in the (sub)consciousness far beyond the territorial boundaries of Persian-speaking lands. One wonders why Persian is not yet an official language of the UN. It should be.

What of the sway of Persian, or for that matter, any other language in today's world? In an epoch in which soft power and technology have combined to gradually reshape and repackage international human discourses, it is language capable of 'selling' to an increasingly aware world-population that will be triumphant in the 21st century. The age of unilingualism and the dominance of one language over another is spent. What is important in this new global village, where post-modern multilingualism is sovereign, is that 'we talk to one another' -- empathetically and with respect.

In the 21st century, the language that will secure a receptive audience is one that offers words capable of transcending cultural, religious and ethnic divides; a language of moderation and rationality; one that advocates peace, tolerance and respect for the dignity of self and the unfamiliar 'other'; a language through which the arts and free thinking flow and flourish (the conditio sine qua non for high culture, progress and civilization). It will be a language that allows others to speak, have a voice and determine their own destiny -- that is a true international language, appealing in its humanity and universal in its reach. Those who embrace this language in this new century will be its winners.

This is a slightly modified version of the original published at Global Brief.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:11 PM on 07/09/2011
funny how spanish is ignored as a contender. those languages which do not use a latin based alphabet have an incredibly difficult barrier to overcome in that much of the technological writings as well as pop culture are written in latin script. i doubt that india will ever embrace chinese. or consider using politically objectionable arabic sripts of arabic and persian. that fact alone militates against chinese or arabic or even persian as becoming lingua franca.

lingua francas are not necessarily tied to power or numbers of first language speakers. latin and french enjoyed centuries of preeminence despite any nation state hegemony. lingua franca results from ease of communication rather than a decided socio-political agenda.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:48 PM on 07/08/2011
As was said below - listening to Persian brings joy!

Having a Persian lover may have something to do with this, of course! You haven't lived until a beautiful young man reads to you from Shahnameh, or says something sweet to you -

"Nazanin, beshineh kenoram - doostet daram!"
11:07 PM on 07/11/2011
I 100% agree with you... :-)
07:42 AM on 07/08/2011
I heartily agree with the sentiments, and love, expressed for the Persian language. It is indeed beutiful, ancient, and the repository of one of the world's richest cultures.

The historic status of Persian in the Middle East, Central Asia and India is somewhat comparable to the status of French in Europe - just as French was the language of culture and wider contact for many countries, especially the eastern European nations (and was even the language of court in Russia), so too was Persian the court language for a time in India, and a potent cultural influence from Turkey to China.

And add to that, the legacy of the ancient Persians is every bit as significant as that of the ancient Greeks - and indeed, the Greeks borrowed an awful lot of their ideas from the Persians. It is the shame of Western education that we learn all about the Greeks, as though they invented their culture all by themselves as an island in a sea of barbarism, and never the other great contemporary culture.

There is no culture that has been so consistently influential in intellectual, cultural and religious terms over the past three thousand years and more, as the Persians.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
07:05 PM on 07/07/2011
Standard for being the the Great civilization; not because they were once Great, because they consistently climb back to be Great again and again against all odds!
Not many civilizations have survived since antiquity let alone being model which other civilizations picked up where they start it, be it giver of monolithic religion or speaking of truth or being guardian of other repressed ethnicities!
06:59 PM on 07/07/2011
I hate to disagree, but language use is driven by economics. It may be a beautiful language, but the region it is spoken in, and the countries that speak it, are doing poorly and are not expected to break out of the many economic issues that are holding them down. For that reason, it is highly unlikely that Persian would ever be a rapidly 'growing' language in use around the world. In this respect, English will continue strongly, with Chinese Mandarin probably being the biggest winner. For the same reasons as above, I do not see Russian coming on strong with a shrinking population, and shrinking economic strength. French is probably also going to fade since it is only spoken in a diminishing capacity outside of France and Quebec.... (I know some Northern African countries speak it but they suffer from a diminishing economic set of circumstances also)... So.. English and Chinese are my choices for growth.. although I would love to learn Persian and think it is quite beautful as was stated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
09:14 AM on 07/08/2011
Of course, the only reason that Iran is not considered amongst the BRIC countries is because of the practice of rejecting the real economic numbers and the effect on those numbers of America's economic warfare on Iran. But the continued strong economic numbers Iran has, and the lack of a large population living in deep poverty, will make it impossible to keep from putting it in that category.

Once you get beyond the anti-Iranian rhetoric, you will see Iran is poised to become the regional economic leader, the regional scientific leader, the regional political leader, all of which will make it likely that its language will be one that the elites of the countries of the region want to be able to function in.
10:20 AM on 07/08/2011
Hard to predict, but I do not see how Iran can become much of a leader when it is a Theocracy dominated by Clerics and religious zealotry. If a couple things happen, such as a change at the top to a more democratic, non- Shia dominated government were to take place - possibly. However, at this point in time, and extrapolating forward, I do not foresee Iran taking a dominant position ... mainly because of their policies towards Israel, and towards the Sunni countries that form the other bloc in that region. Basically, if the leadership in Iran keeps spouting out dogma such as "Israel should be wiped from the Earth", keeps pursuing Nuclear weapon technology, and keeps thumbing their nose at Sunni countries such as Saudi Arabia, I think that they will continue to be sanctioned, and may even end up in a war. This type of behavior will never allow Iran to be what it could truly be.
10:21 AM on 07/08/2011
I am not saying they could not be a regional leader -- they have a proud tradition of science and technology going back to the beginnings of humanity. They are a great people... but the government of Iran is their worst enemy... and the economics look poor if they keep antagonizing everyone around them. I do not think the rhetoric is anti-iran. I think they have brought this on through the Iranian governments own behavior. They killed many people to stop any sort of unrest this past year.... killing your own people, and not allowing any dissent does not support the growth of education, technology, and a lingua franca...
01:32 PM on 07/07/2011
Are there not more speakers of Turkish than of Persian? Turkish may have obtained an edge by the change-over to the Latin alphabet. Persian is more the language of high culture.
05:57 PM on 07/07/2011
The Persian language is beautiful.  So much so that even when hearing someone speak English with a heavy Persian accent, I feel joy.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
08:51 PM on 07/07/2011
Persian is beautiful, but the Arabic alphabet is not well suited for it, only 3 of the 6 vowels are written. You need a spelling reform like for example how the Arabic alphabet was adapted to write Uighur, all the Uighur vowels are written. But then English needs a spelling reform too. What makes it difficult is there is more than one pronunciation standard, British English, American English and Canadian English at least. So if we spelled English phonetically, we would have varieties where we would find it difficult to read each other's spelling. But then you probably already have this with Persian, with the Iranian, Dari and Tajik varieties.