More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Seder

Sam Seder

Posted: August 12, 2010 10:27 AM

Hey Google, That's Bullsh*t

What's Your Reaction:

There's nothing more depressing than when a trusted friend breaks a promise. Particularly, when that friend is so massive that they have the ability to un-democratize the internet almost single-handedly and are not, in fact, your friend, but a multi-billion dollar corporation.

Email Chairman Julius Genachowski: HERE . Tell him you want real Net Neutrality and Sign the petition to tell Google to be less evil HERE

 

Follow Sam Seder on Twitter: www.twitter.com/samseder

 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:21 PM on 08/22/2010
well, would not using google services send them a signal?
02:25 PM on 08/15/2010
Big corporations working with the government to ruin another medium. This doesn't sound familiar.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:28 PM on 08/13/2010
let's all boycott the internet!!! as rep. cantor would say: c'mon!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:27 PM on 08/13/2010
"un-democratize the internet" ??? guess i missed the registration deadline to vote on that. we have a long tradition in this country of selling what used to be free. people used to get land for free just by sqautting on it or putting a stake in the ground and registering it with a land office. people used to get free help to build their entire house. people used to get free water. welcome to the 21st centruy.
11:19 AM on 08/14/2010
This does not concern selling what used to be free.

First, the primary infrastructure was paid for and is currently maintained with tax payer dollars, not by Verizon and not by Google.

Second, it means these corporate giants will be using the infrastructure that we paid for to introduce a filter between the user and the Internet. You want people to be able to download your Web content? Fine, here is a brand new fee you have to pay to them that will determine what speed your content will download at.

This means that companies that were able to start up with little to nothing and thrive based on their merits, like Facebook, YouTube, FunnyorDie, Huffington Post, would die before they got started, since they would need to be able to pay huge sums outright in order for people to access their content.

And if an organization like News Corporation got an upper hand, as they did when the Republicans relaxed the FCC rules concerning ownership in traditional media, you can say goodbye to the expression of dissenting political opinions. Sites like the Huffington Post won't be able to generate enough revenue to pay for anything above a download speed of 1 kbs.

This ploy has been tried in the past, and it is one of many reasons that we need to enshrine net neutrality in federal statutes. This is a simple thing. Write to your Congressional representatives and tell them that this is BS.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
09:45 PM on 08/15/2010
great comment!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HarmNone
Censorship: Reaction of the ignorant to freedom
08:36 PM on 08/18/2010
I've read a couple of things about this, but your comment breaks it down so that it makes sense, thank you!
04:45 PM on 08/13/2010
Sam needs his own show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheapNdumb
I never had any problem
03:32 PM on 08/13/2010
the President has an OFF BUTTON! It will be used soon to mask the coming war with Iran. When it finally gets turned back on it will be censored!
02:34 PM on 08/13/2010
I couldn't agree with you more. I feel like I'm about to be hit by a mack truck with the Name "Google" painted on the side of the doors. There is no doubt about it--they are out to squash us! Lee Hartgrave - Journalist.
09:05 PM on 08/12/2010
Why all this fear mongering around net neutrality? Why this push to put the FCC in charge? Google hasn't sold out. What about USENIX, W3C, ICANN, InerNIC and The Internet Society. How come you don't talk about the international organizations that have been running the Internet so far but you want the FCC to take over? So Google got together with Verizon to make a proposal to the FCC. Big Deal. Why are people being driven into panic mode? I'm beginning to think that some might find it useful to declare the death of the net neutrality now and blame it on Google. I wrote a blog about this today on the Daily Kos. http://www
.dailykos.com/story/2010/8/12/892044/-End-of-the-Internet-As-We-Know-It!
02:51 PM on 08/13/2010
The FCC is not taking over our internet. Net neutrality simply means ISPs would not be able to choose what content you can and can't receive, nor can they make one page load quickly and another load slowly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BrandonHill
08:02 PM on 08/12/2010
We're screwed big-time if Google does anything that negates net-neutrality. They have the power and infulence to single handedly make it possible or impossible to implment net-neutrality.

Oh Google - please don't break your promise. See it through, for the good of all internet users - may it be consumers or companies.
07:28 PM on 08/12/2010
It is definitely time for creative civil disobedience.
07:02 PM on 08/12/2010
And, if you EVER decide to walk away from the high cost of an Adwords campaign - expect your Google organic rank to do everything but totally disappear (even if you invested $5,000/mo in adwords for over a decade).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
04:39 PM on 08/12/2010
I think this is something the people are simply not clueing into. Google, Verizon and I'm sure other major providers will follow suit are attempting to control the wireless internet. They say, they want to create two tiers. One where we have video, music, etc. "for those who can afford to pay" and the other tier for everyone else.
But what they don't tell you is those who CAN PAY include the providers of that content we enjoy now.
If there is a second tier established, those PROVIDERS of content we now enjoy will be encouraged to move into the premium tier that Google and Verizon want to establilsh. There is a financial incentive for them to do so.
The rest will be stuck with QVC level wireless garbage. Then we are back to the days of Bell Telephone hoping for the Government to break up big wireless companies.