iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sander Hicks

Sander Hicks

GET UPDATES FROM Sander Hicks

Holy Week Revolution: How My Faith Was Built Up At Left Forum 2010

Posted: 03/31/10 03:25 PM ET

I first want to say that I'm grateful to everyone who has become a fan of this new blog. The social technology at Huffington Post shows the revolutionary power of the new technologies. Web 2.0 social networks don't just share information; they make that sharing the basis of a real community. And this is where I want to start today, on the topic of new notions of society and community.

It's Holy Week, after all. Christians worldwide are celebrating the mystical climax of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. No matter what you believe, there's something here for all of us, in the story of how a peasant carpenter from the backwater became the greatest punk rock philosopher.

In that spirit, last week I enjoyed "Capitalism, Economy, and Religion: A Christian-Marxist Dialogue," a panel discussion at Left Forum 2010. The conference was impressive, especially for those who remember its old incarnation, the Socialist Scholars Conference. Attendance this year was a record-breaking 3500, up 800 from last year. Big names Noam Chomsky and Reverend Jesse Jackson gave rousing keynotes.

And in a new twist, presentations like "Christian-Marxist Dialogue" sought to find a bridge between faith and secular political organizing -- where the future of the revolution of peace may lie. The Great Recession, the "War on Terror," the failure to prosecute the felonies of Bush and Cheney, and the slack moral relativism of Obama all show that our system of American capitalism is in its deepest crisis. In the West, two alternatives exist: Marxism and Christianity. This panel sought to point out common ground between the two.

Brigitte Kahl from the Union Theological Seminary was the first to speak. "The place where the Marxist and Christian critiques of capitalism intersect," she said, "is "idolatry." In the final book of Das Kapital, Marx points out that we fetishize things like cars, houses, and products. (Fetishize here means that we give them a life spirit.) This corresponds with the ancient prophetic call, from Moses to Isaiah to Jesus, to turn away from worshiping the glamour of the "things made by our hands" and seek higher.

Their call to abjure idolatry was intended to prevent the ancient Hebrews from returning to the slavery from which they had just fled. The idols of the pagans weren't the danger; the danger was the Hebrews' own idolatry. When Moses' brother Aaron lost faith, he collected the Hebrews' gold and forged a bull-calf, and idol that demanded blood sacrifice just as today's Wall Street bull demands war, invasions, empire, and a slack moral relativism.

Panelist Jan Rehmann backed up Kahl's thesis, pointing out that God's first self-definition in Exodus -- "I am the God who led you out of slavery" -- is telling. It means that God is primarily a Great Emancipator, not the vengeful, belligerent, heteronormative patriarch of the Michelangelo paintings. God wants us free, not enslaved. And God's freedom is total: spiritual, political, and economic.

It's slavery that the prophets are still targeting at the other end of the Bible, in the visionary book of Revelations, offering further indictments of our system's idolatry. Revelations is a more focused attack on the economics of oppression. While a state prisoner of Rome, John, the author, envisions the destruction of Rome and its empire. As anarchist theologian Michael Iafrate once wrote, the target here is all empire, subtly cloaked as "Babylon." Why?

Because your merchants were the great ones of the world. All nations were led astray by your magic potion. In her was found the blood of prophets and holy ones. And all who have been slain on the earth.

John's point was that suddenly being number one in business worldwide isn't something to brag about, not if business means that you traffic in unjust wages and the bodies and souls of human beings, and that you kill prophets and activists as a matter of daily practice.

Kahl pointed out that the Left engaged in a grand journey, a kind of "Exodus from Capitalism," with the Soviet experiment of 1917-1989. But that experiment is over. The Left is now in exile. The only way to come back stronger is to learn what we did wrong. Kahl's humility was a refreshing break from the hubris and sectarianism that dominates the American Left. The anti-war movement in the USA is desperate for new ways to build the mass movement against empire. This panel was a bright signal on a hill.

Capitalism itself is a religion, as Rick Wolff, the vivacious professor and self-described "high priest" of economics, pointed out. The mystical power of "the Market" is taught at all levels of our society. "The Market" is revered as a kind of mysterious god, never explained properly. (And did you know? Adam Smith was a professor of religious studies, not economics!)

Wolff pointed out that whether one is religious or not, the language of religion saturates our culture. All activists must know how to connect with as many people as possible, including passionate, spiritual people who feel the call to work for justice. That call is very real. Wolff sees revolutionary potential in the fact that "many people are aware that their religious values are not consistent with the values of capitalism."

After all, there's an inherent rip-off in capitalism: any owner willing to pay a wage does so knowing that he can get more value out of the worker than the owner has to pay. Wage labor is a kind of "short-term slavery."

As a former entrepreneur myself, I want to point out that Wolff is assuming here a big, profitable company, when in reality, five out of six start-ups fail, painfully. Most new employment comes from small businesses, and small business has the flexibility to incorporate new and better ethical practices.

But here's where we all agree: there's something heartening and joyful when you can read the Bible not as a false master narrative of oppression and sexual repression, but as a document of a people suffering and seeking freedom. This panel pointed out that the world's religions are not fixed. Religion is a human construct, and it adapts to changing technologies and social needs. God is well pleased the closer we get to God. God wants us to discard all disfiguring idols and seek higher.

The anthropologist side of my training tells me to look at a cultural practice and seek the reasons for it beneath the culture's own stated reason. Christianity in America for the past two centuries has been dominated by the ethos of capitalism. The religion of capitalism is one devoid of redemption; its only sacraments are debt and guilt. If you fail, it's all your fault. Never question the Almighty Market. Never seek to change the system.

That Christianity worked for the period of the robber barons, and for the wild frontier. But that period is over. The USA and the world are on the verge of a whole new paradigm. The internet has created a new ability to connect, to share, to freely give the best of our hearts and minds to each other. God is at work here.

In his opening speech, the Reverend Jesse Jackson pointed out that "the Left" is somewhat misnamed. Really, we are the moral core. We are the emancipators. We are in the mainstream, especially when we can connect to the power latent in the Judeo-Christian scriptures.

-*-*-*-

This panel was also reviewed at The Mantle, A Forum for Progressive Critique
http://www.mantlethought.org/content/left-forum-2010-marxism-and-christianity

 

Follow Sander Hicks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SanderHicks

I first want to say that I'm grateful to everyone who has become a fan of this new blog. The social technology at Huffington Post shows the revolutionary power of the new technologies. Web 2.0 social ...
I first want to say that I'm grateful to everyone who has become a fan of this new blog. The social technology at Huffington Post shows the revolutionary power of the new technologies. Web 2.0 social ...
Around the Web:

Left Forum

 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:40 AM on 04/04/2010
One can slice and dice the bible and other "sacred" texts to make them say what ever you want them to say. In You can probably make the case that Jesus was a Marxist or a Monarchist. These texts are useful in the same way that Rorschach ink blots are useful in determining the personality of the person being analysed.

I'm a non competitive person, I don't know why, so I latched onto the Golden Rule. I later found out that it is the bases of most religions and that it is the foundation concept for a frail species that required massive social cooperation to survive. When a child is in the bully selfish phase of their development they are admonished with the phrase "How would you like it if he did that to you." This is our first lesson in objectivity.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." all of the rest is just commentary. The Golden Rule is easy to remember and incredibly hard to put into practice. Our social evolution is the process of expanding our definition of others from our clan, to our tribe, to our linguistic group, to our nation, to all peoples and to the biosphere.

That's my story. It has quite literally save my life more than once.
photo
quorthon
Big government IS the answer!
06:28 PM on 04/01/2010
This is nothing new--writers like Zizek and Badiou have been drawing the Christianity-Marxism link for a while. Though intriguing, I think they take their conclusions too far--I'm not buying it. We can conduct a critique of capitalism without the religious overtones.
04:41 PM on 04/01/2010
Let's just pretend for a moment that Christianity and Marxism WERE mutually exclusive and you had to pick between the two. Which one would you choose? In other words, which one are you most passionate about? Do you find Marxism appealing because it seems to be an expression of your Christianity or do you find Christianity attractive because it seesm to be an expression of your Marxism? Do you follow the teachings of Jesus because you believe and trust in Jesus or do you merely support his teachings beacuse they seem to coincide to the ideology of Marx?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sander Hicks
10:25 PM on 04/03/2010
This is a good question. And I don't think it was rhetorical. It seems like you are waiting for someone to respond, or me, so I will. I would pick Jesus if I had to chose. I think his reputation has stood up better over time, despite the abuses done in his name. Similar to Marx, good ideas, breakthrough conceptions, and actual practice, too. But also similarly, the eventual pharisees and didactic aparatchiks and asskissers who only have passion for hierarchy eventually take over. They drain the movement of all spirit. That's where Marxism is today, with groups like ISO and Socialist Action mis-leading the peace movement into exclusionary, PC elitism. They are automatically against a mass movement against the wars of imperialism. But there are still interesting things going on in radical Christianity. Shane Claiborne and Simple Way in PA, or Catholic Worker, in many cities around the globe, just to name a couple.
01:46 PM on 04/01/2010
I did an essay on the first Christians - those at the time of Peter and Paul. All historians of that period called Christianity at that period "love communism". Then time passed and things went down hill.
06:20 PM on 04/01/2010
You can correct me if I am wrong, but the explanation for that was the early church believed in the imminent parousia. As time passed with no second coming, people's patience wore out and they reverted back to their ordinary, less charitable, ways.
12:35 PM on 04/01/2010
What we all forget is that society has 3 legs of stability: spirituality, economics and ethics. You can't figure out the ethics without the other two clearly defined. The present debate unscores the fact that our defition of spirituality is in total flux and our society is at odds in its economics.

What this debate also fails to include is the growing number of statists who believe that religion and the state and the law are one, under Allah.

The old paradigm of Christianity vs. Athieism OR Capitalism vs. Communism is last century's living debate. This century will be the debate between Theocracy vs. Inclusive societies AND Sharia Law vs. Western Rule of Law.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:24 PM on 04/01/2010
"Is Christianity Marxist" [original front-page teaser headline]

Chicken? Egg?

The real question here is "is Marxism Christian" -- UNDENIABLY, although no power-hungry competing organization would ever admit it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mark Olmsted
essayist, blogger, activist
11:23 AM on 04/01/2010
I like the analogy of the left in exile, milling around in the wilderness. The Soviet Union on one side the Church on the other have so distorted the core tenets of both Christian and Marxist thought, it has almost impossible to reclaim a philiosphical system that embraces both.
I propose a political and social movement that coalesces around one primary ideal: kindness. Our "bible" The writings of Martin Luther King Jr.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomDegan
Author of "The Rant": http://www.tomdegan.blogspot
10:00 AM on 04/01/2010
Blessed are the peacemakers
For they shall be called "sons of God"
Blessed are the meek
For they shall inherit the earth....

Well what the....That doesn't sound very right wing to me!

Sander, for a really good perspective on Christianity and and the Progress outlook, I would suggest you read anything you can get your hands on by Thomas Merton - particularly "Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander.

for more on the subject of Merton:

http://tomdegan.blogspot.com/2007/02/thomas-merton-1915-1968.html

Cheerio! Pip! Pip!

Tom Degan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
09:48 AM on 04/01/2010
The gospel/good news, that Jesus preached, was a direct challenge to the politically powerful and the arrogant, self-satisfied, self-righteous teachers of the law.

Two thousand years ago the Cross had NO symbolic religious meaning and was not a piece of jewelry. When Jesus said: "Pick up your cross and follow me," everyone back then understood he was issuing a POLITICAL statement, for the main roads in Jerusalem were lined with crucified agitators, rebels, dissidents and any others who disturbed the status quo of the Roman Occupying Forces.

In the latter days of Nero's reign through Domitian, Christians were persecuted for following the nonviolent, loving and forgiving Jesus. That Jesus was first left behind when Augustine penned the Just War Theory.

Before Emperor Constantine brought Christianity into the mainstream, all the early Church Fathers taught that Christians should not serve in the army but instead willingly suffer rather than inflict harm on any other. Augustine was the first Church Father to consider the concept of a Just War and within 100 years after Constantine, the Empire required that all soldiers in the army must be baptized Christians and thus, the decline of Christianity began.

Excerpted from "21st Century Letter to the Churches in the USA"

http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=823&Itemid=195
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
01:14 AM on 04/01/2010
""And in a new twist, presentations like "Christian-Marxist Dialogue" sought to find a bridge between faith and secular political organizing -- where the future of the revolution of peace may lie. The Great Recession, the "War on Terror," the failure to prosecute the felonies of Bush and Cheney, and the slack moral relativism of Obama all show that our system of American capitalism is in its deepest crisis. In the West, two alternatives exist: Marxism and Christianity. This panel sought to point out common ground between the two.

Brigitte Kahl from the Union Theological Seminary was the first to speak. "The place where the Marxist and Christian critiques of capitalism intersect," she said, "is "idolatry.""

Yep, Beck is totally wrong when he suggests that the advocates of "Social Justice" advocate Socialism or even Marxism. Pay no attention to the fact that they share much of the same ideology and methods.
01:05 AM on 04/01/2010
I think this panel, and this article, is important in order to dispel the myth that all critiques of capitalism require some sort of centralized state. Not all socialists or communists are statists, in fact beyond the Soviet Union most socialist movements have historically been anti-authoritarian. In the present-day dialogue it is vital that we properly define our terms so that others do not turn them into buzzwords for their own agenda or ideology.

Darin Robbins
01:28 PM on 04/01/2010
Of course they are not statists, communism needs "the withering away of the State." This is part of Marx turning Hegel on his head. The Soviet Union was not so much statist as it was Stalinist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
12:21 AM on 04/01/2010
It is sad that there are so many right-wing Christians in this country. In Europe left-wing views in a church are a given. They have gatherings where they present fair trade products, inform people about human rights issues, promote environmentalism and even promote Christian socialism.

http://www.kirchentag.de/aktuell-bremen-2009/glaube/alle-bildergalerien.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
01:21 AM on 04/01/2010
Nothing against Europe but is it possible that there is something distinctly American that is of value? There are plenty of "fair trade products" that can be purchased here, people are aware of human rights issues, some promote enviornmentalism (many don't), religious people on the left and right worship the same Christ in different ways. Why is it wrong to recognize the majority hold different values here? We left Europe for a reason. Remember?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
01:34 AM on 04/01/2010
The left-wing that you know evolved during the late 19th century. So you could not have left because of progressive views that fought for gender equality, universal health care, free education, fair wages,.. or let me say, nearly everything you enjoy today.
05:05 AM on 04/01/2010
You are absolutely correct. European immigrants did indeed leave Europe for a reason. And in MANY cases that reason was...religious persecution. That of course was why the founding fathers were so keen to separate church and state. To them it wasn't a distant theoretical ideal - it was a highly practical requirement because they had seen Europe ravaged by centuries of intractable religious conflict and didn't want the same thing inflicted on the new world. An observation that might serve some of our countrymen who want to turn us into their own preferred version of a christian theocracy well, were they to read the history to understand the point.
06:43 AM on 04/01/2010
I'm not sure there are so many right-wing Christians compared to more moderate and progressive Chrisians and other spiritual people. One of the largest mega-churches in the country is in my town. 20,000 members in a city of 1 million. That's not a large percentage of people but because of the size and tactics of the mega church, they sometimes dominate the news, portrayed as representing a much larger group of people than they actually do.

Of course the marriage of conservative politics and evangelical Christians has added to this phenomenon, right-wing Christians seem to represent all Christians in the news because one of the two political parties shares the same views. There are millions but they're still a minority in a country where 80 something percent identify as 'Christian'.

These mega churches have filled a lot of needs in the suburban community where so many people are isolated. Job networking, social networking, etc. If they had a message of tolerance and social justice instead of the opposite, they could be a positive force. Maybe it's up to more progressive Christians to speak out against their intolerance and extremism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
09:02 AM on 04/01/2010
"f they had a message of tolerance and social justice instead of the opposite, they could be a positive force".

Let it be known that you believe that you believe that the people of the U.S. are "uniquely stupid", that your own "superiority" is factual, and that the Democratic fix is really a political stunt to provide us what you want to give us through devious means (the only way possible politically).

God save us from the "social justice" and "tolerance" of those who believe themselves to be uniquely right, superior, and believe the rest of us to be "uniquely" stupid.