Bush In Israel: Standing With One Side

Air Force One is traveling back in time Tuesday, banking low near the southern Mediterranean coast and touching down on contested soil where the past is always present. In the Holy Land, the battles over historical narrative -- above all, the meaning of the founding of Israel in 1948 -- are as hard-fought as the contemporary struggles over West Bank settlers, Palestinian refugees, and negotiations for a two-state solution. For the observer, or self-described "honest broker" in a long and bitter dispute, identifying with only one side's history carries profound meaning of its own.

Yet when President Bush steps off his plane to help Israel mark its 60th birthday, he will stride firmly into the past of one side. Officials of the Jewish state will sweep the president into their own powerful and compelling narrative: The birth of Israel from the ashes of the Holocaust on May 14, 1948; the invasion of the state, a day later, from Arab armies marching from the north, south, and east; and the loss of fully one percent of the Jewish state's population, in a fierce defense that evokes Israel's unofficial motto: Never again.

What the president won't hear is the Palestinian story. He won't be told that one side's "War of Independence" is the other side's "Nakba," or Catastrophe. And no one is likely to mention that Israel's heroic survival was, to the Arabs, a dispossession in which 750,000 Palestinians fled or were driven out of their homes.

Here, then, is a brief "Nakba" primer for the President, a chronicle of the untold to accompany him on his visit to Jerusalem.

In the spring of 1948, waves of fear gripped Arab Palestine following the April 9 massacre of more than 120 unarmed Palestinians by extremist Jewish militias in the village of Deir Yassin, near Jerusalem. Thus, even before the war officially began, Arab villagers were fleeing for safer ground, fully intending to return when the fighting stopped.

Later that month in the Galilee, Yigal Allon, commander of the elite Jewish brigade known as the Palmach, implemented a plan to spread more fear among the local Arabs. Allon would write later that he gathered Jewish leaders "who had ties with the different Arab villages, and I asked them to whisper in the ears of several Arabs that giant Jewish reinforcements had reached the Galilee and were about to clean out the villages...[and] to advise them, as friends, to flee while they could...the flight encompassed tens of thousands. The stratagem fully achieved its objective."

The next month, May 1948, a similar campaign took hold in the village of Na'ani, according to local Arab and Israeli sources, when a Jewish neighbor rode into town on horseback, shouting "The Jewish army is coming! You must leave, or you will all be killed!" The villagers fled en masse, many coming a few miles north to the Arab town of Ramle. There, they hoped, it would be safe.

Two months later, on July 12, Israeli forces overwhelmed local Arab defenders and occupied the refugee-choked Ramle (now the Israeli city of Ramla) and neighboring Lydda (now Lod). The same day they began expelling the Arabs of the two towns. According to the memoirs of Yitzhak Rabin, then a young Israeli major, the orders came directly from Israel's first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion. Three days later, Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary, "there are 30,000 refugees moving along the road between Ramle and Lydda..they are demanding bread..."

The people of Ramle and Lydda had left in haste and packed little, unprepared for a long hike across stony ground of cactus and Christ's thorn in mid-summer temperatures that reached 100 degrees. Decades later, old men and women in refugee camps would recall, above all, thirst: of quenching it with stagnant water found in old wells; with the drying kernels of a leftover corn harvest; and, in some cases, with their own urine. John Bagot Glubb, the British commander of the Arab Legion, would write that "nobody will ever know how many children died."

Sixty years later, the Nakba lies at the core of Palestinians' identity, and of their view of history and justice. Official U.S. ignorance of that, passed down through generations and embodied in President Bush's visit only to the Israeli side, has, unsurprisingly, angered Palestinians.

"It's a slap in the face," said Diana Buttu, a prominent Palestinian analyst in the West Bank told the New York Times adding that the U.S. is essentially saying: "You have no history, and your past does not matter."
But more than the insult or even stupidity of such a one-sided position is the tactical bungling of an administration that wants to be seen as a fair arbiter of a long-standing dispute. That's pretty hard to do, if all you can see is one side's pain and glory.

Comments

[EngineerBill]

I don't know of any Israeli politician, even Likudniks who will tell you with a straight face that the Palestinians didn't suffer or were not victims of some injustices. Let's get real here. A major reason the Palestinians have suffered is of their own making and the politicization of this issue by Arab leaders. He speaks of 750 thousand Palestinians that fled but what about the nearly same number of Arab Jews that emigrated from neighboring Arab states to Israel? Israel absorbed these people, not only that they welcomed them. I think that if the Palestinians stopped making "the Nabka" the core of their identity and looked toward the future and treated Israel as a neighbor, their quality of life would vastly improve.

[fetacheese]

you mean you want to tell people who are still alive, very much remember the war, and remember being forced from their homes, to simply forget it ever happened? to move on? many people also complain that jews make the holocaust their identity--should the world tell them to simply get over it and not live in the past? that's how ludicrous your statement is. the point tolan is trying to make is that shutting our eyes and pretending that an entire nation of people never existed or never suffered is not only not winning us any points, but it's total hypocrisy. how can we possibly mediate a conflict between two peoples when we're waving flags and celebrating with just the one side on that very same issue?

[messy]

Well, they were told again and again, their Arab brothers would commit genocide and give them back the vacant land "occupied" by inferior, subhuman Jews. They were told, again and again, that there was NO Jewish people, there was NO Holocaust, Just interlopers who had no right to live on the planet.

We are celebrating the triumph over adversity of an indigeonus people over racist imperialism.

[sclucie]

Perhaps food and homes would help them look toward the future. I read the Israeli press, not the American press. It presents a far more balanced view of what is actually happening in Israel than anything we see here - and a far more accurate assessment of what role Americans play in perpetuating the tragedy. If if continues, there will be no more Israel - at least not an Israel worthy of the men and women who fought and died to build a state where "never again" had real meaning.

[hrned]

Bill, the Jews didn't voluntarily leave Arab lands - they were forced out. Unlike Arabs who lived in Turkish, and then British Palestine, who can apply for restitution, these Jews, many of whose families had lived in those lands for over a thousand years, have no recourse.