iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sanford D. Horwitt

GET UPDATES FROM Sanford D. Horwitt
 

Alinsky, Foreclosures and Holding Banks Accountable

Posted: 01/31/2012 10:46 pm

Memo to the Obama Administration: if you want to see the makings of a national model to hold big banks accountable for fixing foreclosure-devastated neighborhoods, go to Milwaukee and talk to citizen leaders of a community organization who are practicing what Saul Alinsky preached.

"You broke it, you fix it," demonstrators chanted outside Wells Fargo's downtown Milwaukee headquarters on a cold January day two years ago. The scores of angry citizens were members of a broad-based community organization, Common Ground, that is comprised of some 40 interfaith religious congregations and other organizations. Ultimately, they targeted not only Wells Fargo but also four other large banks -- Deutsche Bank, U.S. Bank, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase -- that either owned, were trustees or servicers of foreclosed houses.

Forty years after his death, Alinsky's influence is alive and well not only through his still widely read book, Rules for Radicals, but also through the work of his Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) that he started more than 70 years ago with a grant from Marshall Field III, scion of the Chicago department store family.

Today's IAF has created more than 60 community organizations in the U.S. and abroad, but one of the newest, Common Ground, that spans Milwaukee and three adjacent Wisconsin counties, is doing what even the federal government has found to be so elusive: holding big banks accountable for the subprime foreclosure fallout that has left many cities much poorer and pockmarked with foreclosed and abandoned houses. By successfully pressuring five big banks into an unprecedented multimillion dollar commitment to help rehabilitate Milwaukee neighborhoods and winning local government support, the IAF's grassroots Milwaukee organization has forged what observers say should be replicated nationwide.

Before they took to the streets, some 250 Common Ground volunteers devoted nearly a year and hundreds of hours researching the banks' financial statements and foreclosure filings, and going door-to-door documenting the condition of poorly maintained, abandoned houses that degraded neighborhoods. The grim statistics: more than 20,000 foreclosure actions since 2007, a staggering $4 billion in lost property values and, in the case of just one bank, Deutsche Bank, an astonishing 17,041 housing code violations.

Consulting with city officials, Common Ground developed a set of demands, which included a bank-financed fund for the rehabilitation of abandoned houses. At first, the banks refused to meet, but Common Ground members, with terrier-like tenacity, weren't going to be stonewalled like the city government had been when the banks ignored the upkeep of their foreclosed houses.

Using media coverage to good advantage, Common Ground leaders hosted a high-profile public hearing where housing and financial experts explained the link between the blighted neighborhoods and the banks' investment in the subprime mortgage market.

In May of 2010, Common Ground sent two of its members some 4,000 miles to confront Deutsche Bank's CEO, Josef Ackermann, at the bank's annual shareholders meeting in Frankfurt, Germany. German media gave Common Ground's story about Deutsche Bank extensive coverage, including its slogan: "German immigrants built Milwaukee; now a German bank is destroying Milwaukee." After a Common Ground member addressed the shareholders in fluent German, Ackermann announced that he was sending a high-level delegation to Milwaukee to meet with Common Ground and city officials.

But the negotiations with Deutsche Bank and the other four banks dragged on for a year, and it took another trip to Germany, plus a Common Ground appearance at Wells Fargo's 2011 shareholders meeting in San Francisco before a deal started to take shape.

Wells Fargo was the first to step forward with a financial commitment and by the end of the summer the other four banks did, too. The total: $33.8 million in cash and mortgage commitments for priorities that the city and Common Ground identified: the rehabilitation of 100 foreclosed houses in one pilot neighborhood, Sherman Park; mortgage commitments so the rehabbed houses in Sherman Park and other neighborhoods can be sold; hiring more nonprofit housing counselors and supporting a new nonprofit organization that will employ and train low-income men and woman to monitor foreclosed houses and keep them safe and secure.

Here's the larger, national significance of the Milwaukee story.

First, to repair foreclosure-damaged neighborhoods in American cities, grassroots groups with the pluck and persistence of Common Ground must organize to pressure banks to do the right thing when other institutions, including government, are not up to the task. These groups also have the indispensable role, which banks and governments cannot perform, of strengthening the social fabric in fragile, recovering neighborhoods by inspiring local residents to become engaged citizens and shape their own destiny.

Second, the Milwaukee story shows how a savvy community organization and city officials working together can leverage limited public money. Like other hard-hit cities, Milwaukee received federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds. When Common Ground brought the banks to the negotiating table, city officials agreed to target $2 million of its NSP money to revitalize the Sherman Park neighborhood. With that $2 million, Common Ground leveraged a total of $33.8 million from the five banks, a ratio of almost 17 to 1. Multiply the woefully inadequate $7 billion in NSP funds appropriated nationwide to fix devastated neighborhoods by 17 and you get a much more realistic $119 billion. That should be the big banks' share, at a minimum. Call it the banks' down payment on repairing the subprime damage.

The precedent that has been established with the banks in Milwaukee has national implications, according to Alexander von Hoffman, senior fellow at the Joint Center of Housing Studies of Harvard University, who calls the multi-bank financial commitment "unique and significant." And as Alderman Michael Murphy, the respected, veteran chairman of Milwaukee's Common Council Finance and Personnel Committee says about the Milwaukee model: "I would hope that other cities would look at this as a blueprint of how to try to address the foreclosure crisis." Indeed, it is a blueprint and a success story that deserves to be repeated -- and, one would hope, promoted by the Obama Administraton.

Sanford D. Horwitt is the author of Let Them Call Me Rebel: The Life and Legacy of Saul Alinsky.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Capitalism Is King
Obama Has Made Things Worse!
04:30 PM on 02/01/2012
It's always the same, Alinksy and Obama referred to in the same article. Like Salt & Pepper, or Paper & Towel ..... Alinksy & Obama.
02:49 PM on 02/01/2012
The FDIC, is it broke or is there money being printed to fund it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjlwis
01:51 PM on 02/01/2012
i'd like to know why my comments about Milwaukee and a former mayor and his policies that gave the highest economic growth ever were edited out? I guess it's alright to have baseless accusations with no facts to back them up are okay but historical facts don't seem to have a place on this site. What a bunch of hypocrites.
01:26 PM on 02/01/2012
Millions never asked the bank what their payments would be and decide if they could afford that? If these people lost their jobs or health the bank should be "held responsible?"

Perhaps many people have lost their homes or are underwater on their mortgages is because they overpaid for their home.

What helped cause inflated home prices? Government intervention in the housing market by mandating, via CRA, that banks make loans to previously unqualified buyers. The FLOOD of new buyers into the housing market drove prices up for EVERYONE. Many more people who took out home equity loans on the inflated value of their homes and are now underwater.

Clinton appointees Franklin Raines at FM and Henry Cisneiros at HUD kept upping the ante on banks to make more and more sub-prime loans.

The front page of the Sept 11th 2003 New York Times announced "Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory reform in the housing market since the savings and loan crisis of a decade ago."

On May 25th 2006 John McCain co-sponsored a bill, S-190, and gave a speech in support of that bill in which McCain outlined how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "pose enormous risk to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole."

Did McCain miss anything? NO. The banks KNEW the loans they were being forced to make would go bad. Democrats just kept upping the ante to make more loans.
03:23 PM on 02/01/2012
Blaming yourself for your bad decision means that there is nobody to sue or leverage money from. One must always ignore one's own culpability if there is any chance of using Alinksy's methods to cash in. No one considers that people lied on applications or that banks were openly threatened by people like Clinton and Frank to make more mortgages in low-income neighborhoods. This was followed up by their reassurance that these liar's loans would be bought up by Freddie and Fannie and repackaged into securities. This is what caused the crash. The banks did what the govt told them to do and tried to maximize their profits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjlwis
12:42 PM on 02/01/2012
This grassroots movement happening in Wisconsin should not be surprising. After all, the city of Milwaukee had a socialist Mayor, Frank Zeidler, back in the 50's & 60's that helped the city during the best economic growth ever. This State has long been a place where the citizens figure out a way to bring fairness to problem solving. When big banks drag common people through the mud by their greedy tactics, it takes grassroots involvement to correct the problem. Another reason why the current recall efforts will again surprise those who have lost all hope.
12:38 PM on 02/01/2012
$117BB from banks to pay for people's mortgages who didn't pay for them themselves?

What responsibility did the homeowners have when THEY bought the house and THEY signed the mortgage? Apparently none.
photo
Capitalism Is King
Obama Has Made Things Worse!
04:31 PM on 02/01/2012
Come on bave, this represents some more free goodies to the moochers and looters. After all, Obama has to buy votes some way.
10:40 AM on 02/01/2012
It was CRA affirmative action minority lending quotas that required banks to make sub-prime loans for a favorable government CRA rating. Banks needed this favorable CRA rating for government approval of expansions, mergers, new branches etc.

In the late 1990's sub-prime loans accounted for just 7% of all loans. With CLinton appointees Franklin Raines at Fannie Mae and Henry Cisnarios at HUD sub prime loans rose to 50% by the mid 2000's.

The FLOOD of previously unqualified buyers into the market drove prices up for EVERYONE. People got so bold as to buy a house with no money down and cash out their equity after a few years rather than walk away with nothing by renting.

The banks KNEW these loans were risky and would collapse eventually but in a booming economy with low interest rates these high yield sub prime loans juiced up returns.

For banks CRA became a game of musical chairs to collect high returns on sub-prime loans being FORCED on them by the government yet not be holding on to them when the music stopped.

In 1988 Obama wrote a chapter for the book "After ALinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois" in which Obama lamented the community organizers "lack of power" to implement change.

This is nothing more than implementation of Obama's favorite rule, No 13, "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." rather than admit CRA was yet another FAILED democrat social experiment that over inflated the housing market.
01:53 PM on 02/03/2012
Sorry friend, but CRA was enacted in 1977 and there is no link to the sub prime crisis. that started in about 2004 when investment banks started packages mortgage backed securities and selling them off to investors, thus having no reason to do proper due diligence. The majority of foreclosures are in non-CRA neighborhoods and were originated by mortgage brokers, but if blaming poor people because you think there is no way corporations chasing profits could ever create a financing crisis is the way to go, I'll let you live in your bubble. One more question... Why did foreclosures and housing price declines happen all over the world (Spain, Greece, Ireland, UK)? Were poor people and US government regulations to blame for that?
10:40 AM on 02/01/2012
GOOD MORNING!!! MY FELLOW HOMO SAPIENS WHICH MEANS THE SPECIES WHO IS WISE.
Since Holder and his Department of Obstruction of Justice has become totally useless Obama has been forced to appoint a prosecutor from New York to investigate the swindlers in those banks and financial markets who caused the financial meltdown in 2008.
The odds of these trillion, billion, million dollar swindlers ever going to jail are a million to one which clearly indicates how really corrupt, politicalized and useless America's legal systems have become.
02:01 PM on 02/01/2012
Progressiveconnie, you should check out this article on the DOJ. It will really make you wonder what is going on with Holder and the Department of Obstruction of Justice.
http://www.mortgageorb.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.10820
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gudrun
My micro-bio is empty
10:16 AM on 02/01/2012
Saul Alinsky tactics at their finest!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KatRB
Diversity is fabric of America
09:36 AM on 02/01/2012
This article shows how America got to be the greatest country in the world. Local communities working together to solve problems instead of looking to the federal govt to solve them. Obama started out as a community organizer. But all Republicans seem to believe that such experience won't solve the nation's ills. I'm sure that Obama will eventually highlight local community efforts like this one. Hopefully, we'll see more efforts like this springing up across our large country.
12:42 PM on 02/01/2012
You said it. The GOP considers this kind of action "UnAmerican"; somehow we are suppose to just let the big banks ride all over us because it benefits us???
04:18 PM on 02/01/2012
Yes. Protesting is what made America great. Not industry, not the rule of law, not the sanctity of the contract, not strict private property rules, not "God, guns and guts" but sign-waving protestors picketing banks or other places of business that have engaged in perfectly legal business practices. Oh, wait. They were forced into making risky loans to people with bad credit by the government via the CRA. Well it's Bush's fault. Oh,wait. He wanted to investigate Fannie and Freddie but Barney Frank and his buddies halted that. It's not like a social program of the Dems not only went tts up but also brought widespread economic woe to the entire country. Oh, wait.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KatRB
Diversity is fabric of America
07:36 PM on 02/01/2012
Please go back and re-read my comment. I wasn't talking about protests but rather action by a local community to work together to solve their problems rather than look to the federal govt for solutions. If you believe that it was Democratic solutions at the federal level that caused this economic mess then I would assume you would have found the article and my comment refreshing. This community is not wasting time placing blame and expecting the federal govt to fix it. They're working together within their local community to solve the problem as it impacts them and not some other community in the country that might choose to solve it differently. Isn't that the American way?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eclub
яεsτяιcτєd
09:35 AM on 02/01/2012
I'll say it, what we are witnessing is a form of Warfare from Germany and other countries. They have decided to eviscerate the American middle class, even the American.

" In May of 2010, Common Ground sent two of its members some 4,000 miles to confront Deutsche Bank's CEO, Josef Ackermann, at the bank's annual shareholders meeting in Frankfurt, Germany. German media gave Common Ground's story about Deutsche Bank extensive coverage, including its slogan: "German immigrants built Milwaukee; now a German bank is destroying Milwaukee." After a Common Ground member addressed the shareholders in fluent German, Ackermann announced that he was sending a high-level delegation to Milwaukee to meet with Common Ground and city officials".
08:19 AM on 02/01/2012
Seems we are missing part of the story here, so let’s go back in time and review what happened at millions of kitchen tables.

Banker/real estate agent meets with “house buyer from main street”.
Banker/real estate agent: I have run the numbers and you don’t qualify for a loan to buys this house. It appears you can’t really afford to buy this house. Damn shame, I wanted the commission from the sale.
Buyer: Hey I really want to buy this house, besides isn’t the government putting “unofficial” pressure on you to give loans to poor people who can’t afford them?
Bank/agent: Yeah, you’re right. Got to keep the feds happy, besides I want the commission from the sale.
Buyer: How can we fix this?
Bank/agent: Will you be willing to lie about your income on the paperwork to get the loan?
Buyer: Sure! Then I can live in a house!
Bank/agent: Great! Now I will get a commission and feds will be happy!

NOW LET US ASK OURSELVES, WHEN ARE WE GOING TO HOLD MAIN STREET/FEDERAL GOV’T ACCOUNTABLE THE SAME WAY WE HOLD THE BANKS RESPONSIBLE? TWO FACED, ARE WE???
08:25 AM on 02/01/2012
Excellent post!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Yoder
Vote down CISPA
09:04 AM on 02/01/2012
You are absolutely correct. There is a lot of talk about greed on Wall St and greed in Government but no one ever mentions that if Main St was just as greedy. I do feel bad for the people that lost their homes but maybe if they had made smarter choices with the investments that they made we would not have had the 2008 crash. Main St and the government need to live within their means and purchase only what they can afford to pay.
07:44 AM on 02/01/2012
What form of government did Alinsky promote. You would to make this person a hero should read what he stands for first. Clinton and the government created this mess. The end of the glass seagal act was a big part of the problem. These organizers fought to get loans for people who could not afford them. Rules for raticials, is how to get to marxism from present grovernment. Alinsky was a marxist, but if that is the government you believe in then you should believe in Saul Alinsky. A government to control everything leads to what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
midwestgirl1960
08:13 AM on 02/01/2012
yes Clinton may have signed it but it was republicans who wrote the bill, who I might add also held the majority of congress since they controlled both houses.

From the time Newt gave us THE CONTRACT WITH AMERICA republicans held both houses until 2006. They controlled government since the write the laws that Bush rubber stamped.

" government to control everything" you mean like the republican fascist who must be in everyones bedroom at every marriage and in every woman's wombs. Sexism is one of the fascist traits along with well here is the list

the current republican party is the modern fascist.

http://www.rense.com/general37/fascism.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Yoder
Vote down CISPA
09:11 AM on 02/01/2012
So by your logic President Clinton is absolved making the bill law and all the blame goes to the authors. Also, it is not fascism. I do not see any eugenics program. I do not see a single dictatorial figure in control of the Republican party or the government as a whole. I do not see the US conquering countries and then looting them of resources and oppressing the people (if Iraq was about "blood for oil" then why did our gas prices not go down). What I see is the whorish practice of Corporatism, with the government and business in bed together scratching eachother's backs using the lobby system. And let us not forget that our current President received the second largest total amount of contributions from Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac. Obama is not and should not be excused from his complicity in the 2008 housing crash nor should Wall St, Main St or the government.
09:17 AM on 02/01/2012
Republicans in congress voted to get rid of glass-stegal with a veto proof majority. Clinton had nothing to do with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MUDPUPPY
02:32 AM on 02/01/2012
The biggest mistake the banks made was letting themselves be forced into making unjustifiable loans in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rksnj67
Illegitimi non carborundum
07:13 AM on 02/01/2012
The biggest mistake the banks made realizing they could bundle up mortgages (good or bad mortgages, it didn't matter) and sell them as investment vehicles, make bundles of cash on them, and not care whether the whole house of cards came tumbling down.
photo
JDCarnevale
One of the elitists
09:20 AM on 02/01/2012
Exactly... I am so sick of the Faux news argument that poor people caused the collapse. It is ridiculous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
midwestgirl1960
08:16 AM on 02/01/2012
No republicans should not have written the laws and Clinton signed.

Since newt bringing us the contract with America the republicans controlled both houses.

Gramm–Leach–Bliley_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E2%80%93Leach%E2%80%93Bliley_Act
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
01:14 AM on 02/01/2012
What a load of donkey dust! That people have to get together and fight for the banks to upkeep foreclosed homes is missing the point. People should have gotten together and taken to the streets to PREVENT people from losing their homes.

People didn't do a damn thing when their "irresponsible" neighbors were foreclosed on, probably by banks "robosigning", and forced out of their homes...then when the houses started to get run down, they go fight the banks to keep their neighborhood "looking good".

In case these people don't know, it's the PEOPLE, not the houses, that make good neighborhoods. Wonder what their neighborhood will be like when it's taken over by speculators.
09:19 AM on 02/01/2012
What do you think the value of your house will do if half the houses are foreclosed on.
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
12:15 PM on 02/01/2012
I was very disappointed that these homeowners, who were given the adjustable rate "funny" mortgages by the greedy banks had to pay the price of losing their homes , especially since the banks were bailed out. I feel that anyone that was struggling to pay their mortgages should have been able to pay the mortgage based on what their homes were worth AFTER housing prices went down, and anyone who couldn't, to have the option to at least stay in the homes by renting them. But the greedy banks wouldn't have gone for that at all, the dirty sons!
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
02:20 PM on 02/03/2012
Every homeowner takes a risk when they buy a home, but banks were actually pushing the ARMs on people, even those who qualified for regular mortgages. Banks also robo signed and "weren't there" when people wanted to get help adjusting their rates.

Oh, yeah, there were some people who got mortgages by inflating their incomes, and a lot couldn't pay when they lost their jobs, but banks made a fortune bundling the ARMs as CDOs and selling them...so they should give a little of that back to the victims.

It's funny, even now, Freddie was caught betting against homeowners.
09:19 AM on 02/01/2012
I would tell the "neighbors" to make sure the banks sell the homes to people who will live in them, not as speculative teardowns. If anyone else is facing foreclosure, they should be helped by the banks and the neighbors so as to avoid it. Re-writing mortgage loans should be a priority as well, everyone could benefit from a broad-based community financial "adjustment".