More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sarah Butrymowicz

Sarah Butrymowicz

Posted: November 16, 2010 01:51 AM


The recent resignations of high-profile school chiefs Joel Klein in New York and Michelle Rhee in Washington, DC, raise questions about the future of education reform at a time when school districts across the United States are adopting policies the two icons of change pioneered.2010-11-11-superintendentshuffle.jpg

Klein stepped down on Nov. 9 after eight years at the helm of the nation's largest school system, while Rhee left Washington last month after District of Columbia Mayor Adrian Fenty lost his re-election bid. Klein and Rhee have championed holding teachers and principals accountable for student performance, weakening union protections and closing down failing schools.

Klein called his overhauls "the most far-reaching" in the country at a conference Wednesday in New York. "If (school change) is not controversial, it's going to be meaningless."

Frederick M. Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, said that what happens next will depend on replacements for the two leaders and the agenda of the mayors who hire them.

"The departure of two of the most visible break-the-china leaders is important and it raises the question of staying power -- whether successors can build on these efforts, or whether they'll reverse course and opt for something more conventional, is going to be a big story over the next two years," Hess said.

New York, Washington and Chicago, where CEO Ron Huberman resigned last week, have operated as petri dishes for national education reforms in the past decade.

Huberman's predecessor in Chicago, Arne Duncan, is now the United States Secretary of Education, and his encouragement of small schools in the country's third-largest school district led to a new wave of high school reform that Huberman had vowed to continue.

Changes championed by these leaders include incentive pay for teachers based on test scores, greater school choice and new data systems that track the performance of students, teachers and schools. Research on these steps, which have proved unpopular with teachers' unions, has been mixed.

Still, policy makers intent on changing the way public schools operate have adopted many of the overhauls across the country.

"I think the legacy of both Michelle and Joel is that tough but necessary decisions yield results," said Tim Daly, the president of The New Teacher Project, which works with school districts across the country to train and hire effective teachers. "Michelle and Joel did things that were not only necessary but overdue."

Klein, a former antitrust lawyer for the United States Justice Department, will be replaced by publishing executive Cathleen Black. Klein, appointed in 2002 by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, will be remembered for reshaping the system's massive central bureaucracy of 32 local districts. He garnered both praise and protest for his support of charter schools and for his efforts to close 91 failing schools and replace them with 474 smaller ones.

Klein also increased teacher salaries by over 40 percent in exchange for greater accountability, and he linked school funding to student characteristics like their low-income or special-education status. He also started a controversial system of giving report cards to schools based on their test-score progress.

Rhee, who stepped down last month after three and a half years, made national headlines by firing 241 teachers based on their students' test scores. She also fired or didn't renew contracts for at least two dozen principals, including one at the school her daughter attended. Rhee took the blame for Fenty's failed re-election bid.

"I think many of the reforms that Rhee and, in particular, Klein put in place will stand the test of time and hold up pretty well moving forward," said Michael Casserly, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a coalition of 66 of the country's largest urban school systems. "Time will tell."

Already the measures are gaining traction beyond New York and Washington.

For example, Race to the Top, a federal competition that awarded money to states with the best plans to overhaul their education systems, prompted many states to adopt new data systems that will use student test scores to grade schools and teachers.

Both Klein and Rhee say their achievements include higher graduation rates and increased test scores, although critics question how accurately the statistics convey the true story and whether the scores are inflated.

What happens in the immediate future will depend on how new leaders in these cities respond to their mayors, who have the power to hire and fire the school chiefs.

"A lot of support for mayoral control has been tied to the notion that mayors can provide stability," said Jeffrey R. Henig, a professor of education at Teachers College, Columbia University. "The DC case most clearly -- and Chicago as well -- shows that mayors can introduce instability as well."

The upcoming departures of Fenty and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley mean that the tenure of their school leaders is also over. Henig added that "mayoral control is not a reliable solution to the problems of large city districts."

In New York, Bloomberg handpicked Black, chairwoman of Hearst, to take over Klein's job, and in Washington, Kaya Henderson, Rhee's deputy, has been named as interim superintendent.

Like Klein, Black has no background in education, and Rhee only had minimal teaching experience before becoming DC Schools Chancellor in 2007. Critics of mayoral control worry that politicians will appoint non-educators to lead school systems, something that proponents such as Bloomberg see as an asset rather than a liability. They also fear that stakeholder voices -- students, parents, teachers, community members -- will go unheard in a system where the mayor holds the reins.
2010-11-11-nontraditionalsuperintendents.jpg

Pedro Noguera, an urban sociologist and professor at New York University, said there are lessons to be learned from Klein and Rhee's tenures about the limitations of mayoral control and the mistake of seeing it as a panacea.

"Even if you are doing the right things, if you don't engage with people in your communities, you will spend your time fighting," said Noguera, whose research takes him into hundreds of urban schools. "How many shoes can you step on?"

Sarah Garland, Justin Snider and Liz Willen contributed to this article.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:22 PM on 01/05/2011
What reforms?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laura Hayes
12:59 PM on 11/21/2010
Gee I don't know, maybe REAL teachers will now have a say. As far as Mr. Cortines, he is cutting to the bone all of our classified staff and LAUSD has a 700,000 million dollar surplus. The war on education continues.
photo
joanno
Think before speaking...
11:28 AM on 11/21/2010
Speaking as an educational insider, it has long been clear to me that reform is desperately needed and only system shaking initiatives have a prayer of provoking the kinds of change that is needed. Klein, Rhee and other firebrands are needed to push large systems out of their old comfort zones and they get a lot of attention for those efforts. But in numerous smaller districts, NCLB and now RTTT have unleashed powerful currents moving slowly but surely towards fundamentally positive changes. Perhaps breaking up huge city districts into smaller, more manageable entities might be helpful.
10:14 AM on 11/18/2010
Let's hope that this is the beginning of the end of the educational deform movement led by Rhee and Klein that harms public education.
researcher
researcher
03:23 AM on 11/17/2010
pay for performance advocates understand little about the systemic influence on learning and even human behavior.

wall street is pay for performance should that not give us at least a hint of the evil of this we can buy it attitude. but it does not.

pay for performance is right up there with free will treated as an absolute truth and a god made in our image.

every university that I know of teaches pay for performance as an aspect of leadership.

its simple and it is something they think they can buy.

the decline in education cannot be stopped no more then the national debt rising year after year.

it is part of an american mentality of profits over people and this insane idea we can buy our way out of everything with dollars.


obama knows little about the learning process I dont care what universities he graduated from.
this nation refused to accept its own decline of wealth so it borrows trillions to try and fight off the coming future of america as just another latin american third world republic.

canada you had better start building your border fences now for soon you will have americans coming over to do your yard work and meat cutting cheap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:49 PM on 11/16/2010
Superintendents come in with their sweeping changes, mix it all up and then run to another position and leave the mess to the people they claim to be championing, the children.

These people leave before real research can be done to show that their magical reforms change nothing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:40 PM on 11/16/2010
I can speak about Rudy Crew's experience in Miami. His biggest sin was NOT being Cuban and being black.
07:29 PM on 11/16/2010
Reform can actually start now that these two are out.

Neither actually understands how learning occurs. Both are under the mistaken assumption that a test score equals real learning.

Their efforts to quantify everything reduced their districts to test prep factories, dumbing down learning and deprofessionalizing teachers.

Both of these individuals should be kept as far away from any classroom as practicably possible.
photo
EmmaNYC
shoes & ships & sealing wax, cabbages & kings
12:45 AM on 11/17/2010
Exactly.

Neither Rhee nor Klein were reformers. Rather, they were deformers, sent in as corporatized assassins to try to destablize and destroy the unions in their respective cities, all in the name of Holy Data. Thankfully, neither succeeded and now parents, educators and students from both cities can rejoice as they reclaim and rebuild their educational systems out of the shambles left by these two.
06:48 PM on 11/16/2010
Well let's hope it is the end to them and failures like them. Kudos to Jerry Weast, a real educator who worked with the community, teachers, and students to make Montgomery County MD a positive environment for education. Let's put an end to mayoral control, restore democracy, and real public education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:06 PM on 11/19/2010
The thing is, Montgomery County MD has ALWAYS been ahead of the pack when it comes to education. As an educator I have heard about them for the past twenty years, and I live nowhere near the east coast. So the question is, why doesn't the media pick up on the great things this school system has done? I believe the answer is that it doesn't fit the story they want to push. The truth is when you do all the things Jerry Weast has done (and other educators before him) you get results.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Live4literacy
03:08 PM on 11/16/2010
Please, let's hope it's a return to sanity and sound curriculum, versus teach to the test methods....which is what happens when school scores and teacher pay is tied to test performance. It's absolutely ridiculous, doesn't improve education, and is not preparing our students to think and problem solve.