The Artist took home five Oscars at Sunday's Academy Awards, including the top prize, and many attributed the film's success to its beautiful tribute to Hollywood's silent film past. While I agree that the film is certainly a loving homage to the glamor of the movies, I also think the story -- of a dying industry and a man's job loss and his subsequent sobering descent -- is one that resonates deeply in the wake of the 2007-2009 Great Recession.
The hero of the Artist, George Valentin, is a star of the silent film industry. He has great bravado and presence on screen and lives (unhappily) with his wife in their luxurious home. But when "talkies" arrive in Hollywood, George shrugs them off -- convinced that people will find movies in which people speak absurd. Soon, George finds that he is the one who has been cast aside and that Peppy Miller, a young dancer who has appeared as extras in his films, has become the new star. Despite their mutual attraction, Peppy and George go their separate ways and George's path is a downwardly mobile one; he divorces his wife, loses his home, sells off his most cherished possessions, and sets fire to his film collection (and himself). The pinnacle of the movie comes when George learns that Peppy has purchased his possessions to support him and, humiliated, he gets his gun, set on killing himself.
This is a moving tale of love and (job) loss, but it's also one that is very deeply rooted in gender ideologies. Imagine, for a second, that the story were reversed. Peppy is the star of the silent film -- she loses her job, must sell her possessions and learns that George has secretly bought them and is supporting her. This sounds more like the start of a clichéd romance novel than an Oscar-winning movie and we'd likely not believe that Peppy would kill herself over the news that George planned to financially support her. But George's reaction, on the other hand, while overwrought, fits into cultural norms about how men are raised to support themselves and their families. Many researchers have argued that in our society, men feel strong societal pressure to be "breadwinners." Nicholas Townsend convincingly argues that men equate breadwinning, marriage, and fatherhood with their own masculinity. When they fail to meet these ideals, their sense of self takes a hit. When jobs for men disappear, Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas suggest that marriage rates decline, as well -- without a job, men become less marriageable.
As George's story so aptly shows us, there are real costs, not just in job loss, but when gender ideologies so strongly shape how this loss is experienced. In my own research, I found that women often hid their job loss by explaining that they were home taking care of children. But men rarely have this luxury. In fact, a recent study by Noelle Chesley, published in Gender & Society, finds that when men become stay-at-home fathers, they emphasize the economic reasons that they are at home and even describe themselves as being between jobs, rather than as stay-at-home parents.
This is not to argue that women do not suffer when they lose jobs. In fact, recent research from the Institute for Women's Policy Research, found that women were experiencing greater hardship in the wake of the recession than men. But it is clear that when gender ideologies put such emphasis on men's ability to earn a family wage, this not only hurts women in their attempts to gain equal access to employment, but also men when they face challenges in the workforce. In my course on "Work-Life Policies and Practices," last semester, we discussed these challenges and I asked my students how they would solve this problem. One group of students had a simple, but intriguing strategy. Just as businesses instituted "take your daughters to work" days to promote gender equity at work, they thought that schools should institute "take your dads to school" days to promote equal caregiving by men. By showing that men might have important roles as caregivers (not just as earners), the students wondered if we might move society in the right direction. I don't think it's the only strategy we'll need, but I think it could be a very good start.
Follow Sarah Damaske on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sarahdamaske
Nathan Gardels: Hollywood As Global Public Square
when are we going to see a male president? how come congress is only 84% male? how come women congressional members called an all-female panel to stop coverage of viagra, vasectomies, and penile implants?
it's totally unfair. men have absolutely no rights. not just today, but historically. i mean, men couldn't vote for a very long time. they weren't allowed into law schools, medical schools, or the workforce. they couldn't get credit cards or loans without their wives' permission. and even in most of the world today, they can't call the cops on abusive wives, earn a living, get an education, or even drive in some countries!
poor men. the odds are stacked against them.
That sounds like a bogus study performed by a women's group intended to increase funding for women. Don't make vague references to biased studies that you don't even link, it destroys your credibility.
Despite all the emphases on shared parenting, gender equality, and on down the line, it is sad that men must take the beating they doing what is best for the children and the family. Men sd not have to feel this way but seems they do. My daughters wd tell their teachers I was a stay at home dad and all but one were not as respectful as one would think esp considering they were all female teachers.
There is a lot of talk in feminine circles about the increased role men sd take as care givers but have seen first hand from women that when they do, there is a smirk and under the breath chuckle. Such female behavior is part of the reason so many men are resistant to giving up their careers and income in order for their wives to advances their careers and income.
When my brother's company upgraded their computer systems, and everyone had to go to training classes, there were employees in tears because they were so intimidated and scared.