Chicago Police Stonewall on Rape Investigations

Julie was a graduate student at the University of Chicago when, in 2007, she was raped by a man she had been introduced to that night as a friend's new boyfriend. They were at a bar, and he was "acting weird toward me. He kept touching me and I kept pushing him away." The man's behavior attracted the attention of the club's manager and bouncer, who kicked him out.

Later that night, as Julie slept on her friend's couch, the boyfriend entered the apartment and raped her. Julie reported the rape to the police and went to a hospital for a forensic examination to collect DNA and other evidence from her body. She thought her rapist would be arrested.

Every year in the United States, more than 200,000 people report to the police that they have been raped. Many are asked to submit to the collection of DNA evidence from their bodies, which is stored in a small package called a rape kit. It is an invasive and sometimes traumatic process that takes four to six hours. But the potential benefits are enormous: testing the DNA evidence can identify an unknown rapist, confirm the identity of a known assailant, corroborate the victim's account, and exonerate innocent suspects. When a victim undergoes the examination to collect a rape kit, both she and the public reasonably assume that the kit will be tested. But all too often, that is not the case.

Following media reports in 2003 that the Chicago Police Department had 1,500 untested rape kits in storage, the department promised to send every rape kit to the Illinois State Police for testing. But stories from victims raped in Chicago since then raise disturbing questions about whether this promise is being kept. The police are refusing to answer those questions.

While we believe that Chicago sends every rape kit to the state crime lab, there are serious questions about what happens then. In response to a public records request, the state police tracked the number of DNA sexual assault cases sent to them by the Chicago police and the number where DNA testing actually occurred. In 2007, of 835 cases sent, only 388 were tested. Of the 1,211 cases sent in 2008, 685 were tested. The state police told us that rape kits from the Chicago police were not tested in cases where the police determined the reported rape was "unfounded" (in other words, did not happen) or state's attorney decides to close the case -- cases like Julie's

When a victim undergoes the examination to collect a rape kit, both she and the public reasonably assume that the kit will be tested. For months after she was raped, Julie repeatedly called the investigating officer in her case, asking about the status of her rape kit. Her calls went unreturned.

In 2008, she was contacted by the state's attorney's office and told her case had been closed. Julie asked the prosecutor if the police had interviewed the bar manager and bouncer who witnessed her assailant's behavior had been interviewed. The prosecutor said no. Julie asked if her rape kit had been tested. The prosecutor said no.

Human Rights Watch has been tracking the issue of whether rape kits are actually tested or just sit in police storage around the country. In Los Angeles alone, we found 12,500 untested kits. Both the city and the county have promised to test those kits. Testing all the kits can reveal valuable information that could change a prosecutor's mind, though. When New York started testing all its kits, not only did the arrest rate go up, but the prosecution rate also skyrocketed.

The state police said that untested rape kits connected to closed cases are returned to the requesting agency. The Chicago Police Department has denied our public records request for the number that may have been returned with the startling response that, "We do not keep information on rape kits." Repeated requests to speak with principals at the Chicago Police Department have been met with silence.

So, what happened to Julie's kit, and all the other kits like it? If the Chicago Police Department has a good answer, it isn't telling victims like Julie, and it isn't telling us. If the department has in place a system that ensures all rape kits are tested, it should want to share information about its success. If, on the other hand, there are untested rape kits accumulating in police storage facilities, the victims in those crimes, and the public have a right to an explanation.

Untested rape kits, and closed cases, can mean lost justice for some rape victims, and lost opportunity for a Chicago community that cares about preventing sexual violence.

This article originally appeared in Chicago's Hyde Park Herald. Sarah Tofte is a researcher in the United States division of Human Rights Watch.

Update: Chicago and Illinois State Police Respond

Since this op-ed was published, there have been important developments to the story. This week I was contacted by the Chicago Police Department, and they have agreed to meet with Human Rights Watch to discuss the issue of rape kits and rape investigations with us. I was also contacted by the Illinois State Police's (ISP) Forensics Division, which provided Human Rights Watch with the data we used in the October 9, 2009, op-ed. ISP was concerned with my interpretation of data it provided on the number of rape kits submitted by Chicago Police to state crimes labs, versus the number that are actually tested.

In conversations with the Illinois State Police prior to the publishing of the op-ed, they noted to us that they are unable to determine how many rape kits submitted by Chicago Police are actually tested due to the limitations of its database. The Chicago Police, they contend, should be able to provide that data. We tried, in our op-ed, to indicate that there were limitations to what we could conclude form the data we received from the Illinois States Police.

In reaching out to us after the publication of our op-ed, the Illinois State Police points out that the state crime lab's backlog often delays the testing of a rape kit so that it may not be tested during the year it was submitted. As the ISP notes in an email to Human Rights Watch, "Cases ISP reported as being worked during a particular year are not necessarily the same cases that were submitted that year. With the backlogs ISP was experiencing at the time, it would not have been unusual for a case submitted in 2007 to be worked in 2008, for example."

The second point the Illinois State Police make in their communication to us is that many of the kits that appear untested may have been outsourced and tested by a private vendor. As the ISP noted in their e-mail correspondence to Human Rights Watch, "ISP had outsourced a number of cases, including sexual assault cases, in 2007 and 2008. Most of the cases outsourced in those years were from the Chicago lab and would have included mostly CPD cases. Although these outsourced cases weren't worked by an ISP lab, they were still worked, with results provided to the submitting agencies. In fact, during that period, outsourcing was one of the main mechanisms ISP used to help reduce the DNA backlog."

Unfortunately, the Illinois State Police cannot produce data on how many rape kits from Chicago were outsourced for testing. Quoting from the same e-mail to Human Rights Watch, the ISP noted that, "The number of outsourced cases from a particular agency cannot be determined from the database." And further, "...it is not possible to determine the number of unworked cases returned to CPD using information available to ISP."

While it is important to note that outsourcing may have resulted in more kits being tested, we continue to believe that the lack of data, transparency and accountability for kits belies a deeper problem within the city's system for investigating rape cases. We have partial info from ISP that some kits remained untested, and seek clarification from Chicago Police about why this is the case, and about results from both ISP tested and outsourced kits. We hope to get that clarification when we meet with the Chicago Police in the next few weeks.

Jurisdictions that rigorously test all rape kits see sharp increases in arrest and prosecution rates for rape. Since 2003 when the Chicago Police promised to send every rape kit to the Illinois State Police for testing, there has not been a significant increase in rape arrests and prosecutions. Justice for rape victims is what slips through the cracks in the gaps in the data kept about rape kits in Illinois and Chicago.

Comments

[JB85]

I'm extremely fortunate because I was a victim of rape this past summer, had the rape kit performed on me, and received the results five weeks later. It was pure coincidence that my results came in the day my perpetrator was arrested and I met with the assistant DA. What I'm writing about today is not the lack of testing rape kits, but the tremendous difficulty in getting the DA to press charges against rapists in Chicago. I have an overwhelming amount of evidence (rare in rape cases), witnesses, and a detective incredibly devoted to my case and seeing that this man who raped me goes to prison. The assistant DA told me he believed my story and if it were up to him, he would've pressed charges that day; however, his supervising DA who has never met, nor spoken to me, thought there was a chance the state wouldn't win my case in court, so although she didn't flat out reject my charges, she put it as "pending more investigation" and I haven't heard anything since. What I have difficulty accepting is that the most important decision thus far in my case was left up to someone who has never met me. The state's DA refuses to take on any rape case where "they are not guaranteed to win". I think this is absolutely absurd. How does anyone expect rapists to be prosecuted if no one will take the chance in bringing them to court? Something needs to change.

[amyweewee1]

Sheri Mecklenberg, a corporate counselor for the Chicago Police Department, organized an initiative called the Women's DNA Initiative Fund. She seeks private donors. They fund backlogged rape kits that haven't been tested and the statute of limitations is about to expire. More private funding like this is going to be necessary to incite change. We can not simply rely on the city/state/county to get resolution when they are so backlogged, underfunded and undermanned.

I wish the lawmakers would realize that crime against women is a detriment to all of society. And rapist who attack once, invariably will attack again and again. Their crimes also escalate over time and become more than just rape - they include robbery and murder. We must take a stand, and not allow the lack of funds to stand in the way of justice.

[crookedcountyillinois]

Miss/Mrs. Tofte,

I don't trust any government organization that cannot answer simple questions, or even comply with existing laws requiring disclosure of information when requested by a citizen; especially someone like yourself who has every ethical, moral, civic, and legal right to know.

I am not a lawyer, but my own personal opinion is that Mandamus laws apply:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus

Where you might be able to use the court system to force, or compel, the testing to take place, or to even occur in a more transparent manner. A class action or Qui Tam suit could also apply since this affects a population of victims, not just one person. Of course, you would want to talk to a lawyer and the State's Attorney's Office.

This is also very much a political issue. In Cook County, politicians use the Patronage model to get what they want (reelection) by using your tax money to hire their voters. Between patronage workers and their families, this number is often cited at 300,000 votes, which when coupled with anemic voter turnout, reigns supreme on election day: hence they call it "The Machine." This approach creates extra layers of unnecessary bureaucracy (and red tape), too many people hired for the wrong reasons, a lack of accountability, and, of course, an unwillingness to be of help.

I think that the court system is a great place to open up this process for everyone to see.

Cordially,

David

[moutonnoir]

Just wrong.. And the 30% jump in rape from 2007 to 2008 is also disturbing...

[LeftRight]

So wait, without testing the rape kit they just decide that there's no evidence of rape????? TEST THE FU**ING KITS!!!!!!!