More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sarita Gupta

Sarita Gupta

Posted: December 10, 2009 05:03 PM

Caught In the Storm - We Need a Safety Net

What's Your Reaction:

Across the country, millions of people remain unemployed and more people are working harder and longer than ever before to make ends meet. While millions are sacrificing and stretching budgets to make ends meet, Wall Street, in true Scrooge fashion, is getting ready to pay out obscene bonuses to its top executives.

It is in this context that President Obama convened a summit last week at the White House to talk about the need for jobs, and that we release our report, Battered by the Storm. The report, authored by Jobs with Justice, the Institute for Policy Studies, Center for Community Change, and Legal Momentum, is being released as the debate around the need for jobs -- or as some have said, the need for jobs with justice, heats up in Washington D.C.

The study, which examines the impact of the economic crisis on unemployment, poverty, hunger, job creation, and the "social safety net," paints a somber picture of a struggling U.S. economy through statistics and the stories of people living through tough times. The stories in Battered By the Storm should serve as a reminder to those engaged in the debate about jobs, financial reform, and fixing the economy that at the end of the day these disputes are about more than partisan politics. Working people want justice, and they are waiting to see if elected officials will take a stand for them.

The study's authors offer practical and affordable remedies to rebuild a social safety net, as well as funding mechanisms that would show that in America we hold people and corporations accountable.

The Storm

Seventy-five years ago, New Deal programs created in response to the Great Depression laid a broad foundation for economic protection. We argue in the report that over the past 30 years, the country has seen the destruction of many essential programs that provided support to people who, despite working hard, were in need of a helping hand.

The report shows that the rise in unemployment has been brutal across most regions of the country and has crossed racial, sex, and geographical lines. The overall national child poverty rate is expected to increase to 25% by the end of 2009 (50% for African-American children). Unemployment has risen from 5.1% to 9.5% for whites, 6.2% to 13.1% for Latinos, and 8.9% to 15.7% for African-Americans. Our report dismantles the notion that only "lazy" or "irresponsible" people are suffering, noting that "traditional" two-parent and employed households are suffering in the current crisis as are others.

The New Safety Net

Our report argues that we need to rebuild the country's safety net, and we offer concrete solutions to the problems faced by millions of Americans.

Some of our policy recommendations would cost no money to taxpayers, and would come as much needed relief to millions. Foreclosure relief using some of the TARP funds approved by President Bush, and legislation allowing home owners the "right to rent" their homes instead of losing them, as promoted by economist Dean Baker, are two examples of creative solutions Congress may want to examine.

Other policy changes we recommend would cost money, but are necessary investments in our country's future. A public jobs program that pays living wages and provides good benefits to its workforce could not only put millions to work, but also lay the foundation for rebuilding devastated communities across the country. An extension of unemployment benefits and assistance, like COBRA and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), would go a long way towards helping the millions who are about to lose the little help they're currently getting. We recommend that the federal government send money state and local governments who are facing budget deficits and on the verge of cutting needed social services.

How to Pay for the Safety Net

The economic storm hasn't been devastating to those at the very top, as evidenced by the continued success of Wall Street and the giant bonuses on the way.

We argue for a tax on financial transactions, reversing the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts, passing legislation to put an end to overseas tax havens, equalizing tax rates of capital gains and dividends with that of the tax rate of wages, and returning to pre-Reagan taxes on the wealthiest 1% by re-establishing a tax bracket on those making over $2 million a year. The revenue from these changes could pay for some of the policy recommendations that require financing.

Moving Forward

A change in principles and values is necessary to move beyond this crisis. For the past 30 years the idea of private has trumped the public good. Profits have come before people and communities. Demonization and accusation have come before understanding and support. Incompetent government has replaced effective stewardship.

In short, the nation has moved from We to Me. Along the way, we've hid the problems and shame that come with loss of wages, jobs, livelihoods, and communities. We've blamed ourselves and those around us, never thinking to look at the forces that stood to profit from us.

If the nation is to move forward, we need solutions like the ones outlined in the study. More importantly, however, it will require that we as working people work together to build a boat to ride out the storm.



Sarita Gupta was appointed the Executive Director of Jobs with Justice (JwJ) in 2007. Sarita had served for five years as the national field director, overseeing the national field program and leading on strategic programs such as health care justice, organizing and collective bargaining rights campaigns, and immigrant workers' rights. At Jobs with Justice, our goal is to build a strong, progressive labor movement that works in coalition with community, faith, and student organizations to build a broader global movement for economic and social justice.

 

Follow Sarita Gupta on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@jwjnational

 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
10:42 PM on 12/10/2009
I think if more people were saying 'job application', and less people were saying 'safety net', then more people would be employed and able to generally fend for themselves. People want more, more and more, and the government prints more, more and more, and the people that are on top of the whole thing collect more, more and more, and the people on the bottom multiply, and there are more, more and more, and the more I think about it, the more I wonder just how big this notional safety net would have to be to span the globe, because once you pan back, and look at the whole world, it becomes plain that no net would be big enough, or strong enough, to replace the idea that people need to do for themselves. Government can help, but your own 2 hands are indispensible in the quest for your personal salvation, as it were.
11:56 AM on 12/11/2009
I somewhat see the argument you are making, although in order to say job application there need to be actual jobs. They don't exist, and if we stay the course economically there might never again be enough jobs to go around.

Currently the political debate by those at the top (elected officials, big biz, banks, etc...) is not based on a belief that we have a shared responsibility to one another. Its grounded on a belief that we all make it on our own. And to some extent what you say is true, we have to use our own 2 hands as you indicate. BUT when those at the top almost went down, it was us at the bottom that created a safety net (bailouts) for them. I think its outrageous that when working ppl bring up a need for help, they would balk at the notion of doing anything or paying for any of it.

This to me is a political belief question. Because while in practice we probably never will have a large enough net to help everyone across the globe, the question is do we affirm that we do in fact believe in helping those with the least amongst us.

if the answer is no, then I am scared of what tomorrow will bring for those in America.