More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Scott Mendelson

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Mendelson
 

The Newly Announced Before Watchmen Is a Prime Example of What's Killing Mainstream Comics

Posted: 02/ 4/2012 6:40 pm

The big news this week was DC Comic's announcement of a seven-book prequel to Alan Moore's groundbreaking Watchmen series.  Titled Before Watchmen (covers) the mini-series will involve the likes of Brian Azzarello, Darwyn Cooke, and  J. Michael Straczynski with each of the seven chapters concerning a specific major character.  I have no idea whether this project will be any good or not.  But it sits as a shining example of the fundamental flaw that exists in the comic industry, especially within DC Comics.  They spend most of their time chasing the readers that grew up with their iconic characters rather than attempting to attract new readers who are growing up right now.

Was there any 10 year-old comic book fan who was begging to see Hal Jordan return to the role of Green Lantern? Was there any young would-be superhero fan who was itching to see Jason Todd brought back from the dead 15 years after he was infamously killed off?  And is there any new-found comic book reader that is going to race to their nearest comic book store because Jean Grey has been brought back from the dead for the 7,435th time or because Barry Allen is once again The Flash 25 years after he was killed off in a universe-rebooting event?  Yet the stories that are being told, and the "big events" that unfold on an annual basis, are inherently targeted not at the younger readers that might grow up to be life-long comic book fans, but the people my age or older, those who got into comics in the 1980s or 1990s, perhaps drawn by the various film adaptations or cartoons.  We older readers, gripped by our nostalgia for the "Modern Age" and our misunderstanding of its two defining works (Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns, both of which were satires that were taken as literal gospel) have demanded stories that both return to the status quo that we remember (Poof! Jim Gordon is Commissioner again!) while delivering ever-more violent and sexual (translation -- misogynist) stories that all-but exclude the very audience that it should seek to be attracting.

There is a place for "mature content" in comics and it may even be in some of the more mainstream titles. And DC Comics certainly has the right to play around in the Watchmen universe if they so choose. But the constant desire to chase or replicate past glories while targeting not younger audiences but adults around my age, something that I've complained about before in regards to the film/television industry, is a prime problem with the current mainstream comic book industry.  Yes, DC Comics has a strong line-up of books for the very youngest reader.  But once they pass the age of eight or nine, there is literally nowhere left for them to go due to a mainstream set of books that are written for adults, and often sexually immature adults at that. Even when presented with the opportunity to bring new readers in the fold, as with the New 52 company-wide reboot of their existing characters, they botched it by catering to the stereotypical comic book reader: the under-sexed 30 year-old man still living in his parents basement who gets off on naked female superheroes and characters with their faces cut off.  Would any of you encourage your kids, even older kids, to read such material?  Even if they are old enough to handle the violent content, why would you want to expose them to such wanton and blatant sexism?

Obviously the "adult content" and the need to constantly return to the old at the expense of the new are two different issues. But the result is the same -- a comic book industry that seems to be actively trying to repel all but the conditioned and lifelong comic book reader at the expense of actually attracting new eyeballs.

For more on this topic, go HERE, HERE, and HERE.

 

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

...
...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:09 PM on 02/07/2012
My kid reads manga and Simpsons/ Futurama , i think letting him watch the Tick at an early age ruined superheroes for him.

I still love bat manuel
photo
yukonsam
This space reserved for self-referential irony.
05:36 PM on 02/07/2012
Do 10-year-olds want Hal Jordan or Barry Allen back? Who the hell cares? They're young and adaptable. We want OUR Green Lantern and Flash, not the Legion of Substitute Heroes.

What's killing comics is nothing more or less than what's killing magazines and books... fine online publications like this one. As the majors get more saavy at exploiting the online medium, they'll adapt just fine.

But you get grudging agreement on the portayal of women in comics. It's always been a problem, but the level of fan service is just getting ridiculous. You'd almost think the writers and artists of four-color butt-kicking spandex clad vigilantes haven't any notion of subtlety.
04:28 PM on 02/07/2012
Everyone knows that DC hates money! (Seriously, this is a constant refrain when I discuss comics with my friends.)

The reboot contains some of the most toxic destruction of beloved titles I have ever seen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
11:13 AM on 02/07/2012
Excellent analysis. The other thing about Watchmen is that its characters were born out of necessity, not desire. It was originally supposed to include Blue Beetle, Peacemaker, Captain Atom and basically the Charlton line that DC had acquired. DC then told Moore they had plans for them and he had to create replacements (Rorschach for the Question, etc.). As it worked out, it was the very freshness of these fully fleshed out characters that was so much of the appeal of the books. How about DC learn from that example? Not learn in the sense of...hey, let's do another Watchmen. Learn in the sense of...we can introduce new characters if we are willing to let the best writers flesh them out...and treat them like ideas and art rather than solely intellectual property. Make a good product and the market for it will find you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adam in oregon
10:38 AM on 02/07/2012
Whats killing modern comics is the PRICE. Comics used to be affordable. For 10 dollars you could buy plenty of comics and have some change for a candy bar. Now 10 dollars will get you 2 maybe 3 books.
I used to buy lots of books when I was coming up. Now I would need a second job to afford all the comics I used to buy.
Comics were printed on regular paper for nearly 60 years, and then the publishers decided to go with fancy paper, extra covers, holograms etc, that really did nothing to the product except make it more expensive. Every story has to be some major event/crossover tie in 4 part whatever, instead of just a good comic for the month. And there is no reason to have 4 Avengers comics, 5 Batman comics, 7 X men comics a month. It saturates the market too much.
09:52 AM on 02/07/2012
The major comics brands kissed the kids' market goodbye a long, long time ago. A decision was made, I guess sometime in the '80s, to market the product as a boutique item to adults. It felt as though the humorless, pompous editors and writers of comics were embarrassed by their connection to children's entertainment, a connection their entire industry was built on.
09:18 PM on 02/06/2012
I have to disagree.
If a bunch of hacks were involved, ie bad talent, I would question the move but the best and brightest are, so I say- bring it on.
I was more disgusted with the dc relaunch.
I simply hate the erasing of history, especially when I invested much of my time admiring it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdub1991
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
03:05 PM on 02/06/2012
Personally, I think much of what's cited here is more effect than cause. This industry has many problems. Comics were originally a low cost, throwaway entertainment. As such, they worked. Stan Lee changed that in the sixties, making comics more mainstream. That was fine, as long as the comic companies were small concerns. Once these companies were acquired by increasingly larger corporations, they had to start contributing more to the bottom line.

The economics of comics have never been good. The industry has tittered on the brink of collapse since the seventies. Marvel's been in bankruptcy. At times, DC was rumored to be for sale to anyone who would take it. Magazine distributors hated comics because the returns rate (unsold issues returned to the distributor) was too high. Hence, the comic shop--to address distribution. That's also why you no longer see comic racks in general locations--not worth the trouble to keep stocked. With the comics shops, however, came all that collectibles nonsense in the eighties and nineties that also almost destroyed the industry.

I don't think you could ever price comics high enough to make these companies large scale, sustainable enterprises. Today, the majors function almost like movie companies, with tent pole lines that pretty much drive profit through higher sales and licensing (movies, TV, toys). Spiderman, X-Men, Batman, Superman, whatever. The mags themselves are almost secondary as anything other than material to mine for the next franchise or product license.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
11:11 AM on 02/06/2012
They'll write for kids when kids can buy 10 comics a week. ($40 allowance). My kid's grown up so I have no idea what the going rate on allowances is.

When I was a kid there were, as far as I know, no comic book stores. The closest we had was a booth at the local farmer's market that sold returned comics (the top cover page was cut off) 6 for a quarter.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DocManhattan
10:51 AM on 02/06/2012
Didn't DC try to launch a whole new range of superhero characters under a new imprint in the 1990s, in the hope of attracting a new generation of readers? I can't remember the name of it (it wasn't Wildstorm) and clearly it failed so badly that none of the characters are around any more. The company has obviously decided that it makes its money from its traditional characters with established brands, so it has to constantly find new ways of drawing attention to them - killing and resurrecting them, rebooting them, temporarily making another character take on the mantle of the traditional hero before restoring the status quo a year or so later ...

They also realize that there of all the potential buyers who know those old heros and brands, most will no longer be children. So they have to target the stories at older people - the type of older people who are still drawn to comics. That pretty much rules out those whose careers and families fill up their lives - so, hello, basement-dwelling, undersexed 30-year-old.
10:22 AM on 02/06/2012
I don't understand the criticism. The comic book industry has regularly explored origin stories for decades. Not exactly a new or unwelcome phenomenon. And considering the backstories described and alluded to in Watchmen, I would say there a good candidate to do so.
10:06 AM on 02/06/2012
Agree with you 100% Scott but we all know whats really happening here. It's not seven new comics. It's the first part of a well designed transmedia campaign, (Ok Mike...you can write the damn movie. Do the comic please.), for seven new films. Within a month of the comics hitting the racks some "concept art" will show up at i09. A week later a poster at Quiet Earth. Then some buzz at ComicCon. I write this from my sad geeky heart looking up at my Taarna cells and the early Barry Smith Conan comics forever enshrined above my desk. Naturally I'll stand in-line for each film, twice, and buy the BlueRay DVD's the second they come out. Excelsior!!!
04:54 AM on 02/06/2012
I wish comics were more affordable, I grew up with them in the 70s and love them. I got my daughter a subscription for "Sonic the Hedgehog" and she loves it. But heck, in 1975 I could get 4 or 5 comics for $1.00 and my allowance was $5.00 a week. So I could buy 8 comics, some candy and a slurpee and still have money left over. Those were the days. The Silver Age !!!!!!!!!!!! Everything now is just to expensive : (
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
Sooo tired of all the irrational idiots in the wor
10:45 PM on 02/05/2012
I remember when every 7-11 and Stop-N-Go (or any other convenience store or supermarket) had a spinner full of comics, and as a kid I would buy one or two a month. This was back when they were 75-cents or less though, maybe $1.50 for the special- and double-issues. Those days are over though, and Mr. Mendleson doesn't seem to grasp that. The comic companies know exactly who spends the most money on their products these days, and it isn't children. I have known people who spend upwards of $100 or more a month on comics, and they were adults in their late-20s to mid-30s. This primary market remembers the classic characters that they loved as kids and they like the idea of seeing those characters again. Let's face it, kids today have a heck of a lot more entertainment options than we did back in the 70s and 80s, and if the demographics that I see go in and out of the comic shop that is right next to my favorite place for lunch is any indication, those kida are not spending their money on comics. So yeah, the comic companies are trying to hold on to the last demographic they have that will actually purchase their products, trying to squeeze a few more bucks and a few more years out of a slowly dying industry.
Billk29
Justified Ancient of Mu
12:04 PM on 02/08/2012
When i was a kid the corner stores also had a spinner full of comics and i would wait there on delivery day and pick up a dozen or so for 12 cents each or 25 for a double issue.
I was crushed when they raised them to 20 cents. ;-)
I can't imagine paying $4.50 for a comic book like they do today.
I only watch comic movies these days and am very unhappy that everytime they reboot a franchise they seem to have to show an origin story . The new spiderman movie is going to be the same thing again.
05:58 PM on 02/05/2012
Bit thin on theory when it comes to Watchmen and Dark Knight Returns. 'Satire'? Ironic or content? C'mon, try to be a little more substantive on the assertions there!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
09:12 PM on 02/05/2012
They were commentaries on the darker, theoretically authoritarian side of superhero fiction that was taken not as a deconstruction but as 'how we should do things from now on'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:14 PM on 02/07/2012
taken by whom ? i think it is pretty obvious from the first pages what is up in the watchmen. To miss that would be pretty amazing.