More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Scott Mendelson

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Mendelson

Weekend Box Office: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II Dethrones The Dark Knight, Earning $169.1 Million in Its Opening Weekend. Oh, and Sarah Palin Is Not a Movie Star

Posted: 07/18/11 05:13 PM ET

The Harry Potter series finished where it started, at the top of the box office with a record breaking opening weekend. Nine-and-a-half years ago, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone opened the series with a $90.2 million, breaking the 4.5 year old opening weekend record set by The Lost World: Jurassic Park ($72 million).  Over the next 9.5 years, said record was broken four more times, with the last such toppling this very weekend three years ago with The Dark Knight's $158 million Fri-Sun take.  With nearly ten years of anticipation, The Boy Who Lived has returned to the top of the opening weekend charts with a massive $169.1 million Friday-Sunday gross.  That includes a record $91 Friday (best single day, best opening day, best Friday) which in turn included a record $43.5 million at 12:01am alone.  As expected, the picture was massively front-loaded, ending the weekend with the second-smallest weekend multiplier on record, 1.85x (for newbies, weekend multiplier is the final weekend total divided by the first day).  It also set another 'negative' record, earning 25.7% of its weekend total in those Thursday at 12:01am showings alone (the previous such record was set by the last Harry Potter film, which grossed 19% of its $125 million Fri-Sun haul at midnight).


For the record, even with inflation and the 3D price bump, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part II (review) still ranks amongst the very biggest weekends ever in terms of adjusted for inflation (third place behind The Dark Knight and Spider-Man 3), and tickets sold (also in third place).  The expected monster frontloading puts a token blemish on this new record, but $169 million in three days is still $169 million in three days.  Warner Bros's decision to split the final book into two films payed off financially and arguably artistically.  The Deathly Hallows part I was the best film in the series, and this series finale suffered only from being too short and rushed compared to its predecessors.  The Harry Potter franchise is without question this generation's Star Wars, and this final chapter brought out everybody who had even loosely followed the saga over the last decade.  For those who genuinely cared, this was THE event film of the summer, the pay off to seven previous films and the final farewell to any number of classic characters.  The film scored an A from Cinemascore, with an A+ from females who made up 54% of the audience.  It played 55% over-25 and 57% 2D (without the 3D boost, it would have grossed around $150 million, or just below Spider-Man 3). It remains to be seen whether the the allure of seeing Harry, Ron, and Hermione one last time will prevent this film from being as massively frontloaded as the previous three sequels. The last three sequels all did just over or just under twice their opening weekends (five-day openings in the case of parts 5 and 6), ending up between $290 and $301 million the last four times (The Goblet of Fire opened with $101 million in 2005 and made it to $290 million, a 2.8x weekend-to-final multiplier).

If the finale can pull in that 2.8x multiplier, it will end up with $474 million.  That's a bit pie-in-the-sky, even with the whole 'final film' hook.  Even the famously leggy The Dark Knight earned 'just' 3.4x its opening weekend (a multiplier that would give this new champion $575 million).  More likely is that it follows the path of the last film, with a 2.36x multiplier and a $400 million domestic total.  Worst case scenario, it merely doubles this opening weekend take, still ending with a series high of $339 million.  We'll know in the next couple days.  The Dark Knight had a pretty mediocre 2.35x weekend multiplier, and it wasn't until it earned a scorching $66 million on its first three weekdays that I knew it was more than just a quick-kill blockbuster.  Either way, it will be a brutal battle for first place in the US against Transformers: Dark of the Moon, which now has $302 million and will likely top out around $370 million.  I don't have overseas numbers yet, it Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part II set a new worldwide opening weekend record as well, with $475 million.  The previous five-day worldwide record was The Half-Blood Prince's $394 million.  It is sure to become the third film this year (along with Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides and, eventually Transformers Dark of the Moon).

How long this opening weekend (and single day/midnight) record stays intact is a good question.  As much as we hate to admit it, the 3D helped.  The last two Twilight films are, as of yet, not going the 3D route, while Chris Nolan is releasing The Dark Knight Rises in 2D and IMAX 2D.  I don't think either of the Twilight films have it in them to take down the weekend record, as the last book is disliked and/or loathed by much of the fanbase.  The Dark Knight Rises is the obvious likely contender, especially with just another $10 million separating The Dark Knight's opening weekend from the new three-day champion (why I'm not as excited for it as you might be).  But one wonders whether the mainstream appeal of the last film's street-level Batman vs. The Joker epic can be matched by a finale starring Catwoman and uh... Bane (that terrible teaser doesn't help either).  And there is frankly nothing left on the immediate horizon outside of Batman and Edward/Bella that has the innate appeal to beat this record.  Barring some unexpectedly huge debuts for The Avengers, Star Trek 2.0 (if it even gets off the ground), or The Amazing Spider-Man (don't count on it, the original record-breaking Sam Raimi film was capitalizing on 15 years of pent-up demand and post-9/11 patriotism/nationalism), this record may stand for a very long time if Batman can't take it back next year.

The only other movie to open wide this weekend was Disney's Winnie the Pooh (review).  The film was an attempt to revive the theatrical fortunes of the classic children's literary character, but Disney frankly picked a very bad weekend to open on.  The $30 million 2D, hand-drawn feature grossed just $7.8 million in its debut, putting the short-term profitability of this frankly delightful little cartoon in doubt.  This was clear a case of counter-programming that didn't take, or merely a case of Disney merely treating the film as a tax write-off.  I do know that the film would have likely been far more successful opening on a holiday weekend where the biggest franchise of all time was not debuting its final entry.  Put this in the Martin Luther King Jr weekend next year, and it probably flirts with $15-20 million.  Anyway, the film is pretty great, so hopefully the British can save it.  Opening in limited release was the Sarah Palin documentary The Undefeated (I'll let others make fun of the accuracy of that title).  The film debuted on ten screens but managed just $6,513 per screen.  If this were a wide release, that would be pretty impressive, but for a ten-screen debut, it is frankly not.  As tempting as it is to use this number as a political punching bag, would any of us fellow liberals pay $10 and drive to a theater see a 90-minute halo-agraphy about, I dunno, Russ Feingold?  Also debuting in limited release was Errol Morris's Tabloid, which pulled in $91,201 on seven screens.


In holdover news, Woody Allen's Midnight In Paris became Allen's highest-grossing film ever, passing Hannah and Her Sisters and upping its cum to $41.7 million.  The film is Allen's seventh-most popular film when adjusted for inflation and still stands his his most successful film since 1986, and after that his biggest hit since the late 1970s.  Bridesmaids now sits with $161 million, while Kung Fu Panda 2 crossed $160 million (with $582 million worldwide), and Super 8 sits with $122 million.  Bad Teacher has $88 million and will cross $100 million next weekend.  Horrible Bosses had a solid -39% decline and has $60 million in ten days.  The Zookeeper also had an okay drop, but its slightly smaller-than-expected opening leaves the expensive film with $42 million in ten days.  Cars 2 sits with $165 million, which makes it surely the first Pixar film since A Bug's Life in 1998 not to cross the $200 million mark (it's nearing $300 million worldwide).  Finally, Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life crossed the $10 million mark this weekend, despite stubbornly refusing to actually expand above 240 screens.

Join us next weekend, when Paramount and Marvel unleash Captain America (review coming Wednesday), while Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis try to be Friends With Benefits (which is totally different from No Strings Attached).  For a look at the previous Harry Potter films, read the retrospectives of 12345, and 6.  Plus the original reviews for 67, and 8.  For a detailed look at the history of the modern opening weekend record-breakers (written the last time the record was broken), go HERE.

Scott Mendelson

 

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

The Harry Potter series finished where it started, at the top of the box office with a record breaking ...
The Harry Potter series finished where it started, at the top of the box office with a record breaking ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:16 AM on 07/20/2011
whoa!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:35 AM on 07/19/2011
The sucess of movies shows that this would be a great source of revenue to the federal government if tickets were subject to a federal tax. With just a 10% tax on movie tickets the average price would increase just $1.50 to $2 in most places and for this little additional cost would have brought in an additional $17Million to the countries coffers for just one movie on one weekend.

A 10% tax on movie tickets is a little shared sacrifice that we all can deal with to help pay for childrens health care and care of the elderly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:37 PM on 07/19/2011
lol. Cripes.
08:44 PM on 07/18/2011
DH 2 was SUCH a disappointment. A stupid private, nearly fist-fight between Uknow who and Harry rather than Harry pointing out that Voldermort has never understood the most powerful magic- which is LOVE. - on and on- stupid changes to the original story that made no sense except in the constant regurgitation of machismo that is the Hollywood writers' disease. I cannot get my head around why Rowling let this script be produced. It lacked all of the depth and wisdom of her books- as many of the films did but this was the worst by far. I truly was sad after seeing it. lame lame lame lame lame. I wish so much that screenwriters would bother to read the f-ing book and that their reading comprehension was beyond troll level. in this case. . Anyone who truly loved the books is going to hate the movie and anyone who didn't read them will miss the point entirely. Yes- lots of money got made but seriously- why bother writing a book that has wisdom in it only to let it be ruined and coated in ignorance as a movie. What is the point beyond the ability to spend millions on your summer rental. JK= what the Heck?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BabsBP
My micro-bio is empty, and I like it that way.
11:25 AM on 07/19/2011
Totally disagree. Loved the book, thought the movie was true to the book, and so do the other HP book lovers I know. I do agree with you that people who don't read the books don't understand the movies. But that is the same with Shakespeare -- people who are familiar with the story appreciate the plays at a different level. HP books and movies are the best of popular culture for the last dozen years. I will miss them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuoverit
"What year did Jesus think it was?"-GC
02:18 PM on 07/19/2011
"Anyone who truly loved the books is going to hate the movie and anyone who didn't read them will miss the point entirely."

False. I know it's fashionable to hate movies made from books, but come on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
annieclaus
05:19 PM on 07/18/2011
Don't count WINNIE THE POOH out just yet. I'm taking my grandson to see it next weekend. . . and I bet lots of other families will be doing the same now that we've checked the Potter finale off our lists.
Oh, and I probably would go to see the Feingold film!