Swine flu came to international attention within the past two weeks.
Now, almost as quickly, it seems to be fading from the attention of the
news media at least. This roller coaster has little to do with emerging
infectious disease realities.
To be sure, many questions remain unanswered -- public health experts are
still working 24/7 to clear the fog associated with rapid outbreak
investigations. And they will!
The outbreak investigations are complicated, in part, because they
cross international boundaries. Yet two foremost questions remain:
Will there be a Swine flu pandemic? And, if so, how severe will it be?
There are three key factors that will ultimately govern Swine flu's
pandemic potential.
1. Transmissibility or the ability to pass from infected persons to
susceptible persons. At this point, Swine flu has proven that it can be
transmitted from person to person. When a susceptible person comes into
close contact with a Swine flu-infected person, the chances of transmission are
about 20% according to preliminary reports by outbreak investigators in
North America. This figure will be refined with more data but it appears
sufficient to sustain a pandemic.
2. Immunity or the ability to protect against infection once exposed.
Swine flu appears to be a new influenza strain for many if not most
people. In other words, most humans worldwide are susceptible and have
little, if any, prior existing immune protection. Whether past influenza
infections or vaccinations will offer any benefit to certain individuals
remains unclear. It is nevertheless clear that Swine flu will require a
new vaccine to reduce human susceptibility on a worldwide scale. The
lack of widespread prior immunity makes conditions sufficient to sustain
a pandemic.
3. Virulence or the ability of the virus to morbidity and mortality. For
unknown reasons, Swine flu appears to be more deadly in Mexico than in
other countries, including the United States. Yet investigators do not
have good explanations for these difference. Is it related to:
Nutritional factors? Baseline health of certain populations? Access to
health care? Access to medications? More undetected infections than
realized with some causing deaths? Counting deaths not caused by Swine
flu? Intensive outbreak investigations are underway to solve this riddle.
The good news is that Swine flu appears to have relatively low virulence
outside Mexico. The bad news is that Swine flu is constantly rolling its
genetic dice, so virulence could vary (increase or decrease) over time.
At this point, it is impossible to guess or calculate what will happen next.
The current predicament: Swine flu has already fulfilled two criteria --
efficient transmissibility and limited prior immunity worldwide -- to
sustain global spread. The often used definition of a pandemic is that
25% of the world's population becomes infected by the same influenza
strain. The new Swine flu certainly has that potential.
The situation at present is fluid. Swine flu has not yet fully revealed
its propensity for virulence, including the ability to cause health care
visits, hospitalizations, pneumonias, respiratory failure, cytokine
storm, and death. If virulence remains low, the pandemic could be mild.
If virulence increases significantly, the pandemic could be severe.
The World Health Organization's pandemic alert levels signal the spread
and distribution of Swine flu cases. Yet they do not signal how bad a
pandemic might be. These levels are more a reflection of transmission
and immune vulnerability, rather than an indicator of severe outcomes.
There are six WHO alert levels, numbered one to six.
Before the Swine flu appeared, the alert level was set at 3. After the
Swine flu spread in North America, it escalated from 4 to 5 within days.
Alert level 5 reflects spread of a new strain to at least two countries
or one continent -- we are there. Alert level 6 reflects community level
outbreaks in multiple countries and continents -- we are almost there.
News reports indicate that Swine flu has been seeded in 21 countries,
with total WHO-reported cases at 1,409. There are indications that WHO
may declare Alert Level 6 very soon, especially if a large outbreak
cluster is documented on another continent.
This is no time for complacency. We must remain vigilant. The new H1N1
Swine flu remains a real, unpredictable and worldwide threat.
Artwork by Paul Wein.
http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=62
So enjoy it while you have it instead of living in constant fear.
Very few things in life are really more dangerous than driving your car to work every day.
Yep, wash your hands, eat your veggies, get out and play in the dirt from time to time to build that immune system. Same stuff mom told me when I was a kid.
Movin' on...
You might catch a flu.
It might be bad.
Sometimes flu kills people.
It might kill you someday, although you're probably more likely to be run over by a bus ... filled with pigs
The bad news is that some people feel that they were seriously cheated because they didn't get their 15 minutes of fame.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/business/global/06smithfield.html?pagewanted=all
The question is not "if " it will happen but actually "when".
It was quite clear since the beginning of this swine flu scare that it was just this, a scare.
These same folks encouraged people with high blood pressure to eat margarine and avoid fat fish.
We now know margarine is one of the best source of trans fat and fat fish is full of omega 3 of the right kind
Never ever heard about it since or that it was a problem back then. 2 weeks ago I clicked on an
article which stated that the MISHANDLING OF GERMS IS ON THE RISE IN THE USA and the article
was removed from the site. I drew my own conclusions. Merck just announced the USA is no longer
their Number One Customer but the rising markets in Southeast Asia.
Seattle Times Mum On Swine Flu Deception
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa57Am0wScM&feature=channel_page
Humanity has managed to survive every insult thrown at it - specially over the last 200 years of 'so-called modern medicine - and we're still here.
Remember the SARS outbreak a few years ago? 8,000 infected and less than 800 deaths. Recently, I asked a physician doing research into viruses and AIDS "Why do people get fevers"? His response "To kill viruses."
Knowing the adverse effects of suppressing fevers; using drugs like Tamiflu, Relenza or even that old standby , aspirin, probably caused at least 50 percent of the SARS deaths by prolonging the viral infection to the point the patients succumb to pneumonia.
Country doctors knew that you feed a fever and starve a cold. The native shaman of the American aboriginals, Africans, the Vikings, the Laplanders, the Inuit and the traditional herbalists knew this and employed saunas, sweat lodges, hot springs, steam baths and fasting with great success.
If you look after and treat your body with respect in regard to food and drink and do not allow your self to succumb to fear - an immune suppressor in its own right - your immune system will do its work and protect you.
Obama has obviously taken some terrible advise from Rahm "don't let a crisis go to waste" Emanuel and the president will have to pay for it by having Letterman, Leno and the other comics lampooning him for his poor judgement in letting this latest flu scare go the Gerald Ford way.
There is one US Congressman who is a medical doctor who disagrees with the hyteria and hype put on swine II
http://jbs.org/index.php/news-feed-archive/4810