Don't Leave China Out of the Climate Debate

China's pollution costs lives, warms the planet, and distorts trade. It also harms American jobs. Unless the damage caused by China's pollution is addressed, the debates on climate change and global trade will inevitably get sidetracked and deadlocked.

China's steel industry deserves particular scrutiny because it accounts for a disproportionate share of China's pollution and carbon emissions by steel producers worldwide. It is the beneficiary of massive energy subsidies (more than $27 billion since 2000), and, as we now know, enjoys a tremendous and unfair advantage through a virtually non-existent regulatory regime.

Having quadrupled production since 2000, China's steelmakers now account for more than one-third of global production, but their share of greenhouse gas emissions is more than the rest of the world combined. The carbon footprint of a ton of steel made in China is two to three times as large as a ton of steel made in America.

A new report that our organization, the Alliance for American Manufacturing, issued on Monday shows the wide gap between the U.S. and China in environmental regulation and enforcement. Chinese companies emit more than five times as much sulfur dioxide, three times as much nitrogen oxide, and 20 times as much particulate matter as U.S. steel producers on a per ton basis.

Little wonder that 750,000 premature deaths in China every year are caused by air pollution, or that one-fourth of the particulate matter over Los Angeles can be traced back to China.

American steelmakers comply with air and water pollution standards that are six times tighter than China's. They spend at least twice as much to operate and maintain pollution control equipment. So it's important for policymakers to recognize that it is essential to keep manufacturing in the U.S. in a cap-and-trade world.

While America must lead the way on climate change, we can't leave China out. China's products should face the same treatment as America's products under any cap-and-trade or tax regime. Otherwise, American jobs will leave, and as dirtier production ramps up in China, the climate problem will only grow worse. That's not a solution anyone can live with.

Follow Scott Paul on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottPaulAAM

Comments

[TimDanMick]

The US is always looking for excuses for doing nothing about the climate change ignoring the fact that it has been caused by substantially the excesses of the US. We should clean our own yard before pointing the finger at others.

[EgyptianMysterySchool]

The way we change China's polluting ways is w/ our wallets. It them in the bank accounts and make sure they know why we're doing it and they'll change voluntarily. It's the consumer that has the power.

[melmoid]

According to most of the posts I read, most people think that global climate change is a hoax perpetrated by Al Gore. I am so tired of it that I am going to give up reading the scientific literature and worrying about this and other environmental problems. It is just too much work. Maybe most of these naysayers just aren't worth saving. So what the heck are you worrying about?

[EgyptianMysterySchool]

"The world doesn't need to change, you do." - saying of Dr. Malachi Z. York

[tjfdownsouth]

I can't speak for everyone but in my opinion I don't think most disbelieve climate change. My problem is with the assertion that human created CO2 is the culprit. Arguing about the climate change usually falls on deaf ears because it is easy enough to see that the seasons are different but whether this is a human created phenomenon is a whole other debate.

[Spiritof1982]

Human CO2 emissions are a massive acceleration of natural carbon cycling that the earth's sinks cannot accommodate. Of course it's the culprit where bizarre, hyper-fast climate changes are taking place.

[melmoid]

If you think about it the response to climate change should be much different if it is man caused (it is) than if it is entirely natural. If it is natural we would need to build some macro engineered water storage projects in some places and some large dikes in others. If it is man caused we should do this and put reduce emissions because a man caused scenario cannot be expected to be cyclic and moderate over time. Your position is a little like a guy standing on the railroad track with a train coming at him but unable to move while he debates whether it is a diesel or a steam train.