iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Scott Steen

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Steen
 

Are Urban Trees Worth It?

Posted: 12/20/2012 6:22 pm

Some people don't love trees as much as they used to. After the severe storms we have had this year, including Hurricane Sandy, city trees can seem like a dangerous liability. Are urban trees worth the risk they pose to houses, cars and people when a violent storm comes through?

Urban environments are tough on trees. Street trees are often boxed in without enough room for healthy roots or they don't have a sufficient water supply to sustain them. Branches on street trees can be broken by buses or trucks that travel or park too close, or they can be damaged by overly aggressive pruning. The damage often goes unreported, and the trees weaken. High winds can bring those branches -- or the trunk itself -- down on cars, houses or power lines.

But there is another side to it, too. Trees are green infrastructure. Unlike gray infrastructure -- concrete and metal sewers, pipes, bridges, sidewalks -- trees are an investment that increases in value throughout their lifetime, which can last a lot longer than concrete.

In Baltimore, Md., it's estimated that a single tree provides $57,000 in economic and environmental benefits over its lifetime. In a single year, Baltimore's canopy provides $3.3 million in energy savings.

Portland, Ore., is planting 83,000 trees as part of its five-year, $55 million Grey to Green program, to help solve its sewage and stormwater run-off problems.

In Austin, Texas, it's estimated that the city's trees have the potential to store up to 100,000 tons of CO2 per year.

The state of Indiana's street trees provide approximately $79 million annually in environmental and economic benefits. In the capital, Indianapolis, this equals $6.6 million in benefits just from street trees alone.

The list of other benefits trees in cities provide is long -- from removing CO2 from the air, cleaning water and providing habitat for wildlife. But in urban environments, the benefits to people individually and society as a whole extend to social, physical and economic well-being.

People are happier and healthier in cities with more trees. Greener urban areas are connected to healthier and more social interactions between adults and children, as well as lower levels of graffiti, property crimes and violent crimes. According to one major study, public housing buildings surrounded by trees had 52 percent fewer total crimes, 48 percent fewer property crimes and 56 percent fewer violent crimes than buildings with few trees. Tall, dense trees with soft ground surfaces can reduce city noise by 50 percent or more.

Cities trees have also been shown to have significant health benefits. Research on more than 3,000 inner-city children in the United States showed that those who could easily reach a greenspace had less stress and a lower body mass. Among children living in neighborhoods with street trees, there is a lower prevalence of early childhood asthma.

But just as our urban trees are working for us, we need to work for them. As trees in urban forests get larger and provide greater benefits, like any infrastructure, they also get older and may require greater care to keep both them and us safe. Cities must provide adequate funding, crews and staff to keep our trees healthy. But in terms of the services they provide to the city, they are one of the few infrastructure investments that also grows in value.

Eighty percent of the U.S. population lives in urban areas. Over the next 50 years, the population in cities is projected to increase substantially. Urban forests will become even more critical to ensure healthy and livable communities.

With extreme weather occurring with greater frequency, city governments must start investing in urban forests now to mitigate problems in the future. This investment includes long-term, consistent maintenance plans; funding to support jobs for maintenance crews and specialists to monitor and care for trees; and strong ordinances and codes to ensure that planners and developers incorporate trees and greenspace. If we care for our cities' trees, they will give back to us tenfold. It's an important investment in our future. Are they worth the risk? Well, we can't live without them.

###

American Forests restores and protects urban and rural forests. Founded in 1875, the oldest national nonprofit conservation organization in the country has served as a catalyst for many of the most important milestones in the conservation movement, including the founding of the U.S. Forest Service, the national forest and national park systems and literally thousands of forest ecosystem restoration projects and public education efforts. Since 1990, American Forests has planted more than 42 million trees in forests throughout the U.S. and in 38 countries, resulting in cleaner air and drinking water, restored habitat for wildlife and fish, and the removal of millions of tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Learn more at www.americanforests.org.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
Some people don't love trees as much as they used to. After the severe storms we have had this year, including Hurricane Sandy, city trees can seem like a dangerous liability. Are urban trees worth th...
Some people don't love trees as much as they used to. After the severe storms we have had this year, including Hurricane Sandy, city trees can seem like a dangerous liability. Are urban trees worth th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
06:20 PM on 12/25/2012
Tree pruning is part of tree safety. If real trees are a problem, then plant shrubs instead.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
03:53 AM on 12/25/2012
Americans are afraid of everything. Now they are afraid trees are going to fall on your house. I love it. A few trees fall in an area with a population of millions and, because they see it on TV, they think it's coming to their house next. They have more chance of being run over by a charging bull. But don't tell them that. They will argue with you. Facts be damed.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
01:58 PM on 12/23/2012
It might be feasible to use government urban land and railway easements, etc., to plant trees that can be selectively harvested for lumber. That would give nature's forests a chance to regenerate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Daterman
Dump The Teapot
04:38 PM on 12/22/2012
Trees are always worth it!
08:22 PM on 12/21/2012
How about having a better building code for properties so a tree doesn't pose a threat and do something about global warming?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 12/21/2012
Agreed, although more thoughtful tree selection and placement should be a priority.

For example, if we want to survive the 21st century with some open spaces intact, southern and western-facing rooftops should not be shaded by trees so they can accommodate solar PV and water-heating panels (which are very effective shade and offer 38% reduction in cooling costs), and trees need to be trimmed by qualified arborists every year to ensure they don't tear down power lines, or send limbs onto roofs and roadways.

Choosing trees that will not tear up sidewalks/roads or choke underground sewers/utilities is equally important.

In other words, like a car, a house or other useful object, an urban tree needs to be carefully considered and maintained and it will serve you well for many years!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
01:55 PM on 12/23/2012
I also would emphasize the wind-break aspect of huge urban and near-urban forestries. Ironically, the more trees there are, the more they are likely to be blown down. Just as we want solar panels on every roof, we need trees to line every street. (Considering solar access for the solar panels, to be sure.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
11:29 AM on 12/21/2012
As a result of rampant consumerism and agricultural requirements of the developing world, huge swaths of the rainforest continue to disappear. To compensate, America must take the lead and reforest our land. The simplest and easiest way to reduce CO2 production and accumulation in the atmosphere is to plant trees. Only by taking the lead on this issue can America demand others do the same. Let's turn our verdant grass fields into mini-forests.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
01:50 PM on 12/23/2012
If you mean by "grass fields" meadow and prairie, I am doubtful about planting trees on them. These ecologies have great value, and provide a surprising amount of CO2 sequestration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 777
10:20 AM on 12/21/2012
More water for urban trees and country trees and gardens.

http://homesteadsurvival.blogspot.com/2012/06/how-to-make-rainwater-collection-system.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 777
11:50 PM on 12/20/2012
LETS GET MORE WATER AND CLEAN AIR FOR THE TREES!

Arctic Development We Are Missing Out On!

http://larouchepac.com/windowtospace

John F. Kennedy 1964 Proposal;
North American Water And Power Alliance XXI

http://larouchepac.com/nawapaxxi/overview

Impact On Industry;

http://larouchepac.com/node/22525

Overview Section 1;

http://larouchepac.com/node/22137

Oregon California Extension;

http://larouchepac.com/node/22581

Overview Section 2:

http://larouchepac.com/node/22218

Water And Agriculture;

http://larouchepac.com/node/22675