iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sec. Kathleen Sebelius

GET UPDATES FROM Sec. Kathleen Sebelius
 

Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults

Posted: 03/ 8/2012 9:52 am

Over the last four decades, we've seen a steady decline in the percentage of Americans who smoke. In 1965, over 42 percent of Americans smoked, but by 2004, that number had fallen to just under 21 percent.

For all of the progress we've made, tobacco use remains the biggest single threat to Americans' health. It kills an estimated 443,000 Americans each year, and for every tobacco-related death two new young people under the age of 26 become regular smokers.

Today, we are releasing the 2012 Surgeon General's report on tobacco use among youth and young adults, which brings more troubling news. This is the first Surgeon General's report since 1994 to examine tobacco use among young adults ages 18 through 25, as well as the causes and consequences of tobacco use among youth and young adults. And it shows us just what we're up against.

Across the country, there are middle school students developing deadly tobacco addictions before they can even drive a car. And the younger they are when they try tobacco, the more likely they are to get addicted and the more heavily addicted they will become. Each day, more than 3,800 kids under 18 smoke their first cigarette. Overall, more than 600, 000 middle school students and more than 3 million high school students smoke cigarettes, while 1.7 million adolescents use smokeless tobacco products or cigars.

One child picking up a tobacco product is one too many, and while these numbers are completely unacceptable, they are no surprise: More than $1 million an hour is spent to market cigarette products in this country.

In light of this, we are changing the way we rid our communities of tobacco. The Obama Administration pushed legislation that makes it harder for tobacco companies to market to kids. That legislation was debated in Congress for many years, and we got it passed. We have also restricted companies from using terms like "light" or "mild" on products and in marketing. And we have banned certain candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes.

We're also supporting local programs to help people quit smoking and stop people from starting. As part of the new health care law, we gave Americans better access to counseling to help them quit smoking. Around the country, we've seen states join in this fight, with 25 states and Washington, D.C. passing smoke-free laws in their public spaces.

Over the last three years, we've made significant strides in our fight against tobacco, and our efforts are paying off. But today's report is an important reminder to our nation that we have a lot more work to do to make tobacco death and disease part of our past, and no longer part of our future.

For more by Sec. Kathleen Sebelius, click here.

For more on smoking, click here.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Doctor Donna
I walk in eternity
03:35 PM on 03/16/2012
If any other product sold in this country did as much damage as tobacco, the government would immediately outlaw it.
Yet it remains on sale at every corner store.
I've heard every argument, and I still don't get it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Rupel
"Let the lamp affix its beam..."
01:55 AM on 03/12/2012
"For all of the progress we've made, tobacco use remains the biggest single threat to Americans' health."
--No, actually that distinction is held by the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act.

"The Obama Administration pushed legislation that makes it harder for tobacco companies to market to kids. We have also restricted companies from using terms like "light" or "mild" on products and in marketing. And we have banned certain candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes."
--Groundbreaking strategy you got there...

"Around the country, we've seen states join in this fight, with 25 states and Washington, D.C. passing smoke-free laws in their public spaces."
--Yep, keep demonizing people for their personal choices. Send them outside into the cold by the dumpsters to do their filthy deeds. Or, maybe you should arm citizen-nannies with spray bottles and instructions to give any smoker a spritzing.

You wouldn't walk up to a fat person and tell them to stop cramming their face, would you? This is America, and people can make choices. So butt out, lady.
photo
Clarabell
If we only had a "free" press!
11:55 AM on 03/12/2012
"You wouldn't walk up to a fat person and tell them to stop cramming their face, would you? This is America, and people can make choices ..."

So how does hurt me or you???

"Around the country, we've seen states join in this fight, with 25 states and Washington, D.C. passing smoke-free laws in their public spaces."

So how does this affect you or me ????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
11:01 PM on 03/09/2012
When are gadolinium based contrasting agents going to be pulled from the market. They have been administered over 300M times and these substances are highly toxic. There is an impending epidemic. These agents cause a new disease called gadolinium-induced systemic fibrosis. Gadolinium is being found in the reproductive organs of women of childbearing years and in brain tumors of those exposed to GBCAs and have normal functioning kidneys. Please have these agents removed from the market - they are causing health problems for millions. You must stand up to the manufacturers of these GBCAs and other toxic scans. Approve proteomics for diagnostics as well as thermography. We are being poisoned a thousand different ways. We get tobacco now you need to get the other poisons.
08:27 AM on 03/09/2012
Tobacco is not the problem. The problem is the hundreds of chemicals tobacco companies add to it. Pure tobacco actually has studies showing health benefits.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
04:30 PM on 03/09/2012
Actually burning natural tobacco creates toxins and carcinogens all on its own. Burning also produces fine particulate matter (air pollution) that is inhaled deeply into the lungs, damaging lung tissue and causing inflammation in the cardiopulmonary system. Additives used by Big Tobacco serve chiefly to lessened the harshness of the taste and make the nicotine get to the brain quicker
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:58 AM on 03/09/2012
"For all of the progress we've made, tobacco use remains the biggest single threat to Americans' health. It kills an estimated 443,000 Americans each year,"

Well, Ms Sebelius, if tobacco use is the BIGGEST SINGLE THREAT TO AMERICANS health, the logical question is why is it a LEGAL product?
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
04:35 PM on 03/09/2012
I'll answer for Ms. Sebelius. Tobacco is legal because 1) it was in use long before the advent of the governmental regulatory system, 2) its use is culturally acceptable to large numbers of Americans, 3) there are millions of addicted users, 4) and Big Tobacco has and continues to have enormous influence over many aspects of American society, especially politics, and 5) no one believes that simply suddenly banning the substance will eliminate the problem (this was tried with alcohol).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
05:08 PM on 03/09/2012
Yes, alcohol, and marijuana,...

But it goes to show the complete ineffectiveness of our whole system of deciding what is, and is not a "safe" product to sell legally.

If we allow the single biggest threat to American's health to be legal, it seems to lead to the argument that we might as well let them all be legal.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
07:43 AM on 03/09/2012
Okey-dokey - then let's start with how many kids and young adults are trying marijuana daily? How many of them are eating candy, drinking sodas, eating junk food? How many of them are sitting in school or at their jobs all day and then go home and sit in front of a computer or play video games and do not exercise?

I am 75 years old today - have smoked since I was 17 - no heart problems, no respiratory problems - swim during the summer (at least 20 laps per day), bike and walk and hike the hills during the cooler months - still do all my own housework and yard work, including heavy lifting and tree trimming - do volunteer work that involves lifting, bending, getting up and down from the floor - help my younger, non-smoking neighbors with painting and other chores around their homes - dig (by hand) a veggie garden every year and plant, weed and water - and more.

Have friends and family who have died from cancer and they were not around smokers nor did they smoke.

I respect the rights of those who choose not to smoke and do not smoke around them When we go to a restaurant, we go to the non-smoking section. I do not smoke in my vehicle when we go somewhere. I ask that non-smokers give me the same respect and do not preach at me, tell me all the "statistics" or try to get me to
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
11:03 PM on 03/09/2012
Don't get any MRIs with gadoliniium based contrasting agents. They have injected this toxic metal over 300M times. They are not telling us what is making us sick.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
03:23 AM on 03/09/2012
Blah, blah, blah. It's for the children, it's for the children, it's for the...no, it isn't. It's so some bureaucrat can retire fat off the proceeds from tobacco taxes. They don't care if kids smoke or not, and frankly, that's between the kids, and the parents. If they REALLY cared about kids, they'd give them .50 coupons towards the next purchase, and advice on which drunks are most likely to buy your smokes for you. No, smoking is not good for you. But, neither is overarching bureaucracy, and frankly, brown lung is the lesser of the two evils.
photo
sawadee2000
Teaching English in Thailand and loving it!
01:46 AM on 03/09/2012
Remember the "good old days" when Republicans told us that cigarette smoking did not cause cancer or heart disease? Remember the "experts" they trotted out to say that there was no proof that second hand smoke was harmless? The GOP railed against all those "do-gooders" who were trying to interfere with our holy free market system. If they had their way cigarettes would still be advertised on TV, there would be no warning labels and it would be "unconstitutional" to ban smoking anywhere. Any efforts to stop young people from getting addicted are seen as misguided efforts of our nanny state. Did I leave anything out?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:59 AM on 03/09/2012
yes. you left out the fact that tobacco is still a legal product.
photo
mlshea1983
Politics is my football.
07:55 AM on 03/10/2012
As a smoker, I tend to feel more comfortable believing that tobacco is safe and the cancer stuff is mostly a conspiracy, that cancer is mostly just caused by genetics.
photo
Nathan Brittles
Duc,sequere,aut de via decede
11:14 PM on 03/08/2012
Heh. With friends like Sebelius, which Catholic smoker needs enemies.....?
10:47 PM on 03/08/2012
Dear Secretary Sebelius,

As as 20+ year smoker who has tried to quit many, many times, I beg you, BEG you and the Federal government to stop opposing electronic cigarettes. Please do research on this invaluable tool for helping nicotine addicts. Everything I've seen the government say about electronic cigarettes was a broadside against them relying totally on fear and emotion rather than reason and evidence. No other method I have tried has worked for me for longer than 6 months. Electronic cigs worked right away.

Yes, a user of them is still using nicotine, but nicotine is not what gives a person mouth, esophageal or lung cancer, it's just what keeps you addicted. In the name of harm reduction and simply in the name of common decency, please help your department of government to take a more enlightened stance on this particular smoking cessation method.

This administration talks a lot about preventative medicine, here's a place where they could really make that count and save lives. My life is great, but the fact that I smoked for so long is not, it's been the worst thing about my life for years and years. And now that I have e-cigs, every morning I wake up and my throat doesn't hurt, I don't cough all the time, and my acid reflux is markedly improved. Please, I beg you, help more smokers get e-cigs!

Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:19 PM on 03/08/2012
I suspect, but lack the resources to investigate, that tobacco "addiction" might be a compensary reaction to a glandular deficiency. If the body is lacking a natural source of certain enzymes, might one not find satisfaction from external sources that "scratched that itch"? If your parents smoked (mine did), couldn't you be affected in early devlopement, if not in vitro?
10:37 PM on 03/08/2012
no, it is quite easy to prove whether a drug is addictive or not, and nicotine has been proven addictive beyond all reasonable doubt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:33 AM on 03/10/2012
I think you miss my point, not "is it addictive?", but "WHY is it addictive?".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kbuffler42
09:46 PM on 03/08/2012
While I applaud all the efforts made in recent decades, by various poiticians, health organizations, research studies, etc, to make the public aware of the deadly effects of smoking, I still find myself shaking my head at the concept that "there is much more to be done". My cynical reaction is: really, you think! That, however, is not enough. We are in the middle of discussions adnauseum regarding marijuana: legalize, don't legalize. I had a friend going through a significant, but short term (reletively) family health crisis, suffering anxiety and sleeplessness, who asked her family physician for a 5mg valium prescription to help her get much needed sleep: 5 mg. The doctor refused: too addictive. Yet decades after learning the deadly affects of smoking, we continue to allow the tobacco industry to market it's poison without a prescription. Why are tobacco products sold? Why aren't they banned: period. We have outlawed other far less deadly productsor at least restricted them much more vigorously. The only possible reason why a product so universally recognized as a threat to health and life is still so freely available has to be the almighty dollar. If someone has a better understanding of the issue I would appreciate hearing it,
10:38 PM on 03/08/2012
banning tobacco would create a vast new criminal underclass consisting of tens of millions of people. it would be one of the biggest "public health" disasters of all times. if you think a junkie trying to get money to fuel their habit is dangerous, wait until addicts are deprived of nicotine for long enough.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kbuffler42
11:04 PM on 03/08/2012
I hear you and it's an issue to consider. However, regulating tobacco in a way that doesn't endanger the heath (further) of those already addicted or those for whom nicotine has benefits (as seems to be the case for some mental illnesses), ehile taking steps to not enable another generation is another worthy goal. We have a nation of great minds and could do this, but we must confront and dismiss (or eliminate the economic hold tobacco has on us as well as the political hold the manufacturers of tobacco products enjoy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
08:02 AM on 03/09/2012
I agree. ff
photo
Vintage59
Seeking tickets to First Class
09:45 PM on 03/08/2012
This is an overpopulated country. Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
shylove2
warfare state is pathological
08:59 PM on 03/08/2012
Might be good to be careful how manipualtive you are. The federal government subsidized tobacco and profited off of taxes on it.. they are pushers and they have no right to threaten and intimidate the addicts they created and charge them even more for cigarettes to fund child education and deny them insurance coverage or jobs... in fact establishing low maintenance for those already addicted would be a good test for using it on all addictions... legal low maintenance with a non-coercive quiting if personally chosen and no penalty for back sliding.
After all the experiment with prohibiton created the nexus of alcohol in speakeasy's with smoking and recently liberated women partaking in both that sexualized the entire setting... Decreasing substance abuse should be mixed with an enviroment for more sexual freedom and association with less focus on substance and more on sexual exploration and play in clubs to defuse the substance aspect of sexual repression and denial of gratification.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
Won't say it face to face? Don't post it online!
08:18 PM on 03/08/2012
Hypocrisy is your middle name Ms Sebelius. Ask your boss if the federal govt can afford the tax cut.