More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Fritz Hollings

Sen. Fritz Hollings

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Fritz Hollings
 

Quit Planning. Do It, Please

Posted: 05/ 3/11 12:54 PM ET

SENT TO "THE GANG OF SIX" SENATORS, COBURN, CHAMBLISS, CRAPO, CONRAD, DURBIN & WARNER:

We all want to cut taxes. Globalization is nothing more than production looking for a cheaper country to produce. We can cut taxes and stop the hemorrhage of the U.S. off-shoring its production and jobs by eliminating the corporate income tax and replacing it with a 5% value added tax (VAT). One hundred thirty-six countries in globalization have a VAT that is rebated on export. This will immediately boost exports and create jobs. Not only that, it amounts to a tax cut. The average corporate tax is 23% compared to a 5% VAT. The 2010 corporate tax brought in $191.4 billion, whereas a 5% VAT brings in $583 billion. Exemptions of $83 billion for the low income leaves $300 billion to start paying down the debt. With the $100 billion in spending cuts that the "Gang of Six" agrees to, this is a $400 billion cut in the deficit. This makes it profitable for Corporate America to produce in America. It frees $1 trillion in off-shore profits that Corporate America can repatriate and produce and create jobs.

 
SENT TO "THE GANG OF SIX" SENATORS, COBURN, CHAMBLISS, CRAPO, CONRAD, DURBIN & WARNER: We all want to cut taxes. Globalization is nothing more than production looking for a cheaper country to produc...
SENT TO "THE GANG OF SIX" SENATORS, COBURN, CHAMBLISS, CRAPO, CONRAD, DURBIN & WARNER: We all want to cut taxes. Globalization is nothing more than production looking for a cheaper country to produc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
LeftCoastEng
Obsessed with failed trade
06:54 PM on 05/04/2011
We have to do something about our trade deficit. A VAT is one of several possible ways to start pulling good jobs back into this country. Other possible solutions: natural strategic tariff, Buffet voucher system, an industrial policy that encourages companies to develop technologies and jobs here. Keep speaking up Senator!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CalmDawn
05:59 PM on 05/03/2011
Don't assume we all want to cut taxes. Many of us believe wealthy people and corporations aren't paying nearly enough in taxes. VAT taxes are not the solution.
luckybear
Coffee Drinker
07:05 PM on 05/03/2011
Doesn't really matter what people "believe". Polls show most Americans think we spend 20% or more of the budget on foreign aid and that this should be lowered to about 10%. Of course we actually spend less than 1% on foreign aid.

According to the CBO from last summer if we extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich for ten years it costs $700 billion; if we extend them for everyone the cost is 2.7 trillion. Middle class tax cuts cost us $2 trillion in revenue.

You have to broaden the base of taxation. This means eventually a VAT or national sales tax (or gas tax) is coming. Raising taxes on the rich will not be enough to fix our structural deficit which according to Laurence Kotlikoff may be $200 trillion (no that isn't a typo).

Tough decisions remain but our problems will not be solved solely by taxing the rich; it won't work. Also I wouldn't put too much stock in eliminating corporate taxes and magically creating jobs through a VAT. We should have consumption taxes to encourage savings and help fix our deficit not to "create" jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
05:33 PM on 05/03/2011
You heard it, folks. He wants to tax the rich less and the poor more so we can be more third-world than all those third-world countries. Then once we're all starving and broken down, maybe we'll get some of those outsourced jobs back.

No thanks, Senator. You want to live in a hellhole, move to one. Quit trying to turn the U.S.A. into one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Meeker
Nos sunt legio.
04:00 PM on 05/03/2011
I like my idea of eliminating all corporate tax loopholes and adding a new tax break for corporations that add new jobs equal to the total compensation of the position. They would also have to prove that the positions are new positions and that they were not merely replaced and if the position goes away within three years the tax break has to be paid back. This keeps corporate taxes effectively low while actually encouraging them to spend their cash on jobs. Consider that the top corporate tax rate is 35% and GE paid zero. In my scenario they could either pay 35% or higher thousands of people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
03:32 PM on 05/03/2011
South Carolina is a weird place. At least politically.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:30 PM on 05/03/2011
Let the multinational corporations rule the world without the slightest control by the Democratic republics, right?

That's the age old dream of conservatism, to conserve the good old days of the super rich 1000 families and the rest of us their serfs and slaves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toofarleft4thisworld
the Lord giveth; the Landlord taketh away
03:29 PM on 05/03/2011
oh, and don't forget, cut your wages too because globalization is nothing more than production looking for a cheaper place....in some countries people work 14 hour days for 80 cents an hour. that should make us competitive
03:24 PM on 05/03/2011
Frankly i prefer raising taxes rather than lowering them, less taxes mean less basic services the government can provide and i tend to see alot more value for my tax money then i do for my insurance policies. The payments i make on health and car insurance exceed what i pay each month on tax and i don't think either of those country are going to educate my children, pretect national security or look after me when i retire.

The republicans want to lower taxes to increase company profits and the income of wealthy, but this doesn't translate into a benefit for the vast majority of ordinary. It certainly does nothing to cut the defecit either.
HellerHighwater
World centrist, "Far-left" American
02:38 PM on 05/03/2011
Shame on you Senator. Even in retirement you try to perpetrate the dual lie/extortion that a) corporate taxes are anywhere close to what a rational person would consider high (what's lower than zero in many, many cases?) and b) if only taxes were lowered (again), all these corporations would gladly bring all these jobs they're paying someone a few rupees or yuan to do back to the States.
02:09 PM on 05/03/2011
We don't all want to cut taxes. A lot of us want to do what we have to do to turn this country around. It would be nice to see the Republicans get on board with the majority of Americans who want to see the wealthy pay more and to see corporations pay their fair share. It would be nice to see Republicans put the country before their party interests.
05:20 PM on 05/03/2011
"We don't all want to cut Taxes"

We should! If we want to turn this country around. You seem confused about who ultimatly pays. Corporate taxes are paid by consumers when we purchase goods and they discourage business development and investment. The wealthy can change the way they make money to reduce or eliminate taxes. The poor make too little to pay taxes.That leaves the rest of us paying the tax bills.
01:46 PM on 05/03/2011
Fully support cutting the cutting corporate income tax. Say no to VAT. If you insist on increasing taxes increase sales tax is simpler and more honest and does not create a new catagory of tax.

Better yet find another $500B to cut. Move responsibility for education back to the states and cut dept of ed., cut from defense... The list is as long as the deficit.