More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Fritz Hollings

Sen. Fritz Hollings

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Fritz Hollings
 

Wake Up, Get Real!

Posted: 04/26/11 01:07 PM ET

The Post and Courier headline, "Is Boeing in trouble here?", reveals that this country needs a wake-up call. Boeing is being sued by the National Labor Relations Board for locating some of its 787 Dreamliner production to South Carolina. The federal government contends that Boeing's move is in retaliation for labor strikes in Washington State. So if Boeing off-shores production and jobs, it gets a tax break. But if Boeing puts production and jobs in-country, the government sues. When Boeing off-shored production and jobs to China and Japan, Washington exempted Boeing from the corporate income tax so long as it kept profits off-shore. In essence Washington said: "Invest these off-shore profits in China for more profits, so that we can get rid of more jobs." Washington is not serious about creating jobs. Washington's policy is to get rid of jobs. Wake up, America! Get real!

Except for the "Gang of Six," the President and Congress are not serious about paying down the debt. It's always the politics of the problem, not the problem itself. It's always false choices like increased taxes or cutting spending. The issue is not the size of government, but paying for a program at the time of enactment. That's why I voted against prescription drugs -- a good program but not paid for.

A majority of the House of Representatives and forty-one Senators have signed the Grover Norquist pledge to oppose taxes, which guarantees that prescription drugs will never be paid for other than cutting programs. So Ryan's proposal is to cut Medicare in order to pay for Medicare. Every Governor pays the state's bill, but Washington never pays the country's bills. All submit plans to pay down the long-term debt. Both Congressman Ryan and President Obama have submitted plans to cut spending $4 trillion in ten or twelve years. Neither one pays the bill. Ryan cuts health to pay for health or cuts programs to give the rich a tax cut. The president's plan borrows $7 trillion, which adds $3 trillion to the debt. Washington has no credibility. Wake up! Get real!

Congress could cut taxes and start paying down the debt by cancelling the corporate income tax and replace it with a 5% value added tax. 136 countries in international trade compete with a VAT. The VAT is rebated on export.

Germany, for example, has a 19% VAT. Germany has a windmill plant in Charleston, S.C. It highballs the cost of manufacture in Germany, ships the parts for 3% cost, assembles the parts in Charleston for 3%, and produces windmills 13% cheaper than any U. S. production because its 19% VAT is rebated. The 2010 corporate income tax brought in $191.4 billion. A 5% VAT brings in $583 billion. Exemptions of $83 billion for the low income still leaves $300 billion to pay down the debt. A VAT makes it profitable to produce in the United States and slow the off-shoring. A VAT promotes exports; and having cancelled the corporate tax, a trillion dollars in off-shore corporate profits can be repatriated tax free to create production and jobs in the United States. But Wall Street and the multinationals want to keep the off-shore profits flowing. The big banks that make a majority of their profits off-shore, and their lobbyists like Grover Norquist, oppose a VAT, so the president and Congress oppose developing a competitive economy. Wake up! Get real!

Every nation has laws to protect its economy. For example, the War Production Act of 1950 protects domestic defense production. President Kennedy enforced this provision for the textile industry in 1961. All textiles need not be protected, but defense materials such as parachute cloth, camouflage, body armor, etc. need protection. Today, we don't have adequate helicopter production. We won Charlie Wilson's war by shooting down Russian helicopters with stinger missiles. Now the Obama administration is begging Russia for helicopters for Afghanistan. President Nixon levied a 10% import surcharge in 1971 when our trade deficit was a miniscule of what we are experiencing. President Reagan enforced our trade laws to protect the production of steel, automobiles, computers, machine tools, and motorcycles. It saved Intel and Harley-Davidson. But in order to keep the off-shore profits flowing and contributions up, President Obama refuses to enforce our trade laws. Wake up! Get real!

The United States waits for China to go democratic or adopt U. S. capitalism. Why would China change? Japan practiced controlled capitalism, subsidizing its manufacture, selling its export near cost and making up the profit in its closed market. It put General Motors in bankruptcy with Toyota #1.

Following suit, China has wrought a miracle with controlled capitalism. In three decades, China has built a strong economy, a strong defense and has brought 300 million poor into the middle class. China has created more billionaires than Europe. It's now bringing another 400 million into the middle class; and, when that occurs, China will still have another 600 million looking for work. Soon China will need the 49% that it permits for foreign production. Foreseeing this, China alters acquired technology, patents it, and before long the China product becomes the article in trade. China will kiss foreign production goodbye and Corporate America will return home to a depleted economy with nothing to produce. China must control its economy and people to keep the country together. And the United States must protect its economy in order to compete in globalization. Washington, with its free trade nonsense, has no credibility. Wake up! Get real!

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:59 PM on 05/03/2011
Lowest taxes on the rich since right before the great depression*, ya think maybe that's the problem? Raise taxes on the rich and corporations, seize the bankster casinos, cut the war budget in half at least, and invest that money in infrastructure and the citizen's safety net. duh.

* Don't forget capital gains....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stoopid American
Trooth, justice, and the American way ...
11:09 PM on 04/30/2011
Tax cuts will not stimulate the economy. NOTHING will stimulate the economy now. Everyone, Republican and Democrat alike, needs to drop this stimulus nonsense and start talking in realistic terms.

The economy has been stimulated non-stop since the 1960's. NON-STOP. It is no wonder that further stimulus does nothing but make the rich richer and the debt bigger.

The only solution for the American economy, long term: pay down the debt, and restructure the economy so that we actually build things that people want to buy OUTSIDE America.
photo
unionave
Old Codger
10:13 PM on 04/30/2011
What free trade has done is shifted multi-Trillions of Dollars in to the pockets of the international corporations and greatly ruined opportunities in America . Almost everything we purchase today adds more money in the corporate pockets which will not be reinvested in the USA .

Free trade also created the greatest loss of government income in any history . Income from import duties and income tax loss from exported jobs account for a large chunk of that loss .

The nations of South America woke up to the damage these policies cause enough that when GWB attended a meeting there he was not well received when he spoke of "free trade" .

The USA is made up of a variety of people that originated elsewhere so it is easy to sell imported if the price is affordable . But in most other nations imported is not desirable . So in effect , we are cutting our own throats .

Republicans have been singing the tax cut song for so long they can not break the habit . While the American people have no concept of the damage it does to the operation of our nation .
09:31 PM on 04/30/2011
The Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 worked so well I think we need to try it again.
And besides , Hawley was a good Republican from Oregon.
It managed to halve world trade and keep the depression going until WWII.
(with a little help from the federal reserve).
Some how I don't think WW III will end up as nice for us as WW II. So we need to think of some other ending.
photo
unionave
Old Codger
10:20 PM on 04/30/2011
f/f ! Good info .
photo
earto44
Defender of planet Erf.
07:34 PM on 04/30/2011
Go back to when Wallmart really took off. Who was responsible for removing the tarrif's that kept the playing field level? It's a Texas thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
06:44 PM on 04/30/2011
But . . . but . . . but. . . America is the greatest country on earth! Free trade is what God wants! Anything else is socialism or terrorism or something really bad! All the rich people are in favor of free trade, so it must be good! If some people can't find work, they can go to their church for help!
05:48 PM on 04/30/2011
Replacing corporate tax with a VAT is just a scam. News flash. Corporations pay no tax whatsoever. Only the individual pays taxes. These cost of corporate taxes are passed on to the consumer in the form of higher product costs. Figuring another convoluted way of getting the same cash or more to the government is counterproductive. Reducing government imposed costs on production provide the incentive to create more wealth. Wealth creation increases our standard of living.
The size and scope of government should be brought to its constitutional bounds, now!
The talk about budget cuts over the next ten years or more is fallacious. Why not talk about budget cuts in this year alone? I know, it just makes the numbers sound more substantial to figure cuts times ten. Most of the cuts proposed are in the realm of rounding errors when compared to the total budget.
These unconstitutional powers to regulate must be ended and the favors will stop flowing.
Learn about liberty at mises.org and the freeradical.blogspot.com.
Only through education will this country have a chance to get out of this mess and reduce the possibility of getting into a like mess again.
photo
Si1ver1ock
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
06:29 PM on 04/30/2011
"Corporatio­ns pay no tax whatsoever"

Fiine, they can function as efficient tax collectors for the state.
photo
Si1ver1ock
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
04:44 PM on 04/30/2011
Thank you!
04:27 PM on 04/30/2011
Both parties have consistenly sold out American interests and failed to protect American workers which at first glance may seem like a mistake but upon closer examination is the result of corruption and payback to their corporate sponsors. Campaign money and perks for their family are more important than duty to their country. It is a disgrace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fb0252
04:18 PM on 04/30/2011
might also consider ending gov. fraud programs
SS disability fraud.
Va disability fraud
student loan fraud
earned income tax credit fraud.
quit paying $6500/tax payer to have baby
savings 1 trillion.
06:45 PM on 04/30/2011
Spoken like a true republican. Everything that helps the little guy must be government fraud. Missing from your list is where the real fraud is: Wallstreet bail outs, the government passing legislation prohibiting it from using its economic might to bargain for lower pharmaceuticals, what passes for a Department of Defense pork barrel, etc. etc.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Max is Back
Caiu na roda, ou acorda ou vai rodar!
04:02 PM on 04/30/2011
The thing is, if you actually take the time to read these "Free Trade Agreements" you will figure out that there is nothing "Free" about them. They are basically corporate scams to rip off the people of both countries while protecting the interests of the stronger country's industies at the expense of the weaker.
 
Calling it free trade is like calling Ryancare "saving" medicare. From what I understand it's like saying that giving a patient acyanide pill is done to "save" the patient...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alohageedub
03:17 PM on 04/30/2011
Hey, Obama made a deal with Korea! They have agreed to let the U.S. sell 50,000 cars in Korea. Seems like the U.S. should be saying, hey that's great, you too can sell 50,000 cars in the U.S. The U.S. doesn't negotiate trade agreements, it gives them away. What's good for them, must be good for us. You tell the U.S. they can't sell or have a quota, then we should reward them with the same deal!
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
03:09 PM on 04/30/2011
Wake up, Senator! Get real! The US subsides Boing, oil and agriculture, just to name a few. Are you claiming this is free trade, or even fair trade? How do these subsidies help the American people.

What I see here is PORK and more PORK.

1/3 of our budget go to the Pentagon. Many more dollars go .to black budget covert ops, etc. We spend tons od dollars off shore "securing" US "interests." For example, we just spent some $6million to set up the no fly zone in Lybia. The problem is that if we were to cut back on this there would be huge layoffs. Our whole economy is way too dependent of the war industry. Just like we drained the soviets in Afghanistan, we are now draining ourselves with endless war.

How would you wean us off the MIC?
02:25 PM on 04/30/2011
seems to me in all the news reported today...the first lier hasn't got a chance// and than we ask God Bless Us that bull dust the old viking
03:55 AM on 04/28/2011
Its not a rebate on exports. It is a tax on exports levied at zero percent, commonly known as the zero-rate of VAT. The VAT a business pays on its business inputs is refunded to them as a credit against the VAT they charge their customers. Your German example has parts being shipped from the EU to the US, as a qualifying export the VAT is levied at the zero-rate (which is still taxable and still entitles the German windmill plant to recover all of the VAT paid on its business inputs).
The zero-rate can also be applied to certain basic goods and services which are viewed as basic necessities (food, healthcare, education) provided domestically, thus ensuring that the VAT is not a burden on the poor and low income Americans (since the low income / poor spend a higher % of their income on basic items).
The banks oppose a VAT because the VAT creates a cost for the banks. Unlike the Windmill company above making taxable supplies (at both the 5% and 0% rates) banks provides financial services which are, in most jurisdictions that have a VAT (GST in Canada, Australia) classified as "exempt" supplies. Those businesses which make exempt supplies are not entitled to recover the VAT paid on their business inputs. A US VAT needs to look beyond Europe to countries with progressive VAT systems (Singapore, New Zealand) to make a VAT friendly and acceptable to the banks. Its not rocket science.