More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Michael Bennet

Sen. Michael Bennet

Posted: March 4, 2010 08:05 PM

Reform the Filibuster

What's Your Reaction:

During the past year I've had conversations with thousands of people from all parts of Colorado, and I've heard a common refrain: Washington isn't working. Last week, the obstructionist actions of Republican senator Jim Bunning left no doubt that the people of Colorado are right -- Washington is broken, and it's getting worse.

The filibuster was originally intended to protect minority rights and encourage meaningful debate on the Senate floor. Today, this important rule is being abused at an unprecedented rate, and it's grinding the business of the Senate to a standstill.

That's why I am introducing new legislation to reform the Senate's rules -- to reform the filibuster in a responsible, practical way. My bill protects minority rights, while allowing the Senate to more efficiently conduct the people's business and put an end to pointless delays.

The real problem is that the filibuster is being abused with unprecedented frequency. Individuals and parties are using it to obstruct progress, and the American people are paying the price.

Here are the specifics of my filibuster reform proposal:

  • Ends anonymous holds so senators will have to answer to their constituents;
  • Requires filibuster supporters to actually show up and vote;
  • Filibusters at the beginning of debate will be eliminated so we can get back to the business of deliberating bills; and,
  • Creates incentives to encourage bipartisanship and allows bills with bipartisan support to move more quickly.

If you want to help me fix the Senate and get Washington working for you again, click here to contact your senators. Urge them to reform the filibuster today.

The political games that have stopped business in the Senate need to end -- we can do better. Please stand with me, and let's put Washington back to work. Tell your senators to support my bill today.

 

Follow Sen. Michael Bennet on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BennetForCO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 180
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:05 PM on 03/08/2010
Thank God for the filibuster. Bennett is beholding to Obama and is losing big time in Colorado to a Republican. This is politics straight up.
03:08 AM on 03/08/2010
This is a great piece of legislation. Even if it doesn't change the ultimate number from 60, it is a very good thing. The (very) modern fillibuster is shameless, un-democratic and senseless. It needs to be reformed and I don't care if it is done while EITHER party is in the minority. I just contacted my Senators; good work Mr. Bennet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rynox
My patience is over taxed.
12:16 AM on 03/08/2010
Yes, reform it. Our legislature has become rigid with partisanship. Inaction is not an option.
10:00 PM on 03/07/2010
When I asked Michael Bennet face-to-face on Feb 27, 2009 in Golden, Colorado if anyone in Washington, DC was interested in doing something about the filibuster, he said NO and then simply took the next question without further comment.

Since then Democrats have squandered their time as the majority in Congress and angered voters to the extent that Republican Scott Brown was even elected from Massasschusetts!

With time running out, Democrats are facing a brutal mid-term election and Michael Bennet is facing Andrew Romanoff in a Colorado primary. Suddenly, Michael Bennet has found the new religion and agrees it is time to do something about the filibuster. Welcome to the club, Michael! If you were a leader, wouldn't you have arrived at the party a little sooner?

Yes, the filibuster is being abused to the point that the Senate can't get its work done anymore.

The geographical composition of the US Senate is already intended to be a way to protect minority rights and the filibuster was introduced to yet further impede the progress of representative democracy.

Unfortunately, allowing the filibuster in the already undemocratically constituted US Senate places a choke hold on democracy.

The filibuster has always been a bad idea in the view of those who support representative democracy.
photo
mcostello
It's just math
02:17 PM on 03/08/2010
So are you for Bennet or not?
How dare that Romanoff youngster challenge the mighty Bennet. Romanoff has only run the state house here.
Bennet must have the goods on Ritter or someone, because his rise has been too calculated, and until now, he has never run a campaign, that I know of.
It must be nice to start your campaigning career with a milliion bucks courtesy of the POTUS.
What does this guy have on who?
09:52 PM on 03/08/2010
Bennet has never run for nor been elected to office anytime, anywhere, anyhow. Nobody has ever actually voted for Bennet. But he has worked hard visiting people around the state since his appointment. Yet in spite of that, lags behind Romanoff in Rasmussen polls. That concerns me that Bennet is not a strong candidate and is very risky for the Dems to nominate him.

If the Dems in Colorado go with Bennet because Obama endorsed him, and then Bennet loses - the Dems and Obama lose big.

If the Dems go with Romanoff's better chances at winning the election, Obama will simply congratulate him after the primary and all will be forgotten regarding Obama's and Ritter's mysterious dalliance with Bennet which has never been explained.

So my vote is with Romanoff. See you March 16 at the Colorado Caucus!
06:14 PM on 03/07/2010
what's really needed is to clean out house. Get rid of all those corrupt politicians and start afresh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phantasma
Pacific Northwest
05:59 PM on 03/07/2010
Thanks for doing this Senator. It's long overdue. Without majority rule we can't even remotely claim to be a Democracy (or a Republic for those picky).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kalidescopemind
Creek Paddler
03:24 PM on 03/07/2010
Go! Senator Bennet! Its about time! Too bad Harry didn't do it sooner!

This "filibuster by threat" the Republicans love to use daily is nowhere in our constitution, and is being seriously abused by irresponsible Republican Senators!
10:06 AM on 03/07/2010
How pathetic - Dems pass 'Paygo' to require the money be found first before passing more spending, Bunning demads the Dems uphold their own legislation and now it's a feeding frenzy on Bunning - well that makes a lot of sense. Pathetic with filabuster too - if you're not in power you love it, if you'renot in power you don't - plenty of footage out there from both sides. Only goes to show you that both sides are for and against the same thing, the only real difference is timing.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
10:40 AM on 03/07/2010
True, the filibuster only insures that congress take no action or mediocre action. Guess I'd rather win some and lose some than win none, so I vote to kill it and go with a simple majority.

But what I'd really prefer is to find some way to reward congressfolks for voting on their principles and policies rather than on political gains and games. But how to do that? Public finance of elections--period.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fairandbalanced100
12:20 PM on 03/06/2010
The filibuster was only used about 50 times a year or less for several years .
But last year , theRepublicans abused it & used it over 100 times & slowed
down or stopped many things. There are over 100 bills that went thru house
last year , but stopped in senate by Republican filibuster . It has got too easy
to filibuster , so they occur more & last longer. They were intended to slow
things down , but now they are used to stop things & it takes a super majority
of 60 to stop it . I saw a survey that said only 25% of people know that
minority party can stop things with only 41 out of 100.
10:13 AM on 03/07/2010
What are you talking about last year? Until Brown won in Mass ,in Feb 2010 the repubs couldn't stop a bunch of first graders - they had zero power - you need to go back to the drawing board and read up about the filibuster, and the number lawmakers required, and how many Repubs and Dems where there. That's why Brown was such a big deal. Unfourtunatly whereever you got your information from was lying, the ineffectiveness of govrnment had - up until Feb - nothing at all to do with the Repubs, the Dems did that all by their lonesome
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Cunningham Bowler
03:20 PM on 03/07/2010
Your analysis is incorrect: a filibuster does *not* require 40 votes; one person can filibuster, stopping it requires 60 votes and the Democrats have never had 60 votes in this Congress. Remember that the appointment of Al Franken was delayed, but quite deliberate Republican tactics. Even with him Democrats had to persuade non-Democrats to vote with them to break a filibuster. Without him 60 votes meant one official Republican voting with the Democrats. With him 60 votes meant getting all the nominal independents to support the Democrat policies.

There's enormous power in being able to stop things happening. The independents by definition float between Republican and Democrat party lines. To get anything passed Dems have to *buy* Indies. Notices that the Reps deliberately opposed *non-controversial* appointments - forcing Dems to have to sell their souls, and their election promises, if they wanted to get *anything* done.

The tactic works. Senator Bennet's proposal doesn't. The Senate needs to face up to this and, in January 2011, it needs to throw away the old rule book and adopt a new one that works. Otherwise it's just business as usual.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kalidescopemind
Creek Paddler
03:28 PM on 03/07/2010
That's baloney RMG. Our 60th Senator, Joe Liebermann, spoke on behalf of John McCain's presidency at the RNC convention in 2008. The illusion of 60 was only a mirage.
Yasmine
the DEFENDER in CHIEF
12:07 PM on 03/06/2010
the reason the Progressives have no where else to go is that there is NO EFFORT to start a COALITION of all those who believe in progressive goals.
it seems to me that America does not like to have another major 3rd party..............so progressives have to work within the DEMOCRATIC party............just as the tea baggers will have nowhere else to go but to the GOP.
it seems we have to accept this......................good or bad. tough luck
so WITHIN that FRAMEwork ...............it is possible to achieve progressive goals if we set our minds to it.
03:12 PM on 03/06/2010
What I know is how a true Democrat like myself would be very upset if I was called a vile name like a teabagger.
06:02 PM on 03/06/2010
Well said. To respect someone even though you disagree with them is the first step to bringing about any solution. Without respect you are just pushing away the people you want to join you at the table.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cosatjockomo
10:57 AM on 03/06/2010
Agree with most of your suggestions, but the bipartisan support bypass would be awful. What's wrong with American politics is the entrenched 2 party system. We need to destroy both corrupt entities. They have established a leadership hierarchy that disenfranchises most of America, creating a situation where just a few legislators can dictate to the entire body what will be considered. We don't need to make it even easier for the Nancy Pelosi's of the world to ignore obvious public demands to suit her sugar daddy lobbyists. It would be far more effective to implant the heads of lobbyists on the White House fence, until each of the spikes has an occupant. Suddenly you'd see a huge drop in obstructionist behavior due to corrupting incentives.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
08:57 PM on 03/06/2010
Maybe we could hire a few New Guinea headhunters hide in the cherry trees and pick em off with their poison arrows or blow darts or whatever. Then they could show us how to shrink their bloated heads to the size of baseballs.

Of course their boss CEOs would all hastily move to France or some facsimile and take all their billions with them leaving us totally without any dollars. That might happen anyway, so what the hell, go for it CoscoJack.

But first let's kill the filibuster!
02:17 AM on 03/06/2010
Yeah... I do think the filibuster rule needs reform. This was essentially a gentlemen's agreement -- we only filibuster in extreme circumstances. But that's the problem with gentlemen's agreements -- they require gentlemen. Now that even virtually unanimous votes are preceded by days of filibuster, it's clear this need to change.

But far more critical is getting the folks in DC back to doing their elected jobs. That would be representing the people, not corporations, not fundraising. We need to, once and for all, simply outlaw lobbyists. There's nothing in the Constitution to suggest that a corporation has any right to free speech. The individuals in that corporation are, of course, free to individually do whatever they like with their vote. But the way the system works, those in control of large corporations drastically magnify their effective votes. Thus, we have a few individuals imposing horrible choices on the vast majority of the population. Just look at lack of a Public Option, much less Single Payer, in most versions of the new Healthcare bill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 PM on 03/05/2010
I'm at the point where I want to do a lot more than end the filibuster. The Senate has become the greatest roadblock to reform and progress. It serves no useful purpose to average Americans.

It's time to have the states call a constitutional convention and abolish the Senate.
07:16 AM on 03/06/2010
Abolishing the US Senate would sure save a lot of money, and make a fairer government. It would be satisfying, too.
10:07 AM on 03/06/2010
People from large, populous states may want to see the Senate abolished, but those of us in small states (I'm from NH) do not agree. We support senate reform, filibuster reform, and campaign finance reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 PM on 03/06/2010
There is something drastically wrong when one state of a few hundred thousand people can hold the rest of the nation hostage.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LizM
My micro-bio is too long for this space.
11:37 PM on 03/05/2010
Vice President Biden delivered a very important speech on the floor of the Senate in 2005 that many here may be interested in taking a look at.

It was delivered in response to the debate over senate rules and the threat by Republicans to change those rules by a simple majority vote in an effort to eliminate the right to filibuster judicial nominees.

Here is a link to that important floor speech by Senator Biden:
http://www.swingstateproject.com/2005/05/nuclear_option_24.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anym
Obama is GoldmanSachs
10:16 PM on 03/05/2010
NO we don't need to reform the filibuster we need to end it.