More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Tom Carper

Sen. Tom Carper

Posted: October 25, 2010 03:12 PM

With Halloween right around the corner, many of us are casting about for creative costume ideas. Here's a suggestion for a truly frightening option -- try being a cyber criminal or a terrorist.

If you think cyber crime and cyber terrorism aren't real, let alone scary, think again. According to the FBI, in 2008 a wave of thieves fanned out across the globe and almost simultaneously walked off with more than $9 million within 12 hours, using cloned credit card numbers they got by hacking a major credit card company in Atlanta. Further, in 2009 Lockheed Martin and the Department of Defense lost plans to America's future advanced jet fighter, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter -- one that isn't even mass-produced yet -- to suspected Chinese hackers. I'm hard pressed to think which is scarier - the cyber criminals who can hack into businesses or personal networks and steal millions or the cyber terrorists who can attack everything from power plants to military installations with a few key strokes.

Given the truly scary potential these cyber criminals and terrorists possess, it's entirely fitting that we observe National Cybersecurity Awareness Month every October. This year marks the seventh annual National Cybersecurity Awareness Month which is conducted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) and the National Cyber Security Alliance (NCSA). As part of the Department of Homeland Security's "Stop.Think.Connect." campaign to increase public understanding of cyber threats, this annual cybersecurity awareness campaign is designed to encourage Americans to protect their computers and our nation's critical cyber infrastructure.

Across the country, people are working to build awareness of the importance of cybersecurity and the significant threat posed by cyber attacks. In my home state of Delaware, we recognized National Cybersecurity Awareness Month with activities designed to educate Delawareans about the importance of protecting the cyber networks that underpin everything from our bank accounts to the electricity grid and the systems we depend on for our national security. Under the theme "Cybersecurity is Our Shared Responsibility," Delaware's top professionals, government officials and students participated in training, simulation exercises and presentations. I am proud that Delaware continues to be a leader in teaching others about the importance of being vigilant online, not just during the month of October, but throughout the year.

As National Cybersecurity Awareness Month comes to a close, I hope this campaign's outreach was successful in educating Delawareans and all Americans about the importance of cybersecurity and the new technological threats we face. Eventually, I hope Americans focus on this critical issue every day, not just one month out of the year.

Given the serious nature of this growing threat, we have to do more to protect our critical information networks. That's why I will continue to work with my Congressional colleagues to pass comprehensive cybersecurity legislation, the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010, which I authored with Sens. Joe Lieberman (ID-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Me.). This legislation will help provide the government and the private sector with the tools and resources they need to more effectively protect our vital cyber networks.

To learn more about National Cybersecurity Awareness Month and download free online safety tips and resources, I encourage you to visit the Department of Homeland Security's website on Cybersecurity: Our Shared Responsibility.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
11:56 AM on 10/26/2010
You want to keep ramming technology down our throats - even though we know that technology is the culprit behind all of our jobs woes - eventually the chickens will come home to roost. Our government is letting private corporations dictate where technology will take us. But we do not have the regualtions and infrastructure in place to protect ourselves in case of attack - because businesses hate rules! We are being washed away in this tidal wave of technological advancement - with no evacuation or rescue plans in place. Boy, are we gonna get ours.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Broxted
11:38 AM on 10/26/2010
Dear Senator, You are correct in focusing on the more risky aspects of the internet but in Britain we have the opposite, a government hell bent on retaining all e-mails, cell phone details and logging ons from all citizens. Surely a middle ground must be found? It is not credible that Al Qui'da would contact each other and bluntly e-mail "Bomb tomorrow at 11.30am". Yours Respectfully, Ron M. Broxted, Esq.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:06 AM on 10/26/2010
How about foreign-made components in U.S. weapons systems ?...

http://www.truth-out.org/outsourcing-security-defense-manufacturing-goes-way-automobile60818
t r u t h o u t | Outsourcing Security: Defense Manufacturing Goes the Way of the Automobile

"...According to William R. Hawkins, a defense expert on military contracting and former Republican Party staffer, foreigners have been manufacturing critical and sophisticated components of US weaponry for nearly 20 years now.

He says the Pentagon started outsourcing the manufacturing of "high-end" computer chips to Taiwan in the early 1990s - microchips used in US fighter jets and missile defense systems, for instance. Over time, the Taiwanese have "second-sourced" most of these contracts to the Chinese, he says.

"Can we trust buying [high-end] chips from China for our military systems? Will they perform as well?" asks Hawkins. "We have found Chinese chips do not perform as well. They've also found counterfeit chips in the supply chain. Can we be sure the Chinese won't plant Trojans or bugs in them?"

Indeed, on June 13th on 60 Minutes, Jim Gosler, an expert on cyberwarfare, said the US government has uncovered sabotaged microchips within some of the nation's most powerful weapons. "It's very clear that a foreign intelligence service put them there," he added..."
photo
SageSpencer
Angel brought Him the leaden heart & the dead bird
01:02 AM on 10/26/2010
No!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mattjoe3
Once snowmobiled over open water
11:23 PM on 10/25/2010
Oh my Tom…..$9 million within 12 hours is fine so long as it’s American Airlines put options or BP dumped shares.
You want to infringe on my freedom of speech because Lockheed Martin and the Department of Defense need to outsource their I.T. to someone competent? Perhaps legislate private networks for things like 'future advanced jet fighters and electricity grids' and all those other “systems you depend on for national security” ?
Cyber security awareness and legislation is a sham under the guise of national security and that freedom-snatching ‘blank cheque’ synonymous with your feigned “war on terror”.
If not undone by your immense lack of substantive justification, you certainly released the cat from that bag at the mention of Joe Lieberman and the always comforting assurance that “legislation will help provide the government with the tools they need…”
Nobody with a free thought is buying what your selling Mr. Senator and free thinking is becoming contagious….pass it on. ; )
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
11:19 PM on 10/25/2010
Senator, I have one main question for you; why is our infrastructure that is fundamental towards our security hooked up to the publicly accessible internet?

This is the big question. Nobody has ever taken the time to explain why. Yet, every time this issue comes up, it involves questions where the rest of us are asked or demanded to sacrifice our civil liberties. Does a nuclear reactor or a dam need public access points over a computer network? Nobody has explained why such access is necessary. I'll take the threats more seriously when someone can explain to me the rational reason for why the threat exists in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mattjoe3
Once snowmobiled over open water
10:34 PM on 10/25/2010
"Those willing to sacrifice freedom for temporary security will lose both."--Benjamin Franklin

http://www.infowars.com/under-threat-a-free-and-open-internet/
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert David Steele
09:26 PM on 10/25/2010
It's a shame the Senator is regurgitating talking points and unwilling to focus on the real crime: the lobbying by the banks and major infrastructure companies to NOT protect their systems including Supervisory and Control systems (SCADA). I worked with Winn Schwartau, Jim Anderson, and Bill Caeli from Australia to blow the whistle on this in 1994, and both Marty Harris and Al Gore blew us off. Below are two links: the first is to my 1994 letter to the NII boss, and the second is my more recent Cyber-Scam article in Homeland Security Today. I am proud to be a virtual Hacker and to know real Hackers, we have been pushing the edge of the envelope and sounding the alarm since 1990. Government has simply been too corrupt to pay attention, and that includes every Senator now serving. The $12 billion a year earmarked for cyber-security is fraud, waste, and abuse for the simple reason that it is going to be spent PRETENDING to create a secure global grid.

http://www.phibetaiota.net/?p=4329

http://www.phibetaiota.net/2010/02/2010-opinion-americas-cyber-scam/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
11:22 PM on 10/25/2010
The problem I have is that I don't believe this threat is real. For example, as someone with much less to lose, none of the machines where I keep personally sensitive information are hooked up to the internet. It's simply a risk I don't need to take. Given that, why is the government taking such a risk? We shouldn't be asked to give up our civil liberties involving issues where the bigger question is why our government is hooking up critical computer infrastructure to outside access points when they simply don't have to.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:22 PM on 10/25/2010
Missing a moment like this in the Computer World, you never catch UP, No matter how much window dressing you DO!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:21 PM on 10/25/2010
Senator, This Horse LEFT The Barn Years AGO. This is a Johnny come too LATE moment!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bioShell
09:18 PM on 10/25/2010
Ok. How much money do you want ?

The new yorker has an article about "cyber war". http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/11/01/101101fa_fact_hersh

It's all about scaring people to get contracts.

It's interesting that things happened while W was going out. I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I don't find it to be coincidence that a jet is lost near China.
mataylor16
You all want it one way. But, its the other way. -
08:55 PM on 10/25/2010
Whatever sounds like more pork for IT corporations to me.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
06:37 PM on 10/25/2010
"Y2K" was a big hoax, a non-threat. But it allowed IT departments to get funds to rewrite all their old code, and modernize the companies software infrastructure, update it to the web. Along with the web, the resulting productivity increase led to the economic boom in the '90s.

Suspect same of this: a hoax that could greatly increase economic growth. I'm for it :-)
photo
BluestateGuyInTX
A Connecticut yankee in Emperor Bush's Town.
06:07 PM on 10/25/2010
Our poor leadership. It is getting harder and harder to scare us. Don't they realize that nothing breeds an inconvenient courage like continued failed attempts to frighten? All of these "scary stories" seem to blend together now. What is it that we are supposed to be scared of today? I've kind of forgotten. So many scary stories, so little time. ;-) The really scary stuff (the coming meltdown of the financial system) is ignored by our leadership (perhaps because of their complicity in the actions that are leading to the meltdown) but really mundane things become the focus for unrelenting scary stories from our leadership.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
05:09 PM on 10/25/2010
Interesting to have people who don't understand any of the relevant details passing laws on the subject of cybersecurity. He didn't even mention one of the first direct infrastructure attacks in cyberspace that is clearly state sponsored act of war, the recent attack on Iran's facilities using Seimens controllers in high speed systems using a worm spread through multiple unknown Windows vulnerabilities.

Did he not know the significance of this act of war? Previous hacks were for information, not physical destruction of facilities.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
06:40 PM on 10/25/2010
That's because it was against Iran, but more so because it was specific to Siemens equipment, with probably no security, not expected to be connected to the Internet at all. Not very scary to everyone using other equipment. Clearly, Iran has antiquated technology, fine with me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:07 PM on 10/25/2010
LoL.. Does the Senate understand anything about anything?