EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

MN-Sen: I Don't Trust Tim Pawlenty


?>

Originally posted at my blog Senate Guru.

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty has been making the rounds on cable news today, no doubt working to raise in his profile for 2012 in the wake of his decision not to run for re-election in 2010. During these interviews, he has suggested that he would not delay the seating of Minnesota's next Senator. Election law experts appear unanimous that the Minnesota Supreme Court will affirm the victory of Senator-elect Al Franken. The reason I don't trust Pawlenty is that he is leaving himself too much wiggle room. Watch the exchange in the video below, from Pawlenty's appearance today on Fox News:

You know, Neil, if the Minnesota Supreme Court says, 'You sign the certificate' -- and there's not an appeal or some other contrary direction from a federal court -- you know, that's my duty.


Now take into account this report from MinnPost.com's Eric Black back in April:

In a series of email exchanges with Pawlenty's spokester, Brian McClung, I sought to clarify what level of discretion the guv was claiming over the issuance of the certificate. At first, McClung pointed out that there is no deadline in the law for the issuance of the certificate after the conclusion of the Contest Court process and state Supreme Court appeal. It sounded as if Pawlenty was claiming the right to indefinitely postpone the certificate.

Superficially, Pawlenty is telling us not to worry, that he's happy to sign on the dotted line. But he also throws in the caveat "and there's not an appeal or some other contrary direction from a federal court" which makes me wonder.

Having watched the state Supreme Court's proceedings on June 1 when they heard oral arguments from both campaigns, I have a very positive impression of the Court and of the Justices' attention to detail. Expecting that they affirm Senator-elect Franken's victory, it would be proper of them to include an order for Pawlenty, in his role as Governor, to prepare and sign an election certificate. But, given that his staff has noted that there's no time requirement attached, Pawlenty could very easily slow walk the certificate while Republican Norm Coleman seeks a stay or an injunction on the certificate from a federal court in advance of a federal appeal. University of Minnesota's Professor Larry Jacobs explains:

But Jacobs still sees wiggle room here. "Signing it -- and how quickly you sign it -- those are two different things," Jacobs explained. "If Norm indicates that he's going to be filing in federal court, the Governor may just say, 'you know, I am gonna sign it, I'm just waiting to hear from my legal counsel that this is appropriate.'"

Further, if the state Supreme Court affirms Senator-elect Franken's victory but doesn't add in the explicit order to Pawlenty to prepare and sign the election certificate, then who knows!? At the very least, Pawlenty's reassuring words are not all that reassuring, nor should they be given the wiggle room those words leave for Pawlenty.

Of course, if Pawlenty deliberately obstructs and delays after the state Supreme Court rules in Senator-elect Franken's favor, the U.S. Senate is still empowered to seat Senator-elect Franken (and Pawlenty's delay would likely give Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid the political impetus to move forward with Senator-elect Franken's seating), but that move still faces the threat of filibuster from Republicans. If that were to happen, Democrats would likely need a couple of Republicans to buck their Party in the name of supporting the democratic process. Hopefully this issue will be moot, but it's never too early for Democrats to reach out to more responsible Republicans like Olympia Snowe and Dick Lugar about their willingness to support Senator-elect Franken's seating should the eventuality arise.

 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:34 PM on 06/05/2009
Where's the by-line? Did I miss something? What's the name of this MN-Senator­?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyboomerorig
We the People
02:47 PM on 06/04/2009
Ok, so your announceme­nt to not run for the 2010 election means that you have no political losses if you postpone signing the certificat­ion? Gotta think further ahead than that.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
01:41 PM on 06/04/2009
On a brighter note, Tim Pawlenty has little chance of becoming the presidenti­al candidate in 2012; the GOP's base probably won't vote for a Minnesotan­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:34 AM on 06/04/2009
Ultimately­, it is the senate itself, not Pawlenty, which has the final say over who sits and who doesn't. In this matter the Senate is soveriegn. If the senate decides that enough is enough, it has all the power it needs to go round the Governor.
12:35 AM on 06/04/2009
he is heartless. the state legislatur­e almost passed medical marijuana there and gutted it for him... He won't even give the terminally ill a break.
11:54 PM on 06/03/2009
he'll do real good, he just cut health care for the poor, disabled and children in minnesota.
11:05 PM on 06/03/2009
The recount issue is final at the level of state supreme court. A federal action would be entirely distinct, so Coleman and Pawlenty can play amongst themselves­, while Franken starts his duties in the Senate. Unless, of course, Reid does his caving thing yet again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StellaRay
10:58 PM on 06/03/2009
Senate Guru, rest assured that your instincts are in tact. There is absolutely no reason to trust Tim Pawlenty to do the right thing, regardless of the euphanisms he spouts to the media in his attempt to appear as the friendly republican­.

I have been disturbed by his guest spots on Rachel Maddow where she seems so thankful to have an opposition member with the cajones to appear on her show that she's almost flirted her way through every interview with Mr. Tim---inst­ead of questionin­g him on his insane talking point that Coleman is all about fighting for the disenfranc­hised voter. She is usually such a wonk and so full of facts---an easy study of the Franken/Co­leman contest should have given her much more pointed questions to ask.

But this is exactly my point. I'm telling you, Pawlenty is Bush all over again. Sure, different personalit­ies and modes of expression­, but Tim Pawlenty is every bit the right wing conservanu­t that Bush was masqueradi­ng as a reasonable guy you wouldn't mind having a beer with, or in Rachel's case, having on her show.

Those of us who live here in Minnesota know it's true. This man has done nothing but mine his future career and his ties to the GOP since he was dumped by McCain as a possible running mate.
09:22 PM on 06/03/2009
Keep it up GOP, 2010 is just around the corner.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
checkmoot
We have met the enemy and he is us.
07:43 PM on 06/03/2009
The Republican­s know that Coleman will never be seated, but as long as they can stall things off, leaving Minnesota with only one senator, they win.