<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>75293</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Self-Important n&#43;1 Played Absolutely No Role in Resignation of Gawker Editors]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/04/selfimportant-n1-played-a_n_75293.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/3399/thumbs/r-CHOIRE-SICHA-EMILY-GOULD-medium.jpg' align="left" hspace="5">Today I received an email from someone at lit journal <em>n&amp;#43;1</em> with a link to its just-published <a href="http://nplusonemag.com/gawker.html">Gawker critique</a> by <strong>Carla Blumenkranz</strong>. The subject line of the email was "The n&amp;#43;1 article that helped convince Choire and Emily to quit," which sounded off to me because, as I understood it, the combination of <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/120620?page=0">unforgiving hours</a>, a <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/120620?page=0">"soul-killing" editorial focus on saying "the meanest [or] most shocking thing possible"</a> and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/business/media/03gawker.html">new pay structure</a>...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:45:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
