<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>79985</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[See How The New Hampshire Polls Got It Wrong]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/09/see-how-the-new-hampshire_n_79985.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rasmussen New Hampshire Primary (January 5-7 )</strong></p>

<p>Obama 37<br />
Clinton 30<br />
Edwards 19<br />
Richardson 8</p>

<p>McCain 32<br />
Romney 31<br />
Huckabee 10<br />
Giuliani 8<br />
Paul 8</p>

<p>See full <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/poll_rasmussen_new_hampshire_p.php">results</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby New Hampshire Primary (January 5-7)</strong></p>

<p>Obama 42<br />
Clinton 29<br />
Edwards 17<br />
Richardson 5</p>

<p>McCain 36<br />
Romney 27<br />
Huckabee 10<br />
Giuliani 10<br />
Paul 10</p>

<p>See full results <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/poll_reuterscspanzogby_new_ham_2.php">here</a>. </p>

<p><strong>American Research Group (January 6-7)</strong></p>

<p>Obama 40<br />
Clinton 31<br />
Edwards 20<br />
Richardson 4</p>

<p>McCain 31<br />
Romney 24<br />
Huckabee 14<br />
Giuliani 13<br />
Paul 9</p>

<p><br />
<strong>CNN/University of New Hampshire (January 5-6)</strong></p>

<p>Obama 39<br />
Clinton...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:45:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
