<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>99001</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Times Let 'Pentagon Pipeline' Story Die On Its Front Page]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/28/itimesi-pentagon-pipeline_n_99001.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>On April 20, the <i>New York Times</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=2&amp;hp">featured a blockbuster story on "message force multipliers"</a> - the Pentagon's use of "retired" military experts, kept on the government payroll to peddle good news and propaganda about the Iraq war effort. It was a splashy and significant story, the sort that has major impact on the national conversation and gets editors thinking about the possible accolades to come. </p>

<p>One has to wonder, however, if those most closely associated with the journalistic...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-05-06T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
